usmbguest5318
Gold Member
No it doesn't. "Fit to serve" and "advocating policies with which one disagrees" are very different things.that still leaves the question of whether Trump is more fit to serve than a liberal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No it doesn't. "Fit to serve" and "advocating policies with which one disagrees" are very different things.that still leaves the question of whether Trump is more fit to serve than a liberal.
Republicans are good at giving wars BS wars and trump is a disaster waiting to happen??????LOL yeah if you like warsOnce again, all these psychologists are in violation of 'The Goldwater Rule'. They have proven they are unethical.
Goldwater rule - Wikipedia
I don't see why? They are as entitled as anyone to judge his psychological fitness. You have to admit that with his red skin, funny hair, 3 wives, inability to speak English, lying about so much from the get go, his pussy grabbing arrogance, his gold leafed apartment, and always ( at least in beginning) bragging about his money and education, he is way way off center.
As I said though a nutty crazy Republican is probably better than a normal liberal.
I tend to agree with the 50,000 psychologists referred to in the New Yorker magazine article but that still leaves the question of whether Trump is more fit to serve than a liberal.
Given that liberals have destroyed our families, schools, religion, healthcare system, and driven our corporations off shore with their taxes,unions and regulations it seems clear that Trump is still by far the better choice.