A great example of why socialism is better than "charity"

[Cecilie1200]

He doesn't even know what a woman is. He thinks that a “woman” can have an XY chromosome pattern, and a fully-functional male reproductive system. Basic science, basic human biology, is beyond his grasp.

As a woman, I find it to be misogynistic, patriarchal, and culturally-appropriating to be told that my femaleness is just some ephemeral, ultimately-meaningless state of mind that a man can adopt and claim because he "feels like it". We live in a world where the left routinely attacks people for dressing their kid up as Moana for Halloween because it's an "insult to Polynesian people" or some such shit, but tell women that we're supposed to mutely accept that our womanhood, something far more integral to our core identities, can be grafted onto a man by a dress, some makeup, and a "feeling".

Following your dumb logic this guy would be allowed in that shelter

But his girl would not.

I cant see any logic in your thinking.

Perhaps if you understood logic enough to realize that airbrushed pictures of carefully made-up people have little or nothing to do with the real world, especially homeless people.

Are you seriously imagining that your treasured photographs are what all transgendered - or even most, or even a goodly number - people are like? Hell, even Bruce Jenner's Vanity Fair picture isn't what he's actually like, and it was of him!

Back in RealityLand, the 52-year-old homeless person who currently identifies as "Samantha Amanda Coyle" but who is identified as "Timothy Paul Coyle, male" on legal records as recently as January, 2017 (the last time MISTER Coyle had a run-in with the law) only came to this women's shelter after being sent away from the Brother Francis Shelter earlier that day for being drunk and fighting. Since MISTER Coyle frequently lists the address of the Brother Francis Shelter as his residence, it's safe to say they're familiar with him.

The first time he showed up at Downtown Hope Center, they actually sent him away because he was injured, and they gave him cab fare to go to a hospital, and directions to yet another shelter, which takes both men and women. Not exactly your "abandoned to the cold streets" scenario, hmmm? They also agreed with Brother Francis Shelter that he smelled strongly of alcohol.

According to Downtown Hope Center, when MISTER Coyle showed up the next day and tried to gain entrance, they actually sent him away because it was too early in the day. The overnight women's shelter portion of their services doesn't begin until 5 pm.

Also, it's important to note that more investigation into MISTER Coyle tells us that he has a long criminal history, including charges for violent crimes.

And finally, Anchorage apparently has two other women's shelters which do take in transgenders. And they clearly have at least two shelters which take both men and women. So why is it, do you suppose, that this criminally-inclined individual - who was perfectly happy to identify as a male for 50 years until just recently - is so very determined that HE has to stay at this particular shelter for abused women?

And how likely is it that HE looks like the blonde tranny you've always dreamed of and fapped to?

They refused her because of her sexuality and not because of any other reason. Why dont you answer the question ?

They offered to take him to a facility that took in both males and females, there should have been no issue.

And HE actually went to that facility, because they're the ones who helped HIM file his complaint, and their address is the one he listed as his own on the complaint.

 

[Papageorgio]

As a woman, I find it to be misogynistic, patriarchal, and culturally-appropriating to be told that my femaleness is just some ephemeral, ultimately-meaningless state of mind that a man can adopt and claim because he "feels like it". We live in a world where the left routinely attacks people for dressing their kid up as Moana for Halloween because it's an "insult to Polynesian people" or some such shit, but tell women that we're supposed to mutely accept that our womanhood, something far more integral to our core identities, can be grafted onto a man by a dress, some makeup, and a "feeling".

Following your dumb logic this guy would be allowed in that shelter

But his girl would not.

I cant see any logic in your thinking.

Perhaps if you understood logic enough to realize that airbrushed pictures of carefully made-up people have little or nothing to do with the real world, especially homeless people.

Are you seriously imagining that your treasured photographs are what all transgendered - or even most, or even a goodly number - people are like? Hell, even Bruce Jenner's Vanity Fair picture isn't what he's actually like, and it was of him!

