A bit of "irony" on Libby's pardoning.....

Trump, pissed off at Comey, calls him (among other labels), a "leaker and a liar"

Trump then pardons Libby who was convicted of leaking and lying.

Bottom line: Trump dog whistling to Manafort and Cohen.....".....If I'm still around, I'll ALSO pardon you....after all, a criminal mob is like a family."


Libby wasn't actually guilty.

The legal system disagrees with you, and that is really all that matters.



No, it's not.

Libby wasn't actually guilty.


YOU might not care if an innocent man is railroaded by petty tyrants, but I do.
 
Was he convicted of outing Plame?

Give it a rest.....

Libby was far from "innocent," and 11 years ago was convicted on four counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements.


Got it. You know he didnt' do it, but you're happy to see him in jail, for political reasons.

What does that make you?
 
Was he convicted of outing Plame?

Give it a rest.....

Libby was far from "innocent," and 11 years ago was convicted on four counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements.


Got it. You know he didnt' do it, but you're happy to see him in jail, for political reasons.

What does that make you?

nat is a hack and a hypocrite, he wear's those hat's proudly. He knows it was Armitage.
 
Last edited:
Trump, pissed off at Comey, calls him (among other labels), a "leaker and a liar"

Trump then pardons Libby who was convicted of leaking and lying.

Bottom line: Trump dog whistling to Manafort and Cohen.....".....If I'm still around, I'll ALSO pardon you....after all, a criminal mob is like a family."


Libby wasn't actually guilty.

The legal system disagrees with you, and that is really all that matters.

Was he convicted of outing Plame?

Who cares, he was found guilty by our legal system for multiple crimes


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


So, you don't care if an innocent man is sentenced to jail for political reasons.


Wow. That's heartless. Maybe soulless.
 
nat is a hack and a hypocrite, he wear's those hat's proudly. He knows it was Armitage.

On July 14, 2003, a newspaper column by Robert Novak, entitled "Mission to Niger", disclosed Plame's name and status as an "operative" who worked at the CIA.

Novak was an ultra conservative
Armitage was a republican


LOL
 
nat is a hack and a hypocrite, he wear's those hat's proudly. He knows it was Armitage.

On July 14, 2003, a newspaper column by Robert Novak, entitled "Mission to Niger", disclosed Plame's name and status as an "operative" who worked at the CIA.

Novak was an ultra conservative
Armitage was a republican


LOL



So, if it was Armitage, then why is your op not supportive of this pardon?
 
Trump, pissed off at Comey, calls him (among other labels), a "leaker and a liar"

Trump then pardons Libby who was convicted of leaking and lying.

Bottom line: Trump dog whistling to Manafort and Cohen.....".....If I'm still around, I'll ALSO pardon you....after all, a criminal mob is like a family."


Libby wasn't actually guilty.

The legal system disagrees with you, and that is really all that matters.

Was he convicted of outing Plame?

Who cares, he was found guilty by our legal system for multiple crimes


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


So, you don't care if an innocent man is sentenced to jail for political reasons.


Wow. That's heartless. Maybe soulless.

He was convicted of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury, and one count of making false statements. Please provide some sort of evidence he was innocent of all those charges.
 
Trump, pissed off at Comey, calls him (among other labels), a "leaker and a liar"

Trump then pardons Libby who was convicted of leaking and lying.

Bottom line: Trump dog whistling to Manafort and Cohen.....".....If I'm still around, I'll ALSO pardon you....after all, a criminal mob is like a family."


Libby wasn't actually guilty.

The legal system disagrees with you, and that is really all that matters.



No, it's not.

Libby wasn't actually guilty.


YOU might not care if an innocent man is railroaded by petty tyrants, but I do.

The legal system found him guilty of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury, and one count of making false statements. Please provide some evidence he did not commit those 4 crimes.
 
Was he convicted of outing Plame?

Give it a rest.....

Libby was far from "innocent," and 11 years ago was convicted on four counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements.


Got it. You know he didnt' do it, but you're happy to see him in jail, for political reasons.

What does that make you?

nat is a hack and a hypocrite, he wear's those hat's proudly. He knows it was Armitage.

And armitage was never charged with a crime because this “leak” wasn’t a crime
 
Trump, pissed off at Comey, calls him (among other labels), a "leaker and a liar"

Trump then pardons Libby who was convicted of leaking and lying.

Bottom line: Trump dog whistling to Manafort and Cohen.....".....If I'm still around, I'll ALSO pardon you....after all, a criminal mob is like a family."


Libby wasn't actually guilty.

The legal system disagrees with you, and that is really all that matters.



No, it's not.

Libby wasn't actually guilty.


YOU might not care if an innocent man is railroaded by petty tyrants, but I do.

The legal system found him guilty of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury, and one count of making false statements. Please provide some evidence he did not commit those 4 crimes.

A key witness recanted her statements
 
Trump, pissed off at Comey, calls him (among other labels), a "leaker and a liar"

Trump then pardons Libby who was convicted of leaking and lying.

Bottom line: Trump dog whistling to Manafort and Cohen.....".....If I'm still around, I'll ALSO pardon you....after all, a criminal mob is like a family."


Libby wasn't actually guilty.

The legal system disagrees with you, and that is really all that matters.



No, it's not.

Libby wasn't actually guilty.


YOU might not care if an innocent man is railroaded by petty tyrants, but I do.

The legal system found him guilty of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury, and one count of making false statements. Please provide some evidence he did not commit those 4 crimes.

