Jarlaxle
Gold Member
If he was charging the officer, the hits on the arm will bear that out if the points of entry indicate that. If standing prone in surrender, it'll show that as well. Why the autopsy is so critical. And probably why the family requested the second one. Both vindicated the officer.
Check out the news: NO GUN POWER ON HIM. He was shot at a distance.
Would the gun powder penetrate his clothing? Was the clothing available to the medical examiner?
If he was shot in the arm, wouldn't there be residue on his hands, face, and possibly (if wearing short sleeves) his arms?