3 people dead after gunman targeted Black people in Jacksonville

[2aguy]

More lies.

Those are facts…….and you are now called out on the racism of barak obama amd other black democrats and the white democrat party leaders…

 

[2aguy]

And today's republican party defends the confederacy.

Too many foolishly support Confederate flags as symbols of Federalism….they dont support racism or slave owning…that is all on the democrat party….a party you support with all of its racism

 

[IM2]

I did not leave that out, in fact I stated that in my post..

I pointed out that that is how you leftists lie about inter-racial murder to hide the truth.

I posted your quote. The truth is that more whites kill each other. And it's funny how you don't use per capita in this instance.

 

[IM2]

Those are facts…….and you are now called out on the racism of barak obama amd other black democrats and the white democrat party leaders…

You haven't called out anything but a bunch of right wing bullshit.

 

[IM2]

He said nothing wrong. Democrats owned slaves and founded the KKK and today the left pushes anti white racism through wokeism

Race pimping has been your sides ideology for centuries now

Whites invented race pimping and Republicans have race pimped for at least the last 60 years.

 

[TheYellowKing]

Since the Barbary Pirates didn't enslave near the number of whites as whites enslaved blacks, and they weren't in America and were not even black, don't try comparing that to the millions of blacks killed by whites in Africa, during the middle passage, in North/South America and in the Carribean.

Barbary Pirates also known as Barbary Corsairs were involved in the captivity of European slaves and attacks on European coastal villages. However, just like African slave traders, the most prominent Barbary pirates were indeed European renegades, historian Adrian Tinniswood states.

When Europeans were slaves to Africans

They were Ottoman you moron. From modern day Turkey

 

[beagle9]

They are not completely different….they are the same…the government controls all business activity


Here…the internet answers your question….,,

Hitler was a fascist, obviously, and a totalitarian. Somewhere along the line, these characteristics have become ascribed to the political right, or as they love to say nowadays, “The extreme right.” But it’s not true, not even close. There is no such thing as a “right-wing strongman.” Simply put, every single dictator is of the left. Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro, Mussolini, Marcos, Chavez, Kim, Amin, and everyone else you can think of are people of the political left, plain and simple.

I know this cuts against everything you’ve heard in the media, and if you’re under 40, it probably goes against everything you were taught in school. But, to put it mildly, you were lied to.

First off, socialism, fascism, and communism are all very similar – they advocate different ways for the government to grow and “give” people things. Communists provided people with everything they deemed the people needed, for example, and everyone had to “contribute” by working for essentially slave wages. There was a thin veil of economic transactions, but the government all ultimately controlled them. Fascism and socialism are the same way, just slightly different methodologies
—————
So, now we get to the real point at which the argument is made about how all of these evil ideologies are of the left, and it’s pretty simple.

Progressive is the left, conservative is the right, OK? Progressives want a bigger government that does more, and with a bigger government doing more individual liberty necessarily shrinks. Conservatives want smaller government, limited by the Constitution, and more individual liberty.

It stands to reason that the further you go down the progressive direction, the bigger and stronger the government gets, just the opposite for the conservative side.

The natural end of the road for progressives is absolute power, a totalitarian regime imposing its will on the people, whether they like it or not. It’s a disaster, always, and the average person suffers greatly, but they suffer equally. It’s equity on display. Of course, that suffering never makes it to the top – as Soviet citizens starved, Stalin and his pals were fat. While North Koreans ate dirt, every leader in the Kim family was obese. It holds for almost all of them
————-
Now, the logical end for the conservative side of the horizon is anarchy. The further you go down the right, the smaller the government becomes and the more personal liberty there is. The end of that is no government at all, the opposite of the left.

But to hear the Democrat/MSNBC brain trust tell it, as you work your way down the right side, as government power shrinks, there is a magical point at which it somehow spikes back up to be all-powerful, and that’s where Hitler and every other of these monsters somehow lived. It doesn’t make any sense, but they also know people have been conditioned by a horrible left-wing public education system not to understand politics or history and to believe what they hear from “journalists” on TV, so it sticks.

It only sticks with stupid people, but there are enough of them to fuel a movement.

Democrats And The Hitler Lie

townhall.com

The governmental platforms that are created specifically for certain bodies of people usually work in concept in the beginning, but they only work in application if the governments were being guided by Christian principles, and therefore guided by moral standards, but when the devil finds weakness in any platform, system or ideology that is being held up by a certain governmental body, then he looks at it in hopes to exploit the weaknesses found, and then eventually he hopes to destroy the platform with all members or contributor's to the platform in which is his ultimate end game.

So the question is this - What platform serves the citizen's best ? We had the answer in a percentage of here, but my my how those numbers can change quickly. What we are seeing is the infiltration of the mind by demonic forces, and then those forces penetrated are in turn beginning to work for the demonic forces that will eventually destroy the entire platform.

