2000 mules continues to do real damage.

[Soupnazi630]

I think that fascism has a foothold and this movie with it's lies and exaggerations just reinforces it.

Without the preconditioning by Trump, the movie is an obvious fraud.

I fear there's no way back to democracy for America now. Trump and the Republicans will come to power and there will be no way at to remove them.

If there even are ballot boxes, they will be fixed in the hands of the fascists.

Antifa has no access to these ballot boxes and they are the closest thing we have to fascists

 

[Orangecat]

Teaching you how to think boy be silent around your betters

Learn to use commas and periods, you illiterate imbecile.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Learn to use commas and periods, you illiterate imbecile.

Learn a litte about reality you out of touch fool

 

[Lastamender]

Antifa has no access to these ballot boxes and they are the closest thing we have to fascists

They are also Democrats.

 

[Orangecat]

Learn a litte about reality you out of touch fool

What does "litte" mean, you illiterate imbecile?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We" as in your opposing side dummy.

Yes, I understand English. But it is a lie, and no, neither you or they have that. Liar.

 

[Skylar]

You know it's working because lefty is totally preoccupied with discrediting it.

Lefty never wastes time and energy on things that don't matter and THIS IS MATTERING in a big way! The purpose of the movie is not to change minds... no one will change their mind. But those who already thought there was probably a steal are being solidified and will definitely not change their minds to the other way of thinking now and that is a pretty big accomplishment. The greatest flattery to the movie is the fact that the fact checkers have taken up the cause. These organizations are better known as professional liars, re-liars and re-re-liars to anyone who knows better now.

Nothing could convince me more that the movie is dead on than the fact that the fact checkers is have decided to pay attention to it.

Jo

And by 'mattering', you mean acknowledging that this is yet another silly conspiracy that can't pass an even casual review of the evidence?

For example: where did the 380,000 ballots come from? Each ballot belongs to a specific person and is has an accompanying signature that is matched.

In the land of batshit and tinfoil, were there 380,000 'co-conspirators'?

 

[Skylar]

Who has jurisdiction. Has any police agency asked the film makers for anything

The filmmakers turned over their 'evidence' to law enforcement. They were laughed out of the building, .....with the police contradicting even the most basic assumptions of the conspiracy.

With D’Souza claiming that geo tracking is accurate within a few feet. And the police acknowledging that its more like 100 ft.

 

[Skylar]

What police agency would not if the evidence were valid?

Nothing says 'the evidence is valid' like the filmmakers making up 'maps' of US city polling places.....that turn out to be a map of Moscow.

If their arguments had merit, they wouldn't need to make up maps and lie about their findings.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Nothing says 'the evidence is valid' like the filmmakers making up 'maps' of US city polling places.....that turn out to be a map of Moscow.

If their arguments had merit, they wouldn't need to make up maps and lie about their findings.

Did they really do that?

 

[Skylar]

Did they really do that?

They did. They displayed a graphic of what they insinuated was Atlanta, but had a big winding river running through it.

Atlanta has no big river winding through it. It turns out of it the 2000 Mules 'map of atlanta' was horizontally inverted map of downtown Moscow.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They did. They displayed a graphic of what they insinuated was Atlanta, but had a big winding river running through it.

Atlanta has no big river winding through it. It turns out of it the 2000 Mules 'map of atlanta' was horizontally inverted map of downtown Moscow.

Yep.

As with all the lies in the movie, D'Souza's response is that it was a dramatization of the evidence he has never actually seen, but which the filmmakers DEFINITELY have.

I wonder if they have thought about making a movie to present their evidence?

Theater of the absurd

 

[toobfreak]

The irony is that the Democrat voter fraud crimes and election rigging crimes are the real threat to "democracy".

It's just an old soviet ploy that the democrats have picked up and copied to oppress anyone rocking the State's boat. Whatever they are doing or guilty of, they set up the other side hoping to blame on them and make them take the fall for.

 

[Skylar]

Yep.

As with all the lies in the movie, D'Souza's response is that it was a dramatization of the evidence he has never actually seen, but which the filmmakers DEFINITELY have.

I wonder if they have thought about making a movie to present their evidence?

Theater of the absurd

Then we're getting 'second hand' evidence....with no direct access to what they claim to be representing.

Which begs the question: does 'True the Vote' know what the fuck they're talking about? Did they accurately place the polling stations...as the graphics in the movie of the location of polling station locations is MILES off of the actually polling stations. If the graphics are inaccurate, is the map that True the Vote used in their 'analysis' accurate?

Signs point to no. As the law enforcement to review the 'evidence' resoundingly rejected it as indicating any crime.

 

[Lastamender]

And by 'mattering', you mean acknowledging that this is yet another silly conspiracy that can't pass an even casual review of the evidence?

For example: where did the 380,000 ballots come from? Each ballot belongs to a specific person and is has an accompanying signature that is matched.

In the land of batshit and tinfoil, were there 380,000 'co-conspirators'?

Those signatures were not matched and the envelopes are missing. Video from GA. drop boxes has been destroyed. Why if there was no fraud?

 

[Lastamender]

Then we're getting 'second hand' evidence....with no direct access to what they claim to be representing.

Which begs the question: does 'True the Vote' know what the fuck they're talking about? Did they accurately place the polling stations...as the graphics in the movie of the location of polling station locations is MILES off of the actually polling stations. If the graphics are inaccurate, is the map that True the Vote accurate?

Signs point to no. As the law enforcement to review the 'evidence' resoundingly rejected it as indicating any crime.

Prove that. Show us how you know that. The SCOTUS and the NYT says geo tracking is precise. You assholes got caught by the same technology used to censor any mention of fraud.

 

[Skylar]

Those signatures were not matched and the envelopes are missing. Video from GA. drop boxes has been destroyed. Why if there was no fraud?

Says who?

Would that be Gabriel Sterling, the voting system implementation manager for the Secretary of State of Georgia? Would that be Brad Raffensperger, the Secretary of State of Georgia?

Who are you quoting?

 

[Lastamender]

Says who?

Would that be Gabriel Sterling, the voting system implementation manager for the Secretary of State of Georgia? Would that be Brad Raffensperger, the Secretary of State of Georgia?

Who are you quoting?

Those two corrupt Trump hating assholes have 0 credibility. And this is about actual data that is still out there. Why has no one tried to analyze that data and prove it is false?

Guess what it will not happen because it cannot be disproven. It is there and it will not change for eternity.

 

[Skylar]

Prove that. Show us how you know that. The SCOTUS and the NYT says geo tracking is precise. You assholes got caught by the same technology used to censor any mention of fraud.

I'm not quoting me. I'm quoting the law enforcement who reviewed the evidence. They put the Geotracking accurate at 100 ft.

 

[Skylar]

Those two corrupt Trump hating assholes have 0 credibility.

Laughing.....so you're ignoring the voting system implementation manager for the Secretary of State of Georgia, AND the Secretary of State of Georgia.

Who then are you quoting? You've already ignoring the two most authoritative sources in a position to know what they're talking about.