Active Shooter Reported Near Planned Parenthood In Colorado

don't make Blacks stop either. BLM for congress. hear hear hear ye all. Whitey get your guns...
git er done....start East Coast work west.
 
Police in Colorado Springs, Colorado, have responded to calls of an active shooter near a Planned Parenthood.

The Colorado Springs Police Department confirmed to The Huffington Post that there are reports of an active shooter near the facility, but could not say whether the incident is taking place inside or outside the building.

Brigitte Wolfe, who works at a restaurant next door, told the Denver Post she saw at least a dozen police cars.

"We were looking out the window and we had an officer wave us back inside," Wolfe said.

The situation is unfolding less than a month after a shooting rampage left four people dead in Colorado Springs, including the gunman.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Active Shooter Reported In Colorado Springs Near Planned Parenthood

Is this another self-righteous homegrown terrorist anti-abortion nut? We shall see...


It wasn't near the clinic it was IN the clinic.

And yes it's another far right wing conservative terrorist.

I guess the conservatives don't believe that killing innocent lives is murder.

You're actually suggesting that conservatives condone the murder in this situation? You're either:

A) A very successful troll
B) Brainwashed
C) Idiotic
 
Reading for the ignorant:

When and Why Did the Parties Switch Places?

Now go hijack some other thread, Gummo.


Partisan hacks .... SMFH
It must be true, I read it on the Internet!
So if the parties switched in the 1920's why did Democrats try to block the Civil Rights Act in 1964?

As a group, they didn't. Matter of fact more Ds than Rs voted for it, though the gap was not significant.

Why don't I just post this for the 827th time, expecting different results....

The original House version:
  • Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
  • Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
  • >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)
  • Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
  • Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
  • >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)
The Senate version:
  • Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
  • Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
  • Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
  • Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
  • ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
  • ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But again, 94 versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one geographical side versus 92 on the other side?? You just hit the motherlode. NOW you can cite chew some polarization.
BIG time.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

(/STILL COMPLETELY OFFTOPIC)
 
Last edited:
I go for C. Oh say cain't ya'all C.....by the DemWitted light.

Ok I stop now. I just dont care no more. BHO start your last year. woo-doggies. Lets' go.
 
Democrats following their proven and compulsive liars Obama/Bill and now Hillary.

View attachment 55772

trying to divert the thread away for your christian terrorist

Do you have absolute proof of your statement? (christian terrorist)

"divert"..and sorry about that, it started small and got out of hand... oops

I'll stop if the morons will...it's a waste of time for me at this point.
 
Reading for the ignorant:

When and Why Did the Parties Switch Places?

Now go hijack some other thread, Gummo.


Partisan hacks .... SMFH
It must be true, I read it on the Internet!
So if the parties switched in the 1920's why did Democrats try to block the Civil Rights Act in 1964?

As a group, they didn't. Matter of fact more Ds than Rs voted for it, though the gap was not significant.
Democrats blocked the Civil Rights Act for months until Republicans and LBJ strong armed them into letting it go to vote and then voting for it.

History mocks you.
 
Reading for the ignorant:

When and Why Did the Parties Switch Places?

Now go hijack some other thread, Gummo.


Partisan hacks .... SMFH
It must be true, I read it on the Internet!
So if the parties switched in the 1920's why did Democrats try to block the Civil Rights Act in 1964?

As a group, they didn't. Matter of fact more Ds than Rs voted for it, though the gap was not significant.
Democrats blocked the Civil Rights Act for months until Republicans and LBJ strong armed them into letting it go to vote and then voting for it.

History mocks you.

Unfortunately the numbers just proved me right. That's why you had to edit them out.

platter.jpg

Bon appetit, hack.
For an appetizer may I recommend the Crow.
 
Police in Colorado Springs, Colorado, have responded to calls of an active shooter near a Planned Parenthood.

The Colorado Springs Police Department confirmed to The Huffington Post that there are reports of an active shooter near the facility, but could not say whether the incident is taking place inside or outside the building.

Brigitte Wolfe, who works at a restaurant next door, told the Denver Post she saw at least a dozen police cars.

"We were looking out the window and we had an officer wave us back inside," Wolfe said.

