Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Useless public sector jobs.. That dont bring in new money.
Also useless temp jobs like obamas stimulous.
But they do create high paying union defense jobs, so you got to give them that.
Millions of jobs teaching, police, fire, construction, courts...the entire defense industry
Hardly useless "temp" jobs
Whats the matter you dont want to mention the D.O.T. the I.R.S. and all the other high paying great pension paper pushing jobs?
.
Besides cops,firemen and the.like are local not federal try again.
.
Who cares?
Government collects money from the people and uses it to provide services at all levels. Government is still government regardless of the level. It is also difficult to separate local, state and federal funding since all provide funding for schools, police and firemen
Government dont sell anything Except military hardware ..its all paid for with tax dollars thats why most of the jobs are so useless.
There's not going to be any 35% tariff. It's politically impossible, thank God. And it's economically stupid to thing we're going to allow some corp like GE to produce something in Mexico that retails for 35% more here than it retails in Europe.Part of it is the cost of labor, but it is also the lack of labor protection laws, lax environmental regulations, cheap land and tax breaks. How important the cost of labor is depends on how labor intensive that particular industry is. The combination of lower taxes, fewer regulations and a 35% tariff on exports to the US will discourage most companies from moving at least some of their factories to low wage countries. Of course the enormous purchasing power of he US government is another big stick that can be used to persuade them to stay.There are basically three tools the US government has to prevent companies from moving their factories to low wage countries: lower taxes and fewer or relaxed regulation; high tariffs on imports from these factories; and the enormous purchasing power of the US government.The 5 Easiest and 5 Most Difficult Promises for Donald Trump to Keep
Prevent American companies from moving jobs to other countries.
Companies move to other countries to pursue higher profits, and Mr. Trump cannot force them to stay. The question is whether he can make it profitable to do so. It is difficult because labor is much cheaper in other countries. Carrier pays workers at its Indiana factory an average hourly wage of $23 — roughly four times what it plans to pay workers with the same jobs in Mexico.
Mr. Trump has promised tax cuts and regulatory relief, but those are minor expenses for most companies, particularly in comparison to their payrolls. Mr. Trump also has threatened to impose new taxes on imports, but he cannot target particular companies. Any such tariffs would have to be broad — and therefore broadly painful.
.
Low wage countries like Mexico offer US companies cheap land and special deals on regulations and taxes to entice them to leave, so the combination of the friendlier business environment lower US taxes and lower regulations will create along with a 35% tariff on imports will probably keep all but the most labor intensive factories from leaving.
Tariffs can be as broad or as narrow as the government wants them to be. So we can levy a 35% tax on all imports from companies that moved their factories to Mexico after a certain date.
What has happened to the establishment of the Democratic Party that you guys are now rooting against American workers?
The cost advantage to off shoring is LABOR.
I know you're shit for brains and have no fucking clue what you pretend to "talk about."So govt paid jobs building infrastructure that Trump supports is useless?Besides cops,firemen and the.like are local not federal try again.
.
Who cares?
Government collects money from the people and uses it to provide services at all levels. Government is still government regardless of the level. It is also difficult to separate local, state and federal funding since all provide funding for schools, police and firemen
Government dont sell anything Except military hardware ..its all paid for with tax dollars thats why most of the jobs are so useless.
You two dumb asses know exactly what I mean, again quit playing dumb...its boring.
.
Millions of jobs teaching, police, fire, construction, courts...the entire defense industry
Hardly useless "temp" jobs
Whats the matter you dont want to mention the D.O.T. the I.R.S. and all the other high paying great pension paper pushing jobs?
.
Besides cops,firemen and the.like are local not federal try again.
.
Who cares?
Government collects money from the people and uses it to provide services at all levels. Government is still government regardless of the level. It is also difficult to separate local, state and federal funding since all provide funding for schools, police and firemen
Government dont sell anything Except military hardware ..its all paid for with tax dollars thats why most of the jobs are so useless.
Tax dollars are the dollars Government has to spend. They collect money from the people to provide services. Those services create jobs in both the public and private sector.
