Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First....you need to link to an actual government source for that number...which you have not.
Taking that number for now......
320,000,000 million guns.....505 accidental gun deaths.
357,000,000 million guns 586 accidental gun deaths.
Increase in guns in private hands....
37,000,000 million guns.
accidental gun death additions....81.
Accidental car deaths....35,000
Accidental drowning deaths...3,000
Your point is stupid.
Let me flesh this out even more.....to show how completely stupid your point is...
581 accidental gun deaths.......in total....with 357,000,000 million guns in private hands...if that is the correct number since you haven't linked to the CDC final stats for 2014....or 2015....
320,000,000 million guns in private hands....505 accidental gun deaths
357 million guns in private hands... 581 accidental gun deaths.....
81 new accidental gun deaths for an increase in 37,000,000 million guns in private hands...
VS.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_02.pdf
Cars, Accidental deaths 2013......35,369
Poisons...accidental deaths 2013....38,851
Alcohol...accidental deaths 2013...29,001
gravity....accidental falling deaths 2013...30,208
Accidental drowning.....3,391
Accidental exposure to smoke, fire and flames.....2,760
Accidental gun deaths 2013......505
Accidental gun deaths of children under 14 in 2013....in a country with 74.2 million children in 2010...
Under 1 year old: 3
1-4 years old: 27
5-14 years old: 39
Total: 69 ( in a country of 320 million people)
Gun Suicide: 21,175
Non gun suicide: 19,974
WISQARS Leading Causes of Death Reports
Clicked on your link.
Firearms aren't in the top 10
Didn't make that claim.
Then why did you supply that link?
To show the total for 2014 obviously.
Clicked on your link.
Firearms aren't in the top 10
Didn't make that claim.
Then why did you supply that link?
To show the total for 2014 obviously.
The total what?
deaths from the top 10 causes?
None of which are firearms?
Only you would be happy about child death numbers.
Clicked on your link.
Firearms aren't in the top 10
Didn't make that claim.
Then why did you supply that link?
To show the total for 2014 obviously.
Where the accidental gun death for children age 1-14 went down......from 69 in 2013....to 48 in 2014....
Thanks for showing your point is even more stupid than when you began........
And this is while more Americans started buying, owning and actually carrying guns for self defense....
Thanks brain.
Bill Clinton reduced crime with his crime bill. Guns do not effect crime rates.Nope.......you forget to add that Americans carrying guns helped decrease the crime rate....locking up criminals is the best method...but for the ones on the loose, allowing people to carry guns....13 million people carrying now...and the crime rate went down...is the best on scene crime deterrent....
And of course this destroys the gun grabber myth that more guns in the hands of normal people leads to more gun crime......
2/3 of the research says you are wrong, the other 1/3 says concealed carry did nothing and 1 anti gun study said it increased the crime rat.......
And again....the entire premise of the anti gun position has been shown to be wrong...completely and utterly wrong..with no bearing in fact, truth or reality.....
Americans owning and carrying guns for self defense since the 1990s did not increase the gun murder rate, the gun crime rate or violent crime in general......and this decrease happened as more Americans owned and carried guns......the entire myth that more guns will mean more crime is wrong......
The anti gunners have no standing on this issue.....
Most of your research is from one disgraced economist. What study do you have that can be taken seriously?
Nope.....you guys can't deny his research so you say he is disgraced.....
Report: Number Of Concealed Carry Permits Surges As Violent Crime Rate Drops
The “Concealed Carry Permit Holders Across the United States” report from the Crime Prevention Research Center released Wednesday analyzed parallels between a 22 percent drop in the overall violent crime rate in the same time period in which the percentage of the adult population with concealed carry permits soared by 130 percent.
The report finds that 11.1 million Americans now have permits to carry concealed weapons, which are up from 4.5 million in 2007. This 146 percent increase parallels a nearly one-quarter (22 percent) drop in both murder and violent crime rates during the same time period.
Regarding right-to-carry laws as a form of deterrence to violent crime, the study authors note that the large majority of peer-reviewed academic studies conclude that permitted concealed handguns reduce violent crime.
Those debates center around those who claim concealed handgun permits reduce crime and those who say it has no effect. The CPRC report focuses on states that allow right-to-carry permits and states that don’t require permits for concealed weapons rather than just the amount of permits.