Back in RealityLand, the 52-year-old homeless person who currently identifies as "Samantha Amanda Coyle" but who is identified as "Timothy Paul Coyle, male" on legal records as recently as January, 2017 (the last time MISTER Coyle had a run-in with the law) only came to this women's shelter after being sent away from the Brother Francis Shelter earlier that day for being drunk and fighting. Since MISTER Coyle frequently lists the address of the Brother Francis Shelter as his residence, it's safe to say they're familiar with him.

The first time he showed up at Downtown Hope Center, they actually sent him away because he was injured, and they gave him cab fare to go to a hospital, and directions to yet another shelter, which takes both men and women. Not exactly your "abandoned to the cold streets" scenario, hmmm? They also agreed with Brother Francis Shelter that he smelled strongly of alcohol.

According to Downtown Hope Center, when MISTER Coyle showed up the next day and tried to gain entrance, they actually sent him away because it was too early in the day. The overnight women's shelter portion of their services doesn't begin until 5 pm.

Also, it's important to note that more investigation into MISTER Coyle tells us that he has a long criminal history, including charges for violent crimes.

And finally, Anchorage apparently has two other women's shelters which do take in transgenders. And they clearly have at least two shelters which take both men and women. So why is it, do you suppose, that this criminally-inclined individual - who was perfectly happy to identify as a male for 50 years until just recently - is so very determined that HE has to stay at this particular shelter for abused women?

And how likely is it that HE looks like the blonde tranny you've always dreamed of and fapped to?

They refused her because of her sexuality and not because of any other reason. Why dont you answer the question ?

They offered to take him to a facility that took in both males and females, there should have been no issue.

And HE actually went to that facility, because they're the ones who helped HIM file his complaint, and their address is the one he listed as his own on the complaint.

Yep, I can believe it, remember they claim if you don't want to date them, YOU have the problem. Just beyond reason.

 

[hadit]

Not even remotely. And how dare you mansplain what being a woman "really" is, you patriarchal chauvinist?

He doesn't even know what a woman is. He thinks that a “woman” can have an XY chromosome pattern, and a fully-functional male reproductive system. Basic science, basic human biology, is beyond his grasp.

As a woman, I find it to be misogynistic, patriarchal, and culturally-appropriating to be told that my femaleness is just some ephemeral, ultimately-meaningless state of mind that a man can adopt and claim because he "feels like it". We live in a world where the left routinely attacks people for dressing their kid up as Moana for Halloween because it's an "insult to Polynesian people" or some such shit, but tell women that we're supposed to mutely accept that our womanhood, something far more integral to our core identities, can be grafted onto a man by a dress, some makeup, and a "feeling".

Following your dumb logic this guy would be allowed in that shelter

But his girl would not.

I cant see any logic in your thinking.

Perhaps if you understood logic enough to realize that airbrushed pictures of carefully made-up people have little or nothing to do with the real world, especially homeless people.

Are you seriously imagining that your treasured photographs are what all transgendered - or even most, or even a goodly number - people are like? Hell, even Bruce Jenner's Vanity Fair picture isn't what he's actually like, and it was of him!

Back in RealityLand, the 52-year-old homeless person who currently identifies as "Samantha Amanda Coyle" but who is identified as "Timothy Paul Coyle, male" on legal records as recently as January, 2017 (the last time MISTER Coyle had a run-in with the law) only came to this women's shelter after being sent away from the Brother Francis Shelter earlier that day for being drunk and fighting. Since MISTER Coyle frequently lists the address of the Brother Francis Shelter as his residence, it's safe to say they're familiar with him.

The first time he showed up at Downtown Hope Center, they actually sent him away because he was injured, and they gave him cab fare to go to a hospital, and directions to yet another shelter, which takes both men and women. Not exactly your "abandoned to the cold streets" scenario, hmmm? They also agreed with Brother Francis Shelter that he smelled strongly of alcohol.

According to Downtown Hope Center, when MISTER Coyle showed up the next day and tried to gain entrance, they actually sent him away because it was too early in the day. The overnight women's shelter portion of their services doesn't begin until 5 pm.

Also, it's important to note that more investigation into MISTER Coyle tells us that he has a long criminal history, including charges for violent crimes.

