Yes, illegal immigrants can register to vote.

[leftwinger]

95.During the Study Period, Maricopa County EAVS data shows that 752,387 voter registration confirmation notices were sent to voters in Maricopa County to determine if they still lived at the location where they were registered to vote. The data shows that 131,682 voters were removed for various reasons from the notice batch, thus leaving at least 620,000 of the notice letters unaccounted-for in EAVS—the clear outlier of all Arizona counties.

**As we said all along, ARIZ is at least 70-30 Trump MAGA. at least 350,000 bogus votes were dumped into Maricopa County. Not to mention all the stems and seeds counties (Pinal) doing similar.

 

[Care4all]

GOP Save Act that requires proof of citizenship to register to vote is being bucked by democrats, wonder why? Even SCOTUS has upheld you can't ask for proof of citizenship. That is insane with Biden's border security program.

Congressional Democrats insist that the SAVE Act—which requires proof of citizenship to establish eligibility to vote in federal elections—is unnecessary because federal law (18 USC § 611) already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections.

Those making this argument ignore a glaring problem: the government officials who register voters and conduct federal elections aren’t allowed to require proof of citizenship.

It’s therefore shockingly easy for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, leaving our elections dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference.Anyone—even an illegal alien or other non-citizen—can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form.

This is all on the honor system. No proof of citizenship is required.

It’s not just that state officials—who are responsible for federal voter registration and elections in our country—don’t verify citizenship in this context; it’s that the Supreme Court has told them that they’re not allowed to do so.In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, 570 U.S. 1 (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA,” known as the “Motor Voter” law) prohibits states from requiring proof of citizenship when processing federal voter-registration forms.

The SAVE Act would fix this gaping loophole by requiring anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship.It would also require states to review existing federal voter-registration files and remove all non-citizens.Remember: every state except South Carolina issues driver’s licenses to non-citizens, and 19 states issue them to illegal aliens.

This, coupled with the Motor Voter law and the Supreme Court’s ruling, makes it shockingly easy for aliens—legal and illegal—to vote in federal elections, even though they’re prohibited from doing so.Considering that there are now nearly 30 million non-citizens in the U.S., including about 12 million who have entered illegally since the last presidential election, we desperately need the SAVE Act.

While Democrats are already mocking the SAVE Act, they don’t dispute that non-citizens shouldn’t vote in federal elections.Rather, they insist that there’s no need for the bill because non-citizens—being prohibited by law from voting in federal elections—categorically do not vote in such elections.

That argument fails for one simple reason: it implausibly assumes universal compliance with a law that has become breathtakingly easy (and correspondingly tempting) to violate.Some say that non-citizens wouldn’t dare register to vote in federal elections, as doing so is illegal and could adversely affect their present or future immigration status.

Even if this assumption were correct with regard to many (or even most) non-citizens in the U.S., that still wouldn’t disprove the need for the SAVE Act.If even a tiny percentage of America’s 30 million non-citizens were to vote, they could change the outcome of a close federal election.And, as noted by the
@I_A_Project, it’s odd for the left to insist so vehemently that illegal aliens don’t vote, given that congressional

Democrats have inserted language “to waive inadmissibility for illegal voting in all [their] amnesty bills.

”Democrats can’t have it both ways; they can’t (1) credibly say that illegal aliens don’t vote in federal elections, and then (2) expect us to forget their own proposals, which assume the opposite is true.In any event, and regardless of how many (or few) non-citizens may have voted in the past, why not take steps to prevent it from happening in the future?

The sanctity of your vote is at stake.Now more than ever, we need to make sure that our elections are fair, lawfully conducted, and free of foreign influence.

Roy, Lee Introduce Bill to Require Citizenship Proof to Vote

“We now have so many noncitizens in the country that if only 1 out of 100 voted, they would cast hundreds of thousands of votes,” Speaker Johnson says.

www.dailysignal.com

The state is required to vet potential voters registering.... for age, citizenship, any felonies, (still alive, still lives in State) etc. This can be handled by our government election agencies, with ease in their access to government records on us.

The burden should not be on the citizen with their constitutional right to vote. The burden should definitely be on the State to provide state workers to vet registration applications through their govt systems and records.

