Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
no kidding, but according to some here, NOTHING TO SEE move along..Obama knows NOTHING he be squeaky clean AND the people of the Tea Party are trying to destroy the country...
links in article at site
SNIP:
posted at 12:41 pm on May 23, 2013 by Ed Morrissey
Thats the logical question to ask after an avalanche of official denials of knowledge and responsibility from the IRS, Department of Justice, and the White House. I dont know seems to be the new mantra of executives at every level once questioned about wrongdoing and abuse. The editors of the Wall Street Journal wonder not where the buck stops, but if it even exists anywhere in the federal government:
In my column today for the Fiscal Times, I argue that this epidemic of sudden incompetence and ignorance completely undermines the argument for large, activist government. Thats true whether one believes that these executives are either telling the truth or lying about their knowledge and involvement:
ALL of it here
WSJ: Say, who?s running the government? « Hot Air
links in article at site
SNIP:
posted at 12:41 pm on May 23, 2013 by Ed Morrissey
Thats the logical question to ask after an avalanche of official denials of knowledge and responsibility from the IRS, Department of Justice, and the White House. I dont know seems to be the new mantra of executives at every level once questioned about wrongdoing and abuse. The editors of the Wall Street Journal wonder not where the buck stops, but if it even exists anywhere in the federal government:
Theres a certain infantilization of the federal government here that should be especially alarming to taxpayers who have ever crossed paths with the IRS. The agency has the power to make citizens lives miserable, ruin their businesses and garnish their wages. Anyone facing an audit is unlikely to get away with the evasions now in display in the federal bureaucracy.
If the scandal is showing anything, it is that the White House has a bizarre notion of accountability in the federal government. President Obamas former senior adviser, David Axelrod, told MSNBC recently that his guy was off the hook on the IRS scandal because part of being President is theres so much beneath you that you cant know because the government is so vast.
In other words, the bigger the federal government grows, the less the President is responsible for it. Mr. Axelrods remarkable admission, and the liberal media defenses of Mr. Obamas lack of responsibility, prove the tea partys point that an ever larger government has become all but impossible to govern. They also show once again that liberals are good at promising the blessings of government largesse but they leave its messes for others to clean up.
In my column today for the Fiscal Times, I argue that this epidemic of sudden incompetence and ignorance completely undermines the argument for large, activist government. Thats true whether one believes that these executives are either telling the truth or lying about their knowledge and involvement:
ALL of it here
WSJ: Say, who?s running the government? « Hot Air