And finally, Anchorage apparently has two other women's shelters which do take in transgenders. And they clearly have at least two shelters which take both men and women. So why is it, do you suppose, that this criminally-inclined individual - who was perfectly happy to identify as a male for 50 years until just recently - is so very determined that HE has to stay at this particular shelter for abused women?

And how likely is it that HE looks like the blonde tranny you've always dreamed of and fapped to?

They refused her because of her sexuality and not because of any other reason. Why dont you answer the question ?

They refused him because their shelter is for women.

 

[Cecilie1200]

He doesn't even know what a woman is. He thinks that a “woman” can have an XY chromosome pattern, and a fully-functional male reproductive system. Basic science, basic human biology, is beyond his grasp.

As a woman, I find it to be misogynistic, patriarchal, and culturally-appropriating to be told that my femaleness is just some ephemeral, ultimately-meaningless state of mind that a man can adopt and claim because he "feels like it". We live in a world where the left routinely attacks people for dressing their kid up as Moana for Halloween because it's an "insult to Polynesian people" or some such shit, but tell women that we're supposed to mutely accept that our womanhood, something far more integral to our core identities, can be grafted onto a man by a dress, some makeup, and a "feeling".

Following your dumb logic this guy would be allowed in that shelter

But his girl would not.

I cant see any logic in your thinking.

Perhaps if you understood logic enough to realize that airbrushed pictures of carefully made-up people have little or nothing to do with the real world, especially homeless people.

Are you seriously imagining that your treasured photographs are what all transgendered - or even most, or even a goodly number - people are like? Hell, even Bruce Jenner's Vanity Fair picture isn't what he's actually like, and it was of him!

Back in RealityLand, the 52-year-old homeless person who currently identifies as "Samantha Amanda Coyle" but who is identified as "Timothy Paul Coyle, male" on legal records as recently as January, 2017 (the last time MISTER Coyle had a run-in with the law) only came to this women's shelter after being sent away from the Brother Francis Shelter earlier that day for being drunk and fighting. Since MISTER Coyle frequently lists the address of the Brother Francis Shelter as his residence, it's safe to say they're familiar with him.

The first time he showed up at Downtown Hope Center, they actually sent him away because he was injured, and they gave him cab fare to go to a hospital, and directions to yet another shelter, which takes both men and women. Not exactly your "abandoned to the cold streets" scenario, hmmm? They also agreed with Brother Francis Shelter that he smelled strongly of alcohol.

According to Downtown Hope Center, when MISTER Coyle showed up the next day and tried to gain entrance, they actually sent him away because it was too early in the day. The overnight women's shelter portion of their services doesn't begin until 5 pm.

Also, it's important to note that more investigation into MISTER Coyle tells us that he has a long criminal history, including charges for violent crimes.

And finally, Anchorage apparently has two other women's shelters which do take in transgenders. And they clearly have at least two shelters which take both men and women. So why is it, do you suppose, that this criminally-inclined individual - who was perfectly happy to identify as a male for 50 years until just recently - is so very determined that HE has to stay at this particular shelter for abused women?

And how likely is it that HE looks like the blonde tranny you've always dreamed of and fapped to?

They refused her because of her sexuality and not because of any other reason. Why dont you answer the question ?

They refused him because their shelter is for women.

Apparently, that was only one among a number of reasons, although it's a completely valid one.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

They refused her because of her sexuality and not because of any other reason. Why dont you answer the question ?

They refused HIM because he's a man, and the shelter is only for women.

A man believing himself to be a woman is not “sexuality”; it's just delusional madness.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Yep, I can believe it, remember they claim if you don't want to date them, YOU have the problem. Just beyond reason.

The “cotton ceiling”.

 

[danielpalos]

They refused her because of her sexuality and not because of any other reason. Why dont you answer the question ?

They refused HIM because he's a man, and the shelter is only for women.

A man believing himself to be a woman is not “sexuality”; it's just delusional madness.

What about the guy's shelter?

 

[hadit]

As a woman, I find it to be misogynistic, patriarchal, and culturally-appropriating to be told that my femaleness is just some ephemeral, ultimately-meaningless state of mind that a man can adopt and claim because he "feels like it". We live in a world where the left routinely attacks people for dressing their kid up as Moana for Halloween because it's an "insult to Polynesian people" or some such shit, but tell women that we're supposed to mutely accept that our womanhood, something far more integral to our core identities, can be grafted onto a man by a dress, some makeup, and a "feeling".

