A Reminder: Trey Gowdy Has Never Lost A Case As A Prosecutor

You DO know this isn't a criminal trial, right?

It isn't a criminal trial. Much worse for Obama and Hillary it's a trial in the Court of Public Opinion, and it's being carried out by a seasoned prosecutor who is used to explaining complex concepts to the utter morons who are incapable of getting themselves out of jury duty and getting them to agree with HIS view of those things.

That's why the Democrats would be very silly to decide to boycott the committee. They are the only chance for Obama and Hillary to mute some of that bombastic, headline driving propoganda; especially in the year of the mid-term elections.
 
Anyone got a reference to that "no cases lost" claim, besides right-wing rags. 6 years and never a "you win some, you lose some"?
 
For what?
For the death of an American ambassador and a coverup. What do you think Watergate was about, a break in where nothing was stolen and no one died?
Stevens died of his own actions as much as anything else. And there's no coverup, maybe some poorly done spin but that's hardly illegal.


Beating the blame the victim drum is starting to sound like a dull echo. Hey, maybe try blaming Booooosssssshhhhh instead of the dead might help your case!
 
For the death of an American ambassador and a coverup. What do you think Watergate was about, a break in where nothing was stolen and no one died?
Stevens died of his own actions as much as anything else. And there's no coverup, maybe some poorly done spin but that's hardly illegal.


Beating the blame the victim drum is starting to sound like a dull echo. Hey, maybe try blaming Booooosssssshhhhh instead of the dead might help your case!
The truth can be dull, as it is in this case. Sorry.
 
Here's the libs now......

Chris Stevens begged for his own death.............

He knew global warming was coming and he inhaled all the smoke to prove he was backing Hillary and for her to stop climate change.
 
For the death of an American ambassador and a coverup. What do you think Watergate was about, a break in where nothing was stolen and no one died?
Stevens died of his own actions as much as anything else. And there's no coverup, maybe some poorly done spin but that's hardly illegal.
You're floating that boat on here.
Now to the beast, I'm going to rock you.
You ready?
I was born ready.
 
Prosecutors can also cherry-pick cases so they can drop poor cases, cut deals to get guilty pleas, and only go to court with slam dunks.

There's a dead US ambassador and staff, serious questions about what went down and who gave the orders, and stonewalling, but the public could not possibly care less about this. Even if we had video of Hilary ordering the planes to stand down and giggling madly while people died, this will just be a distant memory by 2016 and that's before we even get into the media minimizing everything to help out the Dems.

Sadly, it's a non-starter so far as the public is concerned.
It's non-starter as far as reality is concerned. That's why you guys aren't getting anywhere.
Hey, Asshat ~ They're just getting started. Give it a week of questioning then get back to us about there being nothing there. Until then you know just as much as the rest of us :laugh2:
 
For what?
For the death of an American ambassador and a coverup. What do you think Watergate was about, a break in where nothing was stolen and no one died?
Stevens died of his own actions as much as anything else. And there's no coverup.

You have no idea what was truly going on behind the scenes. If there was no coverup then why have the survivors been told not to tell what happened?
 
For what?
For the death of an American ambassador and a coverup. What do you think Watergate was about, a break in where nothing was stolen and no one died?
Stevens died of his own actions as much as anything else. And there's no coverup, maybe some poorly done spin but that's hardly illegal.
Obviously there was a great deal of spin, the question is if it amounted to a cover up at the eve of an election. Who knew what? Was it just the sloppiness we have come to expect from this administration, or did it go deeper than that. Were they blaming a well-coordinated attack on an impulsive reaction to a video that no one had seen to cover their asses? These are potentially far more damning than a break in at a Washington hotel.
 
Stevens died of his own actions as much as anything else. And there's no coverup, maybe some poorly done spin but that's hardly illegal.


Beating the blame the victim drum is starting to sound like a dull echo. Hey, maybe try blaming Booooosssssshhhhh instead of the dead might help your case!
The truth can be dull, as it is in this case. Sorry.

Sorries as you can be.

You blaming Stevens on his own death is as crazy as JFK and MLK and Bobby wishing death upon themselves.

Now you sure you want to work with that?
 
The truth can be dull, as it is in this case. Sorry.

Truth seems to be what Gowdy will be seeking.

What is there about the truth that you find so devastating? Doth it spring from insider knowedge that the truth might be more ugly than Mrs. Messiah's butt?
 
Prosecutors can also cherry-pick cases so they can drop poor cases, cut deals to get guilty pleas, and only go to court with slam dunks.

There's a dead US ambassador and staff, serious questions about what went down and who gave the orders, and stonewalling, but the public could not possibly care less about this. Even if we had video of Hilary ordering the planes to stand down and giggling madly while people died, this will just be a distant memory by 2016 and that's before we even get into the media minimizing everything to help out the Dems.

Sadly, it's a non-starter so far as the public is concerned.
It's non-starter as far as reality is concerned. That's why you guys aren't getting anywhere.
Hey, Asshat ~ They're just getting started. Give it a week of questioning then get back to us about there being nothing there. Until then you know just as much as the rest of us :laugh2:
Maybe you should read what the GOP has already published? There's no there there, but it sure had a lot of partisan crap in it.
 
For what?
For the death of an American ambassador and a coverup. What do you think Watergate was about, a break in where nothing was stolen and no one died?
Stevens died of his own actions as much as anything else. And there's no coverup, maybe some poorly done spin but that's hardly illegal.

That story may fly on PBS but in the real world Stevens did Not commit suicide by "Smoke Inhalation" :D:D:D
 
The biggest danger to Hillary will be her own memory.

If she recalls and testifies honestly she - or Our Kenyan President - might be in deep shit.

If she can't recall then her mental health comes (again) into question.

Either way there's no upside.

Perhaps a convenient illness.......
 

Forum List

Back
Top