Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The republicans have been trying to destroy Social Security since it was created.At the same time, the country is in dire need of an upgrade. Multiple bridges have collapsed and some roads were even converted to gravel because there weren’t funds to upkeep pavement. About 8,000 bridges are at risk of collapse but still carry 29 million drivers each day. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gives us a D+ rating on roads, bridges, waterways, electrical grids, and other systems. It also says the nation would need to spend $3.6 trillion by 2020 to get things back to a functioning level.Actually, it would help if the Democrats didn't divert the funds...
Congress Undermines America s Infrastructure by Looting the HighwayTrust Fund
A Funding "Crisis"?
The soon-to-be-empty trust fund is a direct consequence of recent congressional overspending in excess of the fuel tax revenues that replenish the fund as well as decades of congressional mandates allowing non-highway interests access to the highway trust fund. In FY 2008, these mandates are estimated to have diverted approximately 38 percent of trust fund spending to projects and programs of little value to the motorist's mobility needs.
Despite the fund's depletion, some in Congress are advocating that the next highway reauthorization bill (scheduled for October 2009) should include a very substantial increase in federal transportation spending. Leaders of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure want total spending raised from the current $286 billion to nearly a half a trillion dollars. Achieving this rate of spending would likely require a doubling of the federal fuel tax from its current level of 18.3 cents per gallon.
Those seeking more transportation spending justify the tax increase as the necessary cost of resolving the nation's infrastructure "crisis." But as this author noted in a recent piece in the Wilson Quarterly, the so-called crisis seems limited exclusively to the infrastructure managed by Congress, and legislative mismanagement-not the level of funding-is a large part of the problem.[2]
Raid on the Funds
Among the many reasons these congressional tax-and-spend schemes will fail to relieve worsening traffic congestion and road deterioration is that less than two-thirds of current federal surface transportation spending is devoted to the general purpose roads that the typical motorist or truck driver (who finances the fund) use in the ordinary course of travel. The other third goes to a growing collection of costly diversions that have little to do with the mobility needs of the average motorist or to the economically essential movement of freight.
In the last highway reauthorization bill (P.L. 109-59), the largest diversion from the authorized $52 billion in total spending from the highway trust fund (including $1.8 billion in general revenues) for FY 2008 is the $9.7 billion in direct spending for transit programs (trolleys, buses, commuter rail, etc.). Transit riders are also the greatest beneficiary of the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality program, which absorbs $1.7 billion from the trust fund. Although transit riders account for only 1.6 percent of surface travel passengers, they receive a subsidy from the motorists amounting to approximately 20 percent of trust fund spending.
Other fund diversions include the Enhancement program ($647 million), the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) ($470 million), Recreational Trails ($80 million), and a transfer of $925 million to the Department of Interior for roads in national parks and forests. Altogether these leakages will absorb more than 26 percent of fund spending in 2008.
The next largest series of diversions are the four major earmarked programs: High Priority Projects, Projects of Regional and National Significance, Transportation Projects (Section 1934 of P.L. 109-59), and the National Corridor Infrastructure Improvement Program. All are authorized to spend $4.5 billion, bringing the diversion share to 35 percent.
About $155 million will be spent on scenic byways, ferry boats, magnetic levitation and tax evasion deterrence, while $408 million will be spent on administrative overhead. More than $570 million will be spent on another twelve mandated programs, including bicycles, racial profiling, historic covered bridges, community preservation, innovative finance, and Safe Routes to Schools (which also supports bicycles). Bringing up the rear are the federally mandated Metropolitan Planning Organizations-whose focus is increasingly directed to land use planning, transit and economic development-which receive $302 million.
Motorists Ripped Off
Altogether, these diversions absorb an estimated $19.6 billion in trust fund spending, or about 38 percent of the total spent from the trust fund. As a consequence, motorists will receive only about 62 percent of what they have paid into the fund for general purpose roads and safety programs. Redeploying these diverted funds back to roads used by the motorists and truckers who fund the system would yield the equivalent of a 50 percent increase in new spending for road improvements and capacity increases.
Conversely, to achieve the same goal by increasing taxes would require a tax increase of $1.67 for each dollar to be spent on roads, since the extra $0.67 would be required by the existing diversions, which traditionally share equally in any funding increase. Thus, in order to return the lost $19.6 billion to roads, fuel taxes would have to be increased by $32.7 billion. These wasted funds are a key reason why the nation's roads are in such bad shape and why congestion is getting worse.
Even More Diversions
Although the sensible policy response would be to pare back the number and cost of the existing diversions, some in Congress have already introduced legislation that would add even more diversions to the depleted trust fund. In 2008, Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) introduced S.3360 to give Amtrak access to the highway trust fund to purchase new railcars. Bill co-sponsor Senator Tom Carper (D-Del.) claims that the legislation would divert $400 million each year in motorist-paid gas taxes to Amtrak, which serves only one half of 1 percent of intercity passenger travel.