The situation is unfolding less than a month after a shooting rampage left four people dead in Colorado Springs, including the gunman.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Active Shooter Reported In Colorado Springs Near Planned Parenthood

Is this another self-righteous homegrown terrorist anti-abortion nut? We shall see...


It wasn't near the clinic it was IN the clinic.

And yes it's another far right wing conservative terrorist.

I guess the conservatives don't believe that killing innocent lives is murder.

You're actually suggesting that conservatives condone the murder in this situation? You're either:

A) A very successful troll
B) Brainwashed
C) Idiotic
D) A typical desperate Democrat doing what their media told them to do/think without the actual facts
 
Reading for the ignorant:

When and Why Did the Parties Switch Places?

Now go hijack some other thread, Gummo.


Partisan hacks .... SMFH
It must be true, I read it on the Internet!
So if the parties switched in the 1920's why did Democrats try to block the Civil Rights Act in 1964?

As a group, they didn't. Matter of fact more Ds than Rs voted for it, though the gap was not significant.
Democrats blocked the Civil Rights Act for months until Republicans and LBJ strong armed them into letting it go to vote and then voting for it.

History mocks you.
Pleased to run across you Weatherman2020, a hearty welcome to the USMB...
 
Reading for the ignorant:

When and Why Did the Parties Switch Places?

Now go hijack some other thread, Gummo.


Partisan hacks .... SMFH
It must be true, I read it on the Internet!
So if the parties switched in the 1920's why did Democrats try to block the Civil Rights Act in 1964?

As a group, they didn't. Matter of fact more Ds than Rs voted for it, though the gap was not significant.
Democrats blocked the Civil Rights Act for months until Republicans and LBJ strong armed them into letting it go to vote and then voting for it.

History mocks you.

Unfortunately the numbers just proved me right. That's why you had to edit them out.

platter.jpg

Bon appetit, hack.
For an appetizer may I recommend the Crow.
OH hum.

June 10, 1964
Civil Rights Filibuster Ended

At 9:51 on the morning of June 10, 1964, Senator Robert C. Byrd completed an address that he had begun 14 hours and 13 minutes earlier. The subject was the pending Civil Rights Act of 1964, a measure that occupied the Senate for 60 working days, including seven Saturdays. A day earlier, Senate whips Hubert Humphrey (D-MN) and Thomas Kuchel (R-CA), the bill's floor managers, concluded they had the 67 votes required at that time to end the debate.​

The Civil Rights Act provided protection of voting rights; banned discrimination in public facilities—including private businesses offering public services—such as lunch counters, hotels, and theaters; and established equal employment opportunity as the law of the land.

As Senator Byrd took his seat, House members, former senators, and others—150 of them—vied for limited standing space at the back of the chamber. With all gallery seats taken, hundreds waited outside in hopelessly extended lines.

Georgia Democrat Richard Russell offered the final arguments in opposition. Minority Leader Everett Dirksen, who had enlisted the Republican votes that made cloture a realistic option, spoke for the proponents with his customary eloquence. Noting that the day marked the 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln's nomination to a second term, the Illinois Republican proclaimed, in the words of Victor Hugo, "Stronger than all the armies is an idea whose time has come." He continued, "The time has come for equality of opportunity in sharing in government, in education, and in employment. It will not be stayed or denied. It is here!"

Never in history had the Senate been able to muster enough votes to cut off a filibuster on a civil rights bill. And only five times in the 47 years since the cloture rule was established had the Senate agreed to cloture for any measure.

U.S. Senate: 1964: Civil Rights Filibuster Ended -- June 10, 1964

WHAT WAS THAT GROUP ROBERT BYRD WAS A MEMBER OF AGAIN? OH YEAH, THE KLU KLUX KLAN.
 
Reading for the ignorant:

When and Why Did the Parties Switch Places?

Now go hijack some other thread, Gummo.


Partisan hacks .... SMFH
It must be true, I read it on the Internet!
So if the parties switched in the 1920's why did Democrats try to block the Civil Rights Act in 1964?

As a group, they didn't. Matter of fact more Ds than Rs voted for it, though the gap was not significant.

Why don't I just post this for the 827th time, expecting different results....

