Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FIRST, can you please show me where guns HAVE been grabbed by the gun grabbers as you call them?This man did as the anti gunners want victims to do.....he complied with the demands of the two violent robbers, gave them the cash they wanted....and then...they were going to pay a visit to the man's wife....so he pulled his gun and shot them.....
So gun grabbers....it would have been a better outcome if he didn't have the gun...right?
And considering he only used the gun as a very last resort, having complied with all of their demands...I guess your stupid theories that gun owners will simply panic or be easily disarmed is crap as well...right?
Kidnapped and robbed victim fatally shoots attacker VIDEO
Around 6:30 a.m., the man was putting items into his truck, which was parked in his driveway, when he was approached by two men who were armed with guns. The suspects instructed the man to go into his house to retrieve his wallet, then forced the man back into his own truck to drive to an ATM to get more cash for the suspects.
The man did as instructed, but after withdrawing the money, the suspects had the man drive to an area near his home. Local media reported the suspects indicated they were going to leave the man at that location and return to the man’s home to harm his wife.
It was at that point, the man turned the tables on the suspects, who were unaware the man had a handgun in his truck. The man grabbed his gun and fired several rounds, striking one of the suspects, and sending the second fleeing from the scene.
One neighbor, who did not wish to be identified, told reporters that when she was letting her dogs outside that morning, she heard six gunshots, followed by several more.
So...the bad guys have guns and they have control of the victim...and he still managed to get his gun and shoot the assholes......
What is it the gun grabbers say...the victim will just get shot for his efforts....from my experience this outcome is not an exception to the rule....
Criminals do not want to get shot, so most of the time they run when the victim has a gun....and even when they shoot back, the victim has as much a chance against them as they have at harming him...
And it was 2 to 1 odds.......
great story and happy ending, which is good btw....
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
Since we dont know if she was coming back to the house shortly thats a claim we cant verify.
The doctor was obviously concerned enough about the threat to take action.
I think he finally got a chance to get the gun when they were ready to leave. He's lucky they were too dumb to search car. The cops would have been to his house before they got back.
Actually, all my "elected officials" are right wing, so they don't represent me anyway. There hasn't been any substantial national gun control legislation that I've been aware of in four decades.Stop being stupid, please. This is a classic "straw man" argument. I know many, many liberals that don't oppose gun ownership. As a progressive, I don't oppose gun ownership. I believe gun owners should simply accept the risk that having a gun in a home poses to that home's occupants--but it's their decision, not mine.The liberal answer is the robbers wanted sex and it was wrong of the man to stop them. Isn't there a right to have sex? Is freedom really that dead. They let the man go. Now he's going to prevent them from exercising their constitutional rights.
I just wish your elected officials felt the same way.
Maybe you should notify them of your stance and all your liberal buddies stance?
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
chance favors the prepared mind
But they still had plenty of opportunities to kill him if they had wanted. He was very lucky. If they had been smart enough to search the car he would never have had a gun.
Braindead is just disappointed they didnt get their chance with the guys wife.
No he was very lucky. They could have gunned him down had they chosen. They chose not too.
Yes...he was lucky. But he was also prepared...if he hadn't had that gun he would not have been lucky would he....they would have done whatever they wanted to the wife....next time he and his wife will probably both carry guns on their hips....and then it won't matter.
And shall we take bets on wether the two criminals passed background checks for their guns............
More likely they would have left him there and wife was fine.
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
Since we dont know if she was coming back to the house shortly thats a claim we cant verify.
The doctor was obviously concerned enough about the threat to take action.
I think he finally got a chance to get the gun when they were ready to leave. He's lucky they were too dumb to search car. The cops would have been to his house before they got back.
Actually, all my "elected officials" are right wing, so they don't represent me anyway. There hasn't been any substantial national gun control legislation that I've been aware of in four decades.Stop being stupid, please. This is a classic "straw man" argument. I know many, many liberals that don't oppose gun ownership. As a progressive, I don't oppose gun ownership. I believe gun owners should simply accept the risk that having a gun in a home poses to that home's occupants--but it's their decision, not mine.The liberal answer is the robbers wanted sex and it was wrong of the man to stop them. Isn't there a right to have sex? Is freedom really that dead. They let the man go. Now he's going to prevent them from exercising their constitutional rights.