Yes, in America we want to restore the numbers using MAGA back to what worked best for most in America, but the demonic forces are fighting against it in the most biggest way ever.

 

[beagle9]

Whites invented race pimping and Republicans have race pimped for at least the last 60 years.

If you are talking about Biden types of white folks, then you might have a point. Sadder even is that his type tries to make black folks his gullible minions. Think about it.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

You're retarded NATIONAL SOCIALISM was a mix of right and left ideologies

Wrong.

There was no ‘socialist’ ideology incorporated into Nazi dogma:

“The full name of Hitler’s party was Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. In English, that translates to National Socialist German Workers’ Party. But it was not a socialist party; it was a right-wing, ultranationalist party dedicated to racial purity, territorial expansion and anti-Semitism — and total political control.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/29/greenes-ahistorical-claim-that-nazis-were-socialists/

 

[2aguy]

I posted your quote. The truth is that more whites kill each other. And it's funny how you don't use per capita in this instance.

That isn't the point....and that is the lie you democrats use to hide the fact that more whites are killed by black males than blacks are killed by whites....which wrecks your whole, America is a racist country lie.

Don't have to use per capita.....the actual numbers from the FBI are higher for blacks murdering whites...but you know that, and try to hide that by making some stupid claim about the per capita number...

 

[2aguy]

You haven't called out anything but a bunch of right wing bullshit.

I called you out on the actual racism of the democrat party leadership....from all three most recent democrat party presidents, from Clinton, to obama, and now biden....all racists.....obama is also an anti-semite.......

 

[2aguy]

Wrong.

There was no ‘socialist’ ideology incorporated into Nazi dogma:

“The full name of Hitler’s party was Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. In English, that translates to National Socialist German Workers’ Party. But it was not a socialist party; it was a right-wing, ultranationalist party dedicated to racial purity, territorial expansion and anti-Semitism — and total political control.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/29/greenes-ahistorical-claim-that-nazis-were-socialists/

And here is the truth.....you are lying, as is your link....

Nazism is Socialism -- F A Hayek, et al

One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too -as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment -have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because -and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany – many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience. But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a move movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt.

A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extend directed against their economic policy. What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice -their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with “the golden International of Jewish Capitalism.”

It would, indeed, hardly have been possible for the Nationalists to advance fundamental objections to the economic policy of the other socialist parties when their own published programme differed from these only in that its socialism was much cruder and less rational. The famous 25 points drawn up by Herr Feder,[2] one of Hitler’s early allies, repeatedly endorsed by Hitler and recognized by the by-laws of the National-Socialist party as the immutable basis of all its actions, which together with an extensive commentary is circulating throughout Germany in many hundreds of thousands of copies, is full of ideas resembling those of the early socialists. But the dominant feature is a fierce hatred of anything capitalistic -individualistic profit seeking, large scale enterprise, banks, joint-stock companies, department stores, “international finance and loan capital,” the system of “interest slavery” in general; the abolition of these is described as the “[indecipherable] of the programme, around which everything else turns.” It was to this programme that the masses of the German people, who were already completely under the influence of collectivist ideas, responded so enthusiastically.

That this violent anti-capitalistic attack is genuine – and not a mere piece of propaganda – becomes as clear from the personal history of the intellectual leaders of the movement as from the general milieu from which it springs. It is not even denied that man of the young men who today play a prominent part in it have previously been communists or socialists. And to any observer of the literary tendencies which made the Germans intelligentsia ready to join the ranks of the new party, it must be clear that the common characteristic of all the politically influential writers – in many cases free from definite party affiliations – was their anti-liberal and anti-capitalist trend. Groups like that formed around the review “Die Tat” have made the phrase “the end of capitalism” an accepted dogma to most young Germans.[3]

And more...

The Myth of "Nazi Capitalism" | Chris Calton

German socialism, as Mises defines it, differs from what he called “socialism of the Russian pattern” in that “it, seemingly and nominally, maintains private ownership of the means of production, entrepreneurship, and market exchange.” However, this is only a superficial system of private ownership because through a complete system of economic intervention and control, the entrepreneurial function of the property owners is completely controlled by the State. By this, Mises means that shop owners do not speculate about future events for the purpose of allocating resources in the pursuit of profits. Just like in the Soviet Union, this entrepreneurial speculation and resource allocation is done by a single entity, the State, and economic calculation is thus impossible.

