50,000 psychologists have signed petition saying Trump unfit to be president:

I tend to agree with the 50,000 psychologists referred to in the New Yorker magazine article but that still leaves the question of whether Trump is more fit to serve than a liberal.

Given that liberals have destroyed our families, schools, religion, healthcare system, and driven our corporations off shore with their taxes,unions and regulations it seems clear that Trump is still by far the better choice.

All that really says to me is that 50,000 psychologists are trying to diagnose without examination, thus committing malpractice.

I don't know that they said it was a technical diagnoses just that he clearly has a screw loose or two:


Trump said on day one he would label China a Currency manipulator? He knew he was lying when he said that but it did not trouble him a bit!

Trump said he had a great new or should I say a terrific new health plan. This was an obvious lie but it did not trouble him one bit.

Trump said he would build a wall and Mexico would pay for it. He knew this was a lie but it did not trouble him one bit

Trump said on day one he would repeal Obamacare but it never happened and it did not travel him one bit

Trump said on day one he would go after Hillary with a special prosecutor. He knew that was a lie but it did not travel him one bit.

Trump said NATO was obsolete. This was absurd, as soon as Trump was elected he had to reassure NATO allies that he was just lying. It did not trouble him a bit.
Trump didn't know when Andrew Jackson lived or what " priming the pump means" indicating that he has little to no education in history or economics.
 
You're right that crimes are not the same as disorders. But the fact is, mentally and emotionally healthy people do not engage in deviant or abusive sexual behavior. For example, the vast majority of child molesters were sexually molested when they were children. We don't know what causes homosexuality, but there is no such thing as a normal person, who "just happens to be homosexual." Homosexuality comes with it a host of other mental and emotional problems. For example, homosexuals are more likely to suffer depression, anxiety, have substance abuse problems, and are more likely to self-harm and commit suicide, than heterosexuals.

Higher Risk of Mental Health Problems for Homosexuals | Psych Central

Also, homosexuals are 10% less likely to report that they are "fairly happy" or "very happy" than heterosexuals.

Now, you're going to say that all these problems homosexuals experience are linked to society's non-acceptance of them, but I don't think that covers all your bases. Homosexuals now have won societal acceptance on many levels, and can now even marry one another, but all these mental and emotional problems have not gone away. Prior to the DSM being purged for political reasons, psychologists recognized that homosexual sexual orientation was merely a symptom of a much larger problem, which is a disordered personality on many levels. Now that the psychological profession has been terrorized into silence, they can no longer treat these problems, but must pretend homosexuals are "healthy" and that the only problem is societal disapproval. Not only is this an unscientific approach, it is harmful, because homosexuals really need psychological help, and they are not getting it.
Homosexuality cannot be "treated". And because the distress of it is ONLY caused by outside prejudice, it is NOT a mental disorder. By your logic, any sexual fetish would be considered a mental disorder. That isn't how it works.



How do you know it can't be treated?



.
Because research shows any therapeutic attempt fails.


They try a lobotomy?



.
You are one sick human being. Grow up. You're not in junior high anymore. You shouldn't care what other people do with their genitals.


What are you talking about Billy, a lobotomy would work..

.
 
They try a lobotomy?



.
You are one sick human being. Grow up. You're not in junior high anymore. You shouldn't care what other people do with their genitals.

FYI: I've seen people change their sexuality and then change it BACK.

The idea that this can't happen is bullshit.
No, you haven't.


Yes, I have.

Woman like men. Then woman like women. Then women liked men again.

During the woman liking women phase, held to the party line, "never really like men, now only like women"


then had children and got married.
Female sexuality is more fluid, but no outside influences can change or.



1. I've seen male homosexuals play similar games.

2. The Party Line for you lefties is that NOTHING can change sexuality. It is "born this way". I've seen men and women change, and sometimes even change BACK. If Change is possible, this a. invalidates many (most) of liberal positions on the subject and b. validates the possibility of an outside influence changing it.
 
The list is a phoney. I've already checked out a number of names. The only psychologist so far is the one that started it.
I tend to agree with the 50,000 psychologists referred to in the New Yorker magazine article but that still leaves the question of whether Trump is more fit to serve than a liberal.

