9 year old exercises his "freedom" by shooting his sister in the head.

[sealybobo]

US boy, 9, 'kills sister over video game'

Only in America.

A 13-year-old girl in Mississippi has died after allegedly being shot by her nine-year-old brother over a video game, police say.

They said the boy grabbed a gun on Saturday afternoon after his sister would not give up the controller.

He allegedly shot her from behind, and the bullet entered her brain.

A local sheriff announced on Sunday that the teen had died of her injuries in a Memphis hospital. It was unclear how the boy obtained the gun.

It is also unclear what consequences the nine-year-old will face.

"He's just nine," Monroe County Sheriff Cecil Cantrell told the Clarion Ledger.

"I assume he's seen this on video games or TV. I don't know if he knew exactly what this would do. I can't answer that. I do know it's a tragedy."

The only way to stop a bad boy with a gun is a good girl with a gun.

Was she armed? No? See?

So you are making a joke about this?

So you were serious about your Hitler comment?

Yes I was serious. Or, it more reminded me of when Saddam called all his countries leaders together and then started naming names. If he called your name you were not only fired you were led away and never heard from again.



Watch this. Only 3 minutes and 40 seconds long. You see the men when they are called out each one of them stands up to protest but to no avail. Each one is led away and murdered.

So Trump hasn't started murdering anyone yet but he is firing anyone who isn't LOYAL.

Yes, Trump is highly unusual. I wouldn't call him Hitler but I also wouldn't call him Jimmy Carter either.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Something tells me the boy was not exercising his freedom, that he was not free to shoot his sister. Not only did the law not allow it, but neither did his parents.

That's not really the point here is it?

The reason he was able to shoot his sister was because of the gun. Why was there a gun in the house? Why was he able to get a gun? Because of the 2A, the NRA, the attitude towards guns in the US.

Wow!

You refuse to acknowledge the failure of the parent and blame everyone else!

It is amazing how you just toss everyone into the same pot as the parent!

Why was the gun in the house?

Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm.

Why was the kid able to obtain the firearm to kill their sister?

The failure of the parent to secure the firearm properly to make sure that their son was not able to get to it without their knowledge!

Now explain to the good board how it is the NRA fault for the parent failure?

I am not part of the NRA but I will be damn if I will ever agree with those like you that put the blame on others for the failure of one or two people!

As a parent it is your job to secure the firearm and if you fail to do so then you are responsible for what your child has done with your firearm along with them!

Not me, not the NRA and not gun owners across this country but you are responsible for securing your firearm and if you do own any my advice to you is to sell them because if you fail to secure your firearm you will blame society and not yourself for your failure in life!

Why was the gun in the house?
Exactly.

To protect their kids from being murdered.

Andrea Yates, in a Mental Facility, Watches Videos of Her Children – 15 Years After She Drowned Them

Fifteen years after drowning her five children in the bathtub of her suburban Houston home, Andrea Yates lives a reclusive life in a Texas mental health facility and frequently watches videos of her children laughing and playing, sources close to Yates tell PEOPLE.

Maybe we need to regulate and ban assault style bathtubs?

Yes you need to ban assault style bathtubs, also you need to ban all of the below items because some stupid parents might forget to lock them away and their children might get hold of them and by accident kill themselves:

 

[sealybobo]

Something tells me the boy was not exercising his freedom, that he was not free to shoot his sister. Not only did the law not allow it, but neither did his parents.

That's not really the point here is it?

The reason he was able to shoot his sister was because of the gun. Why was there a gun in the house? Why was he able to get a gun? Because of the 2A, the NRA, the attitude towards guns in the US.

Wow!

You refuse to acknowledge the failure of the parent and blame everyone else!

It is amazing how you just toss everyone into the same pot as the parent!

Why was the gun in the house?

Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm.

Why was the kid able to obtain the firearm to kill their sister?

The failure of the parent to secure the firearm properly to make sure that their son was not able to get to it without their knowledge!