I just wish your elected officials felt the same way.
Maybe you should notify them of your stance and all your liberal buddies stance?
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
Since we dont know if she was coming back to the house shortly thats a claim we cant verify.
The doctor was obviously concerned enough about the threat to take action.
I think he finally got a chance to get the gun when they were ready to leave. He's lucky they were too dumb to search car. The cops would have been to his house before they got back.
So....again...you prefer the self defense methods of...
1) The kindness of violent criminals
2) the stupidity of violent criminals
3) pure dumb luck...
Brain...you should open up a self defense school and teach those techniques...I am sure they would be very popular......
This is a typically gerrymandered Republican district. I don't know what exactly you're implying with the "crime rate" comment; this is a rural white area in a red state, so the crime here is mainly domestic abuse, drug sales, property theft, and alcohol-related. Also, over half of this nearly all white district is on some form of public assistance--it's a typical Republican stronghold.Actually, all my "elected officials" are right wing, so they don't represent me anyway. There hasn't been any substantial national gun control legislation that I've been aware of in four decades.Stop being stupid, please. This is a classic "straw man" argument. I know many, many liberals that don't oppose gun ownership. As a progressive, I don't oppose gun ownership. I believe gun owners should simply accept the risk that having a gun in a home poses to that home's occupants--but it's their decision, not mine.The liberal answer is the robbers wanted sex and it was wrong of the man to stop them. Isn't there a right to have sex? Is freedom really that dead. They let the man go. Now he's going to prevent them from exercising their constitutional rights.
I just wish your elected officials felt the same way.
Maybe you should notify them of your stance and all your liberal buddies stance?
And thats a good thing.
And why exactly do you live in a district that doesnt represent you?
Could it be the low crime rate? Show your devotion to your liberal buddies and move to the ghetto.
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
Since we dont know if she was coming back to the house shortly thats a claim we cant verify.
The doctor was obviously concerned enough about the threat to take action.
I think he finally got a chance to get the gun when they were ready to leave. He's lucky they were too dumb to search car. The cops would have been to his house before they got back.
How do you know? And why would you take that chance with the life of your wife? I sure wouldnt.
But they still had plenty of opportunities to kill him if they had wanted. He was very lucky. If they had been smart enough to search the car he would never have had a gun.
Braindead is just disappointed they didnt get their chance with the guys wife.
No he was very lucky. They could have gunned him down had they chosen. They chose not too.
Yes...he was lucky. But he was also prepared...if he hadn't had that gun he would not have been lucky would he....they would have done whatever they wanted to the wife....next time he and his wife will probably both carry guns on their hips....and then it won't matter.
And shall we take bets on wether the two criminals passed background checks for their guns............
More likely they would have left him there and wife was fine.
More likely? You're not married are you? If you are you must really hate your wife.
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
Maybe she was tied up....and maybe they just said they were going to leave him by the side of the road....and were going to kill him....perhaps that is why he made the move to fight back....
But.......without the gun...all of the decisions would be left to the violent criminals....
This is a typically gerrymandered Republican district. I don't know what exactly you're implying with the "crime rate" comment; this is a rural white area in a red state, so the crime here is mainly domestic abuse, drug sales, property theft, and alcohol-related. Also, over half of this nearly all white district is on some form of public assistance--it's a typical Republican stronghold.Actually, all my "elected officials" are right wing, so they don't represent me anyway. There hasn't been any substantial national gun control legislation that I've been aware of in four decades.Stop being stupid, please. This is a classic "straw man" argument. I know many, many liberals that don't oppose gun ownership. As a progressive, I don't oppose gun ownership. I believe gun owners should simply accept the risk that having a gun in a home poses to that home's occupants--but it's their decision, not mine.The liberal answer is the robbers wanted sex and it was wrong of the man to stop them. Isn't there a right to have sex? Is freedom really that dead. They let the man go. Now he's going to prevent them from exercising their constitutional rights.
