A Democrat Heroine As Proof There is a 'Far Left'

[PoliticalChic]

There are only two political views, the two major parties.

When was the last time neither a Democrat nor Republican won the presidency?

That doesn't mean other political views don't exist. Good grief...

There are folks who worship the Spaghetti God, too...but we don't include them in a serious discussion of religion.

The same for the Leftists who try to equate some tiny minority of losers with the Right.

See if you can find any radical positions endorsed by the Right.

And stop falling from the propaganda.

I vehemently oppose the Kennedy-era liberalism of the modern day Republican Party. I'm a constitutional conservative who votes the Constitution Party. You consider me "radical" because the Republican Party doesn't support the U.S. Constitution as it should?

And by the way - the Tea Party unseated MANY former Republican representatives. So there is another place at the table.

"You consider me "radical" because the Republican Party doesn't support the U.S. Constitution as it should?"

No I don't.

We're speaking of two political movements: the Far Left....radical with reference to American traditional values and positions....

...and the apocryphal "Far Right"....which doesn't exist.



But.....try again: See if you can find any radical positions endorsed by the Right.

 

[P@triot]

We're speaking of two political movements: the Far Left....radical with reference to American traditional values and positions.... ...and the apocryphal "Far Right"....which doesn't exist. But.....try again: See if you can find any radical positions endorsed by the Right.

What you fail to understand here is that just because those positions aren't endorsed by those in powers doesn't mean they don't exist. Sovereign Citizens absolutely do exist. The Republicans (rightful) refusal to implement that bat-shit crazy belief doesn't cease to make it exist.

The existence of something does not hinge on the Republican's acceptance or refusal of said subject matter.

 

[jknowgood]

What successes?

Your Constitution, for starters.

Liberals like yourself would've been hung back then. The founders actually had common sense. Just think if you would've told them a man should use the bathroom with a girl. Liberalism destroyed the black family all for a vote.

Setting aside the proportions of my manly endowment, why would I have been hanged in 1787?

So men used the bathroom with girls back then? You're an idiot.

They owned other humans "back then". You can't judge modern society by what the founders might think of it.

I cannot think of anything liberals stand for today. That the founding fathers would support.

 

[Reasonable]

1. While there is no Far Right in this nation, there not only is a Far Left, but it is the controlling factor in the Democrat Party.
We'll prove that with the party's choice of poster-girl, Linda Sarsour




2. The mechanism that has proven so successful for the Left is 'Identity Politics,' singling out each and ever group as separate, and with distinct grievances against America and other Americans.
Blacks, the Democrat's ticket to national elections are constantly reminded of an extinct 'racism' that they haven't experienced in nearly seven generations. Remember Biden's "they want to put you back in chains'?

3. The growing Muslim population is one more of the Democrat's brass rings on the political carousel, and they fervently want to grow that particular constituency.


a. "Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart


b. "...Hillary Clinton wants to let 500 percent more Syrians into the U.S." Would Clinton boost Syrian refugees 500 percent?




Beyond the possible avalanche of votes for Democrats- the very same reason for their support of illegal immigration- it is difficult to overlook the conspicuous bond both Islam and Liberalism enjoy: the demand for submission.

".... Americans would once again die in their own country because of an ideology, and a faith, born of a region that most could not find on a map. The enemy could not be reasoned with or dismissed; it could not be appeased by an American withdrawal from the Islamic world. America could leave the Middle East... but the Middle East would follow it home. " The novel 'The Black Widow," by Daniel Silva, p.356



4. It is no accident that the Democrats have selected a Far Left Islamofascist, Linda Sarsour, as their iconic Muslim, the very sort that personifies Democrats today.

I'll document that, next.

When the first 9 words of your OP is a bald faced lie, no further reading is neccesary.

 

[Reasonable]

Your Constitution, for starters.

Liberals like yourself would've been hung back then. The founders actually had common sense. Just think if you would've told them a man should use the bathroom with a girl. Liberalism destroyed the black family all for a vote.

Setting aside the proportions of my manly endowment, why would I have been hanged in 1787?

So men used the bathroom with girls back then? You're an idiot.

They owned other humans "back then". You can't judge modern society by what the founders might think of it.

I cannot think of anything liberals stand for today. That the founding fathers would support.