Now explain to the good board how it is the NRA fault for the parent failure?

I am not part of the NRA but I will be damn if I will ever agree with those like you that put the blame on others for the failure of one or two people!

As a parent it is your job to secure the firearm and if you fail to do so then you are responsible for what your child has done with your firearm along with them!

Not me, not the NRA and not gun owners across this country but you are responsible for securing your firearm and if you do own any my advice to you is to sell them because if you fail to secure your firearm you will blame society and not yourself for your failure in life!

Why was the gun in the house?
Exactly.

To protect their kids from being murdered.

Andrea Yates, in a Mental Facility, Watches Videos of Her Children – 15 Years After She Drowned Them

Fifteen years after drowning her five children in the bathtub of her suburban Houston home, Andrea Yates lives a reclusive life in a Texas mental health facility and frequently watches videos of her children laughing and playing, sources close to Yates tell PEOPLE.

Maybe we need to regulate and ban assault style bathtubs?

Did the kid use a bathtub to murder his sister? Nope. His preferred weapon was a gun.

And if you want to regulate bath tubs and guns that's cool. I'll compromise with you.

 

[sealybobo]

That's not really the point here is it?

The reason he was able to shoot his sister was because of the gun. Why was there a gun in the house? Why was he able to get a gun? Because of the 2A, the NRA, the attitude towards guns in the US.

Wow!

You refuse to acknowledge the failure of the parent and blame everyone else!

It is amazing how you just toss everyone into the same pot as the parent!

Why was the gun in the house?

Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm.

Why was the kid able to obtain the firearm to kill their sister?

The failure of the parent to secure the firearm properly to make sure that their son was not able to get to it without their knowledge!

Now explain to the good board how it is the NRA fault for the parent failure?

I am not part of the NRA but I will be damn if I will ever agree with those like you that put the blame on others for the failure of one or two people!

As a parent it is your job to secure the firearm and if you fail to do so then you are responsible for what your child has done with your firearm along with them!

Not me, not the NRA and not gun owners across this country but you are responsible for securing your firearm and if you do own any my advice to you is to sell them because if you fail to secure your firearm you will blame society and not yourself for your failure in life!

Why was the gun in the house?
Exactly.

To protect their kids from being murdered.

Andrea Yates, in a Mental Facility, Watches Videos of Her Children – 15 Years After She Drowned Them

Fifteen years after drowning her five children in the bathtub of her suburban Houston home, Andrea Yates lives a reclusive life in a Texas mental health facility and frequently watches videos of her children laughing and playing, sources close to Yates tell PEOPLE.

Maybe we need to regulate and ban assault style bathtubs?

Yes you need to ban assault style bathtubs, also you need to ban all of the below items because some stupid parents might forget to lock them away and their children might get hold of them and by accident kill themselves:

Or at least lock the parent up if the kid kills themselves. But really I don't care about their own kids. If a kid kills his sister with a guy and the parents are pro guns it should be an honest mistake. No punishment should follow. But if you accidentally or maliciously shoot a stranger that stranger should own your ass.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Show us the “true and provable” bullshit claim.

Sure, right after you show ME the proof of Trumps collusion with Russia that you've been hollering about all year.

The claim that liberals kill their own children constantly and by the 1000's ?

EASY

But for the record, aside from the tons of news stories constantly of people in Chicago and other liberal towns butchering their children or drowning them etc....there's also the MILLIONS of abortions you liberals love so much

Looks like your claims of "bullshit"....are bullshit.

Now, PROVE collusion. What's that?....you can't?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Wow!

You refuse to acknowledge the failure of the parent and blame everyone else!

It is amazing how you just toss everyone into the same pot as the parent!

Why was the gun in the house?

Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm.

Why was the kid able to obtain the firearm to kill their sister?

The failure of the parent to secure the firearm properly to make sure that their son was not able to get to it without their knowledge!

Now explain to the good board how it is the NRA fault for the parent failure?

