14 Republicans doing the bidding of the Democrats

All those well-regulated militia members who have shot up schools and movie theaters and grocery stores and churches and restaurants and......................


No...criminals did that.......criminals known to the government, and the government did nothing to arrest and jail them, or commit them.....two things which would prevent them from passing current, Federally mandated background checks....

These shootings are the failure of government........
 
All those well-regulated militia members who have shot up schools and movie theaters and grocery stores and churches and restaurants and......................
The Negros in the Democrat controlled big city shitholes are the ones that do the most shooting up in this country. That is where the great majority of the gun crime takes place in this country and the Democrat leadership won't even enforce the existing laws.
 
The truth.....

The Republicans are the really stupid party, the democrat party is the evil party......
Stupid is certainly relevant. However, I would be more inclined to say cowardly.
 
18 year olds are considered adults. They sure as hell can serve in the military and vote but the Democrat and RINO filth do not want them to have the same Constitutional rights as other America and that is despicable.
You mean that (D) and Rino's want to take away ALL guns from 18, 19 and 20 year olds?


The Constitutional Right is ......

Constitution of the United States
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say what kind of guns apply to "Keep and Bear Arms"
 
You mean that (D) and Rino's want to take away ALL guns from 18, 19 and 20 year olds?


The Constitutional Right is ......

Constitution of the United States
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say what kind of guns apply to "Keep and Bear Arms"


Wow....another one of those........

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.

We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001),

the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.

----
 
You mean that (D) and Rino's want to take away ALL guns from 18, 19 and 20 year olds?


The Constitutional Right is ......

Constitution of the United States
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say what kind of guns apply to "Keep and Bear Arms"
Infringements are more than just confiscation. Having to get permission for the filthy ass government to enjoy a right that is guaranteed to be Constitutional right and has been affirmed by the Supreme Court to be an individual right is certainly an infringement.
 
Yeah....they likely have their MSNBC contracts signed....
.

He was okay when he was in the State legislature but pulled a "Roberts" when he got to the Beltway.
Like Chief Justice Roberts, he started going to parties, shooting the breeze or whatever it is they do up there.
He got the attention of some Progressives, and his wife enjoyed the dinners and getting invited to functions.

So ... He tried to pull a "McCain" ... But more often found himself standing in the hallway with notecards
while the Press was chasing Senators Graham or Cruz around with cameras.

He voted very well on measures that didn't make a difference, but then threw in with the wrong crowd when it came to anything of substance.
Just lackluster, standard RINO garbage leaving a lot of folks here shaking their heads and laughing ... We have seen this all before.

He's Toast ... :auiqs.jpg:

.
 
There's value in not having young kids being adopted into the culture of war and murder with guns, but otherwise it's meaningless.

There 'is' the symbolic breakthrough! Maybe future Kyle's will be apprehended by police quicker.
That could cause more immediate violence and mass shootings in the short term.
 
You mean that (D) and Rino's want to take away ALL guns from 18, 19 and 20 year olds?


The Constitutional Right is ......

Constitution of the United States
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say what kind of guns apply to "Keep and Bear Arms"
Nowhere in the Constitution is any type of gun excluded from the people.
 
There's value in not having young kids being adopted into the culture of war and murder with guns, but otherwise it's meaningless.

There 'is' the symbolic breakthrough! Maybe future Kyle's will be apprehended by police quicker.
That could cause more immediate violence and mass shootings in the short term.
So, you oppose self-defense. Interesting.
 
they belonged to militias?
Bodecea likes to post essentially the same thing with minor variations about 1,000 times in a row.
He/ she currently likes to ramble on about "well regulated militias" as if he/she is making some kind of point.
 
There's value in not having young kids being adopted into the culture of war and murder with guns, but otherwise it's meaningless.

There 'is' the symbolic breakthrough! Maybe future Kyle's will be apprehended by police quicker.
That could cause more immediate violence and mass shootings in the short term.
My sons learned how to use firearms at an early age. They are safe and responsible.
 
18 year olds are considered adults. They sure as hell can serve in the military and vote but the Democrat and RINO filth do not want them to have the same Constitutional rights as other Americans and that is despicable.
So what? 14 year old girls could marry when they wrote the constitution. Perhaps 18 year olds today aren't as mature as they were back then.

Yes they can serve in the military. But they can't rent a car or hotel room. Why? Too immature.

They can have them when they turn 21.

It's despicable you won't let 19 year olds drink booze.
 
Bodecea likes to post essentially the same thing with minor variations about 1,000 times in a row.
He/ she currently likes to ramble on about "well regulated militias" as if he/she is making some kind of point.
Why did they write that part then? If it doesn't mean anything.
 

Forum List

Back
Top