The original House version:
  • Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
  • Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
  • >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)
  • Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
  • Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
  • >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)
The Senate version:
  • Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
  • Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
  • Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
  • Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
  • ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
  • ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But again, 94 versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one geographical side versus 92 on the other side?? You just hit the motherlode. NOW you can cite chew some polarization.
BIG time.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

(/STILL COMPLETELY OFFTOPIC)
So, how does this change the Democratic (Socialist) Parties history of racism, regardless of your spin?
 
Police in Colorado Springs, Colorado, have responded to calls of an active shooter near a Planned Parenthood.

The Colorado Springs Police Department confirmed to The Huffington Post that there are reports of an active shooter near the facility, but could not say whether the incident is taking place inside or outside the building.

Brigitte Wolfe, who works at a restaurant next door, told the Denver Post she saw at least a dozen police cars.

"We were looking out the window and we had an officer wave us back inside," Wolfe said.

The situation is unfolding less than a month after a shooting rampage left four people dead in Colorado Springs, including the gunman.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Active Shooter Reported In Colorado Springs Near Planned Parenthood

Is this another self-righteous homegrown terrorist anti-abortion nut? We shall see...


It wasn't near the clinic it was IN the clinic.

And yes it's another far right wing conservative terrorist.

I guess the conservatives don't believe that killing innocent lives is murder.

Look I LIVE HERE. I know this area well. We do not know what this shooter's intent was. He was shooting at people in the King Sooper's parking lot area, which wasn't even close to Planned Parenthood. He was shooting from BEHIND the Planned Parenthood building.

Then he went into the building, and there WERE No injuries or deaths in the Planned Parenthood building. So if it was a hit on Planned Parenthood, he sure wasn't acting like it was.

1. Why was he shooting at people in the King Sooper's parking lot?
2. Why didn't he shoot anyone inside the Planned Parenthood building?

We'll know more tomorrow.
 
One has to wonder how many murders have occurred at this particular abortion clinic, and suddenly all the outrage for a few more?
 
Police in Colorado Springs, Colorado, have responded to calls of an active shooter near a Planned Parenthood.

The Colorado Springs Police Department confirmed to The Huffington Post that there are reports of an active shooter near the facility, but could not say whether the incident is taking place inside or outside the building.

Brigitte Wolfe, who works at a restaurant next door, told the Denver Post she saw at least a dozen police cars.

"We were looking out the window and we had an officer wave us back inside," Wolfe said.

The situation is unfolding less than a month after a shooting rampage left four people dead in Colorado Springs, including the gunman.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Active Shooter Reported In Colorado Springs Near Planned Parenthood

Is this another self-righteous homegrown terrorist anti-abortion nut? We shall see...


It wasn't near the clinic it was IN the clinic.

And yes it's another far right wing conservative terrorist.

I guess the conservatives don't believe that killing innocent lives is murder.

Look I LIVE HERE. I know this area well. We do not know what this shooter's intent was. He was shooting at people in the King Sooper's parking lot area, which wasn't even close to Planned Parenthood. He was shooting from BEHIND the Planned Parenthood building.

Then he went into the building, and there WERE No injuries or deaths in the Planned Parenthood building. So if it was a hit on Planned Parenthood, he sure wasn't acting like it was.

1. Why was he shooting at people in the King Sooper's parking lot?
2. Why didn't he shoot anyone inside the Planned Parenthood building?

We'll know more tomorrow.

Maybe he was shooting at PP protestors. You know, gotta protect planned parenthood folks from free speech.
 
Police in Colorado Springs, Colorado, have responded to calls of an active shooter near a Planned Parenthood.

The Colorado Springs Police Department confirmed to The Huffington Post that there are reports of an active shooter near the facility, but could not say whether the incident is taking place inside or outside the building.

Brigitte Wolfe, who works at a restaurant next door, told the Denver Post she saw at least a dozen police cars.

"We were looking out the window and we had an officer wave us back inside," Wolfe said.

The situation is unfolding less than a month after a shooting rampage left four people dead in Colorado Springs, including the gunman.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Active Shooter Reported In Colorado Springs Near Planned Parenthood

Is this another self-righteous homegrown terrorist anti-abortion nut? We shall see...


It wasn't near the clinic it was IN the clinic.

And yes it's another far right wing conservative terrorist.

I guess the conservatives don't believe that killing innocent lives is murder.

