7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

[Faun]

LIAR!

Mordechai Vanunu (Hebrew: מרדכי ואנונו‎‎; born 14 October 1954), also known as John Crossman,[1][2] is an Israeli former nuclear technician and peace activist[3] who, citing his opposition to weapons of mass destruction, revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the British press in 1986.[4] He was subsequently lured to Italy by a Mossad agent, where he was drugged and abducted by Israeli intelligence agents.[4] He was transported to Israel and ultimately convicted in a trial that was held behind closed doors.[4]

Vanunu spent 18 years in prison, including more than 11 in solitary confinement. Released from prison in 2004, he became subject to a broad array of restrictions on his speech and movement. Since then he has been arrested several times for violations of those restrictions, including giving various interviews to foreign journalists and attempting to leave Israel. He says he suffered "cruel and barbaric treatment" at the hands of Israeli authorities while imprisoned, and suggests that his treatment would have been different if he had not converted to Christianity from Judaism.[5]

In 2007, Vanunu was sentenced to six months in prison for violating terms of his parole. The sentence was considered unusual even by the prosecution who expected a suspended sentence. In response, Amnesty International issued a press release on 2 July 2007, stating that "The organisation considers Mordechai Vanunu to be a prisoner of conscience and calls for his immediate and unconditional release."[6]

In May 2010, Vanunu was arrested and sentenced to three months in jail on a charge that he met foreigners in violation of conditions of his 2004 release from jail. Vanunu has been characterized internationally as a whistleblower[7][8] and by Israel as a traitor.[9][10][11][12]

Daniel Ellsberg has referred to him as "the preeminent hero of the nuclear era".[13]

Who is lying once again..

You as always!

Not me I produce facts and links that your little mind can not absorb..

LIAR!

Two threads and over 30 links and yoiu are calling me a liar fake link poster?

You and little Bo sheep just post crap irrelevant to the he question


.

.

And almost every link you posted relies on the same source... the Senate subcommittee report on the matter. And what did they report?

That Obama gave no money to influence the 2015 election. And how could Obama have done that when the money he did provide was given before the election began?

Common sense eludes you.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

 

[Faun]

Poor, bear513, he's in full meltdown.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.​

Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.

When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”







.

LOLOL

You proved no such thing. Here... from your own source...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.​

So did isreal.you fucking retard, yet your Prince of poop medded in isreals election


The entire world knew that...




Let me ask you faun. How does it feel to be a Obama sheep, does it make you feel special?

Nope, he did not meddle in their election. Your own source says so...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.​

How does that prove Obama did not meddle?



.

Exactly how rightarded are you??

You said Obama meddled by giving OneVoice money to influence the election.

Your own source says you're an imbecile as that did not happen.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

 

[Wyatt earp]

LIAR!

Mordechai Vanunu (Hebrew: מרדכי ואנונו‎‎; born 14 October 1954), also known as John Crossman,[1][2] is an Israeli former nuclear technician and peace activist[3] who, citing his opposition to weapons of mass destruction, revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the British press in 1986.[4] He was subsequently lured to Italy by a Mossad agent, where he was drugged and abducted by Israeli intelligence agents.[4] He was transported to Israel and ultimately convicted in a trial that was held behind closed doors.[4]

Vanunu spent 18 years in prison, including more than 11 in solitary confinement. Released from prison in 2004, he became subject to a broad array of restrictions on his speech and movement. Since then he has been arrested several times for violations of those restrictions, including giving various interviews to foreign journalists and attempting to leave Israel. He says he suffered "cruel and barbaric treatment" at the hands of Israeli authorities while imprisoned, and suggests that his treatment would have been different if he had not converted to Christianity from Judaism.[5]

In 2007, Vanunu was sentenced to six months in prison for violating terms of his parole. The sentence was considered unusual even by the prosecution who expected a suspended sentence. In response, Amnesty International issued a press release on 2 July 2007, stating that "The organisation considers Mordechai Vanunu to be a prisoner of conscience and calls for his immediate and unconditional release."[6]

In May 2010, Vanunu was arrested and sentenced to three months in jail on a charge that he met foreigners in violation of conditions of his 2004 release from jail. Vanunu has been characterized internationally as a whistleblower[7][8] and by Israel as a traitor.[9][10][11][12]

Daniel Ellsberg has referred to him as "the preeminent hero of the nuclear era".[13]

Who is lying once again..Obama snitched to the world on a trusted ally


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less



Every president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war

Obama snitched, no one knew what they really had.


