Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
another Einstein.another "lookie what I found" poster who does not understand how business works.
Hey Sparky.....I bet you would consider it a good idea if you owned a building to hold your press conferences in another building and pay THAT owner the fee for use of the building.
Nice reach.....just makes you look like an ass.
Nah....you made that up. There is absolutely nothing wrong with what he did. To the contrary...if he did not use the most "cost effective" venues, you would be all over the board complaining about that.yep. I just posted the same thing. sorry I didn't see your thread first... the FEC is not happy about the orange overlord....
I suggest you grow up.
So you know for sure that every single one of those payments were about press conferences? Who are you? Mannafort?
And how do you know if was most "cost effective" if you didn't see other bids for those venues?
And this means what? That Trump's presidential bid is on file with the FEC?lol... hey, let the Federal Elections Commission sort out all the details, 'eh? I hear they've become a tad interested in all this broo-ha-ha,
Committee/Candidate Details
Monitoring his spending is what they are supposed to do.We'vve reached new lows in leftist stupidity. No small feat there.another "lookie what I found" poster who does not understand how business works.
Hey Sparky.....I bet you would consider it a good idea if you owned a building to hold your press conferences in another building and pay THAT owner the fee for use of the building.
Nice reach.....just makes you look like an ass.
that's bullshit.
[...]
Trump's campaign didn't respond to detailed questions about the intermingling of his businesses and campaign.
Trump isn't the first high-profile politician to run a campaign while managing large corporate assets. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and presidential contender Steve Forbes both ran companies bearing their name.
Both took great care to carefully separate their businesses and their campaigns, their former aides said, citing the complex maze of campaign finance regulations about using corporate resources. For instance, federal rules require a company to charge their campaigns fair-market value.
[...]
{video on website}
Trump's campaign cycles $6 million into Trump companies
lol... hey, let the Federal Elections Commission sort out all the details, 'eh? I hear they've become a tad interested in all this broo-ha-ha,
Committee/Candidate Details
Grow up.
Nah....nice try, but your continued responses shows me you are all hyped up. LOL...you even admitted to posting the same thing elsewhere.Nope. Not bullshit. What I say is fact. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using the most cost effective venue to run your campaign; even if it is something you own. It is known as being business smart.
There is nothing to debate here. Fact is fact.
You are simply a victim of an investigative reporter who knew you would get all hyped up over a piece like this. The reporter is well aware that most of his "haters" are not overly business savvy and would fall for it hook line and sinker.
And you did.
No need to debate this with me. Nothing illegal here. Move on and grow up
who's hyped up? what you call hyped up, I call feeling amused LOL...... i'll let the FEC decide, just like curiel will decide the trump U lawsuits.
And this means what? That Trump's presidential bid is on file with the FEC?lol... hey, let the Federal Elections Commission sort out all the details, 'eh? I hear they've become a tad interested in all this broo-ha-ha,
Committee/Candidate Details
I hope the rest of America hasn't dumbed down this much.
I never asked them not to do their job.Monitoring his spending is what they are supposed to do.We'vve reached new lows in leftist stupidity. No small feat there.another "lookie what I found" poster who does not understand how business works.
Hey Sparky.....I bet you would consider it a good idea if you owned a building to hold your press conferences in another building and pay THAT owner the fee for use of the building.
Nice reach.....just makes you look like an ass.
that's bullshit.
[...]
Trump's campaign didn't respond to detailed questions about the intermingling of his businesses and campaign.
Trump isn't the first high-profile politician to run a campaign while managing large corporate assets. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and presidential contender Steve Forbes both ran companies bearing their name.
Both took great care to carefully separate their businesses and their campaigns, their former aides said, citing the complex maze of campaign finance regulations about using corporate resources. For instance, federal rules require a company to charge their campaigns fair-market value.
[...]
{video on website}
Trump's campaign cycles $6 million into Trump companies
lol... hey, let the Federal Elections Commission sort out all the details, 'eh? I hear they've become a tad interested in all this broo-ha-ha,
Committee/Candidate Details
Grow up.
yes. that is their job. so why not let them? you sound hyped up. lol.