“In Nazi Germany,” Mises tells us, the property owners “were called shop managers or Betriebsführer. The government tells these seeming entrepreneurs what and how to produce, at what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to whom to sell. The government decrees at what wages labourers should work, and to whom and under what terms the capitalists should entrust their funds. Market exchange is but a sham. As all prices, wages and interest rates are fixed by the authority, they are prices, wages and interest rates in appearance only; in fact they are merely quantitative terms in the authoritarian orders determining each citizen’s income, consumption and standard of living. The authority, not the consumers, directs production. The central board of production management is supreme; all citizens are nothing else but civil servants. This is socialism with the outward appearance of capitalism. Some labels of the capitalistic market economy are retained, but they signify here something entirely different from what they mean in the market economy.”
======

Nazis Were Not Marxists, but They Were Socialists | Jörg Guido Hülsmann

Nazis and marx..

Read A Pile Of Top Nazis Talking About How They Love Leftist Marxism

The Nazis were leftists. This statement is blasphemy to the academic-media complex, since everyone knows the Nazis were degenerate right-wingers fueled by toxic capitalism and racism. But evidence Adolf Hitler’s gang were men of the left, while debatable, is compelling.
The dispute on Nazi origins resurfaced through the confluence of brawling alt-right and antifa fringe movements and recent alternative histories by Dinesh D’Souza and others. The vitriol and lack of candor it produces from supposedly fact-driven academics and media is disturbing, if unsurprising. They stifle dissent on touchy subjects to maintain their narrative and enforce cultural hegemony.

However uncomfortable to opinion shapers, alternative views of the Third Reich exist and were written by the finest minds of their time. Opinions from the period perhaps carry more weight because they are unburdened by the aftermath of the uniquely heinous Nazi crimes.
------

Also, Adolf Hitler Loved Karl Marx
It wasn’t only theoretical. Hitler repeatedly praised Marx privately, stating he had “learned a great deal from Marxism.” The trouble with the Weimar Republic, he said, was that its politicians “had never even read Marx.” He also stated his differences with communists were that they were intellectual types passing out pamphlets, whereas “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun.”

It wasn’t just privately that Hitler’s fealty for Marx surfaced. In “Mein Kampf,” he states that without his racial insights National Socialism “would really do nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground.” Nor did Hitler eschew this sentiment once reaching power. As late as 1941, with the war in bloom, he stated “basically National Socialism and Marxism are the same” in a speech published by the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Nazi propaganda minister and resident intellectual Joseph Goebbels wrote in his diary that the Nazis would install “real socialism” after Russia’s defeat in the East. And Hitler favorite Albert Speer, the Nazi armaments minister whose memoir became an international bestseller, wrote that Hitler viewed Joseph Stalin as a kindred spirit, ensuring his prisoner of war son received good treatment, and even talked of keeping Stalin in power in a puppet government after Germany’s eventual triumph. His views on Great Britain’s Winston Churchill and the United States’s Franklin Delano Roosevelt were decidedly less kind.

Nazi and Communist Hatred of Each Other Was Brotherly
Despite this, there’s a persistent claim that Nazis and communists hated each other, and mention that the Nazis persecuted socialists and oppressed trade unions. These things are true, but prove little. The camps’ hatred stemmed from familiarity. It was internecine, the nastiest kind.

The Nazis and communists were not only in a struggle for street-war supremacy, but also recruits. These recruits were easily turned, because both sides were fighting for the same men. Hayek recalls

 

[2aguy]

Whites invented race pimping and Republicans have race pimped for at least the last 60 years.

The republicans don't race pimp....that is why idiots like you keep asking "What have the republicans done for blacks lately," because the democrats race pimp and also poverty hustle.....to get your votes....the Republicans simply govern according to basic principals of less government.....less government means not handing out or taking away favors based on race.

 

[IM2]

All of the African slaves were captured by black African tribes and sold to Europeans…..

Incorrect. I will skip the complexities of how whites would arm one warring side with guns in return for captives and other similar things not shown at stormfront So let's get to killing this piece of bs.

“According to database-backed estimates by David Eltis and DavidRichardson, only about 389,000 kidnapped Africans were disembarked in the ports of the present-day United States, the majority of them before independence.”29“By 1860, those few hundred thousand Africans had givenway to four million African Americans.”
-Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave -Breeding Industry

According to this information , 389,000 slaves landed on the shoresof what is now America. By 1860, there were four million slaves living here.The importation of slaves was made illegal in 1808. So from 1808 until1860, the number of slaves increased by at least one thousand percent. Ifwe allow for the Africans selling each other, Africans would be responsiblefor approximately 389 thousand slaves. What about the 3.1-4 millionadditional slaves? Africans did not create them.

TEN TIMES MORE SLAVES WERE PRODUCED BY WHITE CONTROLLED SLAVE BREEDING "FARMS" THAN WERE SHIPPED OVER HERE BY AFRICANS!

The United states had to fight a Civil war against the democrats to eventually free the descendants of those slaves. Republicans freed the slaves in this country while the democrats actually started a war to keep blacks as slaves….

