Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have yet to see evidence of when lights were installed and if each light installed has the ability to change color..
The spotlights on the White House are permanent fixtures, as I understand it. The colors are simply celluloid filters put over them. Still, it does have to be planned out and pre-approved. One does not simply do it on the spur-of-the-moment.
.... it's a religious extremist thing.
Contracts and minors re: necessities like a mother and father in marriage is not a religious extremist thing...
It's a matter of established secular law. Unless now you're advocating that anyone who doesn't approve of stripping minors of their rights to contractual necessities is " a whacko idea". Next you'll be arguing that anyone who doesn't approve of lowering the age of sexual consent is "old fashioned, whacko, bigoted...etc. etc. etc."...
It's this fucking easy. "Hey go put some rainbow colored filters on the big bright white lights out side."
Clearly, you don't spend a lot of time working with bureaucracy. One does not simply decide on something like this and have it up in a five-minute span.
Not to mention that someone had to BUY the color filters for the spotlights in the first place. I'm not aware of any previous need that would require the White House to have them on hand.
Haven't they used red & green filters at Christmas for a while?
It's this fucking easy. "Hey go put some rainbow colored filters on the big bright white lights out side."
Clearly, you don't spend a lot of time working with bureaucracy. One does not simply decide on something like this and have it up in a five-minute span.
Not to mention that someone had to BUY the color filters for the spotlights in the first place. I'm not aware of any previous need that would require the White House to have them on hand.
Haven't they used red & green filters at Christmas for a while?
This I could not tell you.
I can, however, tell you that nothing moves that fast in a bureaucracy. Hell, it takes at least 24 hours where I work to get the elevator fixed when it breaks down, and that's actually essential.
I don't have any reason to believe the White House didn't plan for their little display well in advance, even if only on the possibility of the decision they wanted. And whether they did or not, it was divisive and inappropriate.
And whether they did or not, it was divisive and inappropriate.It's this fucking easy. "Hey go put some rainbow colored filters on the big bright white lights out side."
Clearly, you don't spend a lot of time working with bureaucracy. One does not simply decide on something like this and have it up in a five-minute span.
Not to mention that someone had to BUY the color filters for the spotlights in the first place. I'm not aware of any previous need that would require the White House to have them on hand.
Haven't they used red & green filters at Christmas for a while?
It's this fucking easy. "Hey go put some rainbow colored filters on the big bright white lights out side."
Clearly, you don't spend a lot of time working with bureaucracy. One does not simply decide on something like this and have it up in a five-minute span.
Not to mention that someone had to BUY the color filters for the spotlights in the first place. I'm not aware of any previous need that would require the White House to have them on hand.
Haven't they used red & green filters at Christmas for a while?
This I could not tell you.
I can, however, tell you that nothing moves that fast in a bureaucracy. Hell, it takes at least 24 hours where I work to get the elevator fixed when it breaks down, and that's actually essential.
I don't have any reason to believe the White House didn't plan for their little display well in advance, even if only on the possibility of the decision they wanted. And whether they did or not, it was divisive and inappropriate.
And where is the scarcity of necessary time? The simplest of 'if, then' plans solve the entire 'conspiracy'. If the Obergefell decision is in support of gay marriage, then put this handful of gels on our lights.
The Obergefell decision was hardly secret. It was one of the most eagerly anticipated rulings in years. And there were months and months to prepare. And could have been done in minutes.
No need to talk about it. I'm counting on the Big Guy In The Sky to put things right.Everyone should not know what Decision is coming from the United States Supreme Court. Yes. But it's not an "argument". I don't feel the need to argue the basic foundations of the charges and duties of the US Supreme Court and the Judicial Branch of government to maintain its one tenet of Office: THE APPEARANCE OF REMAINING IMPARTIAL UNTIL ALL DELIBERATIONS HAVE ENDED.
Might try retaking American Goverment, the Jr High level course..
Hello, real world, guy. One could tell from the arguments which way the court was likely to rule. The fact was, nearly every lower court that had heard this issue struck down gay marriage bans as unconstitutional. The Judicial Branch had pretty much weighed in on this issue well before Obergefell.
The point is, this issue IS over. Done. It isn't going to change. Even the Republican candidates aren't talking about this anymore because it makes them look like assholes.
Won't you be surprised when you have been on the wrong side of this issue according to the "big guy in the sky."
No need to talk about it. I'm counting on the Big Guy In The Sky to put things right.Everyone should not know what Decision is coming from the United States Supreme Court. Yes. But it's not an "argument". I don't feel the need to argue the basic foundations of the charges and duties of the US Supreme Court and the Judicial Branch of government to maintain its one tenet of Office: THE APPEARANCE OF REMAINING IMPARTIAL UNTIL ALL DELIBERATIONS HAVE ENDED.
