Abortion facts

Abortion is simply a matter of whether or not you believe there is a human being who is being murdered.

For those of us who believe the child in the womb is as important a human being as anyone else, there simply is no argument persuasive enough to convince us it should be legal to murder that child.

Affordability of a child? Affordability is an issue at every age. Being able to afford children can arise at any point. Layoffs, divorce, death of one of the parents, etc. So the affordability excuse for murdering a child is specious.
 
Abortion is simply a matter of whether or not you believe there is a human being who is being murdered.

For those of us who believe the child in the womb is as important a human being as anyone else, there simply is no argument persuasive enough to convince us it should be legal to murder that child.

Affordability of a child? Affordability is an issue at every age. Being able to afford children can arise at any point. Layoffs, divorce, death of one of the parents, etc. So the affordability excuse for murdering a child is specious.

Regardless, it’s still the woman’s choice.

She and only she has to live with the decision.
 
Two-thirds of Americans believe abortion should be illegal after the first trimester.

That means two-thirds of Americans hold a belief which is in direct contradiction to Roe v. Wade.

Some of those two-thirds believe they are "pro-choice", but in the context of Roe v. Wade, they aren't.
 
I don’t know the name of a single victim of abortion...
It's allot easier to kill people when you don't name them.
How many dead Jews could Hitler name?
They all had names and grieving family and friends.
not to the person killing them,,,only numbers
And the dead had a name and grieving family and friends.
you are bound and determined to be a baby killer,,,well your succeeding
 
Abortion is simply a matter of whether or not you believe there is a human being who is being murdered.

For those of us who believe the child in the womb is as important a human being as anyone else, there simply is no argument persuasive enough to convince us it should be legal to murder that child.

Affordability of a child? Affordability is an issue at every age. Being able to afford children can arise at any point. Layoffs, divorce, death of one of the parents, etc. So the affordability excuse for murdering a child is specious.

Regardless, it’s still the woman’s choice.
You don't get to choose if you can kill a kid just because you can't afford it. Otherwise, you could kill a five year old and say it is your choice and the kid has no right to live.

As I said, affordability is a specious argument.
 
Abortion is simply a matter of whether or not you believe there is a human being who is being murdered.

For those of us who believe the child in the womb is as important a human being as anyone else, there simply is no argument persuasive enough to convince us it should be legal to murder that child.

Affordability of a child? Affordability is an issue at every age. Being able to afford children can arise at any point. Layoffs, divorce, death of one of the parents, etc. So the affordability excuse for murdering a child is specious.

Regardless, it’s still the woman’s choice.

She and only she has to live with the decision.
yeah because the babys dead it doesnt have to live with it
 
I don’t know the name of a single victim of abortion...
It's allot easier to kill people when you don't name them.
How many dead Jews could Hitler name?
They all had names and grieving family and friends.
not to the person killing them,,,only numbers
And the dead had a name and grieving family and friends.
you are bound and determined to be a baby killer,,,well your succeeding
I’ve never done such a thing. You sure can’t name a victim.
 
Abortion is simply a matter of whether or not you believe there is a human being who is being murdered.

For those of us who believe the child in the womb is as important a human being as anyone else, there simply is no argument persuasive enough to convince us it should be legal to murder that child.

Affordability of a child? Affordability is an issue at every age. Being able to afford children can arise at any point. Layoffs, divorce, death of one of the parents, etc. So the affordability excuse for murdering a child is specious.

Regardless, it’s still the woman’s choice.
You don't get to choose if you can kill a kid just because you can't afford it. Otherwise, you could kill a five year old and say it is your choice and the kid has no right to live.

As I said, affordability is a specious argument.
The kid has a name and family and friends. It is quite different...
 
That's the difference. Pro-lifers believe the child in the womb has a right to live which trumps the mother's inconvenience. Just as a five year old's right to live trumps a mother's inconvenience.

There is no dividing line. Only pro-abortion people think there is.
 