Additionally, the report notes that the number of concealed carry permit holders “is likely much higher than 11.1 million,” because numbers are not available for all statues that issue permits, such as New York. And four states and the vast majority of Montana don’t require residents to have a
---------
Although cautioning that nationwide “simple cross-sectional comparisons” can present misleading data, the report used new state -level permit data from 2007 on to determine that for each one percentage point increase in the percent of the U.S. adult population holding permits is roughly paralleled with a 1.4 percent drop in the murder rate.
He is a joke proven to make shit up. If his study is your best you have nothing.
Only you would be happy about child death numbers.Clicked on your link.
Firearms aren't in the top 10
Didn't make that claim.
Then why did you supply that link?
To show the total for 2014 obviously.
Where the accidental gun death for children age 1-14 went down......from 69 in 2013....to 48 in 2014....
Thanks for showing your point is even more stupid than when you began........
And this is while more Americans started buying, owning and actually carrying guns for self defense....
Thanks brain.
If that is the best you have nothing.Bill Clinton reduced crime with his crime bill. Guns do not effect crime rates.
2/3 of the research says you are wrong, the other 1/3 says concealed carry did nothing and 1 anti gun study said it increased the crime rat.......
And again....the entire premise of the anti gun position has been shown to be wrong...completely and utterly wrong..with no bearing in fact, truth or reality.....
Americans owning and carrying guns for self defense since the 1990s did not increase the gun murder rate, the gun crime rate or violent crime in general......and this decrease happened as more Americans owned and carried guns......the entire myth that more guns will mean more crime is wrong......
The anti gunners have no standing on this issue.....
Most of your research is from one disgraced economist. What study do you have that can be taken seriously?
Nope.....you guys can't deny his research so you say he is disgraced.....
Report: Number Of Concealed Carry Permits Surges As Violent Crime Rate Drops
The “Concealed Carry Permit Holders Across the United States” report from the Crime Prevention Research Center released Wednesday analyzed parallels between a 22 percent drop in the overall violent crime rate in the same time period in which the percentage of the adult population with concealed carry permits soared by 130 percent.
The report finds that 11.1 million Americans now have permits to carry concealed weapons, which are up from 4.5 million in 2007. This 146 percent increase parallels a nearly one-quarter (22 percent) drop in both murder and violent crime rates during the same time period.
Regarding right-to-carry laws as a form of deterrence to violent crime, the study authors note that the large majority of peer-reviewed academic studies conclude that permitted concealed handguns reduce violent crime.
Those debates center around those who claim concealed handgun permits reduce crime and those who say it has no effect. The CPRC report focuses on states that allow right-to-carry permits and states that don’t require permits for concealed weapons rather than just the amount of permits.
Additionally, the report notes that the number of concealed carry permit holders “is likely much higher than 11.1 million,” because numbers are not available for all statues that issue permits, such as New York. And four states and the vast majority of Montana don’t require residents to have a
---------
Although cautioning that nationwide “simple cross-sectional comparisons” can present misleading data, the report used new state -level permit data from 2007 on to determine that for each one percentage point increase in the percent of the U.S. adult population holding permits is roughly paralleled with a 1.4 percent drop in the murder rate.
He is a joke proven to make shit up. If his study is your best you have nothing.
He is the pain in the ass to anti gun liars......and his research is the best and most in depth out there which is why you guys hate him........and just for giggles I listed all the other research as well....
BTW, you claimed the murder rate went up in Wisconsin after Concealed Carry went into effect, (2011)
It has bounced up and down for the last 10 years
Wisconsin State Crime and Crime Rate - USA.com™
So the research it doesn't effect crime rates holds true.BTW, you claimed the murder rate went up in Wisconsin after Concealed Carry went into effect, (2011)
It has bounced up and down for the last 10 years
Wisconsin State Crime and Crime Rate - USA.com™
Bill Clinton reduced crime with his crime bill. Guns do not effect crime rates.Nope.......you forget to add that Americans carrying guns helped decrease the crime rate....locking up criminals is the best method...but for the ones on the loose, allowing people to carry guns....13 million people carrying now...and the crime rate went down...is the best on scene crime deterrent....
And of course this destroys the gun grabber myth that more guns in the hands of normal people leads to more gun crime......
2/3 of the research says you are wrong, the other 1/3 says concealed carry did nothing and 1 anti gun study said it increased the crime rat.......
And again....the entire premise of the anti gun position has been shown to be wrong...completely and utterly wrong..with no bearing in fact, truth or reality.....