I am not part of the NRA but I will be damn if I will ever agree with those like you that put the blame on others for the failure of one or two people!

As a parent it is your job to secure the firearm and if you fail to do so then you are responsible for what your child has done with your firearm along with them!

Not me, not the NRA and not gun owners across this country but you are responsible for securing your firearm and if you do own any my advice to you is to sell them because if you fail to secure your firearm you will blame society and not yourself for your failure in life!

Why was the gun in the house?
Exactly.

To protect their kids from being murdered.

Andrea Yates, in a Mental Facility, Watches Videos of Her Children – 15 Years After She Drowned Them

Fifteen years after drowning her five children in the bathtub of her suburban Houston home, Andrea Yates lives a reclusive life in a Texas mental health facility and frequently watches videos of her children laughing and playing, sources close to Yates tell PEOPLE.

Maybe we need to regulate and ban assault style bathtubs?

Yes you need to ban assault style bathtubs, also you need to ban all of the below items because some stupid parents might forget to lock them away and their children might get hold of them and by accident kill themselves:

Or at least lock the parent up if the kid kills themselves. But really I don't care about their own kids. If a kid kills his sister with a guy and the parents are pro guns it should be an honest mistake. No punishment should follow. But if you accidentally or maliciously shoot a stranger that stranger should own your ass.

But really I don't care about their own kids.

yeah, I know, because Mothers kill their kids all the time.. They just kill with "CHOICE".

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

US boy, 9, 'kills sister over video game'

Only in America.

A 13-year-old girl in Mississippi has died after allegedly being shot by her nine-year-old brother over a video game, police say.

They said the boy grabbed a gun on Saturday afternoon after his sister would not give up the controller.

He allegedly shot her from behind, and the bullet entered her brain.

A local sheriff announced on Sunday that the teen had died of her injuries in a Memphis hospital. It was unclear how the boy obtained the gun.

It is also unclear what consequences the nine-year-old will face.

"He's just nine," Monroe County Sheriff Cecil Cantrell told the Clarion Ledger.

"I assume he's seen this on video games or TV. I don't know if he knew exactly what this would do. I can't answer that. I do know it's a tragedy."

The only way to stop a bad boy with a gun is a good girl with a gun.

Was she armed? No? See?

So you are making a joke about this?

So you were serious about your Hitler comment?

Yes I was serious. Or, it more reminded me of when Saddam called all his countries leaders together and then started naming names. If he called your name you were not only fired you were led away and never heard from again.



Watch this. Only 3 minutes and 40 seconds long. You see the men when they are called out each one of them stands up to protest but to no avail. Each one is led away and murdered.

So Trump hasn't started murdering anyone yet but he is firing anyone who isn't LOYAL.

Yes, Trump is highly unusual. I wouldn't call him Hitler but I also wouldn't call him Jimmy Carter either.

^^^^ Well Saddam Hussein was a Socialist so it is to be expected Leftists historically love violence and having anyone who disagrees with them murdered, the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party which Saddam was head of in Iraq:

Ba'ath Party (Iraqi-dominated faction) - Wikipedia

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

It will help this little psycho's next victim
and the parents won't endanger their other kids by being negligent.

And I agree we should protect kids from their parents after all parents kill their kids quite often

Thank you.

Liberal parents kill FAR more children without a gun every year than people with guns hands down. It's not even a contest.

Especially LIBERAL parents who are into self pleasure above all else and consider the pregnancies resulting from their liberal escapades a mistake and then seek abortions so they can get back in the game as fast as possible for some more "liberal" fun.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

 

[SassyIrishLass]

US boy, 9, 'kills sister over video game'

Only in America.

A 13-year-old girl in Mississippi has died after allegedly being shot by her nine-year-old brother over a video game, police say.

They said the boy grabbed a gun on Saturday afternoon after his sister would not give up the controller.

He allegedly shot her from behind, and the bullet entered her brain.