Once again you don't know your assfrom a hole in the ground.
The democrats stand for giving everyone a chance to succeed, to live out the American dream no matter their race, religion, ethnic background or sociological place in society. ..... for starters.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We're speaking of two political movements: the Far Left....radical with reference to American traditional values and positions.... ...and the apocryphal "Far Right"....which doesn't exist. But.....try again: See if you can find any radical positions endorsed by the Right.

What you fail to understand here is that just because those positions aren't endorsed by those in powers doesn't mean they don't exist. Sovereign Citizens absolutely do exist. The Republicans (rightful) refusal to implement that bat-shit crazy belief doesn't cease to make it exist.

The existence of something does not hinge on the Republican's acceptance or refusal of said subject matter.

They don't exist in either great enough numbers or as a doctrine of mainstream Rightwing officialdom.


Let's take one more attempt to see if the data convinces you.


1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?
Which is Rightwing?


2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.
Which party opposes prayer and religion in the public arena?
Democrats....Far Left.
The Right is central to American tradition.



3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.

Starting to see a pattern?




4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,
LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.


5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..
Do you see the Right circling the wagons around a pervert/disbarred lawyer?





6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.
A radical and Progressive position.
He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."



7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...

Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.


8. Under Roosevelt's NRA, most manufacturing industries were suddenly forced into government-mandated cartels. Codes that regulated prices and terms of sale briefly transformed much of the American economy into a fascist-style arrangement,
"... into a fascist-style arrangement,..."
"A New Jersey tailor named Jacob Maged was arrested and sent to jail for the “crime” of pressing a suit of clothes for 35 cents rather than the NRA-inspired “Tailor’s Code” of 40 cents."
No surprise here: FDR's New Deal was a copy of Mussolini's economic program.

Could anything short of setting up concentration camps for our citizens, be more radical???

Oh...wait....
FDR did just that.



9. How about The Far Left's Gender-Agenda., versus the Right's stand for tradition and reality: "Republicans Battle to Roll Back Washington's New Transgender Bathroom Rules"

Really....could there be a more pertinent example of the radical, insane Far Left's corruption of tradition and history???

Could there?




10. The corruption of the press by the Far Left: the JournoList Scandal: hundreds of Leftist journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obama’s radical ties. They plotted to smear the other side with lies. Peter Zenger....spinnning in his grave.


And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

You can't.




There is no Far Right, merely the claim of one to camouflage the Far Left's iniquities.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. While there is no Far Right in this nation, there not only is a Far Left, but it is the controlling factor in the Democrat Party.
We'll prove that with the party's choice of poster-girl, Linda Sarsour




2. The mechanism that has proven so successful for the Left is 'Identity Politics,' singling out each and ever group as separate, and with distinct grievances against America and other Americans.
Blacks, the Democrat's ticket to national elections are constantly reminded of an extinct 'racism' that they haven't experienced in nearly seven generations. Remember Biden's "they want to put you back in chains'?

3. The growing Muslim population is one more of the Democrat's brass rings on the political carousel, and they fervently want to grow that particular constituency.


a. "Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart


b. "...Hillary Clinton wants to let 500 percent more Syrians into the U.S." Would Clinton boost Syrian refugees 500 percent?




Beyond the possible avalanche of votes for Democrats- the very same reason for their support of illegal immigration- it is difficult to overlook the conspicuous bond both Islam and Liberalism enjoy: the demand for submission.

".... Americans would once again die in their own country because of an ideology, and a faith, born of a region that most could not find on a map. The enemy could not be reasoned with or dismissed; it could not be appeased by an American withdrawal from the Islamic world. America could leave the Middle East... but the Middle East would follow it home. " The novel 'The Black Widow," by Daniel Silva, p.356



4. It is no accident that the Democrats have selected a Far Left Islamofascist, Linda Sarsour, as their iconic Muslim, the very sort that personifies Democrats today.

I'll document that, next.

When the first 9 words of your OP is a bald faced lie, no further reading is neccesary.

Actually.....it's a fact.
1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?
Which is Rightwing?


2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.
Which party opposes prayer and religion in the public arena?
Democrats....Far Left.
The Right is central to American tradition.



3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.

Starting to see a pattern?




4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,
LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.


