Yes, It Was Rigged

[Slade3200]

When you clutch yours so very tightly, does the clasp usually break?

IDK. Is this really what you’d rather talk about?

 

[The Duke]

You gonna join the Trump fuckboi choir in lock up?

If Trump goes to jail, Democrats will start a bill to re-deny nonviolent convicted felons of reinstating their voting rights.

Because just about everybody in that jail will want to be voting for him by the time he gets done.

And they'll tell all their friends and family, too.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

OJ II

 

[Slade3200]

If Trump goes to jail, Democrats will start a bill to re-deny nonviolent convicted felons of reinstating their voting rights.

Because just about everybody in that jail will want to be voting for him by the time he gets done.

And they'll tell all their friends and family, too.

Genius. I bet that was his strategy all along when he made those payments. That Donnie. Always thinking 13 steps ahead! How inspirational

 

[mudwhistle]

Hmmm. Trump was indicted by a grand jury of his peers and prosecuted in court, in front of an experienced judge in good standing, before a 12-person jury of his peers (approved by defense and prosecution) that included professional people, lawyers and other working solid citizens. Hollie (whoever that is) can just get over it or choke on it.

The Defense wasn't allow to present exculpatory evidence to the jury, nor did the DA allow the Defense to know what the secondary charge was in the indictment that turned these 34 misdemeanors into a felony. The 5th Amendment states that the accused is entitled to have all charges listed in the indictment. This judge should have thrown this case out before it started.

The judge told the jury they could pick one of 3 difference charges without the prosecution having to prove their case, and use this to justify a guilty verdict in as few as 1 and as many as 34 misdemeanor charges. This is telling the jury they don't have to believe the charges in the indictment were proved by the prosecution.

This is just a continuation of 2 fake impeachments and the Jan 6th Committee.

This opens up the rest of the country to start arresting Democrats and using bogus charges to throw them in prison just to get them off the ballot.

 

[BULLDOG]

Since 1995. Yes, I have been a keyboard warrior, and stood up for what's right in life, too.

Do YOU remember Windows 3.1? Have you ever faced down a mob of 50 with just 3 dudes? One of which you gave 2 black eyes to in 1 punch 2 weeks' prior?

Well! You're not me, brah. Fuck off until you've walked a mile in my boots. Something tells me you were too coddled as a child to be able to do that

Wow. I'm impressed. Did you make up that story all on your own, or is it the story line of a comic book?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

This opens up the rest of the country to start arresting Democrats and using bogus charges to throw them in prison just to get them off the ballot.

Corruption doesn’t justify more corruption.

 

[Slade3200]

The Defense wasn't allow to present exculpatory evidence to the jury, nor did the DA allow the Defense to know what the secondary charge was in the indictment that turned these 34 misdemeanors into a felony. The 5th Amendment states that the accused is entitled to have all charges listed in the indictment. This judge should have thrown this case out before it started.

The judge told the jury they could pick one of 3 difference charges without the prosecution having to prove their case, and use this to justify a guilty verdict in as few as 1 and as many as 34 misdemeanor charges. This is telling the jury they don't have to believe the charges in the indictment were proved by the prosecution.

This is just a continuation of 2 fake impeachments and the Jan 6th Committee.

This opens up the rest of the country to start arresting Democrats and using bogus charges to throw them in prison just to get them off the ballot.

Those 3 other charges were laid out more trial and they don’t need to be proven. The charge was classifying biz records. The other crimes only needed to show intent. Not execution.

What is this exculpatory evidence that he wasn’t allowed to present?

 

[BULLDOG]

Nope. What are the exact crimes that allowed Felony charges of musdomeaners past statue of limitations?

Spell them out

You silly goober. Still asking the same dumb question that has been answered many times. Do you have some mental block that keeps you from accepting reality?

 

[mudwhistle]

Those 3 other charges were laid out more trial and they don’t need to be proven. The charge was classifying biz records. The other crimes only needed to show intent. Not execution.

What is this exculpatory evidence that he wasn’t allowed to present?

That the crimes he was accused of weren't crimes at all.

The Defense wasn't allowed to present expert witnesses that destroys the prosecution's case.

 

[Slade3200]

The Defense wasn't allowed to present expert witnesses that destroys the prosecution's case.

Trumps “expert” was not a witness to anything to do with the trial. Judges define the laws and constraints of trials in their courtroom. If Trump wants to appeal he can use his “witness” make a case for why the judge was wrong. But as for this trial, it wouldn’t be appropriate or relevant for this “witness” to be called

 

[eagle1462010]

You silly goober. Still asking the same dumb question that has been answered many times. Do you have some mental block that keeps you from accepting reality?

BS

 

[The Duke]

Wow. I'm impressed. Did you make up that story all on your own, or is it the story line of a comic book?

Sometimes art imitates real life.

Besides, what comic book is it that has an ignorant drunken mob of 50 going after 3 boys launching beer bottles from the rear, empty or full? We held them back until we got to the vehicle and skedaddled, but it didn't end there, No Sir. It dragged on fer quite a while. There were car chases and projectiles and catching some of the motherfuckers that did it and all kinds of stuff.
I seem to remember sticks and bats, too.

 

[Toro]

Lowry is hardly a MAGA guy.

On this, he s 100% correct. And everybody knows this.