Obama Release Of Secret Report On Israel Nukes Betrays Ally


Of course, Israel's nuclear prowess is an open secret. But the details have heretofore been largely unknown — something that's called "constructive ambiguity" in nuclear diplomacy. Keep your enemy guessing.


Now that Obama snitched the world knows they have as greatest nuke technology as us..


It turns out isreal might have the hydrogen bomb, no one expected that in the world


The truth about Israel's secret nuclear arsenal

Again we have the Right lying in packs each citing the other's lie as proof.

Your own link confirms my post that what Obama released was well known since 1986.

From your OWN link:
"Mordechai Vanunu, blew the whistle on it in 1986"

No it wasn't, again it was just speculated , Obama snitched it to the world.



.
.

You're truly brain-dead.

I quoted Gates, former director of the CIA, saying in 2006 that Israel has nukes and you still don't get it.

No that would be you, again we are talking presidents officially acknowledging it, government officials leaked it before 2006 and got in trouble for it, Obama snitched on an ally to fuck them over .

 

[Wyatt earp]

Who is lying once again..

You as always!

Not me I produce facts and links that your little mind can not absorb..

LIAR!

Two threads and over 30 links and yoiu are calling me a liar fake link poster?

You and little Bo sheep just post crap irrelevant to the he question


.

.

And almost every link you posted relies on the same source... the Senate subcommittee report on the matter. And what did they report?

That Obama gave no money to influence the 2015 election. And how could Obama have done that when the money he did provide was given before the election began?

Common sense eludes you.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

Again isreal said it was not illegal either...


And what was "it"


Meddeling in the isreal election

 

[Faun]

Who is lying once again..Obama snitched to the world on a trusted ally


When Obama Disclosed Israel’s Nukes, the Media Could Not have Cared Less



Every president from Eisenhower-Bush #43 knew that Israel had nuclear weapons program and was comfortable with the Jewish State’s intentional ambiguity, neither confirming or denying their weapons program. That is every president with the possible exception of JFK. It is rumored that he wanted to reveal Israel’s program until then foreign minister Golda Meir promised that Israel would never be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a war

Obama snitched, no one knew what they really had.


Obama Release Of Secret Report On Israel Nukes Betrays Ally


Of course, Israel's nuclear prowess is an open secret. But the details have heretofore been largely unknown — something that's called "constructive ambiguity" in nuclear diplomacy. Keep your enemy guessing.


Now that Obama snitched the world knows they have as greatest nuke technology as us..


It turns out isreal might have the hydrogen bomb, no one expected that in the world


The truth about Israel's secret nuclear arsenal

Again we have the Right lying in packs each citing the other's lie as proof.

Your own link confirms my post that what Obama released was well known since 1986.

From your OWN link:
"Mordechai Vanunu, blew the whistle on it in 1986"

No it wasn't, again it was just speculated , Obama snitched it to the world.



.
.

You're truly brain-dead.

I quoted Gates, former director of the CIA, saying in 2006 that Israel has nukes and you still don't get it.

No that would be you, again we are talking presidents officially acknowledging it, government officials leaked it before 2006 and got in trouble for it, Obama snitched on an ally to fuck them over .

Acknowledging what? It was no longer a secret. How does one snitch by saying something that was already said during the previous administration?

 

[Faun]

You as always!

Not me I produce facts and links that your little mind can not absorb..

LIAR!

Two threads and over 30 links and yoiu are calling me a liar fake link poster?

You and little Bo sheep just post crap irrelevant to the he question


.

.

And almost every link you posted relies on the same source... the Senate subcommittee report on the matter. And what did they report?

That Obama gave no money to influence the 2015 election. And how could Obama have done that when the money he did provide was given before the election began?