Roads, water systems, sewer systems,cops, prisons, teachers, defense industry are far from useless
There's not going to be any 35% tariff. It's politically impossible, thank God. And it's economically stupid to thing we're going to allow some corp like GE to produce something in Mexico that retails for 35% more here than it retails in Europe.Part of it is the cost of labor, but it is also the lack of labor protection laws, lax environmental regulations, cheap land and tax breaks. How important the cost of labor is depends on how labor intensive that particular industry is. The combination of lower taxes, fewer regulations and a 35% tariff on exports to the US will discourage most companies from moving at least some of their factories to low wage countries. Of course the enormous purchasing power of he US government is another big stick that can be used to persuade them to stay.There are basically three tools the US government has to prevent companies from moving their factories to low wage countries: lower taxes and fewer or relaxed regulation; high tariffs on imports from these factories; and the enormous purchasing power of the US government.The 5 Easiest and 5 Most Difficult Promises for Donald Trump to Keep
Prevent American companies from moving jobs to other countries.
Companies move to other countries to pursue higher profits, and Mr. Trump cannot force them to stay. The question is whether he can make it profitable to do so. It is difficult because labor is much cheaper in other countries. Carrier pays workers at its Indiana factory an average hourly wage of $23 — roughly four times what it plans to pay workers with the same jobs in Mexico.
Mr. Trump has promised tax cuts and regulatory relief, but those are minor expenses for most companies, particularly in comparison to their payrolls. Mr. Trump also has threatened to impose new taxes on imports, but he cannot target particular companies. Any such tariffs would have to be broad — and therefore broadly painful.
.
Low wage countries like Mexico offer US companies cheap land and special deals on regulations and taxes to entice them to leave, so the combination of the friendlier business environment lower US taxes and lower regulations will create along with a 35% tariff on imports will probably keep all but the most labor intensive factories from leaving.
Tariffs can be as broad or as narrow as the government wants them to be. So we can levy a 35% tax on all imports from companies that moved their factories to Mexico after a certain date.
What has happened to the establishment of the Democratic Party that you guys are now rooting against American workers?
The cost advantage to off shoring is LABOR.
Fuck you trumpchump. There's not going to be a 35% tariff.There's not going to be any 35% tariff. It's politically impossible, thank God. And it's economically stupid to thing we're going to allow some corp like GE to produce something in Mexico that retails for 35% more here than it retails in Europe.Part of it is the cost of labor, but it is also the lack of labor protection laws, lax environmental regulations, cheap land and tax breaks. How important the cost of labor is depends on how labor intensive that particular industry is. The combination of lower taxes, fewer regulations and a 35% tariff on exports to the US will discourage most companies from moving at least some of their factories to low wage countries. Of course the enormous purchasing power of he US government is another big stick that can be used to persuade them to stay.There are basically three tools the US government has to prevent companies from moving their factories to low wage countries: lower taxes and fewer or relaxed regulation; high tariffs on imports from these factories; and the enormous purchasing power of the US government.The 5 Easiest and 5 Most Difficult Promises for Donald Trump to Keep
Prevent American companies from moving jobs to other countries.
Companies move to other countries to pursue higher profits, and Mr. Trump cannot force them to stay. The question is whether he can make it profitable to do so. It is difficult because labor is much cheaper in other countries. Carrier pays workers at its Indiana factory an average hourly wage of $23 — roughly four times what it plans to pay workers with the same jobs in Mexico.
Mr. Trump has promised tax cuts and regulatory relief, but those are minor expenses for most companies, particularly in comparison to their payrolls. Mr. Trump also has threatened to impose new taxes on imports, but he cannot target particular companies. Any such tariffs would have to be broad — and therefore broadly painful.
.
Low wage countries like Mexico offer US companies cheap land and special deals on regulations and taxes to entice them to leave, so the combination of the friendlier business environment lower US taxes and lower regulations will create along with a 35% tariff on imports will probably keep all but the most labor intensive factories from leaving.
Tariffs can be as broad or as narrow as the government wants them to be. So we can levy a 35% tax on all imports from companies that moved their factories to Mexico after a certain date.
