Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Again Nancy Pelosi has no right to launch an impeachment investigation, only the house can do that
- Thread starter Frannie
- Start date
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Its going to be fun watching you idiots defend that in front of the SCOTUS... You do not have the consent of the house to even begin the process...Deplorable trumpbot to youYou're wrong. She needs a vote to start an impeachment, not an investigation.Which means there must be a vote.
Source Ken Star Fox news.
Prove me and Ken wrong kiddies
Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama ....
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,988
- 1,130
Dude wake up they have been doing that for 3 years nothing has changed except that Trumps whistleblower plan is a successDeplorable trumpbot to youYou're wrong. She needs a vote to start an impeachment, not an investigation.Which means there must be a vote.
Source Ken Star Fox news.
Prove me and Ken wrong kiddies
Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama ....
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
You keep dreaming kid because Trump could be president for 8 to 12 more years
over 50% of the House requested the HJC to launch an impeachment inquiry has been going on fro 3 years ????????????
how f'n dumb are you?
you're dismissed btw
Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,988
- 1,130
Its going to be fun watching you idiots defend that in front of the SCOTUS... You do not have the consent of the house to even begin the process...Deplorable trumpbot to youYou're wrong. She needs a vote to start an impeachment, not an investigation.Which means there must be a vote.
Source Ken Star Fox news.
Prove me and Ken wrong kiddies
Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama ....
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
In past presidential impeachments, the House has formally voted to authorize the Judiciary Committee to initiate impeachment proceedings. But this step has been skipped on occasion in the impeachment of judges, and it’s entirely the product of custom and internal House rules (themselves interpreted and controlled by the House majority at a given time).
now you're dismissed -
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
You dont have consent of the full house. You do not have authority to spend money on this... You folks are idiots..Dude wake up they have been doing that for 3 years nothing has changed except that Trumps whistleblower plan is a successDeplorable trumpbot to youYou're wrong. She needs a vote to start an impeachment, not an investigation.
Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama ....
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
You keep dreaming kid because Trump could be president for 8 to 12 more years
over 50% of the House requested the HJC to launch an impeachment inquiry has been going on fro 3 years ????????????
how f'n dumb are you?
you're dismissed btw
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
It can not be skipped.. It is a constitutional requirement!Its going to be fun watching you idiots defend that in front of the SCOTUS... You do not have the consent of the house to even begin the process...Deplorable trumpbot to youYou're wrong. She needs a vote to start an impeachment, not an investigation.
Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama ....
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
In past presidential impeachments, the House has formally voted to authorize the Judiciary Committee to initiate impeachment proceedings. But this step has been skipped on occasion in the impeachment of judges, and it’s entirely the product of custom and internal House rules (themselves interpreted and controlled by the House majority at a given time).
now you're dismissed -
Dismissed you moron..
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
And there it is.. You admit it has been followed before but now you dont want too because it gives Trump and republicans the same powers to subpoena and call witnesses under oath.. And you cant have that..the House has formally voted
Why are you denying Trump and Republicans the right to a defense?
Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,988
- 1,130
You dont have consent of the full house. You do not have authority to spend money on this... You folks are idiots..Dude wake up they have been doing that for 3 years nothing has changed except that Trumps whistleblower plan is a successDeplorable trumpbot to youTrumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama ....
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
You keep dreaming kid because Trump could be president for 8 to 12 more years
over 50% of the House requested the HJC to launch an impeachment inquiry has been going on fro 3 years ????????????
how f'n dumb are you?
you're dismissed btw
consent of a full house -
dumber than a f'n ROCK PILE.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 70,326
- 35,132
- 2,300
Bullshit. How an impeachment Begins is not mentioned in the Constitution you fukkin dolts.It can not be skipped.. It is a constitutional requirement!Its going to be fun watching you idiots defend that in front of the SCOTUS... You do not have the consent of the house to even begin the process...Deplorable trumpbot to youTrumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama ....
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
In past presidential impeachments, the House has formally voted to authorize the Judiciary Committee to initiate impeachment proceedings. But this step has been skipped on occasion in the impeachment of judges, and it’s entirely the product of custom and internal House rules (themselves interpreted and controlled by the House majority at a given time).
now you're dismissed -
Dismissed you moron..
Frannie
Gold Member
- Feb 27, 2019
- 6,880
- 348
- 135
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #90
3 years the dopes have done nothing but scream impeachment. Just like you, face it trump trolled Schiff, the whistleblower is on trumps teamDude wake up they have been doing that for 3 years nothing has changed except that Trumps whistleblower plan is a successDeplorable trumpbot to youYou're wrong. She needs a vote to start an impeachment, not an investigation.
Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama ....
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
You keep dreaming kid because Trump could be president for 8 to 12 more years
over 50% of the House requested the HJC to launch an impeachment inquiry has been going on fro 3 years ????????????
how f'n dumb are you?
you're dismissed btw
Frannie
Gold Member
- Feb 27, 2019
- 6,880
- 348
- 135
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #91
Then the gop can subpoena biden.....Its going to be fun watching you idiots defend that in front of the SCOTUS... You do not have the consent of the house to even begin the process...Deplorable trumpbot to youYou're wrong. She needs a vote to start an impeachment, not an investigation.
Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama ....
