jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,259
- 29,162
They won’t give a loan to over valued property! You’re nutsYou’re an idiot. They can do a loan for any amount they want.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They won’t give a loan to over valued property! You’re nutsYou’re an idiot. They can do a loan for any amount they want.
Already explained.He did nothing. No one was damaged, so what damages does he owe?
You need a victim. You better find one because the state isn’t it.You don't seem to understand how fines work. Especially in cases like this one.
You don't get to keep your ill gotten gains from fraud. That's a basic staple of our code of law.
Actually, when you break State laws, it is.You need a victim. You better find one because the state isn’t it.
Post #?Already explained.
And your "he dindoonuffin" defense is the worst defense imaginable.
Good luck.
They obviously will.They won’t give a loan to over valued property! You’re nuts
Point to the law that you can’t over estimate property value. There isn’t one.Actually, when you break State laws, it is.
The State has standing to sue or to prosecute anyone who breaks State law
This has been explained to you many times.
Not true. You steadfastly refuse to explain your reasoning at every opportunity.Already explained.
And your "he dindoonuffin" defense is the worst defense imaginable.
Good luck.
Yes they will.They won’t give a loan to over valued property! You’re nuts
*on sworn financial statements under penalty of lawPoint to the law that you can’t over estimate property value. There isn’t one.
Explained several times, both by myself and others.Not true. You steadfastly refuse to explain your reasoning at every opportunity.
They are estimates. There is no objective value for any property until it's sold.*on sworn financial statements under penalty of law
(the cultists always forget that part)
There sure is.
This is just getting absurd.
I recommend you read about the case before opening your mouth about it agan.
That's the best defense there is, dumbass.Already explained.
And your "he dindoonuffin" defense is the worst defense imaginable.
Good luck.
They are sworn statements under penalty of law.They are estimates.
"He didn't do it!" is the worst defense imaginable.That's the best defense there is, .
You’re beginning to realize how stupid you’ve been aren’t you.*on sworn financial statements under penalty of law
(the cultists always forget that part)
There sure is.
This is just getting absurd.
I recommend you read about the case before opening your mouth about it agan.
Well that's a hilarious lie.I’ve read the case
Banks don’t make loans on sworn statements dumbass. If they do they’re idiots. Bank do due diligence to determine a properties value before making a loan. They sure as fuck don’t just take your word for it.They are sworn statements under penalty of law.
I obviously know more about it than you do. You must have read the democrat crayons and flash cards version.Well that's a hilarious lie.
They absolutely do. Financial statements compiled by reputable firms. Tax returns. You don't know what you are talking about and should probably shut up immediately.Banks don’t make loans on sworn statements