 

[leftwinger]

Not known. Public schools do not register students by immigration status.

You can say that NOW because Google has buried the facts. The State has buried the facts but at one time it was broadcast all over Silicon valley and you could search it.

The numbers were known in CA. back when I was there it was ~8%. 0.08* 6million student = 480K with 960K parents = ~1.5million way back in 2014.

Now........its 25% illegals population. Do the math at 40 milllion residents. 10 million or 3.3million children of illegals in school.
10%-25% of all Jailed inmates are of illegal status. It stands to reason the popluation is the same.//

 

[Unkotare]

The numbers were known in CA....

Nope.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

GOP Save Act that requires proof of citizenship to register to vote is being bucked by democrats, wonder why? Even SCOTUS has upheld you can't ask for proof of citizenship. That is insane with Biden's border security program.

Congressional Democrats insist that the SAVE Act—which requires proof of citizenship to establish eligibility to vote in federal elections—is unnecessary because federal law (18 USC § 611) already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections.

Those making this argument ignore a glaring problem: the government officials who register voters and conduct federal elections aren’t allowed to require proof of citizenship.

It’s therefore shockingly easy for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, leaving our elections dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference.Anyone—even an illegal alien or other non-citizen—can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form.

This is all on the honor system. No proof of citizenship is required.

It’s not just that state officials—who are responsible for federal voter registration and elections in our country—don’t verify citizenship in this context; it’s that the Supreme Court has told them that they’re not allowed to do so.In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, 570 U.S. 1 (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA,” known as the “Motor Voter” law) prohibits states from requiring proof of citizenship when processing federal voter-registration forms.

The SAVE Act would fix this gaping loophole by requiring anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship.It would also require states to review existing federal voter-registration files and remove all non-citizens.Remember: every state except South Carolina issues driver’s licenses to non-citizens, and 19 states issue them to illegal aliens.

This, coupled with the Motor Voter law and the Supreme Court’s ruling, makes it shockingly easy for aliens—legal and illegal—to vote in federal elections, even though they’re prohibited from doing so.Considering that there are now nearly 30 million non-citizens in the U.S., including about 12 million who have entered illegally since the last presidential election, we desperately need the SAVE Act.

While Democrats are already mocking the SAVE Act, they don’t dispute that non-citizens shouldn’t vote in federal elections.Rather, they insist that there’s no need for the bill because non-citizens—being prohibited by law from voting in federal elections—categorically do not vote in such elections.

That argument fails for one simple reason: it implausibly assumes universal compliance with a law that has become breathtakingly easy (and correspondingly tempting) to violate.Some say that non-citizens wouldn’t dare register to vote in federal elections, as doing so is illegal and could adversely affect their present or future immigration status.

Even if this assumption were correct with regard to many (or even most) non-citizens in the U.S., that still wouldn’t disprove the need for the SAVE Act.If even a tiny percentage of America’s 30 million non-citizens were to vote, they could change the outcome of a close federal election.And, as noted by the
@I_A_Project, it’s odd for the left to insist so vehemently that illegal aliens don’t vote, given that congressional

Democrats have inserted language “to waive inadmissibility for illegal voting in all [their] amnesty bills.

”Democrats can’t have it both ways; they can’t (1) credibly say that illegal aliens don’t vote in federal elections, and then (2) expect us to forget their own proposals, which assume the opposite is true.In any event, and regardless of how many (or few) non-citizens may have voted in the past, why not take steps to prevent it from happening in the future?

The sanctity of your vote is at stake.Now more than ever, we need to make sure that our elections are fair, lawfully conducted, and free of foreign influence.

Roy, Lee Introduce Bill to Require Citizenship Proof to Vote

“We now have so many noncitizens in the country that if only 1 out of 100 voted, they would cast hundreds of thousands of votes,” Speaker Johnson says.

www.dailysignal.com

But they don't.



/thread

 

[Delldude]

The state is required to vet potential voters registering.... for age, citizenship, any felonies, (still alive, still lives in State) etc. This can be handled by our government election agencies, with ease in their access to government records on us.

The burden should not be on the citizen with their constitutional right to vote. The burden should definitely be on the State to provide state workers to vet registration applications through their govt systems and records.