Given that liberals have destroyed our families, schools, religion, healthcare system, and driven our corporations off shore with their taxes,unions and regulations it seems clear that Trump is still by far the better choice.

All that really says to me is that 50,000 psychologists are trying to diagnose without examination, thus committing malpractice.
 
The list is a phoney. I've already checked out a number of names. The only psychologist so far is the one that started it.
I tend to agree with the 50,000 psychologists referred to in the New Yorker magazine article but that still leaves the question of whether Trump is more fit to serve than a liberal.

Given that liberals have destroyed our families, schools, religion, healthcare system, and driven our corporations off shore with their taxes,unions and regulations it seems clear that Trump is still by far the better choice.

All that really says to me is that 50,000 psychologists are trying to diagnose without examination, thus committing malpractice.


Oooh fake news
 
Yeah that's called bisexuality lol. You can't change what a person is attracted to. It doesn't work like that.
thats like saying you cant change a person's attraction to alcohol. If a person is for example 60% hetero he may seek treatment to maintain his life in a hetersexual
family for the benefit of others in his family. Simple enough??
That is so dumb. Comparing alcohol to sexuality makes no sense at all. There is no treatment that actually effectively eliminates homosexual feelings. People can simply choose not to act on those feelings.

yes and they can seek treatment to help them not act on those feelings
Choosing not to act on those feelings doesn't change their sexuality.

it in effect does if a bisexual decides to act hetero all his life or if a gay guy decides to stay in his hetero family because on balance he prefers it
Nothing would change his actual feelings. That is how sexuality is defined.
 
You are one sick human being. Grow up. You're not in junior high anymore. You shouldn't care what other people do with their genitals.

FYI: I've seen people change their sexuality and then change it BACK.

The idea that this can't happen is bullshit.
No, you haven't.


Yes, I have.

Woman like men. Then woman like women. Then women liked men again.

During the woman liking women phase, held to the party line, "never really like men, now only like women"


then had children and got married.
Female sexuality is more fluid, but no outside influences can change or.



1. I've seen male homosexuals play similar games.

2. The Party Line for you lefties is that NOTHING can change sexuality. It is "born this way". I've seen men and women change, and sometimes even change BACK. If Change is possible, this a. invalidates many (most) of liberal positions on the subject and b. validates the possibility of an outside influence changing it.
Oh Christ you haven't seen shit. Am I supposed to believe you have closely interviewed these people and cross referenced? Bullshit.
 
thats like saying you cant change a person's attraction to alcohol. If a person is for example 60% hetero he may seek treatment to maintain his life in a hetersexual
family for the benefit of others in his family. Simple enough??
That is so dumb. Comparing alcohol to sexuality makes no sense at all. There is no treatment that actually effectively eliminates homosexual feelings. People can simply choose not to act on those feelings.

yes and they can seek treatment to help them not act on those feelings
Choosing not to act on those feelings doesn't change their sexuality.

it in effect does if a bisexual decides to act hetero all his life or if a gay guy decides to stay in his hetero family because on balance he prefers it
Nothing would change his actual feelings. That is how sexuality is defined.

Behavior changes you.

Environment changes you.
 
Nothing would change his actual feelings. That is how sexuality is defined.

totally moronic. if you marry a woman you change your feeling about other women ie you don't have feeling for them any longer just like an alcoholic learns to control his feelings. or a 70% bisexual might learn how to control or change his feelings.Simple enough for you now????
 
FYI: I've seen people change their sexuality and then change it BACK.

The idea that this can't happen is bullshit.
No, you haven't.


Yes, I have.

Woman like men. Then woman like women. Then women liked men again.

During the woman liking women phase, held to the party line, "never really like men, now only like women"


then had children and got married.
Female sexuality is more fluid, but no outside influences can change or.



1. I've seen male homosexuals play similar games.

2. The Party Line for you lefties is that NOTHING can change sexuality. It is "born this way". I've seen men and women change, and sometimes even change BACK. If Change is possible, this a. invalidates many (most) of liberal positions on the subject and b. validates the possibility of an outside influence changing it.
Oh Christ you haven't seen shit. Am I supposed to believe you have closely interviewed these people and cross referenced? Bullshit.


