A "jury" of one.....Barr did what he was hired by Trump to do....

[easyt65]

To Barr's credit, he DID state in his little letter that Mueller could NOT determine whether Trump was exonerated from the charge of obstructing justice.....

Since Trump openly (ans stupidly) stated to the Russian ambassador that he fired Comey because of the Russian probe.....and since Trump openly stated to Lester Holt that he wanted Comey gone because of that same on-going Russian probe.........Trump HIMSELF prompted a special counsel probe.

Now, based on Barr's memo as a private citizen that he felt that Trump should never have been investigated as a a president (which was basically a letter requesting Trump to appoint him as AG)....and based on the DOJ unofficial "policy" that a president is ABOVE the law, Barr WILL be called to testify before one or two House committees.

The questions that Barr will be asked will entail his "conclusion" that although Mueller openly stated that the president was NOT exonerated, WHY did Barr determine that there's no further need to investigate Trump?

Basically, based on Mueller's indecision on whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice, the questions for Barr will be interesting in how he answers:

a. Did Mueller hand off a final decision of Trump's obstruction to a jury of one; i.e., Barr???

OR

b. Did Mueller intend for Congress to be the ultimate "judge" on whether there WAS obstruction??

Of course, a close review of the entire Mueller report can best address the two above questions.....

(Go at it, Trump cultists.......but please try some objectivity.....lol)

2+ years of investigations.
NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION
CONFIRMATION OF HILLARY CRIMES
CONFIRMATION FBI & DOJ PROTECTED HER FROM IDICTMENT / PRISON
CONFIRMATION OF THE DOJ-NSA-CIA-FBI ATTEMPTED COUP...

....AND THE LYING, DENYING, JUSTIFYING, DUPED SNOWFLAKES LEFT WITHOUT ANY CREDIBIITY CONTINUE TO PUSH THE PROVEN FALSE NARRATIVE!


Barr was / is not one of the Co-Conspirators. A truly OBJECTIVE US AG makes it impossible for the coup to be successful.

BARR HAS REFERRED OTHER ISSUES TO OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES......DEMOCRATS SHOULD BE VERY AFRAID!

 

[The Original Tree]

Is Barr ready to charge mueller with high treason?

Barr setting up mueller to be charged with high treason

Barr hammered the point to congress that mueller had free rein to go after any potential crime

But mueller did not and did not touch any potential crimes by the deep state

That then proves high treason

Read what Barr says here and that shows he is setting up to charge mueller with high treason

Especially since mueller had the evidence destroyed off of strock and pages govt phones

READ!!

AG Barr's Letter Confirms Mueller as King -- Had Free Rein to do Whatever He Wanted with Witch Hunt -- While President Trump Had Hands Tied

Why did Mueller refuse to Interview Assange?

Why did Mueller refuse to look in to The Sourcing of The Dirty Russian Dossier, who paid for it, how the money was passed along through several Leftist Laundering Operations and ended up in the hands of Foriegn Spies with Russian Ties?

Why did Mueller give John Podesta Immunity?

 

[g5000]

The Republicans investigated Bill Clinton for five years, starting with an investigation into some real estate investments by the Clintons.

When that didn't pan out, the investigation moved on to looking into the firing of White House Travel Office personnel.

When that didn't pan out, the investigation moved on to looking into the suicide of Vince Foster. That didn't pan out, either.

But the Republicans kept going and going. They refused to quit.

And then, finally, they nailed Bill Clinton for lying about a blowjob.

The Republicans never gave up. FIVE YEARS. They kept going until they finally nailed their man.

And did the Republicans suffer for this?

Nope. They acquired the House, the Senate, and the White House for all their hard work.



You can just smell the karma coming, can't you?

 

[g5000]

Is Barr ready to charge mueller with high treason?

Barr setting up mueller to be charged with high treason

Barr hammered the point to congress that mueller had free rein to go after any potential crime

But mueller did not and did not touch any potential crimes by the deep state

That then proves high treason

Read what Barr says here and that shows he is setting up to charge mueller with high treason

Especially since mueller had the evidence destroyed off of strock and pages govt phones

READ!!

AG Barr's Letter Confirms Mueller as King -- Had Free Rein to do Whatever He Wanted with Witch Hunt -- While President Trump Had Hands Tied

Why did Mueller refuse to Interview Assange?

Very funny.

You aren't actually this stupid, are you?

Oh wait...

 

[WTH_Progs?]

To Barr's credit, he DID state in his little letter that Mueller could NOT determine whether Trump was exonerated from the charge of obstructing justice..... ILMAO at "little letter" Makes you sound like you have a little brain.