Following your dumb logic this guy would be allowed in that shelter

But his girl would not.

I cant see any logic in your thinking.

Perhaps if you understood logic enough to realize that airbrushed pictures of carefully made-up people have little or nothing to do with the real world, especially homeless people.

Are you seriously imagining that your treasured photographs are what all transgendered - or even most, or even a goodly number - people are like? Hell, even Bruce Jenner's Vanity Fair picture isn't what he's actually like, and it was of him!

Back in RealityLand, the 52-year-old homeless person who currently identifies as "Samantha Amanda Coyle" but who is identified as "Timothy Paul Coyle, male" on legal records as recently as January, 2017 (the last time MISTER Coyle had a run-in with the law) only came to this women's shelter after being sent away from the Brother Francis Shelter earlier that day for being drunk and fighting. Since MISTER Coyle frequently lists the address of the Brother Francis Shelter as his residence, it's safe to say they're familiar with him.

The first time he showed up at Downtown Hope Center, they actually sent him away because he was injured, and they gave him cab fare to go to a hospital, and directions to yet another shelter, which takes both men and women. Not exactly your "abandoned to the cold streets" scenario, hmmm? They also agreed with Brother Francis Shelter that he smelled strongly of alcohol.

According to Downtown Hope Center, when MISTER Coyle showed up the next day and tried to gain entrance, they actually sent him away because it was too early in the day. The overnight women's shelter portion of their services doesn't begin until 5 pm.

Also, it's important to note that more investigation into MISTER Coyle tells us that he has a long criminal history, including charges for violent crimes.

And finally, Anchorage apparently has two other women's shelters which do take in transgenders. And they clearly have at least two shelters which take both men and women. So why is it, do you suppose, that this criminally-inclined individual - who was perfectly happy to identify as a male for 50 years until just recently - is so very determined that HE has to stay at this particular shelter for abused women?

And how likely is it that HE looks like the blonde tranny you've always dreamed of and fapped to?

They refused her because of her sexuality and not because of any other reason. Why dont you answer the question ?

They refused him because their shelter is for women.

Apparently, that was only one among a number of reasons, although it's a completely valid one.

I figure they can only handle one at a time.

 

[Correll]

Socialism is the foundation for a Capitalist venture. I never said Socialism is a function of all government.you are planting that seed. It is the building block for Capitalism when applicable. And when it is not, we are dependent on Socialism.

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Its a stretch of an argument but without roads and bridges, there wouldnt be near the economic activity.
80% of people who complain about socialism consider military roads and bridges basic govt functions. Without it, there would be absolutely no need for a government in the first place.. Thats why i said it was a stretch.
Its desperation.

I do? Why me? You were the one who said "no they are not". It wasn't me. You were the one who said "there were other forms of "fiscal policy" not me. Lol! Why should I produce a link from which I never made a claim to? You really are making a fool of yourself now.

Are you really stating that you are not aware of any other form of fiscal policy other than command economics? Tax cuts or spending are examples of fiscal policy. And? What about them


Not that you support any other. Are you unaware of any others EXISTING?

Command economics is fiscal policy. Our Space Race was command economics.

Who built the Saturn V?

Congress commanded the fiscal policy of a Space Race, last millennium. The private sector has yet to even go to the Moon on their own.

Your intellectually cowardly dodge is noted.

I did not ask you who PAID for it. I asked you who BUILT it.

In a socialistic nation, the government would have ordered it built, and then it would have been built by another department of the government.


That is NOT what happened in in the Space Race.


And you know that, which is why you so cowardly dodged.


You lose.

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Its a stretch of an argument but without roads and bridges, there wouldnt be near the economic activity.
80% of people who complain about socialism consider military roads and bridges basic govt functions. Without it, there would be absolutely no need for a government in the first place.. Thats why i said it was a stretch.
Its desperation.

Are you really stating that you are not aware of any other form of fiscal policy other than command economics? Tax cuts or spending are examples of fiscal policy. And? What about them


Not that you support any other. Are you unaware of any others EXISTING?

