I don't think
Well, you're right about that at least!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think
You mean putting ISIS in charge?
If this 100 million dollar sand pounding helped anyone, it was the Islamic State.
Eat crow you fucking idiot!
Why did you replace NYcarbineer 's username with mine?It accomplishes a lot for the defense lobby and that massive budget busting defense spending increase they and Trump want.
No doubt. That's the only reason that pounding sand with 1.4 million advanced cruise missiles makes sense.
Honestly, I believe when the numbers come out on this the United States is going to look more pathetic than ever. A weak, irrational, and impulsive Trump switches his entire foreign policy stance in a day due to some graphic videos, and signs off on a costly missile strike on an airfield that was probably evacuated...
1. Immediately after the chemical attack, when they relocated their air assets to prevent something like this from happening
2. When Donald red phoned the Russians, and they told their Syrian allies to move their air assets from the chemical weapon bases.
This was a high risk publicity stunt, and it took 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal. It also makes him look like a major hypocrite for saying this, after tweeting several years ago that Obama should get congressional approval. Syria, Russia, and Iran are already spinning this to shame America. Hell, America should be ashamed for its weak armed imperialism.
It accomplishes a lot for the defense lobby and that massive budget busting defense spending increase they and Trump want.
These idiots don't even realize that you DON'T want to hit the chemical weapons, because of the obvious risk of unleashing them on the surrounding areas.
What "idiots", are you addressing?
The storage facility was known and the missiles were programmed to avoid those facilities.
Meanwhile, with the exception of Syria, Iran, and Russia, the world applauds along with even Democrats in congress.
The ones who are bitching that we didn't hit the chemical weapons.
$20 says you get your information from the fucking Russians, Iranians or Syrians.I was watching the news this morning and the news outlets had satellite photos of before and after. Where were you? Over at CNN or MSNBC? Have they announced the chemical attack yet?
I've seen satelite images and video footage. Not a single hit on the airfield or hardened aircraft shelters. 100 million dollars for zero kills. Eat crow you fucking idiot!
Well it did put some holes in the ground Wonder if that 23 hits out of 59 is true? And yes it could very well have been a stunt to fool people into thinking putin isn't trumps palHonestly, I believe when the numbers come out on this the United States is going to look more pathetic than ever. A weak, irrational, and impulsive Trump switches his entire foreign policy stance in a day due to some graphic videos, and signs off on a costly missile strike on an airfield that was probably evacuated...
1. Immediately after the chemical attack, when they relocated their air assets to prevent something like this from happening
2. When Donald red phoned the Russians, and they told their Syrian allies to move their air assets from the chemical weapon bases.
This was a high risk publicity stunt, and it took 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal. It also makes him look like a major hypocrite for saying this, after tweeting several years ago that Obama should get congressional approval. Syria, Russia, and Iran are already spinning this to shame America. Hell, America should be ashamed for its weak armed imperialism.
If they haven't released imagery how do you know what was damaged?
I know that any competent commander would of relocated their air assets following a high profile chemical attack. If they didn't do that, then they definitely would of after the Russians informed them of an upcoming missile strike.
Derp.
BTW what happened to their high technology Russian missle defense system.... LMFAO....
.
If they haven't released imagery how do you know what was damaged?
I know that any competent commander would of relocated their air assets following a high profile chemical attack. If they didn't do that, then they definitely would of after the Russians informed them of an upcoming missile strike.
Derp.
BTW what happened to their high technology Russian missle defense system.... LMFAO....
.
Some moron on another thread is claiming 36 of 60 Tomahawks were interpreted....LMAO
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?
More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?
More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.
They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in?Glad you aren't running the military.
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?
More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.
They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in?Glad you aren't running the military.
You think there aren't pumps on the fuel trucks that are probably there by now?