Nah....nice try, but your continued responses shows me you are all hyped up. LOL...you even admitted to posting the same thing elsewhere.Nope. Not bullshit. What I say is fact. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using the most cost effective venue to run your campaign; even if it is something you own. It is known as being business smart.
There is nothing to debate here. Fact is fact.
You are simply a victim of an investigative reporter who knew you would get all hyped up over a piece like this. The reporter is well aware that most of his "haters" are not overly business savvy and would fall for it hook line and sinker.
And you did.
No need to debate this with me. Nothing illegal here. Move on and grow up
who's hyped up? what you call hyped up, I call feeling amused LOL...... i'll let the FEC decide, just like curiel will decide the trump U lawsuits.
The FEC has already decided.....nothing to see here......but, of course, you did not read that anywhere so it must not be true.
Grow up.
Of course it is. The FEC has a file on all presidential candidates. That's their job.Monitoring his spending is what they are supposed to do.We'vve reached new lows in leftist stupidity. No small feat there.another "lookie what I found" poster who does not understand how business works.
Hey Sparky.....I bet you would consider it a good idea if you owned a building to hold your press conferences in another building and pay THAT owner the fee for use of the building.
Nice reach.....just makes you look like an ass.
that's bullshit.
[...]
Trump's campaign didn't respond to detailed questions about the intermingling of his businesses and campaign.
Trump isn't the first high-profile politician to run a campaign while managing large corporate assets. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and presidential contender Steve Forbes both ran companies bearing their name.
Both took great care to carefully separate their businesses and their campaigns, their former aides said, citing the complex maze of campaign finance regulations about using corporate resources. For instance, federal rules require a company to charge their campaigns fair-market value.
[...]
{video on website}
Trump's campaign cycles $6 million into Trump companies
lol... hey, let the Federal Elections Commission sort out all the details, 'eh? I hear they've become a tad interested in all this broo-ha-ha,
Committee/Candidate Details
Grow up.
yes. that is their job. so why not let them? you sound hyped up. lol.
wow.This whole FEC filing demonstrates the Trump is in it for Trump and if he can make money off of the stupidity of his fans, he will.
It also demonstrates that the Republicans have pretty much disowned his skanky ass.
Libs still bent out of shape about how other people spend their own money... p
Ah...so that's the direction you tend to go.Nah....nice try, but your continued responses shows me you are all hyped up. LOL...you even admitted to posting the same thing elsewhere.Nope. Not bullshit. What I say is fact. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using the most cost effective venue to run your campaign; even if it is something you own. It is known as being business smart.
There is nothing to debate here. Fact is fact.
You are simply a victim of an investigative reporter who knew you would get all hyped up over a piece like this. The reporter is well aware that most of his "haters" are not overly business savvy and would fall for it hook line and sinker.
And you did.
No need to debate this with me. Nothing illegal here. Move on and grow up
who's hyped up? what you call hyped up, I call feeling amused LOL...... i'll let the FEC decide, just like curiel will decide the trump U lawsuits.
The FEC has already decided.....nothing to see here......but, of course, you did not read that anywhere so it must not be true.
Grow up.
of course I posted it, because it's worthy of discussion. if you think it's nothing, then why are you still here? lol. here this is just for you:
Nah....nice try, but your continued responses shows me you are all hyped up. LOL...you even admitted to posting the same thing elsewhere.Nope. Not bullshit. What I say is fact. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using the most cost effective venue to run your campaign; even if it is something you own. It is known as being business smart.
There is nothing to debate here. Fact is fact.
You are simply a victim of an investigative reporter who knew you would get all hyped up over a piece like this. The reporter is well aware that most of his "haters" are not overly business savvy and would fall for it hook line and sinker.
And you did.
No need to debate this with me. Nothing illegal here. Move on and grow up
who's hyped up? what you call hyped up, I call feeling amused LOL...... i'll let the FEC decide, just like curiel will decide the trump U lawsuits.
The FEC has already decided.....nothing to see here......but, of course, you did not read that anywhere so it must not be true.
Grow up.
I never asked them not to do their job.Monitoring his spending is what they are supposed to do.We'vve reached new lows in leftist stupidity. No small feat there.that's bullshit.