THe woman in question was a close personal friend.

I knew her early in college when she was dating an older man, and sometimes made out with me.

I knew her when she had an ugly breakup with him and "discovered" that she was gay.

I knew her for years afterwards, thought several lesbian relationships.

I reconnected shortly after she got pregnant and married the father.

They were together for a long time and had three(?) children.

When they divorced I asked her, if she was to start dating again, would it be with a woman or a man.

She admitted that it would probably be with a man.


She is not the only one I saw such back and forth behavior, contradicting their stated preferences, just the most extreme.
 
I tend to agree with the 50,000 psychologists referred to in the New Yorker magazine article but that still leaves the question of whether Trump is more fit to serve than a liberal.

Given that liberals have destroyed our families, schools, religion, healthcare system, and driven our corporations off shore with their taxes,unions and regulations it seems clear that Trump is still by far the better choice.
Libs have destroyed nothing you idiot Trump and america are the worlds laughing stock thanks to idiots like you
 
Take this and add 49,999 more to it.
IMG_0595.GIF
 
I tend to agree with the 50,000 psychologists referred to in the New Yorker magazine article but that still leaves the question of whether Trump is more fit to serve than a liberal.

Given that liberals have destroyed our families, schools, religion, healthcare system, and driven our corporations off shore with their taxes,unions and regulations it seems clear that Trump is still by far the better choice.
Lol

As if it fucking matters.

50k Martians said earthlings raped & pillaged their planet via the pyramid teleportation devices.

^^^^^means as much as your op
50,000 granpaws supported the AH trump who gave classified info to Russia All of you freaks should leave and go to Russia
 
That is so dumb. Comparing alcohol to sexuality makes no sense at all. There is no treatment that actually effectively eliminates homosexual feelings. People can simply choose not to act on those feelings.

yes and they can seek treatment to help them not act on those feelings
Choosing not to act on those feelings doesn't change their sexuality.

it in effect does if a bisexual decides to act hetero all his life or if a gay guy decides to stay in his hetero family because on balance he prefers it
Nothing would change his actual feelings. That is how sexuality is defined.

Behavior changes you.

Environment changes you.
Sexuality does not change. Research reflects that.
 
No, you haven't.


Yes, I have.

Woman like men. Then woman like women. Then women liked men again.

During the woman liking women phase, held to the party line, "never really like men, now only like women"


then had children and got married.
Female sexuality is more fluid, but no outside influences can change or.



1. I've seen male homosexuals play similar games.

2. The Party Line for you lefties is that NOTHING can change sexuality. It is "born this way". I've seen men and women change, and sometimes even change BACK. If Change is possible, this a. invalidates many (most) of liberal positions on the subject and b. validates the possibility of an outside influence changing it.
Oh Christ you haven't seen shit. Am I supposed to believe you have closely interviewed these people and cross referenced? Bullshit.


THe woman in question was a close personal friend.

I knew her early in college when she was dating an older man, and sometimes made out with me.

I knew her when she had an ugly breakup with him and "discovered" that she was gay.

I knew her for years afterwards, thought several lesbian relationships.

I reconnected shortly after she got pregnant and married the father.

They were together for a long time and had three(?) children.

When they divorced I asked her, if she was to start dating again, would it be with a woman or a man.

She admitted that it would probably be with a man.


She is not the only one I saw such back and forth behavior, contradicting their stated preferences, just the most extreme.
All of that makes her bisexual. Problably pansexual if anything.
 
yes and they can seek treatment to help them not act on those feelings
Choosing not to act on those feelings doesn't change their sexuality.

it in effect does if a bisexual decides to act hetero all his life or if a gay guy decides to stay in his hetero family because on balance he prefers it
Nothing would change his actual feelings. That is how sexuality is defined.

Behavior changes you.

Environment changes you.
Sexuality does not change. Research reflects that.


Which is absurd. I've seen it repeatedly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top