Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
---Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
---There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.---Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
One is a mother, the other entity is a fetus.There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.---Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
------Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
I (for one) refuse to ignore the violation of the rights of children under the guise that it's none of my business.
Our first Amendment secures every individuals right to free speech and also our right to petition our government for a redress of any grievances.
There are no dis-qualifications in the First Amendment that says "unless it's none of your business."
---One is a mother, the other entity is a fetus.There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.---Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
Perhaps you think that because a human being while in the fetal stage of their life can be called a "fetus" - that means they are something less than a human being.
Newsflash.
A fetal human being is still a human being.
------Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
I (for one) refuse to ignore the violation of the rights of children under the guise that it's none of my business.
Our first Amendment secures every individuals right to free speech and also our right to petition our government for a redress of any grievances.
There are no dis-qualifications in the First Amendment that says "unless it's none of your business."
What are you smokin?
The Bill of Rights is for citizens, and the pregnant woman is one.
The gov violates her rights if it imposes restrictions on her liberty.
.
---One is a mother, the other entity is a fetus.There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.---Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
Perhaps you think that because a human being while in the fetal stage of their life can be called a "fetus" - that means they are something less than a human being.
Newsflash.
A fetal human being is still a human being.
Unless it's your own, a fetus is none of YOUR business.
.
And often her own destiny is the destruction of a human life.---There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.---Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
There is one INDEPENDENT body, and its INDEPENDENT mind must be free to choose her own destiny.
.
---------Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
I (for one) refuse to ignore the violation of the rights of children under the guise that it's none of my business.
Our first Amendment secures every individuals right to free speech and also our right to petition our government for a redress of any grievances.
There are no dis-qualifications in the First Amendment that says "unless it's none of your business."
What are you smokin?
The Bill of Rights is for citizens, and the pregnant woman is one.
The gov violates her rights if it imposes restrictions on her liberty.
.
You are wrong.
The Bill of Rights is for all "persons" within the jurisdiction of our Constitution.
Foreigners and even illegal aliens (non citizens) do not have any less a right to our Constitutional protections when they come into the U.S. than you or I have.
You can see Yick Wo vs Hopkins for a Supreme Court's ruling on that.
---I and countless others are making it our business and there's not anything you can do to stop it.---One is a mother, the other entity is a fetus.There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.---
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
Perhaps you think that because a human being while in the fetal stage of their life can be called a "fetus" - that means they are something less than a human being.
Newsflash.
A fetal human being is still a human being.
Unless it's your own, a fetus is none of YOUR business.
.
Also, just as a bit of trivia. . . No person is allowed to own another. We have laws against slavery now. So, children are not "owned" no matter what age they are or what stage of their life, growth or development it is in.
---------Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
I (for one) refuse to ignore the violation of the rights of children under the guise that it's none of my business.
Our first Amendment secures every individuals right to free speech and also our right to petition our government for a redress of any grievances.
There are no dis-qualifications in the First Amendment that says "unless it's none of your business."
What are you smokin?
The Bill of Rights is for citizens, and the pregnant woman is one.
The gov violates her rights if it imposes restrictions on her liberty.
.
You are wrong.
The Bill of Rights is for all "persons" within the jurisdiction of our Constitution.
Foreigners and even illegal aliens (non citizens) do not have any less a right to our Constitutional protections when they come into the U.S. than you or I have.
You can see Yick Wo vs Hopkins for a Supreme Court's ruling on that.
Is a fetus considered a "person"?
If you think so, how come you can't get a SSN for a fetus, or a normal Death Certificate if the fetus is terminated by nature or otherwise?
.
---I and countless others are making it our business and there's not anything you can do to stop it.---One is a mother, the other entity is a fetus.There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.
Perhaps you think that because a human being while in the fetal stage of their life can be called a "fetus" - that means they are something less than a human being.
Newsflash.
A fetal human being is still a human being.
Unless it's your own, a fetus is none of YOUR business.
.
Also, just as a bit of trivia. . . No person is allowed to own another. We have laws against slavery now. So, children are not "owned" no matter what age they are or what stage of their life, growth or development it is in.
Leave your RELIGION out of other faces who have different opinions.
.
---And often her own destiny is the destruction of a human life.---There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.---Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
There is one INDEPENDENT body, and its INDEPENDENT mind must be free to choose her own destiny.
.
---And often her own destiny is the destruction of a human life.---There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.---Chuz's opinion is simply that abortion should not be performed except when the mother's life is in danger and not even then at times. OK. I disagree.
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
There is one INDEPENDENT body, and its INDEPENDENT mind must be free to choose her own destiny.
.
It is up to her what she chooses to do with her biological cells in HER BODY, if she can help it.
Apparently, God is unable or unwilling to interfere with nature; half of pregnancies are aborted by nature.
.
---I don't need "God" or religion or "Jesus" to recognize the biological fact that a new organism's life begins at conception. I don't need "God" or religion to know what our Constitution says or what the legal definitions are either.
------And often her own destiny is the destruction of a human life.---There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.---
It's the woman's body and her final choice. Unless asked or closely related to her, everyone else should not interfere, ESPECIALLY government and religious kooks.
.
There is one INDEPENDENT body, and its INDEPENDENT mind must be free to choose her own destiny.
.
It is up to her what she chooses to do with her biological cells in HER BODY, if she can help it.
Apparently, God is unable or unwilling to interfere with nature; half of pregnancies are aborted by nature.
.
At the risk of derailing the thread. . . Do you have anything in the way of PROOF of this "God" you are talking about?
Also, check the DNA and the fact that there is a "placental barrier" between the two (or more) lives involved.
------And often her own destiny is the destruction of a human life.---There are two bodies involved, and one of the bodies often ends in destruction.
There is one INDEPENDENT body, and its INDEPENDENT mind must be free to choose her own destiny.
.
It is up to her what she chooses to do with her biological cells in HER BODY, if she can help it.
Apparently, God is unable or unwilling to interfere with nature; half of pregnancies are aborted by nature.
.
At the risk of derailing the thread. . . Do you have anything in the way of PROOF of this "God" you are talking about?
Also, check the DNA and the fact that there is a "placental barrier" between the two (or more) lives involved.
Proof of a god? You're joking, right?
My point was that many, if not MOST fertilized eggs die ... do not develop to birth.
That's life !!
.
---I don't need "God" or religion or "Jesus" to recognize the biological fact that a new organism's life begins at conception. I don't need "God" or religion to know what our Constitution says or what the legal definitions are either.
It may be your opinion that "a person" exists at conception, but that view is not stated in the US Constitution, and i disagree with your personal view.
I have a right to think for myself and do whatever i want to my own body, and if you interfere with my liberties, then i will interfere with yours .
.