Might try retaking American Goverment, the Jr High level course..
Hello, real world, guy. One could tell from the arguments which way the court was likely to rule. The fact was, nearly every lower court that had heard this issue struck down gay marriage bans as unconstitutional. The Judicial Branch had pretty much weighed in on this issue well before Obergefell.
The point is, this issue IS over. Done. It isn't going to change. Even the Republican candidates aren't talking about this anymore because it makes them look like assholes.
It's this fucking easy. "Hey go put some rainbow colored filters on the big bright white lights out side."
Clearly, you don't spend a lot of time working with bureaucracy. One does not simply decide on something like this and have it up in a five-minute span.
Not to mention that someone had to BUY the color filters for the spotlights in the first place. I'm not aware of any previous need that would require the White House to have them on hand.
Haven't they used red & green filters at Christmas for a while?
This I could not tell you.
I can, however, tell you that nothing moves that fast in a bureaucracy. Hell, it takes at least 24 hours where I work to get the elevator fixed when it breaks down, and that's actually essential.
I don't have any reason to believe the White House didn't plan for their little display well in advance, even if only on the possibility of the decision they wanted. And whether they did or not, it was divisive and inappropriate.
And where is the scarcity of necessary time? The simplest of 'if, then' plans solve the entire 'conspiracy'. If the Obergefell decision is in support of gay marriage, then put this handful of gels on our lights.
The Obergefell decision was hardly secret. It was one of the most eagerly anticipated rulings in years. And there were months and months to prepare. And could have been done in minutes.
Image of San Francisco City Hall after the Giants won the World Series- good planning? Or was the World Series fixed?
Clearly, you don't spend a lot of time working with bureaucracy. One does not simply decide on something like this and have it up in a five-minute span.
Not to mention that someone had to BUY the color filters for the spotlights in the first place. I'm not aware of any previous need that would require the White House to have them on hand.
Haven't they used red & green filters at Christmas for a while?
This I could not tell you.
I can, however, tell you that nothing moves that fast in a bureaucracy. Hell, it takes at least 24 hours where I work to get the elevator fixed when it breaks down, and that's actually essential.
I don't have any reason to believe the White House didn't plan for their little display well in advance, even if only on the possibility of the decision they wanted. And whether they did or not, it was divisive and inappropriate.
And where is the scarcity of necessary time? The simplest of 'if, then' plans solve the entire 'conspiracy'. If the Obergefell decision is in support of gay marriage, then put this handful of gels on our lights.
The Obergefell decision was hardly secret. It was one of the most eagerly anticipated rulings in years. And there were months and months to prepare. And could have been done in minutes.
Image of San Francisco City Hall after the Giants won the World Series- good planning? Or was the World Series fixed?
I think we're missing the greater conspiracy.
Yeah, they just *happened* to know our national anthem, huh?
The fix is in!
Won't you be surprised when you have been on the wrong side of this issue according to the "big guy in the sky."
No need to talk about it. I'm counting on the Big Guy In The Sky to put things right.Everyone should not know what Decision is coming from the United States Supreme Court. Yes. But it's not an "argument". I don't feel the need to argue the basic foundations of the charges and duties of the US Supreme Court and the Judicial Branch of government to maintain its one tenet of Office: THE APPEARANCE OF REMAINING IMPARTIAL UNTIL ALL DELIBERATIONS HAVE ENDED.
Might try retaking American Goverment, the Jr High level course..
Hello, real world, guy. One could tell from the arguments which way the court was likely to rule. The fact was, nearly every lower court that had heard this issue struck down gay marriage bans as unconstitutional. The Judicial Branch had pretty much weighed in on this issue well before Obergefell.
The point is, this issue IS over. Done. It isn't going to change. Even the Republican candidates aren't talking about this anymore because it makes them look like assholes.
Won't you be surprised when you find out there IS a "Big Guy In The Sky", and He's none too terribly pleased with you cynically misrepresenting Him for your purposes?
The light show was nothing. The entire Obama regime is an abhorent display of politics for the sake of political gain.so this is the argument? That the White House had a light display ready in solidarity with a decision everyone new was coming?
The light show was nothing. The entire Obama regime is an abhorent display of politics for the sake of political gain.so this is the argument? That the White House had a light display ready in solidarity with a decision everyone new was coming?
Last time I checked, the office of POTUS is representative of ALL of the people. Not just the ones with which agree with the administration's political views and vice versa.