A local sheriff announced on Sunday that the teen had died of her injuries in a Memphis hospital. It was unclear how the boy obtained the gun.

It is also unclear what consequences the nine-year-old will face.

"He's just nine," Monroe County Sheriff Cecil Cantrell told the Clarion Ledger.

"I assume he's seen this on video games or TV. I don't know if he knew exactly what this would do. I can't answer that. I do know it's a tragedy."

But leftists scoff when we say a huge part of the problem is poor parenting, violence in movies and video games. But here we are

 

[sealybobo]

US boy, 9, 'kills sister over video game'

Only in America.

A 13-year-old girl in Mississippi has died after allegedly being shot by her nine-year-old brother over a video game, police say.

They said the boy grabbed a gun on Saturday afternoon after his sister would not give up the controller.

He allegedly shot her from behind, and the bullet entered her brain.

A local sheriff announced on Sunday that the teen had died of her injuries in a Memphis hospital. It was unclear how the boy obtained the gun.

It is also unclear what consequences the nine-year-old will face.

"He's just nine," Monroe County Sheriff Cecil Cantrell told the Clarion Ledger.

"I assume he's seen this on video games or TV. I don't know if he knew exactly what this would do. I can't answer that. I do know it's a tragedy."

The only way to stop a bad boy with a gun is a good girl with a gun.

Was she armed? No? See?

So you are making a joke about this?

So you were serious about your Hitler comment?

Yes I was serious. Or, it more reminded me of when Saddam called all his countries leaders together and then started naming names. If he called your name you were not only fired you were led away and never heard from again.



Watch this. Only 3 minutes and 40 seconds long. You see the men when they are called out each one of them stands up to protest but to no avail. Each one is led away and murdered.

So Trump hasn't started murdering anyone yet but he is firing anyone who isn't LOYAL.

Yes, Trump is highly unusual. I wouldn't call him Hitler but I also wouldn't call him Jimmy Carter either.

^^^^ Well Saddam Hussein was a Socialist so it is to be expected Leftists historically love violence and having anyone who disagrees with them murdered, the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party which Saddam was head of in Iraq:

Ba'ath Party (Iraqi-dominated faction) - Wikipedia

So do fascists and Trump is a fascist if I've ever seen one.

 

[OldLady]

Something tells me the boy was not exercising his freedom, that he was not free to shoot his sister. Not only did the law not allow it, but neither did his parents.

That's not really the point here is it?

The reason he was able to shoot his sister was because of the gun. Why was there a gun in the house? Why was he able to get a gun? Because of the 2A, the NRA, the attitude towards guns in the US.

Wow!

You refuse to acknowledge the failure of the parent and blame everyone else!

It is amazing how you just toss everyone into the same pot as the parent!

Why was the gun in the house?

Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm.

Why was the kid able to obtain the firearm to kill their sister?

The failure of the parent to secure the firearm properly to make sure that their son was not able to get to it without their knowledge!

Now explain to the good board how it is the NRA fault for the parent failure?

I am not part of the NRA but I will be damn if I will ever agree with those like you that put the blame on others for the failure of one or two people!

As a parent it is your job to secure the firearm and if you fail to do so then you are responsible for what your child has done with your firearm along with them!

Not me, not the NRA and not gun owners across this country but you are responsible for securing your firearm and if you do own any my advice to you is to sell them because if you fail to secure your firearm you will blame society and not yourself for your failure in life!

Why was the gun in the house?
Exactly.

^^^^

To quote Bruce:

"Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm."

Apparently, there's the problem.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

US boy, 9, 'kills sister over video game'

Only in America.

A 13-year-old girl in Mississippi has died after allegedly being shot by her nine-year-old brother over a video game, police say.

They said the boy grabbed a gun on Saturday afternoon after his sister would not give up the controller.

He allegedly shot her from behind, and the bullet entered her brain.

A local sheriff announced on Sunday that the teen had died of her injuries in a Memphis hospital. It was unclear how the boy obtained the gun.