What has happened to the establishment of the Democratic Party that you guys are now rooting against American workers?
The cost advantage to off shoring is LABOR.
Also stop the hyper bowl bullshit...
You dont have a clue how the U.S. got the shaft in trade deals and also with the Iran deal..shit can be redone snowflake.
.
The tariff will persuade GE to manufacture goods intended for the US market in the US. European countries will levy tariffs as they believe necessary to protect their industries and jobs.There's not going to be any 35% tariff. It's politically impossible, thank God. And it's economically stupid to thing we're going to allow some corp like GE to produce something in Mexico that retails for 35% more here than it retails in Europe.Part of it is the cost of labor, but it is also the lack of labor protection laws, lax environmental regulations, cheap land and tax breaks. How important the cost of labor is depends on how labor intensive that particular industry is. The combination of lower taxes, fewer regulations and a 35% tariff on exports to the US will discourage most companies from moving at least some of their factories to low wage countries. Of course the enormous purchasing power of he US government is another big stick that can be used to persuade them to stay.There are basically three tools the US government has to prevent companies from moving their factories to low wage countries: lower taxes and fewer or relaxed regulation; high tariffs on imports from these factories; and the enormous purchasing power of the US government.The 5 Easiest and 5 Most Difficult Promises for Donald Trump to Keep
Prevent American companies from moving jobs to other countries.
Companies move to other countries to pursue higher profits, and Mr. Trump cannot force them to stay. The question is whether he can make it profitable to do so. It is difficult because labor is much cheaper in other countries. Carrier pays workers at its Indiana factory an average hourly wage of $23 — roughly four times what it plans to pay workers with the same jobs in Mexico.
Mr. Trump has promised tax cuts and regulatory relief, but those are minor expenses for most companies, particularly in comparison to their payrolls. Mr. Trump also has threatened to impose new taxes on imports, but he cannot target particular companies. Any such tariffs would have to be broad — and therefore broadly painful.
.
Low wage countries like Mexico offer US companies cheap land and special deals on regulations and taxes to entice them to leave, so the combination of the friendlier business environment lower US taxes and lower regulations will create along with a 35% tariff on imports will probably keep all but the most labor intensive factories from leaving.
Tariffs can be as broad or as narrow as the government wants them to be. So we can levy a 35% tax on all imports from companies that moved their factories to Mexico after a certain date.
What has happened to the establishment of the Democratic Party that you guys are now rooting against American workers?
The cost advantage to off shoring is LABOR.
Fuck you trumpchump. There's not going to be a 35% tariff.There's not going to be any 35% tariff. It's politically impossible, thank God. And it's economically stupid to thing we're going to allow some corp like GE to produce something in Mexico that retails for 35% more here than it retails in Europe.Part of it is the cost of labor, but it is also the lack of labor protection laws, lax environmental regulations, cheap land and tax breaks. How important the cost of labor is depends on how labor intensive that particular industry is. The combination of lower taxes, fewer regulations and a 35% tariff on exports to the US will discourage most companies from moving at least some of their factories to low wage countries. Of course the enormous purchasing power of he US government is another big stick that can be used to persuade them to stay.There are basically three tools the US government has to prevent companies from moving their factories to low wage countries: lower taxes and fewer or relaxed regulation; high tariffs on imports from these factories; and the enormous purchasing power of the US government.
Low wage countries like Mexico offer US companies cheap land and special deals on regulations and taxes to entice them to leave, so the combination of the friendlier business environment lower US taxes and lower regulations will create along with a 35% tariff on imports will probably keep all but the most labor intensive factories from leaving.
Tariffs can be as broad or as narrow as the government wants them to be. So we can levy a 35% tax on all imports from companies that moved their factories to Mexico after a certain date.
What has happened to the establishment of the Democratic Party that you guys are now rooting against American workers?
The cost advantage to off shoring is LABOR.
Also stop the hyper bowl bullshit...
You dont have a clue how the U.S. got the shaft in trade deals and also with the Iran deal..shit can be redone snowflake.
.
The 5 Easiest and 5 Most Difficult Promises for Donald Trump to Keep
Prevent American companies from moving jobs to other countries.