Since Trump openly (ans stupidly) stated to the Russian ambassador that he fired Comey because of the Russian probe.....and since Trump openly stated to Lester Holt that he wanted Comey gone because of that same on-going Russian probe.........Trump HIMSELF prompted a special counsel probe......So funny. Hear that people, if Trump wasn't so stupid we wouldn't have discovered how foolish progressives are. The investigation was Trump's fault, even though he's in the clear.

Now, based on Barr's memo as a private citizen that he felt that Trump should never have been investigated as a a president (which was basically a letter requesting Trump to appoint him as AG)....and based on the DOJ unofficial "policy" that a president is ABOVE the law, Barr WILL be called to testify before one or two House committees. The message here is the only reason Trump has been vindicated is cuz Barr's hoping for an AG position. Therefore progs were right all along. Trump colluded with Russia, our democracy was ATTACKED by our own POTUS.

The questions that Barr will be asked will entail his "conclusion" that although Mueller openly stated that the president was NOT exonerated, WHY did Barr determine that there's no further need to investigate Trump? Just to make you unhappy OP, it's all about you. We MUST reopen the RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION.

Basically, based on Mueller's indecision on whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice, the questions for Barr will be interesting in how he answers: Mueller's non-decision was intended to throw progressives a bone. It has absolutely no meaning, but progs live in the abstract anyway.

a. Did Mueller hand off a final decision of Trump's obstruction to a jury of one; i.e., Barr??? What obstruction?

OR

b. Did Mueller intend for Congress to be the ultimate "judge" on whether there WAS obstruction?? Repeat after me OP, give yourself some peace. THERE WILL NEVER BE A CONCLUSION FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Of course, a close review of the entire Mueller report can best address the two above questions.....False hope prog. Hang your hat on this if it helps you sleep nights. You can file the idea next to Trump won't release more tax statements..

(Go at it, Trump cultists.......but please try some objectivity.....lol) You said objectively

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Barr is setting up mueller with being charged with high treason ? B

Barr setting up mueller to be charged with high treason

Barr hammered the point to congress that mueller had free rein to go after any potential crime

But mueller did not and did not touch any potential crimes by the deep state

That then proves high treason

Read what Barr says here and that shows he is setting up to charge mueller with high treason

Especially since mueller had the evidence destroyed off of strock and pages govt phones

READ!!

AG Barr's Letter Confirms Mueller as King -- Had Free Rein to do Whatever He Wanted with Witch Hunt -- While President Trump Had Hands Tied

 

[The Original Tree]

...your ace in the hole turned out to be nothing more than an indictment against the deep state and Dims,

Tell the above comforting words to Manafort, Cohen, Flynn, Gates and soon, Stone......while serving their time in prison......(were all these crooks "dims," moron)..........LOL

Actually Libtard, Manafort was charged for things he did while working for Obama and Clinton in The Ukraine through The Podesta Group. You know, The same Ukraine that illegally gave Joe Biden and his Son a bunch of Bribes and illegal contributions.

Wait until that one hits the fan. Crazy uncle Joe and his Son not only suck China's Cock, but they like them some Ukrainian Dick too.

 

[skookerasbil]

Barr will proceed by making 2 announcements.....

1) He will release the whole Mueller Report

2) He will announce a full investigation into the dossier and FISA issuance.


Then.....everybody is happy!

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Is Barr ready to charge mueller with high treason?

Barr setting up mueller to be charged with high treason

Barr hammered the point to congress that mueller had free rein to go after any potential crime

But mueller did not and did not touch any potential crimes by the deep state

That then proves high treason

Read what Barr says here and that shows he is setting up to charge mueller with high treason

Especially since mueller had the evidence destroyed off of strock and pages govt phones

READ!!

AG Barr's Letter Confirms Mueller as King -- Had Free Rein to do Whatever He Wanted with Witch Hunt -- While President Trump Had Hands Tied

Why did Mueller refuse to Interview Assange?

Very funny.

You aren't actually this stupid, are you?

Oh wait...

Don't be scared

Read what Barr sent congress below

Barr setting up mueller to be charged with high treason

Barr hammered the point to congress that mueller had free rein to go after any potential crime

But mueller did not and did not touch any potential crimes by the deep state

That then proves high treason

Read what Barr says here and that shows he is setting up to charge mueller with high treason

Especially since mueller had the evidence destroyed off of strock and pages govt phones

READ!!