I just wish your elected officials felt the same way.
Maybe you should notify them of your stance and all your liberal buddies stance?
And thats a good thing.
And why exactly do you live in a district that doesnt represent you?
Could it be the low crime rate? Show your devotion to your liberal buddies and move to the ghetto.
Braindead is just disappointed they didnt get their chance with the guys wife.
No he was very lucky. They could have gunned him down had they chosen. They chose not too.
Yes...he was lucky. But he was also prepared...if he hadn't had that gun he would not have been lucky would he....they would have done whatever they wanted to the wife....next time he and his wife will probably both carry guns on their hips....and then it won't matter.
And shall we take bets on wether the two criminals passed background checks for their guns............
More likely they would have left him there and wife was fine.
More likely? You're not married are you? If you are you must really hate your wife.
Yes more likely. Going back would assure being caught. Criminals try to avoid that.
Braindead is just disappointed they didnt get their chance with the guys wife.
No he was very lucky. They could have gunned him down had they chosen. They chose not too.
Yes...he was lucky. But he was also prepared...if he hadn't had that gun he would not have been lucky would he....they would have done whatever they wanted to the wife....next time he and his wife will probably both carry guns on their hips....and then it won't matter.
And shall we take bets on wether the two criminals passed background checks for their guns............
More likely they would have left him there and wife was fine.
More likely? You're not married are you? If you are you must really hate your wife.
Yes more likely. Going back would assure being caught. Criminals try to avoid that.
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
Maybe she was tied up....and maybe they just said they were going to leave him by the side of the road....and were going to kill him....perhaps that is why he made the move to fight back....
But.......without the gun...all of the decisions would be left to the violent criminals....
Story says they were leaving him not killing him. Don't make things up.
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
Since we dont know if she was coming back to the house shortly thats a claim we cant verify.
The doctor was obviously concerned enough about the threat to take action.
I think he finally got a chance to get the gun when they were ready to leave. He's lucky they were too dumb to search car. The cops would have been to his house before they got back.
How do you know? And why would you take that chance with the life of your wife? I sure wouldnt.
They were just leaving him...
No he was very lucky. They could have gunned him down had they chosen. They chose not too.
Yes...he was lucky. But he was also prepared...if he hadn't had that gun he would not have been lucky would he....they would have done whatever they wanted to the wife....next time he and his wife will probably both carry guns on their hips....and then it won't matter.
And shall we take bets on wether the two criminals passed background checks for their guns............
More likely they would have left him there and wife was fine.
More likely? You're not married are you? If you are you must really hate your wife.
Yes more likely. Going back would assure being caught. Criminals try to avoid that.
Not true....in the murder in Connecticut they took the wife back to the house after they took her to her bank....they knew the police were on to them...so after having raped the wife and two daughters and beating the husband with a bat, they went back to destroy the evidence...that is...they burnt the house down with the people in it.........that could have been what they planned here....
It just happened in Washington D.C. a few blocks down from joe biden's home...a man murdered a family, man, wife, and 10 year old son and their housekeeper and set fire to their home...just happened today.........
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
Since we dont know if she was coming back to the house shortly thats a claim we cant verify.
The doctor was obviously concerned enough about the threat to take action.
I think he finally got a chance to get the gun when they were ready to leave. He's lucky they were too dumb to search car. The cops would have been to his house before they got back.
How do you know? And why would you take that chance with the life of your wife? I sure wouldnt.
They were just leaving him...
And you're going to take the word of a two guys who just robbed you? For all you know they were going to gun him down first.
The wife part of this story doesn't make sense. If she was home wouldn't she have called the police? They went in the house and then left earlier.
Maybe she was tied up....and maybe they just said they were going to leave him by the side of the road....and were going to kill him....perhaps that is why he made the move to fight back....
But.......without the gun...all of the decisions would be left to the violent criminals....
Story says they were leaving him not killing him. Don't make things up.
No,....the story says they told him that......and very likely just to keep him compliant......then he pulled his gun and shot them....brain...criminals lie all the time.....