No chance at the state level, they could screw up?

Maybe even ideologically?

 

[Delldude]

Judicial Watch Uh....yeah. Corrupted voter rolls are out there. At least some Politicians in AZ are looking into it.
**************************

The Arizona Republican Party filed a lawsuit against the corrupt Secretary of State Adrian Fontes after discovering from 500,000 to 1.3 million ILLEGAL VOTERS on the state’s voter rolls.

The Arizona Republican party has filed a BOMBSHELL lawsuit against the Secretary of State for violations of the National Voter Registration Act after discovering between 500,000 to 1.3 Million ILLEGAL voters on the voter rolls, including dead people & nonresidents.

“The lawsuit highlights outrageous voter registration rates, with some counties exceeding 100% of eligible voters. The lawsuit uncovered that Arizona has between 500,000 to 1,270,000 unaccounted-for voters on the rolls, including deceased individuals and those who have moved away.”

“Our findings reveal a staggering number of counties with more registered voters than eligible citizens, this is a clear indication of a system in disarray. We are holding Adrian Fontes accountable to ensure fair and credible elections in Arizona.”

This exactly how Democrats cheat, bloated voter rolls combined with universal mail in ballots. Republicans have to get ahead of this before November 5th.

Arizona has at least 500,000 registered voters on the voter rolls who should have otherwise been removed. In other words, at least 500,000 registered voters currently listed on the Secretary’s voter rolls
for Arizona are deceased or no longer reside in Arizona.And a review of other reliable data sources shows that Arizona has between 1,060,000 and 1,270,000 unaccounted-for voters on the state voter rolls.

“Election integrity is a serious issue in our nation,” said Mussi. “Ensuring that Arizonans can have faith in the integrity of our election system and representative government starts with clean voter rolls that leave no doubts about who is able to cast a ballot. That’s why we sent a prelitigation notice to Secretary Fontes last August highlighting the artificially high voter registration rates. Unfortunately, most Arizona counties continue to have voter registration rates far exceeding the national average. We hope that the court compels Secretary Fontes to comply with his obligations under the NVRA to clean up Arizona’s voter rolls.”

Joining Mussi as Plaintiffs in this challenge are the Chair of the Republican Party of Arizona, Gina Swoboda, and Steven Gaynor.

In their lawsuit, the Plaintiffs argue that Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes has failed to perform his mandatory list maintenance duty under the NVRA. For example, the most recent voter registration and census data show that up to four Arizona counties – Apache, La Paz, Navajo, and Santa Cruz – have more registered voters than eligible citizens. The remaining counties across the state have implausibly high voter registration rates that far exceed the average national and statewide voter-registration rates in recent years. Consistent with these artificially high registration rates, the complaint alleges that Arizona has at least 500,000 registered voters on the rolls who should have otherwise been removed because they are deceased or no longer reside in Arizona.


***now let the STAIN bark and bark....like cows bellering at medication time.

Judicial Watch has been filing lawsuits against many states to purge their voter registration rolls via the Clinton VRA. Only problem is the Dems have been fighting them the entire way.
Why would the dems fight cleaning up the registration rolls to prevent fraud?

 

[eagle1462010]

Judicial Watch has been filing lawsuits against many states to purge their voter registration rolls via the Clinton VRA. Only problem is the Dems have been fighting them the entire way.
Why would the dems fight cleaning up the registration rolls to prevent fraud?

You only put on a rubber if you are going to fuck

 

[Delldude]

You only put on a rubber if you are going to fuck

Dems like ridin ' bareback.

 

[Unkotare]

Maybe a good time for a reminder that anyone born in the US is a US citizen, schools do NOT register students according to their immigration status, and that the majority of non-native English speaking students in US public schools are US citizens born right here in the good ol' USA.

 

[Foxfyre]

GOP Save Act that requires proof of citizenship to register to vote is being bucked by democrats, wonder why? Even SCOTUS has upheld you can't ask for proof of citizenship. That is insane with Biden's border security program.

Congressional Democrats insist that the SAVE Act—which requires proof of citizenship to establish eligibility to vote in federal elections—is unnecessary because federal law (18 USC § 611) already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections.