A key witness recanted her statements

Do you have a link?
 
nat is a hack and a hypocrite, he wear's those hat's proudly. He knows it was Armitage.

On July 14, 2003, a newspaper column by Robert Novak, entitled "Mission to Niger", disclosed Plame's name and status as an "operative" who worked at the CIA.

Novak was an ultra conservative
Armitage was a republican


LOL

And neither was charged with a crime because there was nothing illegal about “leaking” her name
 
Libby wasn't actually guilty.

The legal system disagrees with you, and that is really all that matters.

Was he convicted of outing Plame?

Who cares, he was found guilty by our legal system for multiple crimes


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


So, you don't care if an innocent man is sentenced to jail for political reasons.


Wow. That's heartless. Maybe soulless.

He was convicted of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury, and one count of making false statements. Please provide some sort of evidence he was innocent of all those charges.



DID HE COMMIT THE CRIME THAT HE WAS QUESTIONED ON, IE OUTING PLAME?


OR WAS IT ALL BULLSHIT PERJURY TRAPS TO GIVE THE ASSHOLE PROSECUTOR A "WIN" TO HIDE THE FACT THAT HE UTTERLY FAILED.
 
Was he convicted of outing Plame?

Give it a rest.....

Libby was far from "innocent," and 11 years ago was convicted on four counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements.


Got it. You know he didnt' do it, but you're happy to see him in jail, for political reasons.

What does that make you?

nat is a hack and a hypocrite, he wear's those hat's proudly. He knows it was Armitage.

And armitage was never charged with a crime because this “leak” wasn’t a crime

LOL, the point being that the entire thing was bullshit.
 
And neither was charged with a crime because there was nothing illegal about “leaking” her name

Plame was 'covert' agent at time of name leak

The special counsel recommended to the judge that Libby not receive any leniency, because, he writes, "He has expressed no remorse, no acceptance of responsibility, and no recognition that there is anything he should have done differently - either with respect to his false statements and testimony, or his role in providing reporters with classified information about Ms. Wilson's affiliation with the CIA."..........Libby was convicted....of four of five felony counts against him.

Plame was ‘covert’ agent at time of name leak
 
And neither was charged with a crime because there was nothing illegal about “leaking” her name

Plame was 'covert' agent at time of name leak

The special counsel recommended to the judge that Libby not receive any leniency, because, he writes, "He has expressed no remorse, no acceptance of responsibility, and no recognition that there is anything he should have done differently - either with respect to his false statements and testimony, or his role in providing reporters with classified information about Ms. Wilson's affiliation with the CIA."..........Libby was convicted....of four of five felony counts against him.

Plame was ‘covert’ agent at time of name leak

Well except Libby didn't do it.
 
And neither was charged with a crime because there was nothing illegal about “leaking” her name

Plame was 'covert' agent at time of name leak

The special counsel recommended to the judge that Libby not receive any leniency, because, he writes, "He has expressed no remorse, no acceptance of responsibility, and no recognition that there is anything he should have done differently - either with respect to his false statements and testimony, or his role in providing reporters with classified information about Ms. Wilson's affiliation with the CIA."..........Libby was convicted....of four of five felony counts against him.

Plame was ‘covert’ agent at time of name leak

You're nothing but hack kid.

"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage was the source who revealed the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame to syndicated columnist Robert Novak in 2003, touching off a federal investigation, two sources familiar with Armitage's role tell CNN.

The sources said Armitage revealed Plame's role at the CIA almost inadvertently in a casual conversation with Novak, and it is not clear if he knew her identity was classified at the time.

Armitage was not indicted by the federal grand jury that investigated the disclosure of Plame's name to Novak and other journalists. Deliberately revealing the identify of a CIA operative can be a crime.


CNN.com - Sources: State Department official source of Plame leak - Aug 30, 2006
 
And neither was charged with a crime because there was nothing illegal about “leaking” her name

Plame was 'covert' agent at time of name leak

The special counsel recommended to the judge that Libby not receive any leniency, because, he writes, "He has expressed no remorse, no acceptance of responsibility, and no recognition that there is anything he should have done differently - either with respect to his false statements and testimony, or his role in providing reporters with classified information about Ms. Wilson's affiliation with the CIA."..........Libby was convicted....of four of five felony counts against him.

Plame was ‘covert’ agent at time of name leak

You're nothing but hack kid.

"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage was the source who revealed the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame to syndicated columnist Robert Novak in 2003, touching off a federal investigation, two sources familiar with Armitage's role tell CNN.

The sources said Armitage revealed Plame's role at the CIA almost inadvertently in a casual conversation with Novak, and it is not clear if he knew her identity was classified at the time.

Armitage was not indicted by the federal grand jury that investigated the disclosure of Plame's name to Novak and other journalists. Deliberately revealing the identify of a CIA operative can be a crime.


CNN.com - Sources: State Department official source of Plame leak - Aug 30, 2006



vg0my0.jpg




It's going to be funny to see her try to dance around THAT!
 
And neither was charged with a crime because there was nothing illegal about “leaking” her name

Plame was 'covert' agent at time of name leak

The special counsel recommended to the judge that Libby not receive any leniency, because, he writes, "He has expressed no remorse, no acceptance of responsibility, and no recognition that there is anything he should have done differently - either with respect to his false statements and testimony, or his role in providing reporters with classified information about Ms. Wilson's affiliation with the CIA."..........Libby was convicted....of four of five felony counts against him.

Plame was ‘covert’ agent at time of name leak

No she wasn’t. That’s why Armitage was never arrested
 

Forum List

Back
Top