...​

​

When Trump made his statement to reporters on Wednesday morning prior to the jury getting the Alvin Bragg case, he repeatedly used the word “rigged,” and, in this instance, he was absolutely right.​

​

The charges were rigged, the prosecution’s presentation of the case was rigged, the judge’s management of the case was rigged, the gag order was rigged, and the instructions to the jury were rigged.​

​

The whole thing was rigged from beginning to end, in the hopes of — to the extent this case and the guilty verdict will matter in November — rigging the presidential election.​

​

If this had happened in an alderman race in Cook County, Ill., it’d be discomfiting enough, but it happened in what purports to be the greatest city in the world and involves the campaign to become the most powerful political leader in the free world.​

​

The high stakes would, one hopes, compel the authorities to have the most exacting standard for their own conduct and put a premium on maintaining the perception and reality of fairness. The logic of rigging runs the opposite way, though — because it is considered so imperative to stop Donald Trump, any means of opposing him becomes acceptable, indeed necessary.​

​

By any normal standard, Alvin Bragg failed in his duty as a prosecutor by flagrantly distorting the process to manufacture the 34 felonies he charged Trump with. Yet, by the prevailing standard on the left, he has faithfully fulfilled his duty by so effectively rigging the criminal-justice system against the man whom they hate and fear.​

​

One possible reaction to Trump from his adversaries would have been to emphasize their commitment to rules and norms and to do everything they could to buttress them and make the case for them.​

​

Instead, they threw out the rule book beginning in 2016 and have pursued Trump according to the ethic that the ends justify the means, and that consistency, reason, and fairness are for suckers.​

​

To be sure, this approach has its temptations, especially for people who never particularly cared for process or rules to begin with. But their recklessness has further undermined faith in the system, while the alluring idea that there’s a shortcut to diminishing or defeating Trump has so far proved illusory.​

​

Alvin Bragg and Judge Juan Merchan have set a new standard for rigging, and nothing good will come of it.​

Yes, It Was Rigged | National Review

The Alvin Bragg trial was everything that Trump warns about.

www.nationalreview.com

.

 

[BULLDOG]

Sometimes art imitates real life.

And sometimes, pathetic little blowhards make shit up, so they don't feel so dumb and incompetent

 

[White 6]

The Defense wasn't allow to present exculpatory evidence to the jury, nor did the DA allow the Defense to know what the secondary charge was in the indictment that turned these 34 misdemeanors into a felony. The 5th Amendment states that the accused is entitled to have all charges listed in the indictment. This judge should have thrown this case out before it started.

The judge told the jury they could pick one of 3 difference charges without the prosecution having to prove their case, and use this to justify a guilty verdict in as few as 1 and as many as 34 misdemeanor charges. This is telling the jury they don't have to believe the charges in the indictment were proved by the prosecution.

This is just a continuation of 2 fake impeachments and the Jan 6th Committee.

This opens up the rest of the country to start arresting Democrats and using bogus charges to throw them in prison just to get them off the ballot.

Move to New York. Get their laws changed to your liking. Barring that, do not do business or live in New York if you do not wish to be subject to the laws, rules, and procedures recognized as the law of the land there. Also, do not whine about it being unfair to Donny. He chose to live and do business there, and had lawyers, plus accountants, supposedly paid professional to guide him. His mess is his fault, responsibility and his problem. He just thought himself above it. Looks like he was wrong again. He is building quite a losing streak. He should shut up and give up, while only this far behind, fold his tent and move to a quiet life on the edge of a golf course. Just sayin...

 

[eagle1462010]

Move to New York. Get their laws changed to your liking. Barring that, do not do business or live in New York if you do not wish to be subject to the laws, rules, and procedures recognized as the law of the land there. Also, do not whine about it being unfair to Donny. He chose to live and do business there, and had lawyers, plus accountants, supposedly paid professional to guide him. His mess is his fault, responsibility and his problem. He just thought himself above it. Looks like he was wrong again. He is building quite a losing streak. He should shut up and give up, while only this far behind, fold his tent and move to a quiet life on the edge of a golf course. Just sayin...


View attachment 954860

Perhaps that judge should have done his job specifying the actual LAW he was hiding.

Unfit to wear the robe and it will be appealled all the way to SCOTUS.

ELECTION INTERFERENCE??. New York is guilty.

 

[The Duke]

Move to New York. Get their laws changed to your liking. Barring that, do not do business or live in New York if you do not wish to be subject to the laws, rules, and procedures recognized as the law of the land there. Also, do not whine about it being unfair to Donny. He chose to live and do business there, and had lawyers, plus accountants, supposedly paid professional to guide him. His mess is his fault, responsibility and his problem. He just thought himself above it. Looks like he was wrong again. He is building quite a losing streak. He should shut up and give up, while only this far behind, fold his tent and move to a quiet life on the edge of a golf course. Just sayin...


View attachment 954860

He wasn't wrong 30 years ago. It's the new Commie shit that's the problem.

Also:

 

[BULLDOG]

The Defense wasn't allow to present exculpatory evidence to the jury, nor did the DA allow the Defense to know what the secondary charge was in the indictment that turned these 34 misdemeanors into a felony. The 5th Amendment states that the accused is entitled to have all charges listed in the indictment. This judge should have thrown this case out before it started.

The judge told the jury they could pick one of 3 difference charges without the prosecution having to prove their case, and use this to justify a guilty verdict in as few as 1 and as many as 34 misdemeanor charges. This is telling the jury they don't have to believe the charges in the indictment were proved by the prosecution.

This is just a continuation of 2 fake impeachments and the Jan 6th Committee.

This opens up the rest of the country to start arresting Democrats and using bogus charges to throw them in prison just to get them off the ballot.

As expected, your cult leader got his hand spanked, and all the little MAGAs start planning which illegal scam they will enact in response.

 

[BULLDOG]

Perhaps that judge should have done his job specifying the actual LAW he was hiding.

Unfit to wear the robe and it will be appealled all the way to SCOTUS.

ELECTION INTERFERENCE??. New York is guilty.

Or, you could just hold your breath till you turn blue. You'll get the same results.