Those making this argument ignore a glaring problem: the government officials who register voters and conduct federal elections aren’t allowed to require proof of citizenship.

It’s therefore shockingly easy for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, leaving our elections dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference.Anyone—even an illegal alien or other non-citizen—can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form.

This is all on the honor system. No proof of citizenship is required.

It’s not just that state officials—who are responsible for federal voter registration and elections in our country—don’t verify citizenship in this context; it’s that the Supreme Court has told them that they’re not allowed to do so.In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, 570 U.S. 1 (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA,” known as the “Motor Voter” law) prohibits states from requiring proof of citizenship when processing federal voter-registration forms.

The SAVE Act would fix this gaping loophole by requiring anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship.It would also require states to review existing federal voter-registration files and remove all non-citizens.Remember: every state except South Carolina issues driver’s licenses to non-citizens, and 19 states issue them to illegal aliens.

This, coupled with the Motor Voter law and the Supreme Court’s ruling, makes it shockingly easy for aliens—legal and illegal—to vote in federal elections, even though they’re prohibited from doing so.Considering that there are now nearly 30 million non-citizens in the U.S., including about 12 million who have entered illegally since the last presidential election, we desperately need the SAVE Act.

While Democrats are already mocking the SAVE Act, they don’t dispute that non-citizens shouldn’t vote in federal elections.Rather, they insist that there’s no need for the bill because non-citizens—being prohibited by law from voting in federal elections—categorically do not vote in such elections.

That argument fails for one simple reason: it implausibly assumes universal compliance with a law that has become breathtakingly easy (and correspondingly tempting) to violate.Some say that non-citizens wouldn’t dare register to vote in federal elections, as doing so is illegal and could adversely affect their present or future immigration status.

Even if this assumption were correct with regard to many (or even most) non-citizens in the U.S., that still wouldn’t disprove the need for the SAVE Act.If even a tiny percentage of America’s 30 million non-citizens were to vote, they could change the outcome of a close federal election.And, as noted by the
@I_A_Project, it’s odd for the left to insist so vehemently that illegal aliens don’t vote, given that congressional

Democrats have inserted language “to waive inadmissibility for illegal voting in all [their] amnesty bills.

”Democrats can’t have it both ways; they can’t (1) credibly say that illegal aliens don’t vote in federal elections, and then (2) expect us to forget their own proposals, which assume the opposite is true.In any event, and regardless of how many (or few) non-citizens may have voted in the past, why not take steps to prevent it from happening in the future?

The sanctity of your vote is at stake.Now more than ever, we need to make sure that our elections are fair, lawfully conducted, and free of foreign influence.

Roy, Lee Introduce Bill to Require Citizenship Proof to Vote

“We now have so many noncitizens in the country that if only 1 out of 100 voted, they would cast hundreds of thousands of votes,” Speaker Johnson says.

www.dailysignal.com

Absolutely everybody registering to vote should provide photo ID, proof of citizenship (certified birth certificate or U.S. Passport) and proof of residency. And I honestly believe mail in ballots should be notarized as a safeguard.

 

[sparky]

Non-Citizens Register to Vote in Washington D.C., Majority Register as Democrats - [your]NEWS

In Washington D.C., 500 non-citizens have registered to vote, with Democrats significantly outnumbering Republicans.

yournews.com

In a move that has raised eyebrows and sparked debate, 500 non-citizens in Washington D.C. have registered to vote, with a vast majority aligning with the Democratic Party. This development comes in the wake of a ruling last year by an Obama-appointed federal judge who upheld a law allowing non-citizens, including undocumented immigrants, to vote in local elections.

~S~

 

[Hollie]

No..they can't. Not allowed to vote. Period. Except in a few school board districts where they have a direct interest (their child).

Why do we keep recycling lies?..oh yeah. The GOP has NOTHING but division and grievance left to offer the American voter.

They are still not allowed to vote in a state, national, or local election (except in a few distinct local districts).
The OP states clearly that the GOP is introducing this "bill"..not Democrats. It is designed to address a problem that doesn't exist.
To get people like you easily outraged.

A lot of pointless pandering. Illegals are not allowed to stroll across the border but in the lawlessness of the Democrat party, illegals, terrorists and criminal illegals are shuttled into the country by the millions.