In other words, the POTUS is barred BY LAW from picking sides and choosing winners and losers.
Of course since you and the Placeholder in the WH are in lockstep agreement, there is no discussion here.
No need for you to respond. You will believe what you will believe.
I'm done( puts on noise cancelling headphones, looks straight ahead)
Wrong side, my ass.Won't you be surprised when you have been on the wrong side of this issue according to the "big guy in the sky."
No need to talk about it. I'm counting on the Big Guy In The Sky to put things right.Everyone should not know what Decision is coming from the United States Supreme Court. Yes. But it's not an "argument". I don't feel the need to argue the basic foundations of the charges and duties of the US Supreme Court and the Judicial Branch of government to maintain its one tenet of Office: THE APPEARANCE OF REMAINING IMPARTIAL UNTIL ALL DELIBERATIONS HAVE ENDED.
Might try retaking American Goverment, the Jr High level course..
Hello, real world, guy. One could tell from the arguments which way the court was likely to rule. The fact was, nearly every lower court that had heard this issue struck down gay marriage bans as unconstitutional. The Judicial Branch had pretty much weighed in on this issue well before Obergefell.
The point is, this issue IS over. Done. It isn't going to change. Even the Republican candidates aren't talking about this anymore because it makes them look like assholes.
Wrong side, my ass.Won't you be surprised when you have been on the wrong side of this issue according to the "big guy in the sky."
No need to talk about it. I'm counting on the Big Guy In The Sky to put things right.Everyone should not know what Decision is coming from the United States Supreme Court. Yes. But it's not an "argument". I don't feel the need to argue the basic foundations of the charges and duties of the US Supreme Court and the Judicial Branch of government to maintain its one tenet of Office: THE APPEARANCE OF REMAINING IMPARTIAL UNTIL ALL DELIBERATIONS HAVE ENDED.
Might try retaking American Goverment, the Jr High level course..
Hello, real world, guy. One could tell from the arguments which way the court was likely to rule. The fact was, nearly every lower court that had heard this issue struck down gay marriage bans as unconstitutional. The Judicial Branch had pretty much weighed in on this issue well before Obergefell.
The point is, this issue IS over. Done. It isn't going to change. Even the Republican candidates aren't talking about this anymore because it makes them look like assholes.
We'll see, Buttercup.Wrong side, my ass.Won't you be surprised when you have been on the wrong side of this issue according to the "big guy in the sky."
No need to talk about it. I'm counting on the Big Guy In The Sky to put things right.Everyone should not know what Decision is coming from the United States Supreme Court. Yes. But it's not an "argument". I don't feel the need to argue the basic foundations of the charges and duties of the US Supreme Court and the Judicial Branch of government to maintain its one tenet of Office: THE APPEARANCE OF REMAINING IMPARTIAL UNTIL ALL DELIBERATIONS HAVE ENDED.
Might try retaking American Goverment, the Jr High level course..
Hello, real world, guy. One could tell from the arguments which way the court was likely to rule. The fact was, nearly every lower court that had heard this issue struck down gay marriage bans as unconstitutional. The Judicial Branch had pretty much weighed in on this issue well before Obergefell.
The point is, this issue IS over. Done. It isn't going to change. Even the Republican candidates aren't talking about this anymore because it makes them look like assholes.
Yes, your ass is on the wrong side of history.
[
In other words, the POTUS is barred BY LAW from picking sides and choosing winners and losers)
The light show was nothing. The entire Obama regime is an abhorent display of politics for the sake of political gain.so this is the argument? That the White House had a light display ready in solidarity with a decision everyone new was coming?
Last time I checked, the office of POTUS is representative of ALL of the people. Not just the ones with which agree with the administration's political views and vice versa.
In other words, the POTUS is barred BY LAW from picking sides and choosing winners and losers.
Of course since you and the Placeholder in the WH are in lockstep agreement, there is no discussion here.
No need for you to respond. You will believe what you will believe.
I'm done( puts on noise cancelling headphones, looks straight ahead)
We'll see, Buttercup.Wrong side, my ass.Won't you be surprised when you have been on the wrong side of this issue according to the "big guy in the sky."
No need to talk about it. I'm counting on the Big Guy In The Sky to put things right.Hello, real world, guy. One could tell from the arguments which way the court was likely to rule. The fact was, nearly every lower court that had heard this issue struck down gay marriage bans as unconstitutional. The Judicial Branch had pretty much weighed in on this issue well before Obergefell.
The point is, this issue IS over. Done. It isn't going to change. Even the Republican candidates aren't talking about this anymore because it makes them look like assholes.
Yes, your ass is on the wrong side of history.
