Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[I made no such statement, I only speak from my own experiences with gays. So,, don't put words in my mouth, and your little baiting trial, failed, as do most of your posts!
No one has heard of left-wing fascism, and for good reason: there is no such thing.
Fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.
I see we have another elitist left winger, such as Pogo, that believes his own bullshit...Google it, dummy!
Fascism, a one party government dominated by a Leader that eschews democracy and encourages corporatism (government and business), is the hope of the Far Right and their no information people, like Vigilante
I was once invited to the wedding of two friends, both of whom are gay. Only reason I declined was the cost of the travel to the state where they married. I did send regrets and a gift and invite them to stay with my family should their adventures bring them my way.
All of that sincere. I had worked with one of them and found him to be kind, fun to associate with and respectful of the orientation of others. Also one of the best workers in the facility.
The marriage has lasted over 10 years so far and shows no signs of weakening. They have confined their adoptive tendencies to canines which have exhibited only heterosexual tendencies so any question of contagion is laid to rest. Of course lower life forms, liberals, for example, might not enjoy immunity.
[I made no such statement, I only speak from my own experiences with gays. So,
Hmmm. Readers, check the post immediately above.
I used to love being a bouncer at gay bars because I could legally beat the shit out of them.
That's true tolerance. How very civilized and Christ-like.
[I made no such statement, I only speak from my own experiences with gays. So,
Hmmm. Readers, check the post immediately above.
Indeed.
So you're against equality?
What was the matter with "CIVIL UNION" with EXACTLY the same entitlements as a married man and woman?
Because different is not equal. Why do you think one segment of society gets to dominate the definition of a word? Because of religion? Because of tradition? Neither of those are compelling reasons to oppress others.
Hmmm. Readers, check the post immediately above.
Indeed.
I guess he loves to gobble it down
Because different is not equal. Why do you think one segment of society gets to dominate the definition of a word? Because of religion? Because of tradition? Neither of those are compelling reasons to oppress others.
BUT YOU ARE DIFFERENT, if you weren't, you wouldn't be GAY! Two men, or 2 women are NOT the same as a man and a woman...need I explain the difference? You would have EXACTLY the same rights from the government as a married couple have. And YES, religion, and tradition ARE factors in beliefs about GAYS, that's why IN THE CONSTITUTION we have FREEDOM OF RELIGION. Because YOU, and others don't like it, what makes YOU and others think they're rights are ABOVE others...and this coming from an agnostic!
I'm an agnostic. No where in the Constitution is there a Right to force citizens to live by another's religion or traditions. And different under the Law is not equal under the Law. One segment of society doesn't hold dominion over the way a word is defined. Especially when there is no practical reason to deny two homosexuals to do the same thing as two heterosexuals. It has no real world effect on anyone else for gay people to get married. So what's the big deal?
I used to love being a bouncer at gay bars because I could legally beat the shit out of them.
That's true tolerance. How very civilized and Christ-like.
Please stop pretending you know more about Jesus than people who actually know that he beat the crap out of people that pissed him off.
Bigotry and homophobia are characteristics of the uneducated and ignorant.
It's safe to say those who embrace equality of all are the winners.
Gay rights and fascism are ideological opposites.
Read Hitler. The far right reactonary social conservatives have much to regret in their hetero-fascism.
So you're against equality?
What was the matter with "CIVIL UNION" with EXACTLY the same entitlements as a married man and woman?
Because different is not equal. Why do you think one segment of society gets to dominate the definition of a word? Because of religion? Because of tradition? Neither of those are compelling reasons to oppress others.
What was the matter with "CIVIL UNION" with EXACTLY the same entitlements as a married man and woman?
Because different is not equal. Why do you think one segment of society gets to dominate the definition of a word? Because of religion? Because of tradition? Neither of those are compelling reasons to oppress others.
Probably for the same reason you do.
What was that? You didn't know you were dominating the definition of a word? What the fuck did you think you were doing?
BUT YOU ARE DIFFERENT, if you weren't, you wouldn't be GAY! Two men, or 2 women are NOT the same as a man and a woman...need I explain the difference? You would have EXACTLY the same rights from the government as a married couple have. And YES, religion, and tradition ARE factors in beliefs about GAYS, that's why IN THE CONSTITUTION we have FREEDOM OF RELIGION. Because YOU, and others don't like it, what makes YOU and others think they're rights are ABOVE others...and this coming from an agnostic!
I'm an agnostic. No where in the Constitution is there a Right to force citizens to live by another's religion or traditions. And different under the Law is not equal under the Law. One segment of society doesn't hold dominion over the way a word is defined. Especially when there is no practical reason to deny two homosexuals to do the same thing as two heterosexuals. It has no real world effect on anyone else for gay people to get married. So what's the big deal?
Why do you keep arguing against your position? Is it because you are an idiot that doesn't think things through?
What was the matter with "CIVIL UNION" with EXACTLY the same entitlements as a married man and woman?
Because different is not equal. Why do you think one segment of society gets to dominate the definition of a word? Because of religion? Because of tradition? Neither of those are compelling reasons to oppress others.
Different is not equal?
That is a ridiculous concept. Check that..It's absurd.
So...Let's see...Men and women are different....People of various races are different.
Various religions are different.
Several years ago radical feminists went ballistic over a study that concluded men and women process information differently. Their claim was that human nature would require us to compare the two and then declare one must be better than the other.
Feminists feared that because if people discovered the thought patterns were different, they would determine that the way men processed information was "better" or superior to that of women.
No one is being oppressed. That's a lame talking point.
Actually not.Young Conservative DESTROYS gay rights fascists
This is only a young conservative exhibiting his ignorance of the Constitution and its case law.
For example:
Marriage has, had, and always will have, by definition, a certain character and purpose; a character and purpose centered around, above all things, the family. Marriage is the foundation through which a thriving and lasting civilization sees to the propagation of itself. Human beings can only reproduce by means of heterosexuality, and this reality sets the heterosexual union apart. Marriage is meant to be the context in which this reproduction occurs.
Marriage is many things, but it is also this. And this can never be removed from it, no matter the direction of the political winds, or the motion of the shifting sands of public opinion.
Marriage and the family are dimensions of the same whole. They cannot be detached from one another. They, as a whole, as an institution, can only be weakened not erased or redefined. And so the campaign to protect and strengthen the institution was and is designed to do just that. It was never about legislating love or imposing intolerance or discriminating against gay people, or any other silly bumper sticker platitude.
Marriage is contract law, written by the states and administered by state courts; and same-sex couples are currently eligible to enter into marriage contracts, unchanged, and not redefined.
To deny same-sex couples access to marriage law theyre eligible to participate in, therefore, is indeed to discriminate against gay Americans, and to violate their 14th Amendment right to equal protection of the law.
And the ability to procreate is not a prerequisite for entering into marriage, as opposite-sex couples who are infertile are allowed to marry, and older opposite-sex couples where the wife has realized menopause are not compelled by the state to divorce.
Consequently, the young conservatives argument fails as just another manifestation of anger, ignorance, hate, and fear by the right.