 

[Dagosa]

GOP Save Act that requires proof of citizenship to register to vote is being bucked by democrats, wonder why? Even SCOTUS has upheld you can't ask for proof of citizenship. That is insane with Biden's border security program.

Congressional Democrats insist that the SAVE Act—which requires proof of citizenship to establish eligibility to vote in federal elections—is unnecessary because federal law (18 USC § 611) already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections.

Those making this argument ignore a glaring problem: the government officials who register voters and conduct federal elections aren’t allowed to require proof of citizenship.

It’s therefore shockingly easy for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, leaving our elections dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference.Anyone—even an illegal alien or other non-citizen—can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form.

This is all on the honor system. No proof of citizenship is required.

It’s not just that state officials—who are responsible for federal voter registration and elections in our country—don’t verify citizenship in this context; it’s that the Supreme Court has told them that they’re not allowed to do so.In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, 570 U.S. 1 (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA,” known as the “Motor Voter” law) prohibits states from requiring proof of citizenship when processing federal voter-registration forms.

The SAVE Act would fix this gaping loophole by requiring anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship.It would also require states to review existing federal voter-registration files and remove all non-citizens.Remember: every state except South Carolina issues driver’s licenses to non-citizens, and 19 states issue them to illegal aliens.

This, coupled with the Motor Voter law and the Supreme Court’s ruling, makes it shockingly easy for aliens—legal and illegal—to vote in federal elections, even though they’re prohibited from doing so.Considering that there are now nearly 30 million non-citizens in the U.S., including about 12 million who have entered illegally since the last presidential election, we desperately need the SAVE Act.

While Democrats are already mocking the SAVE Act, they don’t dispute that non-citizens shouldn’t vote in federal elections.Rather, they insist that there’s no need for the bill because non-citizens—being prohibited by law from voting in federal elections—categorically do not vote in such elections.

That argument fails for one simple reason: it implausibly assumes universal compliance with a law that has become breathtakingly easy (and correspondingly tempting) to violate.Some say that non-citizens wouldn’t dare register to vote in federal elections, as doing so is illegal and could adversely affect their present or future immigration status.

Even if this assumption were correct with regard to many (or even most) non-citizens in the U.S., that still wouldn’t disprove the need for the SAVE Act.If even a tiny percentage of America’s 30 million non-citizens were to vote, they could change the outcome of a close federal election.And, as noted by the
@I_A_Project, it’s odd for the left to insist so vehemently that illegal aliens don’t vote, given that congressional

Democrats have inserted language “to waive inadmissibility for illegal voting in all [their] amnesty bills.

”Democrats can’t have it both ways; they can’t (1) credibly say that illegal aliens don’t vote in federal elections, and then (2) expect us to forget their own proposals, which assume the opposite is true.In any event, and regardless of how many (or few) non-citizens may have voted in the past, why not take steps to prevent it from happening in the future?

The sanctity of your vote is at stake.Now more than ever, we need to make sure that our elections are fair, lawfully conducted, and free of foreign influence.

Roy, Lee Introduce Bill to Require Citizenship Proof to Vote

“We now have so many noncitizens in the country that if only 1 out of 100 voted, they would cast hundreds of thousands of votes,” Speaker Johnson says.

www.dailysignal.com

All BS
REGISTERED REPUBLICANS, not illegals are being prosecuted for election fraud in several states.

Now show proof it was done by illegals.
Neither the Bush nor Trump AGs which are responsible for federal election fraud found any proof.

Now, we are finding REGISTERED republicans are committing organized election fraud.

 

[Moonglow]

GOP Save Act that requires proof of citizenship to register to vote is being bucked by democrats, wonder why? Even SCOTUS has upheld you can't ask for proof of citizenship. That is insane with Biden's border security program.

Congressional Democrats insist that the SAVE Act—which requires proof of citizenship to establish eligibility to vote in federal elections—is unnecessary because federal law (18 USC § 611) already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections.

Those making this argument ignore a glaring problem: the government officials who register voters and conduct federal elections aren’t allowed to require proof of citizenship.