Command economics is fiscal policy. Our Space Race was command economics.

Who built the Saturn V?

Congress commanded the fiscal policy of a Space Race, last millennium. The private sector has yet to even go to the Moon on their own.

Your intellectually cowardly dodge is noted.

I did not ask you who PAID for it. I asked you who BUILT it.

In a socialistic nation, the government would have ordered it built, and then it would have been built by another department of the government.


That is NOT what happened in in the Space Race.


And you know that, which is why you so cowardly dodged.


You lose.

In right wing fantasy, you always know that you are talking about.

Congress commanded our Space Race and our War on Drugs but not a Mission to Mars.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Wonder why there are so many street people in strongholds......got lots of govt ……..shouldn't be any....

 

[Correll]

Its a stretch of an argument but without roads and bridges, there wouldnt be near the economic activity.
80% of people who complain about socialism consider military roads and bridges basic govt functions. Without it, there would be absolutely no need for a government in the first place.. Thats why i said it was a stretch.
Its desperation.

Command economics is fiscal policy. Our Space Race was command economics.

Who built the Saturn V?

Congress commanded the fiscal policy of a Space Race, last millennium. The private sector has yet to even go to the Moon on their own.

Your intellectually cowardly dodge is noted.

I did not ask you who PAID for it. I asked you who BUILT it.

In a socialistic nation, the government would have ordered it built, and then it would have been built by another department of the government.


That is NOT what happened in in the Space Race.


And you know that, which is why you so cowardly dodged.


You lose.

In right wing fantasy, you always know that you are talking about.

Congress commanded our Space Race and our War on Drugs but not a Mission to Mars.

You admitted that you know that is bullshit, when you dodged the question instead of answering it.


Why are you purposefully and actively spewing shit from your face anus?


Do you like the taste of shit?

 

[danielpalos]

Who built the Saturn V?

Congress commanded the fiscal policy of a Space Race, last millennium. The private sector has yet to even go to the Moon on their own.

Your intellectually cowardly dodge is noted.

I did not ask you who PAID for it. I asked you who BUILT it.

In a socialistic nation, the government would have ordered it built, and then it would have been built by another department of the government.


That is NOT what happened in in the Space Race.


And you know that, which is why you so cowardly dodged.


You lose.

In right wing fantasy, you always know that you are talking about.

Congress commanded our Space Race and our War on Drugs but not a Mission to Mars.

You admitted that you know that is bullshit, when you dodged the question instead of answering it.


Why are you purposefully and actively spewing shit from your face anus?


Do you like the taste of shit?

with Your special pleading in a vacuum? i am advocating for zero point energy, instead.

 

[Correll]

Who built the Saturn V?

Congress commanded the fiscal policy of a Space Race, last millennium. The private sector has yet to even go to the Moon on their own.

Your intellectually cowardly dodge is noted.

I did not ask you who PAID for it. I asked you who BUILT it.

In a socialistic nation, the government would have ordered it built, and then it would have been built by another department of the government.


That is NOT what happened in in the Space Race.


And you know that, which is why you so cowardly dodged.


You lose.

In right wing fantasy, you always know that you are talking about.

Congress commanded our Space Race and our War on Drugs but not a Mission to Mars.

You admitted that you know that is bullshit, when you dodged the question instead of answering it.


Why are you purposefully and actively spewing shit from your face anus?


Do you like the taste of shit?

with Your special pleading in a vacuum? i am advocating for zero point energy, instead.

Now you admit it again, by dodging with a non sequitur.


Are you receiving any positive feedback from your shtick?

 

[danielpalos]

Congress commanded the fiscal policy of a Space Race, last millennium. The private sector has yet to even go to the Moon on their own.

Your intellectually cowardly dodge is noted.

I did not ask you who PAID for it. I asked you who BUILT it.

In a socialistic nation, the government would have ordered it built, and then it would have been built by another department of the government.


That is NOT what happened in in the Space Race.


And you know that, which is why you so cowardly dodged.


You lose.

In right wing fantasy, you always know that you are talking about.

Congress commanded our Space Race and our War on Drugs but not a Mission to Mars.