Common sense eludes you.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

Again isreal said it was not illegal either...


And what was "it"


Meddeling in the isreal election

Who knows why you keep talking about legalities other than because you're brain-dead? Your link says it didn't happen, period.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

 

[jknowgood]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

 

[AntonToo]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Bear, there are many liberals and many conservatives with all kinds of flavor but YOU sir are a dumbass to take this simplistic nonsense seriously.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Derail it? my thread was all about how liberals are incapable of understanding the world around, fruit cake..

Proven


And also did Obama meddle in isreals election


Proven




Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obama administration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.

When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in support of new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’s relationship with the United States. Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned (through an anonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s] enthusiasm for being Israel’s primary defender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration official declaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Such officially authorized criticisms of diplomats from major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu, Israel will pay a “price.”







.

LOLOL

You proved no such thing. Here... from your own source...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.​

So did isreal.you fucking retard, yet your Prince of poop medded in isreals election


The entire world knew that...




Let me ask you faun. How does it feel to be a Obama sheep, does it make you feel special?

Nope, he did not meddle in their election. Your own source says so...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.​

How does that prove Obama did not meddle?



.

Exactly how rightarded are you??

You said Obama meddled by giving OneVoice money to influence the election.

Your own source says you're an imbecile as that did not happen.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

You said Obama meddled by giving OneVoice money to influence the election.

Changing the goal posts now are we? Since when did I say that moron...the entire argument in two threads did Obama meddle in Israels election




And yes Obama gave one voice money, they built up a data base and gave it to V15 ...nothing illegal..



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Bear, there are many liberals and many conservatives with all kinds of flavor but YOU sir are a dumbass to take this simplistic nonsense seriously.

Read the he thread ....they all confirmed it and you just confirmed #7


And notice the OP got what 25 stars?

 

[Faun]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

Yeah, the economy collapsed from toxic mortgages written years earlier when Republicans controlled the Congress and did nothing to stop the hemorrhaging. The credit and real estate markets finally bleed out in 2008 and morons blame the party which just took over.

 

[AntonToo]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Bear, there are many liberals and many conservatives with all kinds of flavor but YOU sir are a dumbass to take this simplistic nonsense seriously.

Read the he thread ....they all confirmed it and you just confirmed #7


And notice the OP got what 25 stars?

That's just stupid.

Aside from me not in any shape or form crediting myself in what you quoted, you don't fucking post a 7 point thesis about how superior you conservatives are and then accuse liberals of giving themself too much credit.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

You proved no such thing. Here... from your own source...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.​

So did isreal.you fucking retard, yet your Prince of poop medded in isreals election


The entire world knew that...




Let me ask you faun. How does it feel to be a Obama sheep, does it make you feel special?

Nope, he did not meddle in their election. Your own source says so...

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.​

How does that prove Obama did not meddle?



.

Exactly how rightarded are you??

You said Obama meddled by giving OneVoice money to influence the election.

Your own source says you're an imbecile as that did not happen.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

You said Obama meddled by giving OneVoice money to influence the election.

Changing the goal posts now are we? Since when did I say that moron...the entire argument in two threads did Obama meddle in Israels election




And yes Obama gave one voice money, they built up a data base and gave it to V15 ...nothing illegal..



.

Nope, you are. Need I remind you again how you started the nonsense by claiming Obama gave money to influence the election?

And again, the subcommittee is not saying it was legal, they concluded it didn't happen. What difference does it make if you're too brain-dead to discern the distinction?

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

 

[Wyatt earp]

Not me I produce facts and links that your little mind can not absorb..

LIAR!

Two threads and over 30 links and yoiu are calling me a liar fake link poster?

You and little Bo sheep just post crap irrelevant to the he question


.

.

And almost every link you posted relies on the same source... the Senate subcommittee report on the matter. And what did they report?

That Obama gave no money to influence the 2015 election. And how could Obama have done that when the money he did provide was given before the election began?

Common sense eludes you.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

Again isreal said it was not illegal either...