It is also unclear what consequences the nine-year-old will face.

"He's just nine," Monroe County Sheriff Cecil Cantrell told the Clarion Ledger.

"I assume he's seen this on video games or TV. I don't know if he knew exactly what this would do. I can't answer that. I do know it's a tragedy."

You're one sick fuck

Why because he posted it?

No, because he's a sick fuck who is using an isolated tragedy to advance the cause of an American Fascist State

 

[OldLady]

Something tells me the boy was not exercising his freedom, that he was not free to shoot his sister. Not only did the law not allow it, but neither did his parents.

That's not really the point here is it?

The reason he was able to shoot his sister was because of the gun. Why was there a gun in the house? Why was he able to get a gun? Because of the 2A, the NRA, the attitude towards guns in the US.

Wow!

You refuse to acknowledge the failure of the parent and blame everyone else!

It is amazing how you just toss everyone into the same pot as the parent!

Why was the gun in the house?

Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm.

Why was the kid able to obtain the firearm to kill their sister?

The failure of the parent to secure the firearm properly to make sure that their son was not able to get to it without their knowledge!

Now explain to the good board how it is the NRA fault for the parent failure?

I am not part of the NRA but I will be damn if I will ever agree with those like you that put the blame on others for the failure of one or two people!

As a parent it is your job to secure the firearm and if you fail to do so then you are responsible for what your child has done with your firearm along with them!

Not me, not the NRA and not gun owners across this country but you are responsible for securing your firearm and if you do own any my advice to you is to sell them because if you fail to secure your firearm you will blame society and not yourself for your failure in life!

Why was the gun in the house?
Exactly.

To protect their kids from being murdered.

Ironic

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Something tells me the boy was not exercising his freedom, that he was not free to shoot his sister. Not only did the law not allow it, but neither did his parents.

That's not really the point here is it?

The reason he was able to shoot his sister was because of the gun. Why was there a gun in the house? Why was he able to get a gun? Because of the 2A, the NRA, the attitude towards guns in the US.

Wow!

You refuse to acknowledge the failure of the parent and blame everyone else!

It is amazing how you just toss everyone into the same pot as the parent!

Why was the gun in the house?

Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm.

Why was the kid able to obtain the firearm to kill their sister?

The failure of the parent to secure the firearm properly to make sure that their son was not able to get to it without their knowledge!

Now explain to the good board how it is the NRA fault for the parent failure?

I am not part of the NRA but I will be damn if I will ever agree with those like you that put the blame on others for the failure of one or two people!

As a parent it is your job to secure the firearm and if you fail to do so then you are responsible for what your child has done with your firearm along with them!

Not me, not the NRA and not gun owners across this country but you are responsible for securing your firearm and if you do own any my advice to you is to sell them because if you fail to secure your firearm you will blame society and not yourself for your failure in life!

Why was the gun in the house?
Exactly.

^^^^

To quote Bruce:

"Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm."

Apparently, there's the problem.

The only problem is that the parent was negligent and/or just stupid and had a gun that they did not secure with the safety lock, so how are you going to Legislate against Individual Stupidity? You cannot.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

That's not really the point here is it?

The reason he was able to shoot his sister was because of the gun. Why was there a gun in the house? Why was he able to get a gun? Because of the 2A, the NRA, the attitude towards guns in the US.

Wow!

You refuse to acknowledge the failure of the parent and blame everyone else!

It is amazing how you just toss everyone into the same pot as the parent!

Why was the gun in the house?

Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm.

Why was the kid able to obtain the firearm to kill their sister?

The failure of the parent to secure the firearm properly to make sure that their son was not able to get to it without their knowledge!

Now explain to the good board how it is the NRA fault for the parent failure?

I am not part of the NRA but I will be damn if I will ever agree with those like you that put the blame on others for the failure of one or two people!

As a parent it is your job to secure the firearm and if you fail to do so then you are responsible for what your child has done with your firearm along with them!