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
In past presidential impeachments, the House has formally voted to authorize the Judiciary Committee to initiate impeachment proceedings. But this step has been skipped on occasion in the impeachment of judges, and it’s entirely the product of custom and internal House rules (themselves interpreted and controlled by the House majority at a given time).
now you're dismissed -
Great
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 70,326
- 35,132
- 2,300
What law? Quote it. Make sure it mentions impeachment Inquiry dumfukNope impeachment must follow the lawYou realize that we are talking about the House right?Your the one who is poorly educated. The Founding fathers made sure that the power of impeachment rests solely in the House Of Representatives... And without the house voting no one has any authority to begin an inquiry... You people are now totally fucked..She said she did, but she never did it as a formal inquiry requires a vote
Play on, if there is a vote the gop calls Biden
Wheeeeeeeeeee
Do it
Above is what passes for Trump ass kissers' "intelligentsia".....Trump DOES love the poorly educated....His base.
How they begin that impeachment is up to them
Frannie
Gold Member
- Feb 27, 2019
- 6,880
- 348
- 135
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #94
Actually kid the house must not follow any certain law, they must follow all laws and I can not quote all laws here.What law? Quote it. Make sure it mentions impeachment Inquiry dumfukNope impeachment must follow the lawYou realize that we are talking about the House right?Your the one who is poorly educated. The Founding fathers made sure that the power of impeachment rests solely in the House Of Representatives... And without the house voting no one has any authority to begin an inquiry... You people are now totally fucked..She said she did, but she never did it as a formal inquiry requires a vote
Play on, if there is a vote the gop calls Biden
Wheeeeeeeeeee
Do it
Above is what passes for Trump ass kissers' "intelligentsia".....Trump DOES love the poorly educated....His base.
How they begin that impeachment is up to them
Play on, Schiff was trolled by trumps whistleblower sting
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
pull your head out of your ass retard...You dont have consent of the full house. You do not have authority to spend money on this... You folks are idiots..Dude wake up they have been doing that for 3 years nothing has changed except that Trumps whistleblower plan is a successDeplorable trumpbot to you
bite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
You keep dreaming kid because Trump could be president for 8 to 12 more years
over 50% of the House requested the HJC to launch an impeachment inquiry has been going on fro 3 years ????????????
how f'n dumb are you?
you're dismissed btw
consent of a full house -
dumber than a f'n ROCK PILE.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Frannie
Gold Member
- Feb 27, 2019
- 6,880
- 348
- 135
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #96
Yo do you really want to see that head?pull your head out of your ass retard...You dont have consent of the full house. You do not have authority to spend money on this... You folks are idiots..Dude wake up they have been doing that for 3 years nothing has changed except that Trumps whistleblower plan is a successbite me
The House Judiciary Committee is now engaged in a full-blown investigation and legal fight with the goal of deciding whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump by the end of the year, according to Democratic officials involved in the effort …
As additional House Democrats continue to call for the House Judiciary Committee to launch an impeachment inquiry — which more than half the caucus now supports — Democratic sources say the issue is essentially moot since what the panel is doing is basically that: investigating whether Trump should be impeached.
You keep dreaming kid because Trump could be president for 8 to 12 more years
over 50% of the House requested the HJC to launch an impeachment inquiry has been going on fro 3 years ????????????
how f'n dumb are you?
you're dismissed btw
consent of a full house -
dumber than a f'n ROCK PILE.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Let it stay in the ass
Which means there must be a vote.
Source Ken Star Fox news.
Prove me and Ken wrong kiddies
No citation.
An impeachment process against Richard Nixon began in the United States House of Representatives on October 30, 1973, following the "Saturday Night Massacre" episode of the Watergate scandal. The House Judiciary Committee set up an impeachment inquiry staff and began investigations into possible impeachable offenses by Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States. The process was formally initiated on February 6, 1974, when the House of Representatives passed a resolution, H.Res. 803, giving the Judiciary Committee authority to investigate whether sufficient grounds existed to impeach
Frannie
Gold Member
- Feb 27, 2019
- 6,880
- 348
- 135
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #98
I gather that you provided the date of the vote and as such agree with me. So thanks for thatWhich means there must be a vote.
Source Ken Star Fox news.
Prove me and Ken wrong kiddies
No citation.
An impeachment process against Richard Nixon began in the United States House of Representatives on October 30, 1973, following the "Saturday Night Massacre" episode of the Watergate scandal. The House Judiciary Committee set up an impeachment inquiry staff and began investigations into possible impeachable offenses by Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States. The process was formally initiated on February 6, 1974, when the House of Representatives passed a resolution, H.Res. 803, giving the Judiciary Committee authority to investigate whether sufficient grounds existed to impeach
America First
Rookie
- Feb 21, 2018
- 4
- 0
- 1
They make up the rules as they travel down the road of oversight. They've been doing it for (3) years already. Why would they stop now?Which means there must be a vote.
Source Ken Star Fox news.
Prove me and Ken wrong kiddies
The House investigation started on October 30, 1973- by the House Judiciary Committee.I gather that you provided the date of the vote and as such agree with me. So thanks for thatWhich means there must be a vote.
Source Ken Star Fox news.
Prove me and Ken wrong kiddies
No citation.
An impeachment process against Richard Nixon began in the United States House of Representatives on October 30, 1973, following the "Saturday Night Massacre" episode of the Watergate scandal. The House Judiciary Committee set up an impeachment inquiry staff and began investigations into possible impeachable offenses by Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States. The process was formally initiated on February 6, 1974, when the House of Representatives passed a resolution, H.Res. 803, giving the Judiciary Committee authority to investigate whether sufficient grounds existed to impeach
The House voted on February 6, 1974 to give the Judiciary committee to investigate impeachment.
So yes- the House has the right to handle impeachment proceedings as it sees fit- and right now it is where the House was in November of 1973.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 233
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 40
- Views
- 323
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 40
- Replies
- 26
- Views
- 109
- Replies
- 61
- Views
- 252
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8543
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 485
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-