And what was "it"


Meddeling in the isreal election

Who knows why you keep talking about legalities other than because you're brain-dead? Your link says it didn't happen, period.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

I met a lot of posters who loved obozo but you and edy take the cake, again why you changing the goal posts days later?



The question was always the same did Obama meddle in isreals election?

Yes he did and, Frances, canadas, Germans and Russians...from what I read and posted links too

 

[danielpalos]

Liberals understand the World, alleged conservatives are just clueless and Causeless, and have nothing but right wing fantasy, as a result.

 

[Faun]

LIAR!

Two threads and over 30 links and yoiu are calling me a liar fake link poster?

You and little Bo sheep just post crap irrelevant to the he question


.

.

And almost every link you posted relies on the same source... the Senate subcommittee report on the matter. And what did they report?

That Obama gave no money to influence the 2015 election. And how could Obama have done that when the money he did provide was given before the election began?

Common sense eludes you.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

Again isreal said it was not illegal either...


And what was "it"


Meddeling in the isreal election

Who knows why you keep talking about legalities other than because you're brain-dead? Your link says it didn't happen, period.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

I met a lot of posters who loved obozo but you and edy take the cake, again why you changing the goal posts days later?



The question was always the same did Obama meddle in isreals election?

Yes he did and, Frances, canadas, Germans and Russians...from what I read and posted links too

LOLOL

That may be your question now, but only because you're trying to pivot away from what you were saying when you were claiming Obama funneled money to the Israeli election.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Bear, there are many liberals and many conservatives with all kinds of flavor but YOU sir are a dumbass to take this simplistic nonsense seriously.

Read the he thread ....they all confirmed it and you just confirmed #7


And notice the OP got what 25 stars?

That's just stupid.

Aside from me not in any shape or form crediting myself in what you quoted, you don't fucking post a 7 point thesis about how superior you conservatives are and then accuse liberals of giving themself too much credit.

What superiority? Who said anything about conservatives being superior? The OP is about 7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world around them, look at this argument (or lack of on faun and Ed) they are incapable of absorbing facts that goes against the liberal doctrine...

.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Two threads and over 30 links and yoiu are calling me a liar fake link poster?

You and little Bo sheep just post crap irrelevant to the he question


.

.

And almost every link you posted relies on the same source... the Senate subcommittee report on the matter. And what did they report?

That Obama gave no money to influence the 2015 election. And how could Obama have done that when the money he did provide was given before the election began?

Common sense eludes you.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

Again isreal said it was not illegal either...


And what was "it"


Meddeling in the isreal election

Who knows why you keep talking about legalities other than because you're brain-dead? Your link says it didn't happen, period.

The Subcommittee found no evidence that OneVoice spent grant funds to influence the 2015 Israeli elections.

Review of U.S. State Department Grants to OneVoice
​

I met a lot of posters who loved obozo but you and edy take the cake, again why you changing the goal posts days later?



The question was always the same did Obama meddle in isreals election?

Yes he did and, Frances, canadas, Germans and Russians...from what I read and posted links too

LOLOL

That may be your question now, but only because you're trying to pivot away from what you were saying when you were claiming Obama funneled money to the Israeli election.

That was always the question, going back to the other thread...you were always posting idiotic and butt hurt



.

 

[Faun]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Bear, there are many liberals and many conservatives with all kinds of flavor but YOU sir are a dumbass to take this simplistic nonsense seriously.

Read the he thread ....they all confirmed it and you just confirmed #7


And notice the OP got what 25 stars?

That's just stupid.

Aside from me not in any shape or form crediting myself in what you quoted, you don't fucking post a 7 point thesis about how superior you conservatives are and then accuse liberals of giving themself too much credit.

What superiority? Who said anything about conservatives being superior? The OP is about 7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world around them, look at this argument (or lack of on faun and Ed) they are incapable of absorbing facts that goes against the liberal doctrine...

.

LOLOL

Exactly how are we lacking in argument when we're using your own links against your argument??

 

[Wyatt earp]

Liberals understand the World, alleged conservatives are just clueless and Causeless, and have nothing but right wing fantasy, as a result.

No you don't you cherry pick it and tune out things you don't want to hear

.