Not me, not the NRA and not gun owners across this country but you are responsible for securing your firearm and if you do own any my advice to you is to sell them because if you fail to secure your firearm you will blame society and not yourself for your failure in life!

Why was the gun in the house?
Exactly.

^^^^

To quote Bruce:

"Because the person passed the State requirements to own the firearm."

Apparently, there's the problem.

The only problem is that the parent was negligent and/or just stupid and had a gun that they did not secure with the safety lock, so how are you going to Legislate against Individual Stupidity? You cannot.

Now now never let a crisis go to waste...and leftists don't

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The only way to stop a bad boy with a gun is a good girl with a gun.

Was she armed? No? See?

So you are making a joke about this?

So you were serious about your Hitler comment?

Yes I was serious. Or, it more reminded me of when Saddam called all his countries leaders together and then started naming names. If he called your name you were not only fired you were led away and never heard from again.



Watch this. Only 3 minutes and 40 seconds long. You see the men when they are called out each one of them stands up to protest but to no avail. Each one is led away and murdered.

So Trump hasn't started murdering anyone yet but he is firing anyone who isn't LOYAL.

Yes, Trump is highly unusual. I wouldn't call him Hitler but I also wouldn't call him Jimmy Carter either.

^^^^ Well Saddam Hussein was a Socialist so it is to be expected Leftists historically love violence and having anyone who disagrees with them murdered, the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party which Saddam was head of in Iraq:

Ba'ath Party (Iraqi-dominated faction) - Wikipedia

So do fascists and Trump is a fascist if I've ever seen one.

Yeah, giving more of the working people more of their own money, sure is Fascism......

 

[Cellblock2429]

The kid's parents should be thrown in jail for negligent homicide and the little psycho should spend the next 10 years in a locked ward of a mental institution

How does that help the next victim ?

Its just reactive.People have proven on many occasions that they cant be trusted and its time for grown ups to protect the kids.

/----/ Tommy, did you give up your car yet? You can't be trusted.

 

[sealybobo]

It will help this little psycho's next victim
and the parents won't endanger their other kids by being negligent.

And I agree we should protect kids from their parents after all parents kill their kids quite often

Thank you.

Liberal parents kill FAR more children without a gun every year than people with guns hands down. It's not even a contest.

Especially LIBERAL parents who are into self pleasure above all else and consider the pregnancies resulting from their liberal escapades a mistake and then seek abortions so they can get back in the game as fast as possible for some more "liberal" fun.

Seeds not children.

So you are making a joke about this?

So you were serious about your Hitler comment?

Yes I was serious. Or, it more reminded me of when Saddam called all his countries leaders together and then started naming names. If he called your name you were not only fired you were led away and never heard from again.



Watch this. Only 3 minutes and 40 seconds long. You see the men when they are called out each one of them stands up to protest but to no avail. Each one is led away and murdered.

So Trump hasn't started murdering anyone yet but he is firing anyone who isn't LOYAL.

Yes, Trump is highly unusual. I wouldn't call him Hitler but I also wouldn't call him Jimmy Carter either.

^^^^ Well Saddam Hussein was a Socialist so it is to be expected Leftists historically love violence and having anyone who disagrees with them murdered, the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party which Saddam was head of in Iraq:

Ba'ath Party (Iraqi-dominated faction) - Wikipedia

So do fascists and Trump is a fascist if I've ever seen one.

Yeah, giving more of the working people more of their own money, sure is Fascism......

Crumbs.

And yes, Hitler too promised everyone would be better off financially if he was in charge. Moussalini too. So giving you a few bucks to make you happy and shut you up is right out of the fascist playbook.

 

[Windparadox]

and yet all you "activists" seem to be calling for gun bans

`
Why is it that with your types, for someone to advocate putting legal pragmatic restrictions on purchasing guns, automatically means "everyone" wants to "ban" and/or "confiscate" all guns? That's crazy.
`