Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"and Ukraine would have to answer just like anyone else."
Ok.
So what? How? They were condemned?
Or is not clear who inflicted airstrike?
Or was at least ATTEMPT ... to find the culprits?
Your video has nothing to do with MH17 and it is pure propaganda to insinuate one side is more guilty than another side for atrocities, mistakes, collateral damage and other incidents common in any war. That video could have been caused by separatist or Ukraine government forces or Ukraine anti separatist forces. It could have been a mistake by any of them. This is what happens when people take up arms and start a violent revolution to separate and cause civil war. A war is started and this is what happens in war. Blame those who promote taking up arms to make change.
You are arguing against a UN Tribunal in one case and complaining about not having a court in another. If no one will present case of war crimes to international court or UN who do you blame? Who represents separatist areas of Ukraine, what you call New Russia? Russia can supply bullets and BUKS, tanks and rifles, but can not provide diplomats and lawyers to make charges of war crimes?This video - proof.
There are victims.
There are witnesses.
There is a video of attack.
There is everything you need for the court.
But the court is not. Why is that?
That is known as a deflection Stratford. Deflections are used when you can not answer questions and you want to evade admitting you are unable to answer. The person arguing against your ideas is not the target when that person is arguing a widely accepted viewpoint. It is not Camp that is putting down your concepts, it is the international global community. Russia has some support even from some who normally are critical of Russia. In the end however, Russia looks bad and loses the argument. It will have to deal with the consequences for many years into the future. In the end the case will probably be determined in the worst places possible, multiple civil courts in multiple countries.
I'm not complaining.You are arguing against a UN Tribunal in one case and complaining about not having a court in another.
On US television =)))Russia looks bad
Arguments are needed for those who can think. But do not believe what is said by TV.and loses the argument.
Why no one wants to judge the perpetrators of the events in the video?
I honestly try to understand the logic of the Ukrainians. The part that accuses Putin. But where is the logic? This Ukrainian plane.Maybe you should ask your government about it?Why no one wants to judge the perpetrators of the events in the video?
I answered your question. Someone of authority has to make a request of an investigation into a specific war crime. In the case you reference it is alleged by you that a Ukraine aircraft made a strike that killed and injured civilians. Evidence must be presented for investigation and some authority has to formally open an investigation. Some official group or authority most go to some official organization to make this request. That whole mess in eastern Ukraine should be investigated by a UN Tribunal or court for war crimes. Perhaps the ICC could do it. Maybe Russia could agree to MH 17 Tribunal with caveat that all crimes can be investigated. I think this will not happen because I think both sides have bad behavior to hide.I'm not complaining.You are arguing against a UN Tribunal in one case and complaining about not having a court in another.
I point to the facts - fair trial does not exist.
I asked the question, but you did not answer. Why no one wants to judge the perpetrators of the events in the video?
On US television =)))Russia looks bad
Arguments are needed for those who can think. But do not believe what is said by TV.and loses the argument.
With caveat?Maybe Russia could agree to MH 17 Tribunal with caveat that all crimes can be investigated.
On July, 17 it will be exactly a year since the flight MH-17 has been intercepted by a rocket and the Malaysian Boeing with almost 300 people on its board crashed. And after a year we still have as much information about it as the first few days.
1. The communications between the pilots and the Ukrainian air traffic controllers have never been published. In all other cases the communications have been published same or the next day after the crash.
2. “Irrefutable evidence” of who has shot the Boeing, which Obama has been claiming to have, has never been presented.
All above sounds like everybody, who has access to the true information about the reasons and the causers of the tragedy [Obama and official Kiev] , are not interested for the truth to come out. Why? May be because it contradicts their geopolitical games?…
Obama is so arrogant to think that he is so great and all the world is so damn to believe his words automatically without any evidence.
With caveat?
That judges must be fair and impartial?
They must be such without a request.
If they are not so
1) is not competent
2) prejudiced
3) 1 and 2
someone can tell where the plane that crashed into the Pentagon?
Everyone can see - no aircraft.
But none as though does not see.
And he does not want to talk about it.
Do you understand what that means?
And what's that?
And what's that?
You can not love Yanukovych.
But you can not deny one important fact.
He never used the weapon. His car was shot. He did not give the order to fire on their own people!
And what is your Petro Poroshenko promised? Sell a chocolate factory, if he becomes president.
He became president. Sold?=)))