BREAKING: Supreme Court rules Trump is entitled to some immunity in Jan. 6 case

[pknopp]

I didn't avoid it numbnuts. I have you the constitutionality of it

And the justices found a protection that does NOT exist in the Constitution but struck down RvW over the same thing.

Massive hypocrisy.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The country has had it bad since then.

It was proven to the whole world that the two men running for POTUS are not qualified to visit the white house let alone be POTUS and now they have both been handed the world's biggest get out of jail free card

Thanks to the democrat weaponizing the justice department. You numbnuts were told this wasn't going to stand

 

[struth]

People need to pay attention.


"a former president’s official acts"

The cases against Trump are about actions outside of what are viewed as official duties. Can assassination of a political rival by the President be viewed as an official act? Yes. Wuld it be outside what are considered official duties? Yes.

So you are saying Xiden is going to be prosecuted for sending armed agents down to raid trump’s home? You might be right…though given the fact he is senile I doubt trump will prosecute him for that assassination attempt

 

[Jessica-stormlover]

This insanity should be tested properly. President Biden could officially order the justice department to designate Trump an enemy of the country and then order the military to eliminate that threat. And maybe while they are at it also take out the conservative members of the supreme court. All very officially of course.

​

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And the justices found a protection that does NOT exist in the Constitution but struck down RvW over the same thing.

Massive hypocrisy.

It's a states right issue so yes the ninth amendment and the 10th amendment

 

[bigrebnc1775]

This insanity should be tested properly. President Biden could officially order the justice department to designate Trump an enemy of the country and then order the military to eliminate that threat. And maybe while they are at it also take out the conservative members of the supreme court. All very officially of course.

​

Try it numbnuts

 

[crossbody]

You support giving even more power to the government?

We support removing absolute legal conviction power from the democrats

 

[two_iron]

Oh snap!!!


View attachment 969963


5 min ago

Scathing Sotomayor dissent: "The President is now a king above the law"​

Justice Sonia Sotomayor did not hold back in her dissent.

“Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends. Because if he knew that he may one day face liability for breaking the law, he might not be as bold and fearless as we would like him to be. That is the majority’s message today. Even if these nightmare scenarios never play out, and I pray they never do, the damage has been done. The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.”
“Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.”
“Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends. Because if he knew that he may one day face liability for breaking the law, he might not be as bold and fearless as we would like him to be. That is the majority’s message today.”

This is the one that's sick as fuck.... and will be replaced by President Trump's choice....

Hang in there for 6 more months bitch!!!

 

[pknopp]

It's a states right issue so yes the ninth amendment and the 10th amendment

That's not what they ruled. They ruled there is no protection in the Constitution. Here they found a protection that does not exist in the Constitution.

 

[Foxfyre]

The democrat party has has a no good, really fucking aweful, bad week...........

I said early on in 2016 that if Trump did absolutely nothing more than saving the high court from the neoMarxist totalitarian extreme leftism the Democrats et al are pushing that is tearing this country apart and would make the Court into something it was never ever intended to be, it would be worth my vote.

He did that.

I will still disagree with the Court from time to time I'm sure, but at least we are seeing sanity and constitutional principles returned to the process.

Thank you President Trump!!!!

 

[two_iron]

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

didn't take long for this thread to meet up with standards for the Taunting Arena.

I suggest Rubber Room.

 

[scruffy]

Oh snap!!!


View attachment 969963


5 min ago

Scathing Sotomayor dissent: "The President is now a king above the law"​

Justice Sonia Sotomayor did not hold back in her dissent.

“Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends. Because if he knew that he may one day face liability for breaking the law, he might not be as bold and fearless as we would like him to be. That is the majority’s message today. Even if these nightmare scenarios never play out, and I pray they never do, the damage has been done. The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.”
“Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.”
“Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends. Because if he knew that he may one day face liability for breaking the law, he might not be as bold and fearless as we would like him to be. That is the majority’s message today.”

Leftards are fucking morons.

The president has NEVER had total immunity.

Not once.

Not ever.

 

[two_iron]

"Elections have consequences" - anonymous muzzie faggot, circa 2009

 

[jbrownson0831]

Oh snap!!!


View attachment 969963


5 min ago

Scathing Sotomayor dissent: "The President is now a king above the law"​

Justice Sonia Sotomayor did not hold back in her dissent.

“Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends. Because if he knew that he may one day face liability for breaking the law, he might not be as bold and fearless as we would like him to be. That is the majority’s message today. Even if these nightmare scenarios never play out, and I pray they never do, the damage has been done. The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.”
“Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.”
“Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends. Because if he knew that he may one day face liability for breaking the law, he might not be as bold and fearless as we would like him to be. That is the majority’s message today.”

What's she griping about, Poopeypants has already been doing all these things.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

That's not what they ruled. They ruled there is no protection in the Constitution. Here they found a protection that does not exist in the Constitution.

It's a states rights issue numbnuts 9th and 10 th amendment

 

[two_iron]

 

[Foxfyre]

And then you prove all of my comments about this are correct.

No matter how many times you say that doesn't make it true. Sorry.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

5 min ago

Rep. Jim Jordan slams special counsel Jack Smith following Supreme Court's Trump immunity decision​

Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, a staunch ally of Donald Trump’s, has taken aim at special counsel Jack Smith following the Supreme Court’s decision that Trump could claim immunity for some actions he took while he was president.

Jordan called Smith “hyper-partisan” and claimed the decision showed he could not “weaponize the rule of law to go after the Administration’s chief political rival.”

“We hope that the Left will stop its attacks on President Trump and uphold democratic norms,” he wrote on X.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Did a search of Absolute Immunity and discussions surrounding presidential immunity.



Magadonians have no shame. All along they predicted absolute immunity. Now they act as if the immunity ruling is a win for Trump and likely to kill off prosecutions of their Leader.