Americans owning and carrying guns for self defense since the 1990s did not increase the gun murder rate, the gun crime rate or violent crime in general......and this decrease happened as more Americans owned and carried guns......the entire myth that more guns will mean more crime is wrong......
The anti gunners have no standing on this issue.....
Most of your research is from one disgraced economist. What study do you have that can be taken seriously?
Here you go...again...all of the research....
Do Right-to-carry laws reduce violent crime? - Crime Prevention Research Center
A 2012 survey of the literature is available here. Some of the research showing that concealed carry laws reduce violent crime is listed here.
Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns, John R. Lott, Jr. and David B. Mustard, Journal of Legal Studies, 1997
The Effect of Concealed Weapons Laws: An Extreme Bound Analysis by William Alan Bartley and Mark A Cohen, published in Economic Inquiry, April 1998 (Copy available here)
The Concealed‐Handgun Debate, John R. Lott, Jr., Journal of Legal Studies, January 1998
Criminal Deterrence, Geographic Spillovers, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns by Stephen Bronars and John R. Lott, Jr., American Economic Review, May 1998
The Impact of Gun Laws on Police Deaths by David Mustard, published in the Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Privately Produced General Deterrence By BRUCE L. BENSON AND BRENT D. MAST, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Does the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns Deter Countable Crimes? Only a Count Analysis Can Say By FLORENZ PLASSMANN AND T. NICOLAUS TIDEMAN, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Testing for the Effects of Concealed Weapons Laws: Specification Errors and Robustness By CARLISLE E. MOODY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Right-to-Carry Concealed Weapon Laws and Homicide in Large U.S. Counties: The Effect on Weapon Types, Victim Characteristics, and Victim-Offender Relationships By DAVID E. OLSON AND MICHAEL D. MALTZ, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
The Impact of Banning Juvenile Gun Possession By Thomas B. Marvell, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Safe-Storage Gun Laws: Accidental Deaths, Suicides, and Crime By JOHN R. LOTT, JR., AND JOHN E. WHITLEY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Confirming More Guns, Less Crime by Florenz Plassmann and John Whitley, published in the Stanford Law Review, 2003
Measurement Error in County-Level UCR Data by John R. Lott, Jr. and John Whitley, published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, June 2003, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 185-198
Using Placebo Laws to Test “More Guns, Less Crime” by Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok, published in Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 4 (1): Article 1, 2004
Multiple Victim Public Shootings, Bombings, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handgun Laws: Contrasting Private and Public Law Enforcement By John R. Lott, Jr. and William Landes, published in The Bias Against Guns
More Readers of Gun Magazines, But Not More Crimes by Florenz Plassmann and John R. Lott, Jr.
“More Guns, Less Crime” by John R Lott, Jr. (University of Chicago Press, 2010, 3rd edition).
“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody, Thomas B. Marvell, Paul R Zimmerman, and Fasil Alemante published in Review of Economics & Finance, 2014
“An examination of the effects of concealed weapons laws and assault weapons bans on state-level murder rates” by Mark Giusa published in Applied Economics Letters, Volume 21, Issue 4, 2014
“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, volume 5, number 3, September 2008 It is also available here..
“The Debate on Shall Issue Laws, Continued” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 6, Number 2 May 2009
“Did John Lott Provide Bad Data to the NRC? A Note on Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang” by Carlisle e. Moody, John R Lott, Jr, and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 10, Number 1, January 2013
“On the Choice of Control Variables in the Crime Equation” by Carlisle E. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Volume 72, Issue 5, pages 696–715, October 2010.
More Guns, Less Crime: A Response to Ayres and Donohue’s 1999 book review in the American Law and Economics Review by John R. Lott, Jr.
Right-to-Carry Laws and Violent Crime Revisited: Clustering, Measurement Error, and State-by-State Break downs by John R. Lott, Jr.
For the data errors in the one published paper by Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang that claims to find a bad effect from right-to-carry laws on aggravated assaults see this paper.
In addition, Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang have retracted their original claim that the my research could not be replicated. Their argument was that Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang could not replicate the replication work done by the National Research Council that had replicated my research.
In an Erratum note published in October 2012 they concede: “Subsequent to the publication of this article, members of the NRC panel demonstrated to the authors that the results in question were replicable if the authors used the data and statistical models described in Chapter 6 of the NRC (2004) report.”
I see disgraced Lott over and over and over...