[...]
Trump's campaign didn't respond to detailed questions about the intermingling of his businesses and campaign.
Trump isn't the first high-profile politician to run a campaign while managing large corporate assets. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and presidential contender Steve Forbes both ran companies bearing their name.
Both took great care to carefully separate their businesses and their campaigns, their former aides said, citing the complex maze of campaign finance regulations about using corporate resources. For instance, federal rules require a company to charge their campaigns fair-market value.
[...]
{video on website}
Trump's campaign cycles $6 million into Trump companies
lol... hey, let the Federal Elections Commission sort out all the details, 'eh? I hear they've become a tad interested in all this broo-ha-ha,
Committee/Candidate Details
Grow up.
yes. that is their job. so why not let them? you sound hyped up. lol.
Seems you just did not know that listing his expenses was their job. You seemed excited to show how they listed them.
So I decided to edumucate you.
After all...someone has to.
So?Nah....nice try, but your continued responses shows me you are all hyped up. LOL...you even admitted to posting the same thing elsewhere.Nope. Not bullshit. What I say is fact. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using the most cost effective venue to run your campaign; even if it is something you own. It is known as being business smart.
There is nothing to debate here. Fact is fact.
You are simply a victim of an investigative reporter who knew you would get all hyped up over a piece like this. The reporter is well aware that most of his "haters" are not overly business savvy and would fall for it hook line and sinker.
And you did.
No need to debate this with me. Nothing illegal here. Move on and grow up
who's hyped up? what you call hyped up, I call feeling amused LOL...... i'll let the FEC decide, just like curiel will decide the trump U lawsuits.
The FEC has already decided.....nothing to see here......but, of course, you did not read that anywhere so it must not be true.
Grow up.
You're full of shit. The filing was just released last night.
FFS, the man didn't get rich that by being an idiot!
Nope he inherited it. To keep it he swindles people out of money like how he's doing his supporters now
Bulllshit.
The leftist in this board are so desperate. It must feel daunting to have absolutely nothing.
So you have a problem with Trump spending my / our money but you have no problem with Hillary 'losing' $6 Billion or Obama having LIED to us about taking (stealing) $500 MILLION for Zika virus but REALLY giving it to the UN to support their latest Global Warming initiative?!Libs still bent out of shape about how other people spend their own money... p
He's spending your money
Now THAT is true 'partisanship'!
Ah...so that's the direction you tend to go.Nah....nice try, but your continued responses shows me you are all hyped up. LOL...you even admitted to posting the same thing elsewhere.Nope. Not bullshit. What I say is fact. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using the most cost effective venue to run your campaign; even if it is something you own. It is known as being business smart.
There is nothing to debate here. Fact is fact.
You are simply a victim of an investigative reporter who knew you would get all hyped up over a piece like this. The reporter is well aware that most of his "haters" are not overly business savvy and would fall for it hook line and sinker.
And you did.
No need to debate this with me. Nothing illegal here. Move on and grow up
who's hyped up? what you call hyped up, I call feeling amused LOL...... i'll let the FEC decide, just like curiel will decide the trump U lawsuits.
The FEC has already decided.....nothing to see here......but, of course, you did not read that anywhere so it must not be true.
Grow up.
of course I posted it, because it's worthy of discussion. if you think it's nothing, then why are you still here? lol. here this is just for you:
Cya.
So you have a problem with Trump spending my / our money but you have no problem with Hillary 'losing' $6 Billion or Obama having LIED to us about taking (stealing) $500 MILLION for Zika virus but REALLY giving it to the UN to support their latest Global Warming initiative?!Libs still bent out of shape about how other people spend their own money... p
He's spending your money
what I get a kick out of is how they are all about how Trump likely did something wrong...even though they are not investigating him...So you have a problem with Trump spending my / our money but you have no problem with Hillary 'losing' $6 Billion or Obama having LIED to us about taking (stealing) $500 MILLION for Zika virus but REALLY giving it to the UN to support their latest Global Warming initiative?!Libs still bent out of shape about how other people spend their own money... p
He's spending your money
