Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there proof of calling the criminal a name? And why does it matter if the F'ing criminal was called a name? We all saw the criminal attack them, grabbing their gun, which is automatic self defense.There is nothing phony when it comes to you, you are just as racist as these 3 clowns on trial. I guess it was phony when Travis McMichael stood over Ahmaud after he murdered him and called him an Fing Nword.
OH stop with the Bullshit---the coroners came up with drug tests that clearly show a lethal dose of drugs in the criminals system--meaning he died of drugs. YOu do know what lethal means right?
For Biden not have been cheating, you would have to believe that the dittering idiot got more votes than Obama while winning less than half of the counties that Obama did. Biden therefore cheated.
Is there proof of calling the criminal a name? And why does it matter if the F'ing criminal was called a name? We all saw the criminal attack them, grabbing their gun, which is automatic self defense.
No I prove everyday I am dealing with racist like you.You prove everyd that you're a racist...lol
A known thief by who? He jogged through that neighborhood all the time, so WTF was he reconing? Tell us what authority did they have to even try and arrest him and what were they arresting him for?There is NO WAY those 3 will be acquitted. NOT gonna happen. IMO, Aubery was a known thief, that he was doing some recon, got caught and rather than just accept the arrest, he fought with one of them over a shotgun.
That's the problem you AssUMe alot.I assume the gun was brought to the scene for a precaution in case Aubery was armed but I don't agree that they should have tried to make a citizen's arrest. They likely could have followed him or at least gotten good images of his face while waiting on cops to arrive. Either way, all three are headed to prison.
We will know if these 3 racist murderers walk out of that court room free men.It doesn't matter whether they are biased or not, it matters if they express their bias during interviews of being on a jury. Nobody knows what their biases may be until they state so.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-trial-jury-selected-georgia/6266635001/ahaum
All white except one juror. Lord the blacks is mad already. here comes blm . duck and cover.
You said it was the prosecutor now you are switching to the Judge and during the elections that was looked at by SEVERAL Judges not one.Judges do a lot of things people don't like. I have been telling you that since the election.
History shows us that black juries convict black defendants everyday, so that is bullshit. History shows us that All white juries have allowed white defendants to get away murdering black men since this country was founded. That is FACT.Why?
Because black jurors cannot be impartial? Yeah. That's pretty fucking clear. But, you don't even know what the fuck happened.
No the defense struck EVERY black juror but one, what the hell do you think the prosecutor was challenging in court.Take 48 potential juror.
They all randomly get a number from 1-48. They are seated in numerical order. Let's say that the 12 black jurors were seated at 3, 10, 12, 21, 22, 28, 31, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47. Both sides are going to strike the lowest numbered jurors because the first 12 (or alternate 13) remaining after all strikes are made get seated.
Prosecution strikes jurors 1, 7, 9, 10, 14, 18
Defense strikes 3, 6, 10, 12, 15, 21
They both struck juror 10. (happens way more than you might think)
That leaves 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 22, 20, 23, 24
There's your jury. The defense struck 4 blacks, leaving 8, but the seating works out to exclude all black jurors but 1.
It's really not that hard to see it happening.
There is NO WAY those 3 will be acquitted. NOT gonna happen. IMO, Aubery was a known thief, that he was doing some recon, got caught and rather than just accept the arrest, he fought with one of them over a shotgun. I assume the gun was brought to the scene for a precaution in case Aubery was armed but I don't agree that they should have tried to make a citizen's arrest. They likely could have followed him or at least gotten good images of his face while waiting on cops to arrive. Either way, all three are headed to prison.
That's because it is.Seems like utter bullshit to me.
Yes dumb ass it's on the video.Is there proof of calling the criminal a name?
What crime had he committed Turtleshit? Running why black, when did that become a crime?And why does it matter if the F'ing criminal was called a name? We all saw the criminal attack them, grabbing their gun, which is automatic self defense.
....but instead they filled it with friends and family of the McMichaels and you think that's fair.They should have just filled to jury panel with Aubrey's friends and family.
That's the only way YOU will see it as fair.
OH stop with the Bullshit---the coroners came up with drug tests that clearly show a lethal dose of drugs in the criminals system--meaning he died of drugs. YOu do know what lethal means right?
For Biden not have been cheating, you would have to believe that the dittering idiot got more votes than Obama while winning less than half of the counties that Obama did. Biden therefore cheated.
And the defense struck them for their stated bias as admitted by the Judge.History shows us that black juries convict black defendants everyday, so that is bullshit. History shows us that All white juries have allowed white defendants to get away murdering black men since this country was founded. That is FACT.
No the defense struck EVERY black juror but one, what the hell do you think the prosecutor was challenging in court.
The last thing justice needs is an all black jury presiding over a black criminal.
Ahmaud Arbery case in Georgia: 11 white jurors and just 1 Black man seated for trial
Sparks flew in Brunswick, Georgia, during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors based on race. In the end, just one Black man made it onto the jury of 12. All the others...www.ajc.com
Sparks flew during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors because of their race.
We can see where this is going.
The fix is in.
The last thing justice needs is an all black jury presiding over a black criminal.
Just like that - convictions would drop by 99.874%
Why?
Because black jurors cannot be impartial? Yeah. That's pretty fucking clear. But, you don't even know what the fuck happened.
Take 48 potential juror.
They all randomly get a number from 1-48. They are seated in numerical order. Let's say that the 12 black jurors were seated at 3, 10, 12, 21, 22, 28, 31, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47. Both sides are going to strike the lowest numbered jurors because the first 12 (or alternate 13) remaining after all strikes are made get seated.
Prosecution strikes jurors 1, 7, 9, 10, 14, 18
Defense strikes 3, 6, 10, 12, 15, 21
They both struck juror 10. (happens way more than you might think)
That leaves 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 22, 20, 23, 24
There's your jury. The defense struck 4 blacks, leaving 8, but the seating works out to exclude all black jurors but 1.
It's really not that hard to see it happening.
The defense used the stated bias of those jurors to strike them as evidenced by the Judges comment on it being discriminatory BUT they had justifiable reason. In other words the Judge whined about following the law.Great point.
However, if I read the OP's article right the defense actually did use 11 strikes on black jurors. The prosecution used 12 strikes on white jurors.
Prosecutor Linda Dunikoski said the attorneys representing Greg McMichael, his son Travis McMichael and their neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan used their allotted strikes to eliminate 11 of 12 prospective Black jurors from the qualified panel, leaving a mostly white jury to decide the high-profile case.
The takeaway from this is the defendants are supposed to be guaranteed a fair trial, but clearly attorneys on both sides thought skin color mattered. It was still a fair election process and I still think the jury will be impartial.
Proof?No the defense struck EVERY black juror but one, what the hell do you think the prosecutor was challenging in court.