Another potential major diversion could come from Representative Jim Oberstar's (D-Minn.) H.R. 3246 (the Regional Economic and Infrastructure Development Act of 2007), which would authorize federal funding for five new regional commissions that would be similar to the ARC, which has access to the highway trust fund. Although the bill in its current form does not give these new commissions such access, it is likely that its final version would include that privilege in order to create regional parity and because the Delta Regional Authority, which will be reconstituted as a "commission" under H.R. 3246, already has access to the trust fund (Section 1308).
Beyond helping to keep Americans safe, investment in infrastructure brings dividends for the national economy. Standard & Poors has estimated that spending $1.3 billion in a year would create 29,000 jobs, add $2 billion to economic growth, and reduce the deficit by $200 million. That’s all in the short term; in the long term, infrastructure upgrades keep paying off long after the projects themselves end. Without that kind of investment, however, the country risks losing out on nearly $1 trillion in business sales, 3.5 million jobs, and more than $3.1 trillion in GDP by 2020, according to an estimate by the ASCE.
Republicans have blocked efforts to inject money into these projects, however. They blocked Obama’s $60 billion infrastructure proposal in 2011 and haven’t taken him up on the latest one. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) also recently stood firm against raising the gas tax, which sends money to the Highway Trust Fund.
It's the cons that have raided Social Security out of $3 trillion.
Really?
How did they do that?
#1 Asking Sharpton if he's been oppressed is like asking the nazi's if they hated Jews. And like the nazi's, racists DO KNOW, but don't care.1. Have any proof of the claim we need that spending? Thinkprogress is like asking Al Sharpton if he's been oppressed. The answer is they don't know and don't care, they're in it for the money.....and the cons are cutting infrastructure spending. By doing so, they are destroying the economy.
With Republican Obstruction A Last Resort For Fixing Our Roads And Bridges ThinkProgress
2. Do you have that FULL accounting of all the money we've spent in the past 10 years yet?
Yo moron, Raygun tripled the national debt in his eight years. Shrub daddy doubled it again in only four years. Clinton balanced the budget, which Shrub Jr. destroyed in six months and doubled the national debt yet again, adding more than all presidents added together. All you got is bullshit, and you know it.Hangover
Gee, it's kind of bad that the Democrats raided the Highway Trust Fund, isn't it?
And to think that taking ISIS out will cost more since Obama pulled our troops out of Iraq and gave them all of that top-of-the-line equipment, along with a lot more areas to operate from, thanks to his Arab Spring.
Evidently the Democrats need to learn a little fiscal responsibility.
the naples volcano eruption of 5000BC (give or take 25,000 years), yup, lack of funding.
Cons will tell you the world is only 6,000 year old. Only morons would believe that con....And Huckabee is one of those cons, and he's running for president.the naples volcano eruption of 5000BC (give or take 25,000 years), yup, lack of funding.
That goes, like, 18,000 years into the future.
Maybe you meant nipples ...
.
Cons will tell you the world is only 6,000 year old. Only morons would believe that con....And Huckabee is one of those cons, and he's running for president.the naples volcano eruption of 5000BC (give or take 25,000 years), yup, lack of funding.
That goes, like, 18,000 years into the future.
Maybe you meant nipples ...
.
joe bidens gaffs alone could of been avoided. not even with one billion dollars.Cons will tell you the world is only 6,000 year old. Only morons would believe that con....And Huckabee is one of those cons, and he's running for president.the naples volcano eruption of 5000BC (give or take 25,000 years), yup, lack of funding.
That goes, like, 18,000 years into the future.
Maybe you meant nipples ...
.
Joe Biden can launch a nuclear holocaust if Obama is too busy putting.
These things need a bit of perspective.
.
^^^^^A FUX NEWS devotee.^^^^^Stink Progress isn't a very reliable source
The republicans have been trying to destroy Social Security since it was created.At the same time, the country is in dire need of an upgrade. Multiple bridges have collapsed and some roads were even converted to gravel because there weren’t funds to upkeep pavement. About 8,000 bridges are at risk of collapse but still carry 29 million drivers each day. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gives us a D+ rating on roads, bridges, waterways, electrical grids, and other systems. It also says the nation would need to spend $3.6 trillion by 2020 to get things back to a functioning level.Actually, it would help if the Democrats didn't divert the funds...
Congress Undermines America s Infrastructure by Looting the HighwayTrust Fund
A Funding "Crisis"?
The soon-to-be-empty trust fund is a direct consequence of recent congressional overspending in excess of the fuel tax revenues that replenish the fund as well as decades of congressional mandates allowing non-highway interests access to the highway trust fund. In FY 2008, these mandates are estimated to have diverted approximately 38 percent of trust fund spending to projects and programs of little value to the motorist's mobility needs.
Despite the fund's depletion, some in Congress are advocating that the next highway reauthorization bill (scheduled for October 2009) should include a very substantial increase in federal transportation spending. Leaders of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure want total spending raised from the current $286 billion to nearly a half a trillion dollars. Achieving this rate of spending would likely require a doubling of the federal fuel tax from its current level of 18.3 cents per gallon.
