Roudy
Diamond Member
- Mar 16, 2012
- 59,568
- 17,869
- 2,180
Meanwhile she doesn't even bat an eye when Assad drops poison gas on his own people, killing 400 kids in their sleep. Oh wait, she DOES care. She'll find a way to make it look as if the Jooooos did it. Ha ha ha. Disgusting.The way Sherri carries on you would think the kid was shot in the eye with a Tomahawk missle.WHY IS DU WEAPONRY ALREADY ILLEGAL?
The depleted uranium (DU) weaponry that the United States is using in Iraq and Afghanistan, and has used in the former Yugoslavia, is clearly illegal.
This is an essential point that the public, and victims of DU poisoning, including U.S. veterans, need to understand and stress in their arguments against DU weapons.
DU weapons fail the 4 point legal test, as international lawyer Karen Parker describes below:
A weapon is made illegal two ways: (1) by adoption of a specific treaty banning it; and (2) because it may not be used without violating the existing law and customs of war. A weapon made illegal only because there is a specific treaty banning it is only illegal for countries that ratify such a treaty. A weapon that is illegal by operation of existing law is illegal for all countries. This is true even if there is also a treaty on this weapon and a country has not ratified that treaty.
The laws and customs of war (humanitarian law) includes all treaties governing military operations, weapons and protection of victims of war as well as all customary international law on these subjects. In other words, in evaluating whether a particular weapon is legal or illegal when there is not a specific treaty, the whole of humanitarian law must be consulted.
There are four rules derived from the whole of humanitarian law regarding weapons:
(1) Weapons may only be used in the legal field of battle, defined as legal military targets of the enemy in the war. Weapons may not have an adverse effect off the legal field of battle. (The "territorial" test).
(2) Weapons can only be used for the duration of an armed conflict. A weapon that is used or continues to act after the war is over violates this criterion. (The "temporal" test).
(3) Weapons may not be unduly inhumane. (The "humaneness" test).
(4) Weapons may not have an unduly negative effect on the natural environment. (The "environmental" test).
DU weaponry fails all four tests:
(1) It cannot be "contained" to legal fields of battle and thus fails the territorial test.
(2) It continues to act after hostilities are over and thus fails the temporal test.
(3) It is inhumane and thus fails the humaneness test. DU is inhumane because of how it can kill -- by cancer, kidney disease, etc. long after the hostilities are over. DU is inhumane because it causes birth (genetic) defects thus effecting children (who may never be a military target) and who are born after the war is over. The use of DU weapons may be characterized as genocidal by burdening gene pools of future generations.
(4) DU cannot be used without unduly damaging the natural environment and thus fails the environment test.
THE USE OF DEPLETED URANIUM WEAPONS IS ILLEGAL *PIC*
I would be ashamed if all I could do was cut and paste lying propaganda. Off topic propaganda at that. The OP is about a 6 year old losing an eye. Was he shot with a DU round, ShiaSherri?