Thanks for that Wisqars Site from the CDC.....I now have it ready to go....
And this is why I keep posting when brain posts....with each time he starts a thread or posts a post....the anti gun argument on U.S.message board gets weaker and less relevant.........and is shown to be stupid and pointless and not based in the truth, the facts or reality.....
We can thank brain and the other anti gunners for that.
Bill Clinton reduced crime with his crime bill. Guns do not effect crime rates.
2/3 of the research says you are wrong, the other 1/3 says concealed carry did nothing and 1 anti gun study said it increased the crime rat.......
And again....the entire premise of the anti gun position has been shown to be wrong...completely and utterly wrong..with no bearing in fact, truth or reality.....
Americans owning and carrying guns for self defense since the 1990s did not increase the gun murder rate, the gun crime rate or violent crime in general......and this decrease happened as more Americans owned and carried guns......the entire myth that more guns will mean more crime is wrong......
The anti gunners have no standing on this issue.....
Most of your research is from one disgraced economist. What study do you have that can be taken seriously?
Here you go...again...all of the research....
Do Right-to-carry laws reduce violent crime? - Crime Prevention Research Center
A 2012 survey of the literature is available here. Some of the research showing that concealed carry laws reduce violent crime is listed here.
Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns, John R. Lott, Jr. and David B. Mustard, Journal of Legal Studies, 1997
The Effect of Concealed Weapons Laws: An Extreme Bound Analysis by William Alan Bartley and Mark A Cohen, published in Economic Inquiry, April 1998 (Copy available here)
The Concealed‐Handgun Debate, John R. Lott, Jr., Journal of Legal Studies, January 1998
Criminal Deterrence, Geographic Spillovers, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns by Stephen Bronars and John R. Lott, Jr., American Economic Review, May 1998
The Impact of Gun Laws on Police Deaths by David Mustard, published in the Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Privately Produced General Deterrence By BRUCE L. BENSON AND BRENT D. MAST, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Does the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns Deter Countable Crimes? Only a Count Analysis Can Say By FLORENZ PLASSMANN AND T. NICOLAUS TIDEMAN, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Testing for the Effects of Concealed Weapons Laws: Specification Errors and Robustness By CARLISLE E. MOODY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Right-to-Carry Concealed Weapon Laws and Homicide in Large U.S. Counties: The Effect on Weapon Types, Victim Characteristics, and Victim-Offender Relationships By DAVID E. OLSON AND MICHAEL D. MALTZ, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
The Impact of Banning Juvenile Gun Possession By Thomas B. Marvell, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Safe-Storage Gun Laws: Accidental Deaths, Suicides, and Crime By JOHN R. LOTT, JR., AND JOHN E. WHITLEY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Confirming More Guns, Less Crime by Florenz Plassmann and John Whitley, published in the Stanford Law Review, 2003
Measurement Error in County-Level UCR Data by John R. Lott, Jr. and John Whitley, published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, June 2003, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 185-198
Using Placebo Laws to Test “More Guns, Less Crime” by Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok, published in Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 4 (1): Article 1, 2004
Multiple Victim Public Shootings, Bombings, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handgun Laws: Contrasting Private and Public Law Enforcement By John R. Lott, Jr. and William Landes, published in The Bias Against Guns
More Readers of Gun Magazines, But Not More Crimes by Florenz Plassmann and John R. Lott, Jr.
“More Guns, Less Crime” by John R Lott, Jr. (University of Chicago Press, 2010, 3rd edition).
“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody, Thomas B. Marvell, Paul R Zimmerman, and Fasil Alemante published in Review of Economics & Finance, 2014
“An examination of the effects of concealed weapons laws and assault weapons bans on state-level murder rates” by Mark Giusa published in Applied Economics Letters, Volume 21, Issue 4, 2014
“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, volume 5, number 3, September 2008 It is also available here..
“The Debate on Shall Issue Laws, Continued” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 6, Number 2 May 2009
“Did John Lott Provide Bad Data to the NRC? A Note on Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang” by Carlisle e. Moody, John R Lott, Jr, and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 10, Number 1, January 2013
“On the Choice of Control Variables in the Crime Equation” by Carlisle E. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Volume 72, Issue 5, pages 696–715, October 2010.
More Guns, Less Crime: A Response to Ayres and Donohue’s 1999 book review in the American Law and Economics Review by John R. Lott, Jr.
