Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
interesting how troofers will use data from something they say didnt happen as proof it didnt happen
if flight 77 never crashed into the pentagon, how the fuck did they find this FDR INSIDE THE PENTAGON????????
It was planted by the conspirators, but the conspirators are so bad at the conspiracy component of the conspiracy that they inadvertently left confusing data in the shit they planted which can be used to demonstrate that the incident never even happened in the first place!
Shit. I think I'm really getting the hang of this Troofer stuff!
Don't forget they put the burnt bodies there too.. *yawn*..
I can't believe this type of bullshit..
what squeaming? (not even sure thats a word).
you clearly have no idea what i am talking about. i didnt say it didnt have the ability. i said it had no port. its not the same thing. i never even once said it was manufactured without the ability to monitor the door. the door sensor doesnt even get connected to the FDR. it gets connected to the FDAU.
Even manu quoted your post claiming the fdr was not manufactured with the ability to monitor the door and concluded the op was false from your bogus claim. I pointed him to eots' post with the links showing the fdr was updated then he moved on to asking if it was working. Your lame ass port excuse is fucking weak. Can't you at least try to entertain us while trying to avoid admitting you fucked up? All you're doing is showing why people shouldn't take you seriously.
please prove the door was monitored and that it was never opened....and while you are at it explain the voice recording of the cockpit invasion....
interesting how troofers will use data from something they say didnt happen as proof it didnt happen
if flight 77 never crashed into the pentagon, how the fuck did they find this FDR INSIDE THE PENTAGON????????
interesting how troofers will use data from something they say didnt happen as proof it didnt happen
if flight 77 never crashed into the pentagon, how the fuck did they find this FDR INSIDE THE PENTAGON????????
I guess you get so thrilled about trying to beat down others that you fail to miss the obvious: if this is true it contradicts the OCT and that is wholly independent of any claims that say it was not flt77 that hit the Pent.
what the fuck does OCT(October) have to do with this?interesting how troofers will use data from something they say didnt happen as proof it didnt happen
if flight 77 never crashed into the pentagon, how the fuck did they find this FDR INSIDE THE PENTAGON????????
I guess you get so thrilled about trying to beat down others that you fail to miss the obvious: if this is true it contradicts the OCT and that is wholly independent of any claims that say it was not flt77 that hit the Pent.
yes, it isinteresting how troofers will use data from something they say didnt happen as proof it didnt happen
if flight 77 never crashed into the pentagon, how the fuck did they find this FDR INSIDE THE PENTAGON????????
I guess you get so thrilled about trying to beat down others that you fail to miss the obvious: if this is true it contradicts the OCT and that is wholly independent of any claims that say it was not flt77 that hit the Pent.
Failing to miss the obvious is usually considered a GOOD thing!
It was planted by the conspirators, but the conspirators are so bad at the conspiracy component of the conspiracy that they inadvertently left confusing data in the shit they planted which can be used to demonstrate that the incident never even happened in the first place!
Shit. I think I'm really getting the hang of this Troofer stuff!
Don't forget they put the burnt bodies there too.. *yawn*..
I can't believe this type of bullshit..
In other words, for my made-up "Troofer" answer to fly, the Troofers would be required to make the claim that the conspirators planted bodies at the crash site and those bodies were either pre-burned OR got burned in the fires that never actually happened!
Man. I guess being a Troofer requires more effort than I have given them credit for.
it would be nothing but a huge waste of time, money,and resourcesi was previously all for a new investigation into 9/11.
now this thread has given me some doubt as to whether that is a good idea or not. here we have someone that claims a flight cockpit door was never opened and the plane could never possibly have been hijacked. he never even bothered to check even the most basic background information to see if a door sensor was even being recorded.
now this ridiculous claim is spread all over the internet and so called "truth seekers" swallow it hook, line and sinker without any skepticism at all. its really quite scary.
her dumbfuck, read post 175because the cockpit voice recorder recorded the entryhow do you know it was open?
thats how
you can HEAR them storm the cockpit, thus the door HAD to be opened for that to happen
You know the contents of the cvr? Hmmm....