AG Barr's Letter Confirms Mueller as King -- Had Free Rein to do Whatever He Wanted with Witch Hunt -- While President Trump Had Hands Tied

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Can we all pitch in a dollar and get us a usmb board attorney to navigate us through these perils?

 

[GreenAndBlue]

...your ace in the hole turned out to be nothing more than an indictment against the deep state and Dims,

Tell the above comforting words to Manafort, Cohen, Flynn, Gates and soon, Stone......while serving their time in prison......(were all these crooks "dims," moron)..........LOL

Actually Libtard, Manafort was charged for things he did while working for Obama and Clinton in The Ukraine through The Podesta Group. You know, The same Ukraine that illegally gave Joe Biden and his Son a bunch of Bribes and illegal contributions.

Wait until that one hits the fan. Crazy uncle Joe and his Son not only suck China's Cock, but they like them some Ukrainian Dick too.

Yes
That podesta group did the same crime

Muella went against the AG instructions of all potential crimes

Barr specifically sent that letter to congress which is setting up mueller with a charge of high treason

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Mueller destroyed evidence of potential crimes. With the destroying of evidence off of strock and pages govt phones

How much other evidence has mueller destroyed???

It seems Barr is on this issue by writing that letter to congress

 

[GreenAndBlue]

To Barr's credit, he DID state in his little letter that Mueller could NOT determine whether Trump was exonerated from the charge of obstructing justice..... ILMAO at "little letter" Makes you sound like you have a little brain.

Since Trump openly (ans stupidly) stated to the Russian ambassador that he fired Comey because of the Russian probe.....and since Trump openly stated to Lester Holt that he wanted Comey gone because of that same on-going Russian probe.........Trump HIMSELF prompted a special counsel probe......So funny. Hear that people, if Trump wasn't so stupid we wouldn't have discovered how foolish progressives are. The investigation was Trump's fault, even though he's in the clear.

Now, based on Barr's memo as a private citizen that he felt that Trump should never have been investigated as a a president (which was basically a letter requesting Trump to appoint him as AG)....and based on the DOJ unofficial "policy" that a president is ABOVE the law, Barr WILL be called to testify before one or two House committees. The message here is the only reason Trump has been vindicated is cuz Barr's hoping for an AG position. Therefore progs were right all along. Trump colluded with Russia, our democracy was ATTACKED by our own POTUS.

The questions that Barr will be asked will entail his "conclusion" that although Mueller openly stated that the president was NOT exonerated, WHY did Barr determine that there's no further need to investigate Trump? Just to make you unhappy OP, it's all about you. We MUST reopen the RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION.

Basically, based on Mueller's indecision on whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice, the questions for Barr will be interesting in how he answers: Mueller's non-decision was intended to throw progressives a bone. It has absolutely no meaning, but progs live in the abstract anyway.

a. Did Mueller hand off a final decision of Trump's obstruction to a jury of one; i.e., Barr??? What obstruction?

OR

b. Did Mueller intend for Congress to be the ultimate "judge" on whether there WAS obstruction?? Repeat after me OP, give yourself some peace. THERE WILL NEVER BE A CONCLUSION FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Of course, a close review of the entire Mueller report can best address the two above questions.....False hope prog. Hang your hat on this if it helps you sleep nights. You can file the idea next to Trump won't release more tax statements..

(Go at it, Trump cultists.......but please try some objectivity.....lol) You said objectively

The men have already judged this by mueller and the deep state as high treason !!

 

[Meathead]

I pre-ordered a hard copy of Mueller's report a couple weeks ago on Amazon. It won't be available until the end of April.

Until then, I am going to take what anyone says about the Mueller report with a grain of salt.

Hopefully, an electronic version of Mueller's report will be published online before the end of April. Then I can commence reading it.

Before, during, and after that, the parroting rube herd will parrot what they are told to parrot. I will take anything they vomit onto this forum as the manufactured bullshit ("fake news") that it is.

One thing you can count on is that not one Trumpanzee will read the report for themselves since it is longer than a tweet. They just don't have that kind of intellectual bandwidth.

Trump's troubles are far from over. Not only is there a question of obstruction of justice, there are still the investigations being done by the Southern District of New York into money laundering, tax evasion, and insurance fraud.

There is also the open question of campaign finance fraud with respect to the payments to Stormy Daniels.

I am on record many times over on this forum that I do not believe Trump personally colluded with Putin. Putin is not stupid enough to collude directly with a retarded huckster who would have spilled the beans via tweet five minutes into the act.

Trump made the "rusher collusion hoax" the centerpiece of his bloviations. All to distract and detract from the many other questions of his corruption and moral turpitude.