Right-to-Carry Laws and Violent Crime Revisited: Clustering, Measurement Error, and State-by-State Break downs by John R. Lott, Jr.
For the data errors in the one published paper by Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang that claims to find a bad effect from right-to-carry laws on aggravated assaults see this paper.
In addition, Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang have retracted their original claim that the my research could not be replicated. Their argument was that Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang could not replicate the replication work done by the National Research Council that had replicated my research.
In an Erratum note published in October 2012 they concede: “Subsequent to the publication of this article, members of the NRC panel demonstrated to the authors that the results in question were replicable if the authors used the data and statistical models described in Chapter 6 of the NRC (2004) report.”
I see disgraced Lott over and over and over...
And then all the others......the best in the field and then the rest...all stating that you are wrong.....
So the research it doesn't effect crime rates holds true.BTW, you claimed the murder rate went up in Wisconsin after Concealed Carry went into effect, (2011)
It has bounced up and down for the last 10 years
Wisconsin State Crime and Crime Rate - USA.com™
BTW, you claimed the murder rate went up in Wisconsin after Concealed Carry went into effect, (2011)
It has bounced up and down for the last 10 years
Wisconsin State Crime and Crime Rate - USA.com™
2/3 of the research says you are wrong, the other 1/3 says concealed carry did nothing and 1 anti gun study said it increased the crime rat.......
And again....the entire premise of the anti gun position has been shown to be wrong...completely and utterly wrong..with no bearing in fact, truth or reality.....
Americans owning and carrying guns for self defense since the 1990s did not increase the gun murder rate, the gun crime rate or violent crime in general......and this decrease happened as more Americans owned and carried guns......the entire myth that more guns will mean more crime is wrong......
The anti gunners have no standing on this issue.....
Most of your research is from one disgraced economist. What study do you have that can be taken seriously?
Here you go...again...all of the research....
Do Right-to-carry laws reduce violent crime? - Crime Prevention Research Center
A 2012 survey of the literature is available here. Some of the research showing that concealed carry laws reduce violent crime is listed here.
Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns, John R. Lott, Jr. and David B. Mustard, Journal of Legal Studies, 1997
The Effect of Concealed Weapons Laws: An Extreme Bound Analysis by William Alan Bartley and Mark A Cohen, published in Economic Inquiry, April 1998 (Copy available here)
The Concealed‐Handgun Debate, John R. Lott, Jr., Journal of Legal Studies, January 1998
Criminal Deterrence, Geographic Spillovers, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns by Stephen Bronars and John R. Lott, Jr., American Economic Review, May 1998
The Impact of Gun Laws on Police Deaths by David Mustard, published in the Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Privately Produced General Deterrence By BRUCE L. BENSON AND BRENT D. MAST, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Does the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns Deter Countable Crimes? Only a Count Analysis Can Say By FLORENZ PLASSMANN AND T. NICOLAUS TIDEMAN, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Testing for the Effects of Concealed Weapons Laws: Specification Errors and Robustness By CARLISLE E. MOODY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Right-to-Carry Concealed Weapon Laws and Homicide in Large U.S. Counties: The Effect on Weapon Types, Victim Characteristics, and Victim-Offender Relationships By DAVID E. OLSON AND MICHAEL D. MALTZ, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
The Impact of Banning Juvenile Gun Possession By Thomas B. Marvell, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Safe-Storage Gun Laws: Accidental Deaths, Suicides, and Crime By JOHN R. LOTT, JR., AND JOHN E. WHITLEY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Confirming More Guns, Less Crime by Florenz Plassmann and John Whitley, published in the Stanford Law Review, 2003
Measurement Error in County-Level UCR Data by John R. Lott, Jr. and John Whitley, published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, June 2003, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 185-198
Using Placebo Laws to Test “More Guns, Less Crime” by Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok, published in Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 4 (1): Article 1, 2004
Multiple Victim Public Shootings, Bombings, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handgun Laws: Contrasting Private and Public Law Enforcement By John R. Lott, Jr. and William Landes, published in The Bias Against Guns
More Readers of Gun Magazines, But Not More Crimes by Florenz Plassmann and John R. Lott, Jr.
“More Guns, Less Crime” by John R Lott, Jr. (University of Chicago Press, 2010, 3rd edition).
“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody, Thomas B. Marvell, Paul R Zimmerman, and Fasil Alemante published in Review of Economics & Finance, 2014
“An examination of the effects of concealed weapons laws and assault weapons bans on state-level murder rates” by Mark Giusa published in Applied Economics Letters, Volume 21, Issue 4, 2014
“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, volume 5, number 3, September 2008 It is also available here..
