Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not true...he took the salt away from the rich...don't you remember the dems in NY and NJ screaming their greedy lungs out over it...Trump took goodies from wealthy and you dems don't even know it....nice media we have in America....Trump didn't write the budget nor did he have much of anything to do with it. While I agree when you are $30 trillion in debt you don't give millionaire's tax breaks to buy cars, Trump didn't strip squat.
Of course, it does.............................when a democrat is in office.On top of the 28-30 trillion we already owe. We need to paydown debt, not create more. It destabilizes the economy, weakens the dollar and it leads to more debt.
Yeah, I remember.Not true...he took the salt away from the rich...don't you remember the dems in NY and NJ screaming their greedy lungs out over it...Trump took goodies from wealthy and you dems don't even know it....nice media we have in America....
Youre fucking delusional.Or Republican.
That doesn't change the fact that we're talking about $350 B a year. Less actually because of savings in the bill.
Trump said that to wealthy earners...people who own businesses and work for a living...the dems seem only interested in protecting their donors and the non working wealthy...the people that have zero income but are super rich.....Yeah, I remember.
December 24, 2017
President Trump kicked off his holiday weekend at Mar-a-Lago Friday night at a dinner where he told friends, "You all just got a lot richer," referencing the sweeping tax overhaul he signed into law hours earlier.
The president has spent many weekends of his presidency so far at the "Winter White House," where initiation fees cost $200,000, annual dues cost $14,000, and some of the most affluent members of society have the opportunity to interact with the president in a setting while many Americans cannot.
Not true...he took the salt away from the rich...don't you remember the dems in NY and NJ screaming their greedy lungs out over it...Trump took goodies from wealthy and you dems don't even know it....nice media we have in America...
Sure Trump did.Trump said that to wealthy earners...people who own businesses and work for a living...the dems seem only interested in protecting their donors and the non working wealthy...the people that have zero income but are super rich.....
The bottom line remains, the president can't strip anything out of the spending bills sent his way. All he can do is sign or veto the whole thing, and that's why Congress keeps sending up those massive omnibus spending bills stuffed to the gills will garbage spending.Trump didn't write the budget nor did he have much of anything to do with it. While I agree when you are $30 trillion in debt you don't give millionaire's tax breaks to buy cars, Trump didn't strip squat.
The bottom line remains, the president can't strip anything out of the spending bills sent his way. All he can do is sign or veto the whole thing, and that's why Congress keeps sending up those massive omnibus spending bills stuffed to the gills will garbage spending.
Neither side is any different when it comes to running up the debt. It isn’t smart and if morons can’t get over ”well the other side does it.” That is the problem, neither side wants to take any responsibility for the massive debt. This is what happens when a two party system works for the rich and special interests in stead of the people who voted them in.Of course, it does.............................when a democrat is in office.
When a republican is in office, it's called..................capitalism.
True but only ONE party are self-described "conservatives", that consistently, whine about spending and the debt/deficit, when they are not in office, they have done it since they lost to Clinton, decades ago.Neither side is any different when it comes to running up the debt. It isn’t smart and if morons can’t get over ”well the other side does it.” That is the problem, neither side wants to take any responsibility for the massive debt. This is what happens when a two party system works for the rich and special interests in stead of the people who voted them in.
What they mean is that they are spending zero dollars of their moneyIt actually costs $0.
Left wing math.
That wasn't the rich. They did well with Trump's tax cuts.Not true...he took the salt away from the rich...don't you remember the dems in NY and NJ screaming their greedy lungs out over it...Trump took goodies from wealthy and you dems don't even know it....nice media we have in America....
That makes no difference to me, they both spend money we don’t have. I find both parties claim crap they are and are really not. Both are disgusting an neither should be trusted. The rich take care of their own first. That is all this bill is about.True but only ONE party are self-described "conservatives", that consistently, whine about spending and the debt/deficit, when they are not in office, they have done it since they lost to Clinton, decades ago.
Keep repeating it lemming. It is going to comeback and bite us and there will be no easy fix.This is a deficit economy
That's HOW it works.
And the government...unlike any other entity, ONLY pays the interest on loans.
Our national debt only costs us $370 billion. Less than half what we pay for Defense.
IF this 3.5T were added to the debt that interest payment (and that is not the case...very little will actually be added to the debt) it would be what? $420B?
Hardly unaffordable
www.itsuptous.org
www.pgpf.org
The crowding out effect has been discussed for over a hundred years in various forms. During much of this time, people thought of capital as being finite and confined to individual countries, which was largely the case due to lower volumes of international trade compared to the present day. In that context, increased taxation for public works projects and public spending could be directly linked to a reduction in the capacity for private spending within a given country, as less money was available.Keep repeating it lemming. It is going to comeback and bite us and there will be no easy fix.
Interest on the National Debt and its Economic Impact I Up To Us
What is the economic impact of the national debt? And who gets the interest paid on it? What does the national debt have to do with your wallet? Quite a bit, actually. Learn here and take action to raise your voice!The Fiscal & Economic Impact of the National Debt
See the consequences of our growing national debt and learn how our economic future is at risk if we fail to improve the U.S.’s current fiscal policy.
The crowding out effect has been discussed for over a hundred years in various forms. During much of this time, people thought of capital as being finite and confined to individual countries, which was largely the case due to lower volumes of international trade compared to the present day. In that context, increased taxation for public works projects and public spending could be directly linked to a reduction in the capacity for private spending within a given country, as less money was available.
The Crowding Out Effect vs. Crowding In
On the other hand, macroeconomic theories such as Chartalism and Post-Keynesian posit that government borrowing, in a modern economy operating significantly below capacity, can actually increase demand by generating employment, thereby stimulating private spending as well. This process is often referred to as "crowding in."
The crowding in theory has gained some currency among economists in recent years after it was noted that, during the Great Recession of 2007–2009, massive spending on the part of the federal government on bonds and other securities actually had the effect of reducing interest rates.1
