Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't worry about the $100 million, Dr. Carson just found that Obama stole $500 BILLION from HUD. That is just one department of which the crooked Obama regime stole everything not nailed down.
They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in?Glad you aren't running the military.
I seen them go slower over head in Iraq and being shot down by small arms fire. Lucky shooting? Maybe
.
No you didn't.
Honestly, I believe when the numbers come out on this the United States is going to look more pathetic than ever. A weak, irrational, and impulsive Trump switches his entire foreign policy stance in a day due to some graphic videos, and signs off on a costly missile strike on an airfield that was probably evacuated...
1. Immediately after the chemical attack, when they relocated their air assets to prevent something like this from happening
2. When Donald red phoned the Russians, and they told their Syrian allies to move their air assets from the chemical weapon bases.
This was a high risk publicity stunt, and it took 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal. It also makes him look like a major hypocrite for saying this, after tweeting several years ago that Obama should get congressional approval. Syria, Russia, and Iran are already spinning this to shame America. Hell, America should be ashamed for its weak armed imperialism.
Honestly, I believe when the numbers come out on this the United States is going to look more pathetic than ever. A weak, irrational, and impulsive Trump switches his entire foreign policy stance in a day due to some graphic videos, and signs off on a costly missile strike on an airfield that was probably evacuated...
1. Immediately after the chemical attack, when they relocated their air assets to prevent something like this from happening
2. When Donald red phoned the Russians, and they told their Syrian allies to move their air assets from the chemical weapon bases.
This was a high risk publicity stunt, and it took 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal. It also makes him look like a major hypocrite for saying this, after tweeting several years ago that Obama should get congressional approval. Syria, Russia, and Iran are already spinning this to shame America. Hell, America should be ashamed for its weak armed imperialism.
They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in?
Fuel can be trucked in, returning the airport to operation, as we saw, less than 24 hours later. Patching a runway takes time to fix, a week or more.
The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
Why is the pentagon so slow to release satellite imagery? Maybe it has to do with Russia saying only half the missiles hit the airbase.
No one lies and bullshits more than pentagon officials. They better release some hard imagery that 100 million dollars and 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal did more than that in damage to the Syrians. I doubt it.
Honestly, I believe when the numbers come out on this the United States is going to look more pathetic than ever. A weak, irrational, and impulsive Trump switches his entire foreign policy stance in a day due to some graphic videos, and signs off on a costly missile strike on an airfield that was probably evacuated...
1. Immediately after the chemical attack, when they relocated their air assets to prevent something like this from happening
2. When Donald red phoned the Russians, and they told their Syrian allies to move their air assets from the chemical weapon bases.
This was a high risk publicity stunt, and it took 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal. It also makes him look like a major hypocrite for saying this, after tweeting several years ago that Obama should get congressional approval. Syria, Russia, and Iran are already spinning this to shame America. Hell, America should be ashamed for its weak armed imperialism.
A Su-24 takes 3,652 gallons per fill up. As Su-17 a measly 1,240 gallons per fill up. Standard Russian fuel trucks are about 5,000 gallons. With the fuel dumps gone, those trucks for would to make runs to the nearest fuel depot, probably taking hours. They'd need a fleet of trucks just to keep up the pace. Blowing up the fuel depot is better than trying to shoot up a fleet of trucks. I'm content to let the military experts who planned this mission do the target selecting.Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?The missiles destroyed aircraft, hardened hangars, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems and radar at the Shayrat Airfield.
U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack
More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?
More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.
They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in?
You think there aren't pumps on the fuel trucks that are probably there by now?
No it doesn't. It would not take anywhere near a week to fix.
No it doesn't. It would not take anywhere near a week to fix.
Tell that to concrete.
Airmen resurrect Iraqi airfield wrecked by ISIS, in time for Mosul fight
And it took some time to bring in the over 200 pieces of heavy equipment -- excavators, mixers, cranes, industrial saws, and specialized runway repair equipment known as "Super Kit" -- as well as supplies such as specialized heavy durability concrete used for runways.
Once all that was done, Isler said, the 29 airmen started work on Sept. 29. They cleared the trenches of debris, all the way down to the hard surface below, as well as identifying other damaged areas and cut that concrete out as well. They sawed off the edges of the holes to smooth them out. And then they tamped down earth, filled the holes with concrete, and cured it.