It's allot easier to kill people when you don't name them.
How many dead Jews could Hitler name?
They all had names and grieving family and friends.
not to the person killing them,,,only numbers
And the dead had a name and grieving family and friends.
you are bound and determined to be a baby killer,,,well your succeeding
I’ve never done such a thing. You sure can’t name a victim.
baby killer
 
That's the difference. Pro-lifers believe the child in the womb has a right to live which trumps the mother's inconvenience. Just as a five year old's right to live trumps a mother's inconvenience.

There is no dividing line. Only pro-abortion people think there is.
Pro lifers aren’t the ones who will be caring for that child. Do we really need more bad parents?
 
Abortion is simply a matter of whether or not you believe there is a human being who is being murdered.

For those of us who believe the child in the womb is as important a human being as anyone else, there simply is no argument persuasive enough to convince us it should be legal to murder that child.

Affordability of a child? Affordability is an issue at every age. Being able to afford children can arise at any point. Layoffs, divorce, death of one of the parents, etc. So the affordability excuse for murdering a child is specious.

Regardless, it’s still the woman’s choice.
You don't get to choose if you can kill a kid just because you can't afford it. Otherwise, you could kill a five year old and say it is your choice and the kid has no right to live.

As I said, affordability is a specious argument.
The kid has a name and family and friends. It is quite different...
The unborn child has a family, and in many cases has a name before birth.

Regardless, having a name and friends is not what determines one's right to live.


There is no dividing line.
 
That's the difference. Pro-lifers believe the child in the womb has a right to live which trumps the mother's inconvenience. Just as a five year old's right to live trumps a mother's inconvenience.

There is no dividing line. Only pro-abortion people think there is.
Pro lifers aren’t the ones who will be caring for that child. Do we really need more bad parents?
its called adoption baby killer
 
They all had names and grieving family and friends.
not to the person killing them,,,only numbers
And the dead had a name and grieving family and friends.
you are bound and determined to be a baby killer,,,well your succeeding
I’ve never done such a thing. You sure can’t name a victim.
baby killer
Name a victim then.
 
That's the difference. Pro-lifers believe the child in the womb has a right to live which trumps the mother's inconvenience. Just as a five year old's right to live trumps a mother's inconvenience.

There is no dividing line. Only pro-abortion people think there is.
Pro lifers aren’t the ones who will be caring for that child. Do we really need more bad parents?
its called adoption baby killer
You have proof they would all be adopted do you?
 
That's the difference. Pro-lifers believe the child in the womb has a right to live which trumps the mother's inconvenience. Just as a five year old's right to live trumps a mother's inconvenience.

There is no dividing line. Only pro-abortion people think there is.
Pro lifers aren’t the ones who will be caring for that child. Do we really need more bad parents?
You assume the people who don't want this particular child they are killing are bad parents.

Interesting. Very revealing insight into your psyche.
 
not to the person killing them,,,only numbers
And the dead had a name and grieving family and friends.
you are bound and determined to be a baby killer,,,well your succeeding
I’ve never done such a thing. You sure can’t name a victim.
baby killer
Name a victim then.
my sons name was Jeremy,,,

now you have
 
That's the difference. Pro-lifers believe the child in the womb has a right to live which trumps the mother's inconvenience. Just as a five year old's right to live trumps a mother's inconvenience.

There is no dividing line. Only pro-abortion people think there is.
Pro lifers aren’t the ones who will be caring for that child. Do we really need more bad parents?
its called adoption baby killer
You have proof they would all be adopted do you?
There is a multi-year waiting list for people who want to adopt a newborn.
 
That's the difference. Pro-lifers believe the child in the womb has a right to live which trumps the mother's inconvenience. Just as a five year old's right to live trumps a mother's inconvenience.

There is no dividing line. Only pro-abortion people think there is.
Pro lifers aren’t the ones who will be caring for that child. Do we really need more bad parents?
its called adoption baby killer
You have proof they would all be adopted do you?
not the point baby killer
 

Forum List

Back
Top