drtywhtboy
Member
- Jul 20, 2012
- 90
- 14
Can't we call ABC and see if we can't get him FIRED..or at the least, reprimanded..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You all are sounding pretty defensive. We don't know whether this guy has a Teaparty website or not.
You all are sounding pretty defensive. We don't know whether this guy has a Teaparty website or not.
That's just the problem. It was assumed and wished for that he did. Instead of discovering a connection, he has to prove that there is not one.
You all are sounding pretty defensive. We don't know whether this guy has a Teaparty website or not.
Not just signs, but the tea baggers have shown up and paraded with assault rifles and hand guns at their events.
Automatic Weapons at Political Rally - YouTube
You all are sounding pretty defensive. We don't know whether this guy has a Teaparty website or not.
Sad.
Ross's speculation was irresponsible and damaging. I have seen no evidence that it was deliberate or that it was intended to advance a political narrative. If Ross thought that there wasn't any evidence that the alleged shooter was affiliated with the Tea Party surely he would have realized that claiming otherwise would damage his own credibility. Far more likely, Ross thought that what he suggested was true and was trying to get the notion out as fast as possible to avoid being "scooped".
I doubt ABC could be successfully sued over this. Ross made it clear that he wasn't saying that the alleged shooter was definitely associated with the Tea Party, and there does not seem to be a falsehood on which to hang a libel charge. Ross's words were irresponsible, but not factually inaccurate.
Sad.
Ross's speculation was irresponsible and damaging. I have seen no evidence that it was deliberate or that it was intended to advance a political narrative. If Ross thought that there wasn't any evidence that the alleged shooter was affiliated with the Tea Party surely he would have realized that claiming otherwise would damage his own credibility. Far more likely, Ross thought that what he suggested was true and was trying to get the notion out as fast as possible to avoid being "scooped".
I doubt ABC could be successfully sued over this. Ross made it clear that he wasn't saying that the alleged shooter was definitely associated with the Tea Party, and there does not seem to be a falsehood on which to hang a libel charge. Ross's words were irresponsible, but not factually inaccurate.
Not just signs, but the tea baggers have shown up and paraded with assault rifles and hand guns at their events.
Automatic Weapons at Political Rally - YouTube
It's called the 'right to bear arms'.
But I do recall one certain news outlet having an outright hissy fit about some 'white guy with an assualt rifle' at a TEA Party event. Turned out, that particular TEA Partier was black. Don't you ever feel embarrassed being led around by the nose by your masters?
Learned the difference between 'vile' and 'vial' yet, moron?
Eat a dick California_fatty, no one cares what you bubber shaking triple chin has to say.
Not just signs, but the tea baggers have shown up and paraded with assault rifles and hand guns at their events.
Automatic Weapons at Political Rally - YouTube
It's called the 'right to bear arms'.
But I do recall one certain news outlet having an outright hissy fit about some 'white guy with an assualt rifle' at a TEA Party event. Turned out, that particular TEA Partier was black. Don't you ever feel embarrassed being led around by the nose by your masters?
Learned the difference between 'vile' and 'vial' yet, moron?