5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..
Do you see the Right circling the wagons around a pervert/disbarred lawyer?





6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.
A radical and Progressive position.
He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."



7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...

Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.


8. Under Roosevelt's NRA, most manufacturing industries were suddenly forced into government-mandated cartels. Codes that regulated prices and terms of sale briefly transformed much of the American economy into a fascist-style arrangement,
"... into a fascist-style arrangement,..."
"A New Jersey tailor named Jacob Maged was arrested and sent to jail for the “crime” of pressing a suit of clothes for 35 cents rather than the NRA-inspired “Tailor’s Code” of 40 cents."
No surprise here: FDR's New Deal was a copy of Mussolini's economic program.

Could anything short of setting up concentration camps for our citizens, be more radical???

Oh...wait....
FDR did just that.



9. How about The Far Left's Gender-Agenda., versus the Right's stand for tradition and reality: "Republicans Battle to Roll Back Washington's New Transgender Bathroom Rules"

Really....could there be a more pertinent example of the radical, insane Far Left's corruption of tradition and history???

Could there?




10. The corruption of the press by the Far Left: the JournoList Scandal: hundreds of Leftist journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obama’s radical ties. They plotted to smear the other side with lies. Peter Zenger....spinnning in his grave.


And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

You can't.




There is no Far Right, merely the claim of one to camouflage the Far Left's iniquities.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals like yourself would've been hung back then. The founders actually had common sense. Just think if you would've told them a man should use the bathroom with a girl. Liberalism destroyed the black family all for a vote.

Setting aside the proportions of my manly endowment, why would I have been hanged in 1787?

So men used the bathroom with girls back then? You're an idiot.

They owned other humans "back then". You can't judge modern society by what the founders might think of it.

I cannot think of anything liberals stand for today. That the founding fathers would support.

Once again you don't know your assfrom a hole in the ground.
The democrats stand for giving everyone a chance to succeed, to live out the American dream no matter their race, religion, ethnic background or sociological place in society. ..... for starters.

"the democrats stand for giving everyone a chance to succeed, to live out the American dream no matter their race, religion, ethnic background or sociological place in society. ..... "


Did they give the bakers who declined to make a cake for a gay couple a chance to succeed?


The Democrat Equation:

Insistence + coercion = Submission

 

[P@triot]

They don't exist in either great enough numbers or as a doctrine of mainstream Rightwing officialdom.

Again...that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just means that it's not embraced by the Republican Party. Existing and not being embraced by the Republican Party are two distinctly different things.

Let's take one more attempt to see if the data convinces you.

1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical? Which is Rightwing?

Again - you keep going back only to the party platform of the Republicans. Just because it is not part of their platform doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The existence of something does not hinge on the Republican's acceptance or refusal of said subject matter.

 

[The Professor]

There's no 'far right' in America?

Then what does this rightwinger represent? Mainstream Conservatism? lol

Richard B. Spencer - Wikipedia

Who?

WHO is the OP talking about?

The new darling of the Left. You are certainly aware of her.

They say you can judge a man by the company he keeps: Here is a partial lists of those the lib-nuts admire and defend: Linda Sarsour, Hugo Chávez Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Bowe Bergdahl and Black Lives Matter.

So why vote Democrat? Because there is nothing wiser than importing your enemies, financially supporting them, ignoring their crimes and and protecting them from criticism while they try to take over your country.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They don't exist in either great enough numbers or as a doctrine of mainstream Rightwing officialdom.

Again...that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just means that it's not embraced by the Republican Party. Existing and not being embraced by the Republican Party are two distinctly different things.

Let's take one more attempt to see if the data convinces you.

1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical? Which is Rightwing?

Again - you keep going back only to the party platform of the Republicans. Just because it is not part of their platform doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The existence of something does not hinge on the Republican's acceptance or refusal of said subject matter.

Well....why is it you are unable to give examples of radical positions by the Right?

 

[P@triot]

They don't exist in either great enough numbers or as a doctrine of mainstream Rightwing officialdom.

Again...that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just means that it's not embraced by the Republican Party. Existing and not being embraced by the Republican Party are two distinctly different things.

Let's take one more attempt to see if the data convinces you.

1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical? Which is Rightwing?

