ABC moderators slammed for their pathetic bias.

[Marener]

It is a non issue to the person who was asked and to many others.

That doesn’t really make any sense. Candidates aren’t asked about what is an issue for them, they’re asked about issues for voters.

You know, because they’re running for office. It’s the whole point of the debate.

 

[Marener]

Hey stupid, not playing your games.

Back up your bullshit with data. No tap dancing allowed.

So we’ve proven you’re full of shit.

 

[Nostra]

So we’ve proven you’re full of shit.

Hey stupid, I already told you I'm not playing your games.

You have failed to be able to back up your lies with data.

You lose, liar.

 

[BackAgain]

That doesn’t really make any sense. Candidates aren’t asked about what is an issue for them, they’re asked about issues for voters.

You make no sense whatsoever.

Candidates get asked questions. Some are actual issues. Some are mere bait. The candidates get to control how they answer — including whether they choose to bother “responding” at all.

You know, because they’re running for office. It’s the whole point of the debate.

No. The point of the debate is to get your points across. But when some jackass asks a question designed for other purposes, it can be very smart indeed to shit can that “question.”

 

[Marener]

You have failed to be able to back up your lies with data.

I’m not playing your games.

 

[BackAgain]

So we’ve proven you’re full of shit.

You’ve been exposed as a fraud.

My point is the valid one.

 

[Nostra]

I’m not playing your games.

Bring the data backing up your claims, then you are allowed to ask questions, Simp.

Until then you have been exposed as a lying sack of vermin shit.

 

[Marener]

Candidates get asked questions. Some are actual issues. Some are mere bait. The candidates get to control how they answer — including whether they choose to bother “responding” at all

Again, trying to figure out why you think you get to declare what is and isn’t an issue.

His lack of an answer, which by your description is a pretty easy one, demonstrates his weakness.

 

[Nostra]

Again, trying to figure out why you think you get to declare what is and isn’t an issue.

His lack of an answer, which by your description is a pretty easy one, demonstrates his weakness.

Why can you declare what is an issue and he can't declare what isn't an issue, Simp?

 

[Marener]

Bring the data backing up your claims, then you are allowed to ask questions, Simp.

I gave an opinion and backed it up with data and logic.

 

[Nostra]

I gave an opinion and backed it up with data and logic.

More lies.

You have no data, and no logic.

 

[Marener]

Why can you declare what is an issue and he can't declare what isn't an issue, Simp?

I’m a voter and he’s a candidate.

 

[Marener]

You have no data, and no logic.

That’s a lie.

 

[BackAgain]

Again, trying to figure out why you think you get to declare what is and isn’t an issue.

Already answered. I am not responsible for your metal difficulties.

His lack of an answer, which by your description is a pretty easy one, demonstrates his weakness.

Repeating your false premise and absurd conclusion don’t support your claim.

Toddle off. You really suck at this.

 

[Nostra]

That’s a lie.

Show it.

Watch this....

 

[Marener]

Already answered. I am not responsible for your metal difficulties.

Actually you didn’t. You merely asked why I get to declare something an issue. Which you agreed that I do.

Repeating your false premise and absurd conclusion don’t support your claim.

Nothing absurd about my opinion. Nothing false about the premise.

All you do is make unsupported claims.

 

[Marener]

Show it.

Watch this....

Already did. I’m not playing your games.

 

[Toro]

Liberal hacks shouldn't be moderators. These two are two of the biggest hacks out there.

 

[Nostra]

Already did. I’m not playing your games.

Lies.