CBS News reported that "Preliminary information shows there is nothing that appears to be useful on the cockpit voice tape. The tape appears to be blank or erased."[84] In its report on the CVR, the NTSB identified the unit as an L-3 Communications, Fairchild Aviation Recorders model A-100A cockpit voice recorder; a device which records on magnetic tape. The NTSB reported that "The majority of the recording tape was fused into a solid block of charred plastic." No usable segments of tape were found inside the recorder.[85]
i was previously all for a new investigation into 9/11.
now this thread has given me some doubt as to whether that is a good idea or not. here we have someone that claims a flight cockpit door was never opened and the plane could never possibly have been hijacked. he never even bothered to check even the most basic background information to see if a door sensor was even being recorded.
now this ridiculous claim is spread all over the internet and so called "truth seekers" swallow it hook, line and sinker without any skepticism at all. its really quite scary.
interesting how troofers will use data from something they say didnt happen as proof it didnt happen
if flight 77 never crashed into the pentagon, how the fuck did they find this FDR INSIDE THE PENTAGON????????
I guess you get so thrilled about trying to beat down others that you fail to miss the obvious: if this is true it contradicts the OCT and that is wholly independent of any claims that say it was not flt77 that hit the Pent.
Failing to miss the obvious is usually considered a GOOD thing!
i was previously all for a new investigation into 9/11.
now this thread has given me some doubt as to whether that is a good idea or not. here we have someone that claims a flight cockpit door was never opened and the plane could never possibly have been hijacked. he never even bothered to check even the most basic background information to see if a door sensor was even being recorded.
now this ridiculous claim is spread all over the internet and so called "truth seekers" swallow it hook, line and sinker without any skepticism at all. its really quite scary.
You lying fuck. I'm a truth seeker and I've clearly and repeatedly stated I don't know if the op claim is true.
you prove that reading comprehension is not your strong suitI guess you get so thrilled about trying to beat down others that you fail to miss the obvious: if this is true it contradicts the OCT and that is wholly independent of any claims that say it was not flt77 that hit the Pent.
Failing to miss the obvious is usually considered a GOOD thing!
Good job on ignoring the point of the post.
his guilt complexi was previously all for a new investigation into 9/11.
now this thread has given me some doubt as to whether that is a good idea or not. here we have someone that claims a flight cockpit door was never opened and the plane could never possibly have been hijacked. he never even bothered to check even the most basic background information to see if a door sensor was even being recorded.
now this ridiculous claim is spread all over the internet and so called "truth seekers" swallow it hook, line and sinker without any skepticism at all. its really quite scary.
You lying fuck. I'm a truth seeker and I've clearly and repeatedly stated I don't know if the op claim is true.
what makes you think i was talking about you?
i was previously all for a new investigation into 9/11.
now this thread has given me some doubt as to whether that is a good idea or not. here we have someone that claims a flight cockpit door was never opened and the plane could never possibly have been hijacked. he never even bothered to check even the most basic background information to see if a door sensor was even being recorded.
now this ridiculous claim is spread all over the internet and so called "truth seekers" swallow it hook, line and sinker without any skepticism at all. its really quite scary.
You lying fuck. I'm a truth seeker and I've clearly and repeatedly stated I don't know if the op claim is true.
her dumbfuck, read post 175because the cockpit voice recorder recorded the entry
thats how
you can HEAR them storm the cockpit, thus the door HAD to be opened for that to happen
You know the contents of the cvr? Hmmm....
CBS News reported that "Preliminary information shows there is nothing that appears to be useful on the cockpit voice tape. The tape appears to be blank or erased."[84] In its report on the CVR, the NTSB identified the unit as an L-3 Communications, Fairchild Aviation Recorders model A-100A cockpit voice recorder; a device which records on magnetic tape. The NTSB reported that "The majority of the recording tape was fused into a solid block of charred plastic." No usable segments of tape were found inside the recorder.[85]
then pull your head out of your ass so you can breath for a change
i was previously all for a new investigation into 9/11.
now this thread has given me some doubt as to whether that is a good idea or not. here we have someone that claims a flight cockpit door was never opened and the plane could never possibly have been hijacked. he never even bothered to check even the most basic background information to see if a door sensor was even being recorded.
now this ridiculous claim is spread all over the internet and so called "truth seekers" swallow it hook, line and sinker without any skepticism at all. its really quite scary.
You lying fuck. I'm a truth seeker and I've clearly and repeatedly stated I don't know if the op claim is true.
what makes you think i was talking about you?
This is yet another example of you trying to backpedal and just like fizz, try to pretend you didn't make a definitive claim. Let's see what you said in post 165:
(divecon)
"because the cockpit voice recorder recorded the entry
thats how
you can HEAR them storm the cockpit, thus the door HAD to be opened for that to happen"
There you are boldly claiming the op is wrong based on the recording of the cabin takeover. The cvr never provided that info. One of your OCTA buddies even believed you without checking the facts. As always, you will leave a neg rep comment because you do it every time I show you are full of shit. All I ask is to please try and be entertaining. Come up with some new names or something....