Now we can get down to the brass tacks.

We all breathlessly await your analysis. Now go take a shower ffs!

 

[Oddball]

To Barr's credit, he DID state in his little letter that Mueller could NOT determine whether Trump was exonerated from the charge of obstructing justice.....

Since Trump openly (ans stupidly) stated to the Russian ambassador that he fired Comey because of the Russian probe.....and since Trump openly stated to Lester Holt that he wanted Comey gone because of that same on-going Russian probe.........Trump HIMSELF prompted a special counsel probe.

Now, based on Barr's memo as a private citizen that he felt that Trump should never have been investigated as a a president (which was basically a letter requesting Trump to appoint him as AG)....and based on the DOJ unofficial "policy" that a president is ABOVE the law, Barr WILL be called to testify before one or two House committees.

The questions that Barr will be asked will entail his "conclusion" that although Mueller openly stated that the president was NOT exonerated, WHY did Barr determine that there's no further need to investigate Trump?

Basically, based on Mueller's indecision on whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice, the questions for Barr will be interesting in how he answers:

a. Did Mueller hand off a final decision of Trump's obstruction to a jury of one; i.e., Barr???

OR

b. Did Mueller intend for Congress to be the ultimate "judge" on whether there WAS obstruction??

Of course, a close review of the entire Mueller report can best address the two above questions.....

(Go at it, Trump cultists.......but please try some objectivity.....lol)

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I pre-ordered a hard copy of Mueller's report a couple weeks ago on Amazon. It won't be available until the end of April.

Until then, I am going to take what anyone says about the Mueller report with a grain of salt.

Hopefully, an electronic version of Mueller's report will be published online before the end of April. Then I can commence reading it.

Before, during, and after that, the parroting rube herd will parrot what they are told to parrot. I will take anything they vomit onto this forum as the manufactured bullshit ("fake news") that it is.

One thing you can count on is that not one Trumpanzee will read the report for themselves since it is longer than a tweet. They just don't have that kind of intellectual bandwidth.

Trump's troubles are far from over. Not only is there a question of obstruction of justice, there are still the investigations being done by the Southern District of New York into money laundering, tax evasion, and insurance fraud.

There is also the open question of campaign finance fraud with respect to the payments to Stormy Daniels.

I am on record many times over on this forum that I do not believe Trump personally colluded with Putin. Putin is not stupid enough to collude directly with a retarded huckster who would have spilled the beans via tweet five minutes into the act.

Trump made the "rusher collusion hoax" the centerpiece of his bloviations. All to distract and detract from the many other questions of his corruption and moral turpitude.

Now we can get down to the brass tacks.

No one is saying Trump is cleared completely.
What's interesting however, is how your media has been blubbering non-stop for two years how collusion is absolutely there, and how it's right in front of everyone's nose.
Well that has now blown up in your face for all to see.

 

[depotoo]

He stated he spoke with other officials and Rosenstein was also involved in the decision.

To Barr's credit, he DID state in his little letter that Mueller could NOT determine whether Trump was exonerated from the charge of obstructing justice.....

Since Trump openly (ans stupidly) stated to the Russian ambassador that he fired Comey because of the Russian probe.....and since Trump openly stated to Lester Holt that he wanted Comey gone because of that same on-going Russian probe.........Trump HIMSELF prompted a special counsel probe.

Now, based on Barr's memo as a private citizen that he felt that Trump should never have been investigated as a a president (which was basically a letter requesting Trump to appoint him as AG)....and based on the DOJ unofficial "policy" that a president is ABOVE the law, Barr WILL be called to testify before one or two House committees.

The questions that Barr will be asked will entail his "conclusion" that although Mueller openly stated that the president was NOT exonerated, WHY did Barr determine that there's no further need to investigate Trump?

Basically, based on Mueller's indecision on whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice, the questions for Barr will be interesting in how he answers:

a. Did Mueller hand off a final decision of Trump's obstruction to a jury of one; i.e., Barr???

OR

b. Did Mueller intend for Congress to be the ultimate "judge" on whether there WAS obstruction??

Of course, a close review of the entire Mueller report can best address the two above questions.....

(Go at it, Trump cultists.......but please try some objectivity.....lol)

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Mueller did not investigate any liberal potential crimes

Barr wrote congress Friday saying he had free rein in going after potential crimes

 

[rightwinger]

Still waiting to see the report

Barr was not hired to give his version of it. He said he would be transparent

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Barr is setting up mueller to be charged with high treason

His letter to congress friday is the proof