Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He wasn't prosecuted because there was nothing to prosecute, you fucking douchebag.You mean, when the orange slob was an unindicted co-conspirator in felonies that sent his person lawyer to prison, and was only spared prosecution and prison due to being a sitting president?
Haha, you might want to find a better example to whine about.
We'll see how comical you find it when your orange cat-turd cult king is under indictment for espionage....among other things.
We can always hope that is what he grabbed. If true perhaos he will reveal what’s in those files when he campaigns for President in 2024. I would love to know who actually terminated JFK before I die as I lived through that assassination.He took JFK and UFO files
There is proof that Trump has additional top secret documents, besides the jackets with missing contents....And you have no proof of your claims. I doubt that you have a security clearance to even look inside these empty folders and just make your lies to make yourself feel important, Hint: you are worthless.
There is proof that Trump has additional top secret documents, besides the jackets with missing contents....
Any copy of top secret documents requested that leaves the vault, is signed out by the guardians, with logs of who eligible took it.... And then logged back in, when the copy is returned....
Allegedly, there are more top secret and classified documents that Trump has not returned and were not logged back in as him returning them.
Merrick Garland and The Department of Justice is deposed from power in a week?You realize your Reich is deposed from power in a week?
Oberfuhrer Wray better concern himself with his own indictments.
Clearly there was, as his personal lawyer went to prison for felonies he committed at the direction of Trump. Trump avoided prosecution by being a sitting president.He wasn't prosecuted because there was nothing to prosecute,
Imagine all you will. Your imagination is just your desire to cause hurt to one of your vastly better leaders and is as false as anything else you have posted.I imagine we are just about a week away from more FBI raids on Trump properties.
Your entire response relies on the world "allegedly", meaning not proven or a fact. If there were indeed such proof as you suggest, don't you think the democrats would have already started spew out loud about it and posting to their media slaves? Or perhaps the archives would have listed the titles of such documents?There is proof that Trump has additional top secret documents, besides the jackets with missing contents....
Any copy of top secret documents requested that leaves the vault, is signed out by the guardians, with logs of who eligible took it.... And then logged back in, when the copy is returned....
Allegedly, there are more top secret and classified documents that Trump has not returned and were not logged back in as him returning them.
Merrick Garland and The Department of Justice is deposed from power in a week?
Who told you that?
Sorry, turd, but your attempt to commit logic failed. Your theory that if A works for B, and A gets arrested, then B must be guilty of something isn't accepted in any court of law. However, all you progressive morons believe it.Clearly there was, as his personal lawyer went to prison for felonies he committed at the direction of Trump. Trump avoided prosecution by being a sitting president.
False, and you are either abjectly ignorant of the facts or are having a cultist breakdown. Trump was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the felonies that sent his personal lawyer to prison. If you don't understand what that means, then you're stupid. But you do understand. As evidenced by the bizarre, irrelevant outburst above.Your theory that if A works for B, and A gets arrested, then B must be guilty of something isn't accepted in any court of law.
So you're saying that the courts will accept the crimes committed by some professional acquaintance as evidence that you have committed a crime?False, and you are either abjectly ignorant of the facts or are having a cultist breakdown. Trump was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the felonies that sent his personal lawyer to prison. If you don't understand what that means, then you're stupid. But you do understand. As evidenced by the bizarre, irrelevant outburst above.
Nope! I take it back. You really don't get it at all. Pathetic.So you're saying that the courts will accept the crimes committed by some professional acquaintance as evidence that you have committed a crime?
That's what you agreed to, idiot.Nope! I take it back. You really don't get it at all. Pathetic.
False. Like I said, you don't get it. Which is the norm, the bar isn't real high for you.That's what you agreed to, idiot.
If I'm wrong, then explain where you didn't disagree with the following statement:False. Like I said, you don't get it. Which is the norm, the bar isn't real high for you.
It's wrong and idiotic. You clearly don't understand what was meant in the court filing. And I sure as hell am not going to exert any effort to crack that nut that is your thick litte skull. Not my problem. Sorry.If I'm wrong, then explain where you didn't disagree with the following statement:
"The courts will accept the crimes committed by some professional acquaintance as evidence that you have committed a crime"
Otherwise, admit that you lack the capacity to commit logic.
"Meant" in what court filing?It's wrong and idiotic. You clearly don't understand what was meant in the court filing. And I sure as hell am not going to exert any effort to crack that nut that is your thick litte skull. Not my problem. Sorry.
Why would the indictment of Cohen mention any crimes committed by Trump? Please quote the language in Cohen's indictment that does that.Hint: it states that the evidence shows Trump committed the same crimes for which Cohen was convicted.
Good luck, crybaby.