It’s therefore shockingly easy for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, leaving our elections dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference.Anyone—even an illegal alien or other non-citizen—can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form.

This is all on the honor system. No proof of citizenship is required.

It’s not just that state officials—who are responsible for federal voter registration and elections in our country—don’t verify citizenship in this context; it’s that the Supreme Court has told them that they’re not allowed to do so.In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, 570 U.S. 1 (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA,” known as the “Motor Voter” law) prohibits states from requiring proof of citizenship when processing federal voter-registration forms.

The SAVE Act would fix this gaping loophole by requiring anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship.It would also require states to review existing federal voter-registration files and remove all non-citizens.Remember: every state except South Carolina issues driver’s licenses to non-citizens, and 19 states issue them to illegal aliens.

This, coupled with the Motor Voter law and the Supreme Court’s ruling, makes it shockingly easy for aliens—legal and illegal—to vote in federal elections, even though they’re prohibited from doing so.Considering that there are now nearly 30 million non-citizens in the U.S., including about 12 million who have entered illegally since the last presidential election, we desperately need the SAVE Act.

While Democrats are already mocking the SAVE Act, they don’t dispute that non-citizens shouldn’t vote in federal elections.Rather, they insist that there’s no need for the bill because non-citizens—being prohibited by law from voting in federal elections—categorically do not vote in such elections.

That argument fails for one simple reason: it implausibly assumes universal compliance with a law that has become breathtakingly easy (and correspondingly tempting) to violate.Some say that non-citizens wouldn’t dare register to vote in federal elections, as doing so is illegal and could adversely affect their present or future immigration status.

Even if this assumption were correct with regard to many (or even most) non-citizens in the U.S., that still wouldn’t disprove the need for the SAVE Act.If even a tiny percentage of America’s 30 million non-citizens were to vote, they could change the outcome of a close federal election.And, as noted by the
@I_A_Project, it’s odd for the left to insist so vehemently that illegal aliens don’t vote, given that congressional

Democrats have inserted language “to waive inadmissibility for illegal voting in all [their] amnesty bills.

”Democrats can’t have it both ways; they can’t (1) credibly say that illegal aliens don’t vote in federal elections, and then (2) expect us to forget their own proposals, which assume the opposite is true.In any event, and regardless of how many (or few) non-citizens may have voted in the past, why not take steps to prevent it from happening in the future?

The sanctity of your vote is at stake.Now more than ever, we need to make sure that our elections are fair, lawfully conducted, and free of foreign influence.

Roy, Lee Introduce Bill to Require Citizenship Proof to Vote

“We now have so many noncitizens in the country that if only 1 out of 100 voted, they would cast hundreds of thousands of votes,” Speaker Johnson says.

www.dailysignal.com

Did you get it?

 

[leftwinger]

In only some states, lawmakers will not allow illegals to vote in local elections, but every state will allow illegal aliens to vote in national elections, including the presidential election. This is because of provisions in the federal Voting Rights Act, which allow you to vote without proving identity.

As of June 2024, the following seven states included language explicitly prohibiting noncitizen voting in their state constitutions.[33]

• Alabama

• Arizona

• Colorado

• Florida

• Louisiana

• North Dakota

• Ohio

Still, in Arizona and other states, you are not required to prove citizenship to receive a federal-only ballot, will allow anyone to vote in federal elections, including presidential elections. You must only check a box affirming you are a citizen and a box affirming you will be 18 or older on or before election day, put a name–any name–and an address to have your ballot mailed if you would like. The “proof of citizenship or last four digits of Social Security Number” box on the federal voter registration form, which is accepted in all 50 states, is not a required field.

Next, all that you must do is sign and date the form and “swear/affirm that:

• I am a United States Citizen
• I meet the eligibility requirements of my stater and subscribe to any oath required
• The information I have provided is true to the best of my knowledge under penalty of perjury. If I have provided false information, I may be fined, imprisoned, or (if not a U.S. citizen) deported from or refused entry to the United States.”

After Arizona enacted its proof of citizenship law in 2004, it began rejecting all voter registration applicants that didn’t include documented proof of citizenship.