Those seeking more transportation spending justify the tax increase as the necessary cost of resolving the nation's infrastructure "crisis." But as this author noted in a recent piece in the Wilson Quarterly, the so-called crisis seems limited exclusively to the infrastructure managed by Congress, and legislative mismanagement-not the level of funding-is a large part of the problem.[2]
Raid on the Funds
Among the many reasons these congressional tax-and-spend schemes will fail to relieve worsening traffic congestion and road deterioration is that less than two-thirds of current federal surface transportation spending is devoted to the general purpose roads that the typical motorist or truck driver (who finances the fund) use in the ordinary course of travel. The other third goes to a growing collection of costly diversions that have little to do with the mobility needs of the average motorist or to the economically essential movement of freight.
In the last highway reauthorization bill (P.L. 109-59), the largest diversion from the authorized $52 billion in total spending from the highway trust fund (including $1.8 billion in general revenues) for FY 2008 is the $9.7 billion in direct spending for transit programs (trolleys, buses, commuter rail, etc.). Transit riders are also the greatest beneficiary of the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality program, which absorbs $1.7 billion from the trust fund. Although transit riders account for only 1.6 percent of surface travel passengers, they receive a subsidy from the motorists amounting to approximately 20 percent of trust fund spending.
Other fund diversions include the Enhancement program ($647 million), the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) ($470 million), Recreational Trails ($80 million), and a transfer of $925 million to the Department of Interior for roads in national parks and forests. Altogether these leakages will absorb more than 26 percent of fund spending in 2008.
The next largest series of diversions are the four major earmarked programs: High Priority Projects, Projects of Regional and National Significance, Transportation Projects (Section 1934 of P.L. 109-59), and the National Corridor Infrastructure Improvement Program. All are authorized to spend $4.5 billion, bringing the diversion share to 35 percent.
About $155 million will be spent on scenic byways, ferry boats, magnetic levitation and tax evasion deterrence, while $408 million will be spent on administrative overhead. More than $570 million will be spent on another twelve mandated programs, including bicycles, racial profiling, historic covered bridges, community preservation, innovative finance, and Safe Routes to Schools (which also supports bicycles). Bringing up the rear are the federally mandated Metropolitan Planning Organizations-whose focus is increasingly directed to land use planning, transit and economic development-which receive $302 million.
Motorists Ripped Off
Altogether, these diversions absorb an estimated $19.6 billion in trust fund spending, or about 38 percent of the total spent from the trust fund. As a consequence, motorists will receive only about 62 percent of what they have paid into the fund for general purpose roads and safety programs. Redeploying these diverted funds back to roads used by the motorists and truckers who fund the system would yield the equivalent of a 50 percent increase in new spending for road improvements and capacity increases.
Conversely, to achieve the same goal by increasing taxes would require a tax increase of $1.67 for each dollar to be spent on roads, since the extra $0.67 would be required by the existing diversions, which traditionally share equally in any funding increase. Thus, in order to return the lost $19.6 billion to roads, fuel taxes would have to be increased by $32.7 billion. These wasted funds are a key reason why the nation's roads are in such bad shape and why congestion is getting worse.
Even More Diversions
Although the sensible policy response would be to pare back the number and cost of the existing diversions, some in Congress have already introduced legislation that would add even more diversions to the depleted trust fund. In 2008, Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) introduced S.3360 to give Amtrak access to the highway trust fund to purchase new railcars. Bill co-sponsor Senator Tom Carper (D-Del.) claims that the legislation would divert $400 million each year in motorist-paid gas taxes to Amtrak, which serves only one half of 1 percent of intercity passenger travel.
Another potential major diversion could come from Representative Jim Oberstar's (D-Minn.) H.R. 3246 (the Regional Economic and Infrastructure Development Act of 2007), which would authorize federal funding for five new regional commissions that would be similar to the ARC, which has access to the highway trust fund. Although the bill in its current form does not give these new commissions such access, it is likely that its final version would include that privilege in order to create regional parity and because the Delta Regional Authority, which will be reconstituted as a "commission" under H.R. 3246, already has access to the trust fund (Section 1308).
Beyond helping to keep Americans safe, investment in infrastructure brings dividends for the national economy. Standard & Poors has estimated that spending $1.3 billion in a year would create 29,000 jobs, add $2 billion to economic growth, and reduce the deficit by $200 million. That’s all in the short term; in the long term, infrastructure upgrades keep paying off long after the projects themselves end. Without that kind of investment, however, the country risks losing out on nearly $1 trillion in business sales, 3.5 million jobs, and more than $3.1 trillion in GDP by 2020, according to an estimate by the ASCE.
Republicans have blocked efforts to inject money into these projects, however. They blocked Obama’s $60 billion infrastructure proposal in 2011 and haven’t taken him up on the latest one. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) also recently stood firm against raising the gas tax, which sends money to the Highway Trust Fund.
It's the cons that have raided Social Security out of $3 trillion.
Really?
How did they do that?
Ronald Reagan and The Great Social Security Heist
Ronald Reagan and The Great Social Security Heist FedSmith.com
I love it when cons try to make "progressive" a dirty word. It exposes their desire to live in the stone age.^^^^^A FUX NEWS devotee.^^^^^Stink Progress isn't a very reliable source
How cute, you hate Fox but you worship TP a purely Progressive site
