Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think I have to pay for an article that my opponent promotes. You notice, he can't explain his own evidence.Christians are allowed an education. Have you ever read Ram Bam? Even the ancient Jews knew the difference between science and myth. They don't reject education.
Genesis is backed up by science such as the design of animals, e.g. the human body.Like in Genesis?
Nope. Genesis is didactic literature for bronze age people.Genesis is backed up by science such as the design of animals, e.g. the human body.
I'm surprised you never heard of Ram Bam. Science and Medieval Philosophy: Maimonides | My Jewish LearningI don't think I have to pay for an article that my opponent promotes. You notice, he can't explain his own evidence.
What's Ram Bam (a new Dodge truck?) and what are examples of what the ancient Jews saw as differences between science and myth?
Actually, just peruse the things we call biology texts and you will see uncanny similarities shared by all biological organisms. Nothing about biology leads one to presume supernatural intervention by various gods.Just peruse any study of human or animal anatomy and you'll realize the utter impossibility of evolution.
sciencereligiondialogue.org
You're deflecting. A study of anatomy is the gold standard for those who are seriously interested. Comparative biology is akin to 'whataboutism'.Actually, just peruse the things we call biology texts and you will see uncanny similarities shared by all biological organisms. Nothing about biology leads one to presume supernatural intervention by various gods.
The bible describes four 'ages' represented by precious, and utilitarian metals. We are in the 'iron age', vastly inferior to the bronze (brass) age.Nope. Genesis is didactic literature for bronze age people.
God made us to survive sin.Nope. Genesis is didactic literature for bronze age people.
What does that have to do with didactic literature?God made us to survive sin.
Just what are those similarities? Can you give us some examples?Actually, just peruse the things we call biology texts and you will see uncanny similarities shared by all biological organisms. Nothing about biology leads one to presume supernatural intervention by various gods.
What does didactic lit have to do with science?What does that have to do with didactic literature?
Nothing in science 'backs up' the genesis fable.Genesis is backed up by science such as the design of animals, e.g. the human body.
Nothing? Not even the water cycle?Nothing in science 'backs up' the genesis fable.
hsm.stackexchange.com
Deflecting about what? It's just a fact that all biological organisms share similarities that have no connections to supernatural intervention by various gods. Molecular sequences, however, provide irrefutable evidence demonstrating the genealogical similarities that connect all life. The study of molecular sequences allow for very precise probability calculations that show just how well defined the predictions of common descent with modification actually match empirical and observational data. Common descent is a deduction that directly follows from observed data based on population studies.You're deflecting. A study of anatomy is the gold standard for those who are seriously interested. Comparative biology is akin to 'whataboutism'.
Science usually operates within the parameters of what is possible, except when it comes to the ToE.
Reminds me of a cartoon of a meeting that pictured pandamonium in a board room over some complex problem that threatened the very existence of the business. At the head of the table stood the chairman who after enduring the hysterical doomsday cries of the board members leaned forward with fisted hands placed on the table and eyes narrowed menacingly quieted the assembly with the question, "But what are we going to... do about it?"
Now picture a similar meeting of atheist scientists agonizing over the widespread belief in God and of Creation. The answer concerning 'what to do about it' was...the Theory of Evolution.
Now you know "the rest of the story."
No, because the evidence says so."Because somebody else says so".
Typical evolutioner nonsense.
You've never seen mist rising from rocks after a rain shower on a hot day?Nothing? Not even the water cycle?
Genesis 2:6
But there went up a mist (vapor) from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.
When and how was the water cycle discovered?
When and how was the water cycle discovered? Did people, like ancient Greek philosophers, have any correct ideas on the water cycle? Was its discovery more of a recent thing?
What a bunch of vapid psychobabble.You're deflecting. A study of anatomy is the gold standard for those who are seriously interested. Comparative biology is akin to 'whataboutism'.
Science usually operates within the parameters of what is possible, except when it comes to the ToE.
Reminds me of a cartoon of a meeting that pictured pandamonium in a board room over some complex problem that threatened the very existence of the business. At the head of the table stood the chairman who after enduring the hysterical doomsday cries of the board members leaned forward with fisted hands placed on the table and eyes narrowed menacingly quieted the assembly with the question, "But what are we going to... do about it?"
Now picture a similar meeting of atheist scientists agonizing over the widespread belief in God and of Creation. The answer concerning 'what to do about it' was...the Theory of Evolution.
Now you know "the rest of the story."
Just what are those similarities? Can you give us some examples?
Our human bodies show intelligent design such as DNA and blood flow to our organs.
God made us to survive sin.