Companies move to other countries to pursue higher profits, and Mr. Trump cannot force them to stay. The question is whether he can make it profitable to do so. It is difficult because labor is much cheaper in other countries. Carrier pays workers at its Indiana factory an average hourly wage of $23 — roughly four times what it plans to pay workers with the same jobs in Mexico.
Mr. Trump has promised tax cuts and regulatory relief, but those are minor expenses for most companies, particularly in comparison to their payrolls. Mr. Trump also has threatened to impose new taxes on imports, but he cannot target particular companies. Any such tariffs would have to be broad — and therefore broadly painful.
.
All Trump must do is keep one campaign promise and he will exceed Obama's commitments.
That was not promised. What was promised was to cut the deficit in half. Learn the difference.So uh...
Your meat puppet faggot ever get around to...
"Cutting the debt in half"?
All Trump must do is keep one campaign promise and he will exceed Obama's commitments.
Obama stopped a depression, passed universal healthcare, got combat troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, repealed the Bush tax cuts and saved the auto companies
Trump will not even come close
ISIS is through. By the time DJ takes office, there will be only mopping up to do.Obama bombs...
Obamacare
Defeat Isis
Stop Iran development of nukes
Create renewable energy
Create good paying jobs
Seal borders
Build military
Defend marriage
Keep men out of women's bathrooms
Expand the democrat party
Yeah, Trump fed the coal workers a big heaping serving of bullshit. He's not going to be able to save their jobs. Trump's Chumps have been fooled into bleeving it has something to do with regulation, but it doesn't.Revive American steel-making and coal-mining industries.
The productivity of the American coal industry has increased roughly tenfold since the end of World War II. The work that once required 10 miners now requires just one. Steel making has undergone a similar transformation. That is by far the most important reason employment in both industries has declined precipitously. Most of those jobs are never coming back.
Demand for coal has also declined thanks to a revolution in the production of natural gas and, to a lesser extent, other alternative energy sources
The federal government cannot create jobs… FactInvest in infrastructure to create jobs.
Mr. Trump will find bipartisan support in Congress for his proposal to create jobs and stimulate the economy by building and repairing highways, bridges, water systems and other public works. But many Republicans may balk at a big spending program that adds to the federal budget deficit.
Some Democrats will resist Mr. Trump’s proposal to offer tax breaks to private companies in return for infrastructure investments, notably because the federal government is able to borrow money at exceptionally low rates. Democrats are also likely to resist efforts to waive environmental rules or prevailing-wage protections for construction projects.
The Government creates tens of millions of jobs......FACT
The federal government cannot create jobs… FactInvest in infrastructure to create jobs.
Mr. Trump will find bipartisan support in Congress for his proposal to create jobs and stimulate the economy by building and repairing highways, bridges, water systems and other public works. But many Republicans may balk at a big spending program that adds to the federal budget deficit.
Some Democrats will resist Mr. Trump’s proposal to offer tax breaks to private companies in return for infrastructure investments, notably because the federal government is able to borrow money at exceptionally low rates. Democrats are also likely to resist efforts to waive environmental rules or prevailing-wage protections for construction projects.
The Government creates tens of millions of jobs......FACT
Rustic's never heard of Homeland Security.
The federal government cannot create jobs… Fact
Actually, Obama caused the recession by responding too timidly and indecisively to the financial crisis he inherited. When he took office there was a financial crisis but not a recession. The recession predictably resulted from a contraction of credit because of the financial crisis. What the country needed was a large infusion of credit from the federal government so that credit worthy consumers and businesses could continue to function and many pointed out that Sweden had recently gone through a similar financial crisis as a result of a real estate bubble bursting, but that Sweden had prevented this from causing a recession by quickly taking over troubled banks and providing all the capital necessary to keep the economy going. His failure to act quickly and decisively caused the recession.All Trump must do is keep one campaign promise and he will exceed Obama's commitments.
Obama stopped a depression, passed universal healthcare, got combat troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, repealed the Bush tax cuts and saved the auto companies
Trump will not even come close