You're actually suggesting that conservatives condone the murder in this situation? You're either:

A) A very successful troll
B) Brainwashed
C) Idiotic



Produce one right winger on this thread that has condemned this violence and murder.

All I see from the right winger is deflection, lies, trying to change the subject and trying to blame it on democrats.

Aren't democrats the ones who are taking guns from people? Aren't democrats the ones who defend women's right to choose?

Please produce some honest evidence of any right winger condemning this.

For you to say such a thing you're either

A. A very successful troll
B. Brainwashed
C. Idiotic.
Or
D. All of the above.

My vote is for D.
 
Police in Colorado Springs, Colorado, have responded to calls of an active shooter near a Planned Parenthood.

The Colorado Springs Police Department confirmed to The Huffington Post that there are reports of an active shooter near the facility, but could not say whether the incident is taking place inside or outside the building.

Brigitte Wolfe, who works at a restaurant next door, told the Denver Post she saw at least a dozen police cars.

"We were looking out the window and we had an officer wave us back inside," Wolfe said.

The situation is unfolding less than a month after a shooting rampage left four people dead in Colorado Springs, including the gunman.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Active Shooter Reported In Colorado Springs Near Planned Parenthood

Is this another self-righteous homegrown terrorist anti-abortion nut? We shall see...


It wasn't near the clinic it was IN the clinic.

And yes it's another far right wing conservative terrorist.

I guess the conservatives don't believe that killing innocent lives is murder.

You're actually suggesting that conservatives condone the murder in this situation? You're either:

A) A very successful troll
B) Brainwashed
C) Idiotic



Produce one right winger on this thread that has condemned this violence and murder.

All I see from the right winger is deflection, lies, trying to change the subject and trying to blame it on democrats.

Aren't democrats the ones who are taking guns from people? Aren't democrats the ones who defend women's right to choose?

Please produce some honest evidence of any right winger condemning this.

For you to say such a thing you're either

A. A very successful troll
B. Brainwashed
C. Idiotic.
Or
D. All of the above.

My vote is for D.

Actually I'm not a right-winger...I just don't like it when people paint groups of people with a broad brush, which you obviously have zero problem doing.

Democrats tend to be the ones attacking police officers to be fair.

Show me one left-winger condemning the media for jumping the gun and accusing the officer who killed Michael Brown (who WAS a thug). Just one.

Here's my point: USMB is NOT an accurate gauge of society at large, because if somebody googles/looks for a message board to discuss politics, they're MUCH more likely to be far left/right leaning than the average member of society who can't name 3 members of the SCOTUS.
 
Police in Colorado Springs, Colorado, have responded to calls of an active shooter near a Planned Parenthood.

The Colorado Springs Police Department confirmed to The Huffington Post that there are reports of an active shooter near the facility, but could not say whether the incident is taking place inside or outside the building.

Brigitte Wolfe, who works at a restaurant next door, told the Denver Post she saw at least a dozen police cars.

"We were looking out the window and we had an officer wave us back inside," Wolfe said.

The situation is unfolding less than a month after a shooting rampage left four people dead in Colorado Springs, including the gunman.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Active Shooter Reported In Colorado Springs Near Planned Parenthood

Is this another self-righteous homegrown terrorist anti-abortion nut? We shall see...


It wasn't near the clinic it was IN the clinic.

And yes it's another far right wing conservative terrorist.

I guess the conservatives don't believe that killing innocent lives is murder.

You're actually suggesting that conservatives condone the murder in this situation? You're either:

A) A very successful troll
B) Brainwashed
C) Idiotic



Produce one right winger on this thread that has condemned this violence and murder.

All I see from the right winger is deflection, lies, trying to change the subject and trying to blame it on democrats.

Aren't democrats the ones who are taking guns from people? Aren't democrats the ones who defend women's right to choose?

Please produce some honest evidence of any right winger condemning this.

For you to say such a thing you're either

A. A very successful troll
B. Brainwashed
C. Idiotic.
Or
D. All of the above.

My vote is for D.
Read post #341 this thread...I'm seeing Democrats attack/ lie/accuse Republicans and people of faith without the facts, how do you feel about that?

..and does one rotten nut, say Obama, represent all people?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top