You admitted that you know that is bullshit, when you dodged the question instead of answering it.


Why are you purposefully and actively spewing shit from your face anus?


Do you like the taste of shit?

with Your special pleading in a vacuum? i am advocating for zero point energy, instead.

Now you admit it again, by dodging with a non sequitur.


Are you receiving any positive feedback from your shtick?

The right wing is economically clueless and economically Causeless.

We have a mixed market economy.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

The private sector "works within those fixed goalpost" Standards.

 

[hadit]

Socialism states that the means of production should be owned or controlled by the government as a representation of the people.


Building a road, is not an attempt to control the economic activity that takes advantage of that road.


Thus it is not socialism.

Its a stretch of an argument but without roads and bridges, there wouldnt be near the economic activity.
80% of people who complain about socialism consider military roads and bridges basic govt functions. Without it, there would be absolutely no need for a government in the first place.. Thats why i said it was a stretch.
Its desperation.

Are you really stating that you are not aware of any other form of fiscal policy other than command economics? Tax cuts or spending are examples of fiscal policy. And? What about them


Not that you support any other. Are you unaware of any others EXISTING?

Command economics is fiscal policy. Our Space Race was command economics.

Who built the Saturn V?

Congress commanded the fiscal policy of a Space Race, last millennium. The private sector has yet to even go to the Moon on their own.

Your intellectually cowardly dodge is noted.

I did not ask you who PAID for it. I asked you who BUILT it.

In a socialistic nation, the government would have ordered it built, and then it would have been built by another department of the government.


That is NOT what happened in in the Space Race.


And you know that, which is why you so cowardly dodged.


You lose.

You are now entering a place where strange things are asserted, nothing is substantiated, and losers strut around insisting they always win. Welcome to the Twilight Zone.

Danielpalos is the Twilight Zone.

 

[Correll]

Your intellectually cowardly dodge is noted.

I did not ask you who PAID for it. I asked you who BUILT it.

In a socialistic nation, the government would have ordered it built, and then it would have been built by another department of the government.


That is NOT what happened in in the Space Race.


And you know that, which is why you so cowardly dodged.


You lose.

In right wing fantasy, you always know that you are talking about.

Congress commanded our Space Race and our War on Drugs but not a Mission to Mars.

You admitted that you know that is bullshit, when you dodged the question instead of answering it.


Why are you purposefully and actively spewing shit from your face anus?


Do you like the taste of shit?

with Your special pleading in a vacuum? i am advocating for zero point energy, instead.

Now you admit it again, by dodging with a non sequitur.


Are you receiving any positive feedback from your shtick?

The right wing is economically clueless and economically Causeless.

We have a mixed market economy.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

The private sector "works within those fixed goalpost" Standards.

A mixed market is not a socialist economy. The government ordering and paying for a product from private enterprise is not socialism.


That you lie about that, shows that you know that your position is bullshit.


I asked you a question.


Are you receiving any positive feedback from your shtick?

 

[danielpalos]

In right wing fantasy, you always know that you are talking about.

Congress commanded our Space Race and our War on Drugs but not a Mission to Mars.

You admitted that you know that is bullshit, when you dodged the question instead of answering it.


Why are you purposefully and actively spewing shit from your face anus?


Do you like the taste of shit?

with Your special pleading in a vacuum? i am advocating for zero point energy, instead.

Now you admit it again, by dodging with a non sequitur.


Are you receiving any positive feedback from your shtick?

The right wing is economically clueless and economically Causeless.

We have a mixed market economy.

Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

The private sector "works within those fixed goalpost" Standards.

A mixed market is not a socialist economy. The government ordering and paying for a product from private enterprise is not socialism.


That you lie about that, shows that you know that your position is bullshit.


I asked you a question.


Are you receiving any positive feedback from your shtick?

True capitalism is an AnCap and has no Government. Government is socialism.

 

[bripat9643]

Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

How many people froze to death in the Siberian Gulag?

 

[bripat9643]

Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

If he's a tranny, then he isn't a woman. Do you understand the concept of "women's shelter?" The purpose of a women's shelter is to protect women from men. That means the tranny.