Then, in 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that, under the Voting Rights Act — which doesn’t require documentation — Arizona had to let these voters vote in federal elections. The state created a system in which it rejected any state voter registration application that didn’t have documents proving citizenship, but if the voter used a federal form, they would be registered as a federal-only voter. Because few voters use the federal form, the federal-only list was relatively small at the time.

After groups sued, in 2018, the state agreed to start adding voters to the federal-only list regardless of whether they used the state or federal form. That caused the list to grow, and fast.

As of October 2019, there were about 17,000 federal-only voters, according to state data. By October 2020, there were about 36,000.


***all Stain are evil liars supporting this criminal takeover regime.

 

[surada]

GOP Save Act that requires proof of citizenship to register to vote is being bucked by democrats, wonder why? Even SCOTUS has upheld you can't ask for proof of citizenship. That is insane with Biden's border security program.

Congressional Democrats insist that the SAVE Act—which requires proof of citizenship to establish eligibility to vote in federal elections—is unnecessary because federal law (18 USC § 611) already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections.

Those making this argument ignore a glaring problem: the government officials who register voters and conduct federal elections aren’t allowed to require proof of citizenship.

It’s therefore shockingly easy for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, leaving our elections dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference.Anyone—even an illegal alien or other non-citizen—can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form.

This is all on the honor system. No proof of citizenship is required.

It’s not just that state officials—who are responsible for federal voter registration and elections in our country—don’t verify citizenship in this context; it’s that the Supreme Court has told them that they’re not allowed to do so.In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, 570 U.S. 1 (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA,” known as the “Motor Voter” law) prohibits states from requiring proof of citizenship when processing federal voter-registration forms.

The SAVE Act would fix this gaping loophole by requiring anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship.It would also require states to review existing federal voter-registration files and remove all non-citizens.Remember: every state except South Carolina issues driver’s licenses to non-citizens, and 19 states issue them to illegal aliens.

This, coupled with the Motor Voter law and the Supreme Court’s ruling, makes it shockingly easy for aliens—legal and illegal—to vote in federal elections, even though they’re prohibited from doing so.Considering that there are now nearly 30 million non-citizens in the U.S., including about 12 million who have entered illegally since the last presidential election, we desperately need the SAVE Act.

While Democrats are already mocking the SAVE Act, they don’t dispute that non-citizens shouldn’t vote in federal elections.Rather, they insist that there’s no need for the bill because non-citizens—being prohibited by law from voting in federal elections—categorically do not vote in such elections.

That argument fails for one simple reason: it implausibly assumes universal compliance with a law that has become breathtakingly easy (and correspondingly tempting) to violate.Some say that non-citizens wouldn’t dare register to vote in federal elections, as doing so is illegal and could adversely affect their present or future immigration status.

Even if this assumption were correct with regard to many (or even most) non-citizens in the U.S., that still wouldn’t disprove the need for the SAVE Act.If even a tiny percentage of America’s 30 million non-citizens were to vote, they could change the outcome of a close federal election.And, as noted by the
@I_A_Project, it’s odd for the left to insist so vehemently that illegal aliens don’t vote, given that congressional

Democrats have inserted language “to waive inadmissibility for illegal voting in all [their] amnesty bills.

”Democrats can’t have it both ways; they can’t (1) credibly say that illegal aliens don’t vote in federal elections, and then (2) expect us to forget their own proposals, which assume the opposite is true.In any event, and regardless of how many (or few) non-citizens may have voted in the past, why not take steps to prevent it from happening in the future?

The sanctity of your vote is at stake.Now more than ever, we need to make sure that our elections are fair, lawfully conducted, and free of foreign influence.

Roy, Lee Introduce Bill to Require Citizenship Proof to Vote

“We now have so many noncitizens in the country that if only 1 out of 100 voted, they would cast hundreds of thousands of votes,” Speaker Johnson says.

www.dailysignal.com

This is garbage. Look at your source.

 

[surada]

Requiring proof of citizenship is the issue you missed. Miss the part where illegals can get driver licenses in a bunch of states?

I can get a driver's seat in Europe, you moron.

 

[Delldude]

This is garbage. Look at your source.

Is it incorrect? If so, point out where they are wrong.

I can get a driver's seat in Europe, you moron.

Great, this is the US.