jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,218
- 29,148
Notice how you didn't really say anything?Go ahead, it won't change the fact that the physical evidence refutes your religion. Nor will it change the fact that your cult continually engages in fraud to force figures to fit.
Hottest year on record, 1934. BUT that doesn't fit with the doctrine of the church, so let's just change those temperatures to something that works for the faith?
That ain't science, that's fraud.
You AGW fools are no different than the Catholic Church of the 1300's.
I don't care if you have consensus that the sun orbits the earth. I don't care if you have a computer model that the earth is the center of the universe.
Yes, you will destroy anyone who questions church doctrine, using the coercion of the church to keep any study of forbidden ideas away from questioning minds.
You are the herald of the new dark ages, where knowledge is suppressed in favor of "consensus."
Weren't you challenged with finding a credible source that denies climate change? You know, a reputable organization that doesn't cater to wingnuts, conspiracy theorists or the oil industry? You asked me to name organizations that not funded by the government that see climate change as real and that was an easy task. Now it's your turn.
Only orgs that support the AGW hocus pocus are reputable,
According to your definition of "reputable,"
I haven't found a reputable one that doesn't believe in the science of climate change. And of all people I certainly don't expect you to be capable of proving differently.
You still think your so smart and that only you are the arbiter of who and what is reputable.. Arguing with an idiot is pointless..
Notice how you didn't really say anything?
Funny I was thinking the same thing of you.