Ahmaud Arbery’s killers racist rants exposed in Federal trial

[Mac-7]

Double jeapordy is one jurisdiction charging individuals more than once for the same crime.

Wrong

the state and feds cannot both charge one person with the same crime

so they resort to the racist hate crime law to fool the public

but its still double jeapordy

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Theft, not that it matters. The post I responded to said "how is it the business of the McMichaels to enforce that".

What theft did he commit in that neighborhood

 

[Faun]

Wrong

the state and feds cannot both charge one person with the same crime

so they resort to the racist hate crime law to fool the public

but its still double jeapordy

LOLOLOLOL

Great, thanks for showing the forum that not only are you a racist piece of shit, but you're also a dumb mother fucker.

Moron, the federal government and the states are separate jurisdictions. Each state shares concurrent jurisdiction with the federal government; and each has the legal authority to charge individuals with the same crime.

You're an embarrassment to the white race.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Had he been white chances are he would not have been prowling around the construction site to begin with

but assuming he was a person with a rap sheet the white guy may have run away too

So why do they have whites on camera prowling around?

 

[Mac-7]

LOLOLOLOL

Great, thanks for showing the forum that not only are you a racist piece of shit, but you're also a dumb mother fucker.

Moron, the federal government and the states are separate jurisdictions. Each state shares a concurrent jurisdiction with the federal government; and each has the legal authority to charge individuals with the same crime.

You're an embarrassment to the white race.

You always resort to profanity and personal insults when your argument is circling the drain

and this time is no exception

 

[Mac-7]

So why do they have whites on camera prowling around?

You have no idea of the circumstances in those video’s

But dont believe for a second that whites only object to being stolen from by black people

 

[Grumblenuts]

United States[edit]​

Main article: Double Jeopardy Clause
The ancient protection of the Common Law against double jeopardy is maintained in its full rigour in the United States. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides:

... nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; ...[54]

Conversely, double jeopardy comes with a key exception. Under the multiple sovereignties doctrine, multiple sovereigns can indict a defendant for the same crime. The federal and state governments can have overlapping criminal laws, so a criminal offender may be convicted in individual states and federal courts for exactly the same crime or for different crimes arising out of the same facts.

 

[Faun]

You always resort to profanity and personal insults when your argument is circling the drain

and this time is no exception

LOLOLOL

You're no less ignorant just because I highlight your ignorance with vulgarities.

Moron, you literally exposed how fucking stupid you are when you said the federal government and a state can't both charge someone with the same crime.

Such stupid nonsense exposes your ignorance in regards to concurrent jurisdiction. And now that you've once again utterly demonstrated how ignorant you are and what an embarrassment you are to the white race, I've reduced you to bitching & moaning about me insulting you because you can't even defend your own idiotic statements.

 

[Grumblenuts]

You always resort to profanity and personal insults when your argument is circling the drain

and this time is no exception

A shower of profanity is just what one asks for who keeps digging when repeatedly shown to have nothing.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

You have no idea of the circumstances in those video’s

Right, but you know the circumstances of the black man being there.

But dont believe for a second that whites only object to being stolen from by black people.

Larry English said that it was whites who were stealing from the construction site, but you know more than he does.

 

[miketx]

Yes we are shocked, truly shocked there was racism here...

loons see racism everywhere

 

[miketx]

No idea why you brought up racism.

Because he's a lying douche.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Because he's a lying douche.

No, I meant in relation to my previous post, but our miscommunication was unsurprising in retrospect given the topic.

 

[Godboy]

Huh? What crime against the McMichael's neighbors did Arbery commit?

Either understand the debate by reading what I responded to in the first place, or shut up.

 

[Godboy]

What theft did he commit in that neighborhood

Why would it matter in this debate where an idiot lefty says to me "people should mind their own business"?

 

[Faun]

Either understand the debate by reading what I responded to in the first place, or shut up.

Translation: Arbery did not commit any crime.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Why would it matter in this debate where an idiot lefty says to me "people should mind their own business"?

So he didn't commit any crime, thxs.

 

[Godboy]

Translation: Arbery did not commit any crime.

Are you a moron? Shut your bitch ass up until you understand the debate.

 

[Godboy]

So he didn't commit any crime, thxs.

You must be an idiot to think that. He has a record you uninformed fool. This motherfucker took a gun to a school that he wasnt even a student at. He was even on probabtion for theft while he was trying to steal from this neighborhood where he was killed.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Prosecutors argued that defense lawyers were seeking to put Arbery on trial by making his criminal record and other prior problems part of the case. None of the three defendants knew Arbery, or anything about his past, prior to the shooting. Prosecutors said his past was irrelevant to their decision to arm themselves and ultimately shoot a man who was trying to run away.

In a written order, Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley ruled evidence of Arbery’s past run-ins with the law could unfairly “lead the jury to believe that although Arbery did not apparently commit any felony that day, he may pose future dangerousness in that he would eventually commit more alleged crimes, and therefore, the Defendants’ actions were somehow justified.”

“The character of victim is neither relevant nor admissible in murder trial,” the judge wrote in his ruling Monday.

The McMichaels pursued Arbery in a pickup truck after they spotted him running in their neighborhood Feb. 23, 2020. Bryan joined the chase and took cellphone video of Travis McMichael shooting Arbery three times at close range with a shotgun.