protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,072
- 18,331
- 2,250
NO. "No Swimming does NOT mean don't go in the water. It only means don't swim. They need signs that also say to look out for alligators and no wading. This would be counter to business though.Not sure, but in a resort like that, and especially the lake being man made, I have to think that one would also think that the policy would have been no gators in the lake or pond were so many families and their children are visiting. It didn't have to have Gators in the pond or lake, so why were they there ?
It's Florida ... and they are a protected species. In fact, some 'Lizard Rights' vermin will probably sue over the gators they killed searching for the body. I'm not joking.
'No Swimming' means don't go in the water. A list of reasons why wouldn't fit on a sign, and most wouldn't read it anyway, just as happened in this tragedy.
Disney is clearly to blame for this, and should be sued for millions$$$$.
1. The shores of this lake look like a beach, that invites people to sit on the sand and wade in the water. It ought to have a grassy natural look, with an alligator fence around it, to keep people and dogs away from the water.
2. There should be alligator warning signs (which I see commonly see even beside small retention ponds) Instead, the only signs posted were > NO SWIMMING. That's not good enough.
This is how signs should be >>> Only with the small print bigger.
![ut_gatorplug_0618~1.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Farchive.sltrib.com%2Fimages%2F2005%2F0713%2Fut_gatorplug_0618%7E1.jpg&hash=69e26b2f51b7e56fcbe5f51325aabb50)
or this >>>