bucs90
Gold Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 26,545
- 6,027
- 280
I post this all the time in these threads and rarely does anyone listen. Hopefully you will.
I was in law enforcement on the military side for 24 years.
Just because you put a person in cuffs does NOT mean they broke any laws, it does NOT mean you suspect them of any laws, it does NOT mean you are a mean racist.
It means you are taking them into custody and using cuffs to help ensure both your safety and theirs. Now it may SEEM silly to you that they placed a 14 year old in cuffs, BUT A) their training says place everyone in cuffs and B) their have been plenty of instances of 14 year olds committing acts of violence to necessitate the precaution.
If you're putting them in cuffs you're detaining them. If you're detaining them, you're arresting them. If you're arresting them, yes....you do need reasonable suspicion that they've commited some crime. And there was jack shit in this case. There was no bomb. Worse, no one accused him of making a bomb. The teacher who brought Ahmed to the principal said it was the 'infrastructure' for a bomb.
There were no explosives. Its impossible for it have been a bomb. No one that called the cops even *alleged* it was a bomb. If the cops were unsure what it was, investigate. Confiscate it. I have no problem with any of it.
But arresting the kid? Dragging him from the school in cuffs? That was simply unjustified.
Holy fuck you're stupid. Detained is NOT the same as arrested.
Reasonable suspicion is NOT the same as probable cause.
I can't tolerate stupidity at this level much longer.