“The Debate on Shall Issue Laws, Continued” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 6, Number 2 May 2009
“Did John Lott Provide Bad Data to the NRC? A Note on Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang” by Carlisle e. Moody, John R Lott, Jr, and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 10, Number 1, January 2013
“On the Choice of Control Variables in the Crime Equation” by Carlisle E. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Volume 72, Issue 5, pages 696–715, October 2010.
More Guns, Less Crime: A Response to Ayres and Donohue’s 1999 book review in the American Law and Economics Review by John R. Lott, Jr.
Right-to-Carry Laws and Violent Crime Revisited: Clustering, Measurement Error, and State-by-State Break downs by John R. Lott, Jr.
For the data errors in the one published paper by Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang that claims to find a bad effect from right-to-carry laws on aggravated assaults see this paper.
In addition, Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang have retracted their original claim that the my research could not be replicated. Their argument was that Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang could not replicate the replication work done by the National Research Council that had replicated my research.
In an Erratum note published in October 2012 they concede: “Subsequent to the publication of this article, members of the NRC panel demonstrated to the authors that the results in question were replicable if the authors used the data and statistical models described in Chapter 6 of the NRC (2004) report.”
I see disgraced Lott over and over and over...
And then all the others......the best in the field and then the rest...all stating that you are wrong.....
Please link any one that doesn't include Lott that can be taken seriously and I will review it. Your list is from lotts site...
So the research it doesn't effect crime rates holds true.BTW, you claimed the murder rate went up in Wisconsin after Concealed Carry went into effect, (2011)
It has bounced up and down for the last 10 years
Wisconsin State Crime and Crime Rate - USA.com™
Take a look at 2011, when it first took effect.
Dropped like a rock, then went back to normal.
Most of your research is from one disgraced economist. What study do you have that can be taken seriously?
Here you go...again...all of the research....
Do Right-to-carry laws reduce violent crime? - Crime Prevention Research Center
A 2012 survey of the literature is available here. Some of the research showing that concealed carry laws reduce violent crime is listed here.
Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns, John R. Lott, Jr. and David B. Mustard, Journal of Legal Studies, 1997
The Effect of Concealed Weapons Laws: An Extreme Bound Analysis by William Alan Bartley and Mark A Cohen, published in Economic Inquiry, April 1998 (Copy available here)
The Concealed‐Handgun Debate, John R. Lott, Jr., Journal of Legal Studies, January 1998
Criminal Deterrence, Geographic Spillovers, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns by Stephen Bronars and John R. Lott, Jr., American Economic Review, May 1998
The Impact of Gun Laws on Police Deaths by David Mustard, published in the Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Privately Produced General Deterrence By BRUCE L. BENSON AND BRENT D. MAST, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Does the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns Deter Countable Crimes? Only a Count Analysis Can Say By FLORENZ PLASSMANN AND T. NICOLAUS TIDEMAN, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Testing for the Effects of Concealed Weapons Laws: Specification Errors and Robustness By CARLISLE E. MOODY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Right-to-Carry Concealed Weapon Laws and Homicide in Large U.S. Counties: The Effect on Weapon Types, Victim Characteristics, and Victim-Offender Relationships By DAVID E. OLSON AND MICHAEL D. MALTZ, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
The Impact of Banning Juvenile Gun Possession By Thomas B. Marvell, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Safe-Storage Gun Laws: Accidental Deaths, Suicides, and Crime By JOHN R. LOTT, JR., AND JOHN E. WHITLEY, Journal of Law and Economics, October 2001
Confirming More Guns, Less Crime by Florenz Plassmann and John Whitley, published in the Stanford Law Review, 2003
Measurement Error in County-Level UCR Data by John R. Lott, Jr. and John Whitley, published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, June 2003, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 185-198
Using Placebo Laws to Test “More Guns, Less Crime” by Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok, published in Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 4 (1): Article 1, 2004
Multiple Victim Public Shootings, Bombings, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handgun Laws: Contrasting Private and Public Law Enforcement By John R. Lott, Jr. and William Landes, published in The Bias Against Guns
More Readers of Gun Magazines, But Not More Crimes by Florenz Plassmann and John R. Lott, Jr.