Incorrect. Northern Democrats fought for the Union. The Confederacy was a different country so American political parties were not part of the confederacy. Plus:

As the country began splitting up, a great panic started consuming the outgoing Buchanan administration and members of congress. The wanted to keep the union together. President Buchanan declared secession was a constitutional crisis and then asked Congress to develop a plan to keep the south in the union.

Congress offered over fifty different proposals trying to keep the union together. In the end, congress settled for a proposal by Republican Thomas Corwin. It is called the Corwin Amendment, or more accurately, the slavery amendment.

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.

When Lincoln took over, he supported the Amendment.

“I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service ... holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.”

Corwin felt that congress did not have the power to interfere with slavery in the states where slavery existed. Lincoln agreed, and that was the actual Republican Party policy.

History is documented. It is time to stop lying.

 

[IM2]

The republicans don't race pimp....that is why idiots like you keep asking "What have the republicans done for blacks lately," because the democrats race pimp and also poverty hustle.....to get your votes....the Republicans simply govern according to basic principals of less government.....less government means not handing out or taking away favors based on race.

The Republicans are kings of race pimping. You are an example of how white elites pimp other whites into voting for things that help those same elites.

 

[2aguy]

The Republicans are kings of race pimping. You are an example of how white elites pimp other whites into voting for things that help those same elites.

No...they are not....if they were they would be the democrat party.....the party that uses racism as a tool, weapon and a shield.

Blacks have been voting for the democrat party since Roosevelt.....and they have suffered ever since, losing millions of their children to democrat party abortion mills, to democrat party policies that create generational poverty and crime.....destroying the lives of black children and taking from them the future they deserve....

Idiots like you support the democrat party, and keep the racism alive...

 

[Zincwarrior]

Evidently there is an HBU nearby and he had been staking the area out.

 

[2aguy]

All of the African slaves were captured by black African tribes and sold to Europeans…..

Incorrect. I will skip the complexities of how whites would arm one warring side with guns in return for captives and other similar things not shown at stormfront So let's get to killing this piece of bs.

“According to database-backed estimates by David Eltis and DavidRichardson, only about 389,000 kidnapped Africans were disembarked in the ports of the present-day United States, the majority of them before independence.”29“By 1860, those few hundred thousand Africans had givenway to four million African Americans.”
-Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave -Breeding Industry

According to this information , 389,000 slaves landed on the shoresof what is now America. By 1860, there were four million slaves living here.The importation of slaves was made illegal in 1808. So from 1808 until1860, the number of slaves increased by at least one thousand percent. Ifwe allow for the Africans selling each other, Africans would be responsiblefor approximately 389 thousand slaves. What about the 3.1-4 millionadditional slaves? Africans did not create them.

TEN TIMES MORE SLAVES WERE PRODUCED BY WHITE CONTROLLED SLAVE BREEDING "FARMS" THAN WERE SHIPPED OVER HERE BY AFRICANS!

The United states had to fight a Civil war against the democrats to eventually free the descendants of those slaves. Republicans freed the slaves in this country while the democrats actually started a war to keep blacks as slaves….

Incorrect. Northern Democrats fought for the Union. The Confederacy was a different country so American political parties were not part of the confederacy. Plus:

As the country began splitting up, a great panic started consuming the outgoing Buchanan administration and members of congress. The wanted to keep the union together. President Buchanan declared secession was a constitutional crisis and then asked Congress to develop a plan to keep the south in the union.

Congress offered over fifty different proposals trying to keep the union together. In the end, congress settled for a proposal by Republican Thomas Corwin. It is called the Corwin Amendment, or more accurately, the slavery amendment.

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.

When Lincoln took over, he supported the Amendment.

“I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service ... holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.”

Corwin felt that congress did not have the power to interfere with slavery in the states where slavery existed. Lincoln agreed, and that was the actual Republican Party policy.

History is documented. It is time to stop lying.

And.......I know, I know, you have to hide the fact that all the slaves in our hemisphere were originally brought here after being captured by black africans and arabs.....and over the hundreds of years they had more children when they were here.....

You also glossed over the fact that America ended the slave trade....but the democrats ran those breeding farms you say existed......

And you bring up that stupid amendment that was never passed or set into the Constitution...a poor attempt to avert a war the Democrat party was willing and actually did start to keep blacks as slaves......while the democrat party actually started a war to keep blacks as their slaves, the Republican party fought the democrats and when they won.....you doofus.......the Republican party actually freed the slaves........and then the democrat party went on to murder and deny them their Rights under our Constitution...

You can't escape that, and that you try to escape those facts and defend the democrat party shows you truly are a useful idiot for the actual racist democrats.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Evidently there is an HBU nearby and he had been staking the area out. He went for the university first, but was spotted then went on lockdown. He then went to the store.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Evidently there is an HBU nearby and he had been staking the area out. He went for the university first, but was spotted then went on lockdown. He then went to the store.