100 million dollars for an attack that kills zero aircraft and accomplishes nothing strategically

Eat crow you fucking idiot!

I prepared this just for you. It might need a bit more salt!
CrowonPlate.jpg
 
It accomplishes a lot for the defense lobby and that massive budget busting defense spending increase they and Trump want.

No doubt. That's the only reason that pounding sand with 1.4 million advanced cruise missiles makes sense.
Why did you replace NYcarbineer 's username with mine?

Honestly, I believe when the numbers come out on this the United States is going to look more pathetic than ever. A weak, irrational, and impulsive Trump switches his entire foreign policy stance in a day due to some graphic videos, and signs off on a costly missile strike on an airfield that was probably evacuated...

1. Immediately after the chemical attack, when they relocated their air assets to prevent something like this from happening

2. When Donald red phoned the Russians, and they told their Syrian allies to move their air assets from the chemical weapon bases.

This was a high risk publicity stunt, and it took 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal. It also makes him look like a major hypocrite for saying this, after tweeting several years ago that Obama should get congressional approval. Syria, Russia, and Iran are already spinning this to shame America. Hell, America should be ashamed for its weak armed imperialism.

It accomplishes a lot for the defense lobby and that massive budget busting defense spending increase they and Trump want.
 
These idiots don't even realize that you DON'T want to hit the chemical weapons, because of the obvious risk of unleashing them on the surrounding areas.

What "idiots", are you addressing?

The storage facility was known and the missiles were programmed to avoid those facilities.

Meanwhile, with the exception of Syria, Iran, and Russia, the world applauds along with even Democrats in congress.

The ones who are bitching that we didn't hit the chemical weapons.

How do you know we didn't hit chemical weapons? Syria and Russia are certainly not going to admit they were there to be hit, and as I mentioned in another thread, there is probably a reason why all the missiles were fired in such quick succession... so that once the initial missile blew up the chemical weapons the next wave would explode and burn up the chemicals in the air.
 
I was watching the news this morning and the news outlets had satellite photos of before and after. Where were you? Over at CNN or MSNBC? Have they announced the chemical attack yet?

I've seen satelite images and video footage. Not a single hit on the airfield or hardened aircraft shelters. 100 million dollars for zero kills. Eat crow you fucking idiot!
$20 says you get your information from the fucking Russians, Iranians or Syrians.

$1000 says you are wrong about "Not a single hit on the airfield or hardened aircraft shelters." Payment in American dollars, not your foreign shit.
 
Honestly, I believe when the numbers come out on this the United States is going to look more pathetic than ever. A weak, irrational, and impulsive Trump switches his entire foreign policy stance in a day due to some graphic videos, and signs off on a costly missile strike on an airfield that was probably evacuated...

1. Immediately after the chemical attack, when they relocated their air assets to prevent something like this from happening

2. When Donald red phoned the Russians, and they told their Syrian allies to move their air assets from the chemical weapon bases.

This was a high risk publicity stunt, and it took 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal. It also makes him look like a major hypocrite for saying this, after tweeting several years ago that Obama should get congressional approval. Syria, Russia, and Iran are already spinning this to shame America. Hell, America should be ashamed for its weak armed imperialism.
Well it did put some holes in the ground Wonder if that 23 hits out of 59 is true? And yes it could very well have been a stunt to fool people into thinking putin isn't trumps pal
 
If they haven't released imagery how do you know what was damaged?

I know that any competent commander would of relocated their air assets following a high profile chemical attack. If they didn't do that, then they definitely would of after the Russians informed them of an upcoming missile strike.

Derp.


BTW what happened to their high technology Russian missle defense system.... LMFAO....




.

As far as I know only Patriot missile system has that capability. Putin deployed S400/300 after Turkey shot down 2 fighter planes last year. Both system are designed to take down aircraft but not missile.
 
If they haven't released imagery how do you know what was damaged?

I know that any competent commander would of relocated their air assets following a high profile chemical attack. If they didn't do that, then they definitely would of after the Russians informed them of an upcoming missile strike.

Derp.


BTW what happened to their high technology Russian missle defense system.... LMFAO....




.

Some moron on another thread is claiming 36 of 60 Tomahawks were interpreted....LMAO

I coulda swear you were on the Russian side-------- So what happened? You switched sides.
 
The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?


More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?
 
The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?


More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?

More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.
 
Leftist have about as much knowledge of military operations as a kindergarten failure has about brain surgery. You prove your stupidity every time you post.
 
The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?


More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?

More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.

They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in? :dunno: Glad you aren't running the military.
 
The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?


More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?

More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.

They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in? :dunno: Glad you aren't running the military.

You think there aren't pumps on the fuel trucks that are probably there by now?
 
The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?


More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?

More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.

They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in? :dunno: Glad you aren't running the military.

You think there aren't pumps on the fuel trucks that are probably there by now?


You don't get it...and with your comments regarding the runway, you never will.
 

Forum List

Back
Top