Again - you keep going back only to the party platform of the Republicans. Just because it is not part of their platform doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The existence of something does not hinge on the Republican's acceptance or refusal of said subject matter.

Well....why is it you are unable to give examples of radical positions by the Right?

I did already. Sovereign Citizens. You know exactly what their position is. Just because the Republican Party doesn't embrace their position doesn't mean it fails to exist.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There's no 'far right' in America?

Then what does this rightwinger represent? Mainstream Conservatism? lol

Richard B. Spencer - Wikipedia

Who?

WHO is the OP talking about?

The new darling of the Left. You are certainly aware of her.

They say you can judge a man by the company he keeps: Here is a partial lists of those the lib-nuts admire and defend: Linda Sarsour, Hugo Chávez Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Bowe Bergdahl and Black Lives Matter.

So why vote Democrat? Because there is nothing wiser than importing your enemies, financially supporting them, ignoring their crimes and and protecting them from criticism while they try to take over your country.

...and the snake, Hussein Obama.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. Here, an analysis of the Democrat Far Left's choice as Muslim spokesperson, Linda Sarsour.








9.For comparison purposes, this is what the Democrats/Liberals refused to choose as their Muslim spokesperson:

 

[PoliticalChic]

They don't exist in either great enough numbers or as a doctrine of mainstream Rightwing officialdom.

Again...that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just means that it's not embraced by the Republican Party. Existing and not being embraced by the Republican Party are two distinctly different things.

Let's take one more attempt to see if the data convinces you.

1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical? Which is Rightwing?

Again - you keep going back only to the party platform of the Republicans. Just because it is not part of their platform doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The existence of something does not hinge on the Republican's acceptance or refusal of said subject matter.

Well....why is it you are unable to give examples of radical positions by the Right?

I did already. Sovereign Citizens. You know exactly what their position is. Just because the Republican Party doesn't embrace their position doesn't mean it fails to exist.

What is the Far Right position you are claiming as mainstream rightwing?

There isn't any, is there.


I challenged the dunce in post #84 to provide a radical position vis-a-vis American tradition, values and/or history......

....and guess what.....

....no one is able to succeed in said challenge.


Hence.....there simply is no Far Right in this country......simply a claim that there is.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[


Well....why is it you are unable to give examples of radical positions by the Right?

Banning Islam. Restrict the vote to taxpayers only. Ban all abortion without exceptions. End Medicaid. End Medicare. Deny gays equal rights. Secession is legal (LOL). Abolish all gun control. Repeal the portion of the Civil Rights Act that bans discrimination by businesses.

 

[NYcarbineer]

They don't exist in either great enough numbers or as a doctrine of mainstream Rightwing officialdom.

Again...that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just means that it's not embraced by the Republican Party. Existing and not being embraced by the Republican Party are two distinctly different things.

Let's take one more attempt to see if the data convinces you.

1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical? Which is Rightwing?

Again - you keep going back only to the party platform of the Republicans. Just because it is not part of their platform doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The existence of something does not hinge on the Republican's acceptance or refusal of said subject matter.

Well....why is it you are unable to give examples of radical positions by the Right?

I did already. Sovereign Citizens. You know exactly what their position is. Just because the Republican Party doesn't embrace their position doesn't mean it fails to exist.

It's standard practice of the OP to simply ignore any successful refutation of her claims.

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. The brilliant Ben Shapiro crushes a Sarsour-apologist:







As pointed out by our pal, the Professor....." They say you can judge a man by the company he keeps"....and that is why we find radicals, terrorists, America-haters, and certifiable sociopaths among and leading the Democrat Party.



And murderers, too.

 

[P@triot]

It's standard practice of the OP to simply ignore any successful refutation of her claims.

I don't care what side of the aisle a person is on - I'm not going to accept posts not rooted in reality. And I have the highest respect for PoliticalChic. She's extremely bright. But it's just not rational to proclaim that if the Republican Party doesn't include something in their platform, then that something doesn't exist.

There is a radical right (Sovereign Citizens, Anarchists, and to a small degree - libertarians). Hell, Sovereign Citizens kill law enforcement officers. How can you claim something doesn't exist when it is taking the life of law enforcement officers?

 

[P@triot]

I love how Remy makes the left look absolute bat-shit crazy drama queens with this piece...