“More Guns, Less Crime” by John R Lott, Jr. (University of Chicago Press, 2010, 3rd edition).
“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody, Thomas B. Marvell, Paul R Zimmerman, and Fasil Alemante published in Review of Economics & Finance, 2014
“An examination of the effects of concealed weapons laws and assault weapons bans on state-level murder rates” by Mark Giusa published in Applied Economics Letters, Volume 21, Issue 4, 2014
“The Debate on Shall-Issue Laws” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, volume 5, number 3, September 2008 It is also available here..
“The Debate on Shall Issue Laws, Continued” by Carlisle e. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 6, Number 2 May 2009
“Did John Lott Provide Bad Data to the NRC? A Note on Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang” by Carlisle e. Moody, John R Lott, Jr, and Thomas B. Marvell, published in Econ Journal Watch, Volume 10, Number 1, January 2013
“On the Choice of Control Variables in the Crime Equation” by Carlisle E. Moody and Thomas B. Marvell, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Volume 72, Issue 5, pages 696–715, October 2010.
More Guns, Less Crime: A Response to Ayres and Donohue’s 1999 book review in the American Law and Economics Review by John R. Lott, Jr.
Right-to-Carry Laws and Violent Crime Revisited: Clustering, Measurement Error, and State-by-State Break downs by John R. Lott, Jr.
For the data errors in the one published paper by Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang that claims to find a bad effect from right-to-carry laws on aggravated assaults see this paper.
In addition, Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang have retracted their original claim that the my research could not be replicated. Their argument was that Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang could not replicate the replication work done by the National Research Council that had replicated my research.
In an Erratum note published in October 2012 they concede: “Subsequent to the publication of this article, members of the NRC panel demonstrated to the authors that the results in question were replicable if the authors used the data and statistical models described in Chapter 6 of the NRC (2004) report.”
I see disgraced Lott over and over and over...
And then all the others......the best in the field and then the rest...all stating that you are wrong.....
Please link any one that doesn't include Lott that can be taken seriously and I will review it. Your list is from lotts site...
Moron.....they are all peer reviewed studies.......15 of them are not John Lott.....and of course...you want him taken out because he is the most experienced in this area of research........and the most public.....so you want him excluded...nice try......Tell the Patriots to bench their quarter back and see how that goes...
BTW, you claimed the murder rate went up in Wisconsin after Concealed Carry went into effect, (2011)
It has bounced up and down for the last 10 years
Wisconsin State Crime and Crime Rate - USA.com™
this is one of the reasons...Ferguson is another...
No easy answers to Milwaukee’s spiraling violence
Overworked, overtaxed
But the toughest sentences in the world won't help solve the city's crime problem if police aren't arresting the most violent criminals in the first place, said Michael Crivello, president of the Milwaukee Professional Police Association, which represents rank-and-file officers.
"The way I see it is — whether we're on the advent of travesty or we're already well into it — it was something that was bound to happen," he said.
Crivello and the union believe Flynn's changes in department structure and new policies implemented during his tenure have made it more difficult for officers to do their jobs effectively.
Crivello pointed to a reduction in the number of detectives, which was about 250 when Flynn took over in 2008 and is now about 180. Much of the responsibility for investigating crimes has been shifted from detectives to patrol officers.
"They're so overworked, overtaxed and trying to work with a different skill set, which they don't possess," Crivello said.
The dismantling of the gang and vice squads has allowed more violent criminals to roam free, according to Crivello.
"What you get out of it is human intelligence," he said of specialized squads. "That's how we win wars. You have to know what's going on in the streets. We've lost so much of that."
--------
The policy was changed in 2010 and has reduced the number of crashes. On the flip side, criminals who may be wanted on warrants, have a gun under the seat or have a trunk full of drugs know that if they flee police, there is very little the officers can do, Crivello said.
"They can literally flip the finger to an officer and take off hard and fast and get away with it," he said.
Flynn pointed out that critics used a similar argument against the old policy, saying officers were taking undue risks by chasing motorists who may not have guns or drugs. Research indicates that the vast majority of pursuits turn out to be for minor traffic violations, he said.
Soooooo....The actual case is bad policy from an inept democrat mayor....and the Ferguson effect.......not concealed carry by normal, law abiding citizens....
-------------------------------- of course and thankyou for a good thought . It is the price and it is a reasonble price to pay RWinger !!Its a real shame that nothing at all can be done.
It is the price we pay for our second amendment rights
