presonorek
Gold Member
We need to build taxpayer funded orphanages. Why aren't we doing that?
I have never understood why pro-lifers haven't pursued something along these lines. It would prevent them from a lot of mocking.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We need to build taxpayer funded orphanages. Why aren't we doing that?
Its called the foster care system, moron and, yeah, you pay for it.We need to build taxpayer funded orphanages. Why aren't we doing that?
Its called the foster care system, moron and, yeah, you pay for it.
Foster care beats murder any day of the week.You are right but the foster care system isn't championed by pro-life organizations as part of a holistic approach to ending abortion.
the great replacement for the immigrants will be the unwanted children of the citizens.What do anti abortion people intend to do with all those unwanted children? I do not see them lining up to adopt them.
By the way, I am not pro choice. I am in favor of government financed abortion at any stage of pregnancy.
I am not pro life either. I am an enthusiast for capital punishment.
Biologically speaking, that child is certainly alive. Biologically speaking, non-living things do not and CANNOT grow or develop, while an unborn child does both. I thought we were supposed to revere and follow science.
No it isn't. It's not breathing and for humans breathing is life. If it was "alive", it could live on its own, outside the womb
Biologically speaking, the fetus in gestation is not an "unborn baby". It's a fetus.
Yes it does. We went thru the process to be foster parents. When we did get the opportunity to foster a 6 year old, we backed out. We didn't want to disrupt our lives. Foster parents are brave and admirable.Foster care beats murder any day of the week.
The unborn baby grows and changes. Dead tissue does not grow or change. Sorry, that child is alive, whether you want to admit it or not. Tell you what, go up to the next pregnant woman you see and congratulate her on the dead thing inside her. Tell us how it went after you get to the ICU.No it isn't. It's not breathing and for humans breathing is life. If it was "alive", it could live on its own, outside the womb
Biologically speaking, the fetus in gestation is not an "unborn baby". It's a fetus.
Do you want IVF banned? Or is that murder when they destroy unused frozen embryos, ok you?OK, Göbbels.
1. Since prolife advocates don't rely on laws or govt punishing them in order not to believe in or seek abortion,There is no way to credibly claim that an unborn child is not a living human being. Once that's established, we can talk about the relative value of that life, but we need to be clear about what we're killing.
Personhood is a legal concept, and we understand that a newborn child is not a person until the Lawyer Fairy consults with the mother (not the father, he doesn't count), sprinkles his magic dust and declares the child to be a person, but biology states the developing child is a human being at an early stage of development.
So get the father's signature on the forms to murder the baby and hold him responsible too. Too many times the abortion is done without the father's knowledge or consent.Until laws address the men equally as responsible as the women, there is a problem with discrimination.
The unborn baby grows and changes
Do you want IVF banned? Or is that murder when they destroy unused frozen embryos, ok you?
the People of this State have adopted a Constitutional amendment directly aimed at stopping courts from excluding ‘unborn life’ from legal protection.”
That isnt a religious argument, dummy.
Those “unused frozen embryos”ae human beings, and to intentionally cause their death—how is that not murder?
A Question For Pro-Choicers 231028
{post•1020} ding Oct’23 Saqfpc: Consciousness did indeed evolve unless of course you believe life went from non-self aware single cell organisms to highly complex, self aware beings magically. {post•1020} ding 231027 Saqfpc01020
An abortion and IVF question for Saint Bobblaylock: Does a frozen embryonic unborn baby have consciousness?
Write like a grown-up human being.
ding wrote:It's not an insult. It's a statement of fact. For you to deny that consciousness did indeed involve and continues to evolve is to deny evolution itself. Consciousness did indeed involve unless of course you belief life went from non-self aware single cell organisms to highly complex, self aware beings magically. Apparently this was beyond your level to comprehend. Because if you did comprehend it then it would be much simpler to see that everything continues to evolve. All aspects of evolution; stellar, chemical and biological continue to evolve. Consciousness is most certainly a stage of the evolution of space and time. The most important one. It's when the universe literally became self aware. So for you to fail to acknowledge this self evident fact can only be because it is beyond your ability to comprehend it. So it wasn't an insult. It was a factual statement.