But after an intense three-week repair effort on the part of 29 airmen, Q-West, as it is informally known to troops, is once again receiving massive C-130 Hercules aircraft.
A Su-24 takes 3,652 gallons per fill up. As Su-17 a measly 1,240 gallons per fill up. Standard Russian fuel trucks are about 5,000 gallons. With the fuel dumps gone, those trucks for would to make runs to the nearest fuel depot, probably taking hours. They'd need a fleet of trucks just to keep up the pace. Blowing up the fuel depot is better than trying to shoot up a fleet of trucks. I'm content to let the military experts who planned this mission do the target selecting.Yet they didn't touch the runways. You think the people guiding those extremely precise missiles just forgot to do that?
More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?
More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.
They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in?
You think there aren't pumps on the fuel trucks that are probably there by now?
Interesting to see you so hopeful for the Syrians and Russians to repair the damage.A Su-24 takes 3,652 gallons per fill up. As Su-17 a measly 1,240 gallons per fill up. Standard Russian fuel trucks are about 5,000 gallons. With the fuel dumps gone, those trucks for would to make runs to the nearest fuel depot, probably taking hours. They'd need a fleet of trucks just to keep up the pace. Blowing up the fuel depot is better than trying to shoot up a fleet of trucks. I'm content to let the military experts who planned this mission do the target selecting.More than likely they didn't touch the runway for a couple of reasons...First because Russia uses them too, and secondly why use a $500K missile to blow a hole in a runway that can be patched and fixed in a couple days for a couple thousand dollars? Doesn't make much sense does it?
More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.
They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in?
You think there aren't pumps on the fuel trucks that are probably there by now?
Of course Trucks would just be a temporary fix. Since there is no fire, I'm sure the pipeline that normally supplies their fuel is well along the way to repair.
You are comparing TWO YEARS worth of damage to a couple missiles... do you understand how ridiculous a comparison that is?
1) The Syrians and the Russians are not very cooperative in helping us with good pictures for CNN.Watch the news footage . They show the same 3 pictures of the damage . One of those plane huts was messed up . And maybe a jet or somthing was burned up .
Wanna bet the Russians have a heads up and the planes were gone before the attack ?
Watch the news footage . They show the same 3 pictures of the damage . One of those plane huts was messed up . And maybe a jet or somthing was burned up .
Wanna bet the Russians have a heads up and the planes were gone before the attack ?
Interesting to see you so hopeful for the Syrians and Russians to repair the damage.A Su-24 takes 3,652 gallons per fill up. As Su-17 a measly 1,240 gallons per fill up. Standard Russian fuel trucks are about 5,000 gallons. With the fuel dumps gone, those trucks for would to make runs to the nearest fuel depot, probably taking hours. They'd need a fleet of trucks just to keep up the pace. Blowing up the fuel depot is better than trying to shoot up a fleet of trucks. I'm content to let the military experts who planned this mission do the target selecting.More cost effective to blow up a fuel depot that can be up and running in a couple of hours, as soon as they can get the trucks there? This is nothing but a distraction. The idiot solved nothing. Great publicity stunt though.
They blew up the entire fuel depot...that means not just the fuel, but the pumps, and the buildings. So you think it is a smart idea to fly a $500K missile into the ground on purpose to create a hole that can just be filled in?
You think there aren't pumps on the fuel trucks that are probably there by now?
Of course Trucks would just be a temporary fix. Since there is no fire, I'm sure the pipeline that normally supplies their fuel is well along the way to repair.
What's the matter, Oink...afraid you might not get your check this month?Honestly, I believe when the numbers come out on this the United States is going to look more pathetic than ever. A weak, irrational, and impulsive Trump switches his entire foreign policy stance in a day due to some graphic videos, and signs off on a costly missile strike on an airfield that was probably evacuated...
1. Immediately after the chemical attack, when they relocated their air assets to prevent something like this from happening
2. When Donald red phoned the Russians, and they told their Syrian allies to move their air assets from the chemical weapon bases.
This was a high risk publicity stunt, and it took 2% of the US tomahawk missile arsenal. It also makes him look like a major hypocrite for saying this, after tweeting several years ago that Obama should get congressional approval. Syria, Russia, and Iran are already spinning this to shame America. Hell, America should be ashamed for its weak armed imperialism.
