A massive oil project has people questioning Biden’s climate promises. Could ‘Willow’ alienate climate-friendly voters? Say it ain't so, Joe!

basquebromance

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 2015
109,396
27,033
2,220
Joe Biden doesn't hate oil and gas. Joe Biden hates US oil and gas. Instead of relying on Putin, Maduro, and the Saudis for fossil fuels, we MUST take an all-of-the-above energy approach and unleash our energy independence and invest in American jobs.

 
Joe Biden doesn't hate oil and gas. Joe Biden hates US oil and gas. Instead of relying on Putin, Maduro, and the Saudis for fossil fuels, we MUST take an all-of-the-above energy approach and unleash our energy independence and invest in American jobs.



We don't buy any oil from Saudi Arabia and this author is a moron.
 

In any case, we should be buying all of it from other countries and leaving ours in the ground, especially when it's so cheap. Burn theirs up, not our own reserves. Stop exporting food as well.

 

In any case, we should be buying all of it from other countries and leaving ours in the ground, especially when it's so cheap.

Maybe. That's up to US oil companies.

Currently China is buying up most Saudi oil. China is also buying Russian oil. And, India is gorging on Russian oil.

Markets change.
 
Co2 does nothing.

"Climate friendly voters" who think Co2 does anything are ABSOLUTE SCIENCE INVALID MORONS...


Here is the DATA for the 100th time...

Co2 went up in the atmosphere, temps did not according to the two and only two measures we have... and then the climate "scientists" fudged both...




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data.




NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST HERE. Satellite and balloon data was highly correlated with both showing a colder than normal atmosphere in 1998, first time Bill Clinton claimed "warmest year ever."

Their choice = accept the data, admit Co2 does NOTHING, terminate Co2 taxpayer funded "research" and file for unemployment

OR


Fudge the data and keep bilking the American taxpayer for fudge and fraud



CO2 does NOTHING. We could increase atmospheric Co2 10 fold from today and IT WOULD STILL DO NOTHING
 
The CEO of Agrifert is an old friend.

It's a big future market for them. Petroleum is a lot more useful for other stuff than as motor fuel. If they want to survive they need to develop a more diversified economy, and dump the terrorists they keep as pets. They would do well to ally with India and Australia as business partners inn Asia.
 
It's a big future market for them. Petroleum is a lot more useful for other stuff than as motor fuel. If they want to survive they need to develop a more diversified economy, and dump the terrorists they keep as pets. They would do well to ally with India and Australia as business partners inn Asia.

They have two now three industrial cities downstream.. Jubail, Yanbu and a new one. It's seamless... and pretty damned spectacular. Ten years ago they added 500,000 new manufacturing jobs.
 
They have two now three industrial cities downstream.. Jubail, Yanbu and a new one. It's seamless... and pretty damned spectacular. Ten years ago they added 500,000 new manufacturing jobs.


I did some contract work on this expansion for a couple of days. That plant has been there there since 1965, but it was small then.
 

I did some contract work on this expansion for a couple of days. That plant has been there there since 1965, but it was small then.

I know. You worked on that? Cool.
 

Forum List

Back
Top