America’s Founders Were Deeply Religious

You forgot to answer what happened to diana after she insulted the god queen



Are you still claiming that the English worshipped the king as God....or have you admitted your error?


All of your posts should be seen through this prism:

I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.
You are extraordinarily funny when triggered

I certainly don't mind revealing what a fool you are.......


Are you still claiming that the English worshipped the king as God....or have you admitted your error?


All of your posts should be seen through this prism:

I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.
You really are not smart

Divine right of kings - Wikipedia



You need not go to the trouble of proving you're an imbecile....

From that link:

"Outside of Christianity,[clarification needed] kings were often seen as either ruling with the backing of heavenly powers or perhaps even being divine beings themselves."



Ever hear of the Magna Carta, dope?

Can anyone change anything on wikipedia?

Anyone with Internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles, except in limited cases where editing is restricted to prevent disruption or vandalism. Users can contribute anonymously, under a pseudonym, or, if they choose to, with their real identity.
 
Who do you think the native indigenous peoples of the Americas were talking about when they say
the great spirit?
A single deity.
One creator .
Not a sun god or mother earth god.
Nope...the great creator was the one who did the creating....doesn't mean he/she was the only one......

The Great Creator was and still is, all of God's spirit's in one ,whose spirt is in everything living on this planet.
 
I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.
Princess Diana insulted the queen

How is she doing dunce

Lol

You do know that washington laid devil triangles as streets in dc....

Lol, I bet you are an abused altar girl


I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.

Worship all the god you wish.

Just remember that the FF's intentionally kept your gods out of the Constitution.

Not Gods
God
If that were true both houses would never have had opening prayer.
Whether worshipping god or gods or statues or golden icons.

Nothing to do with the Constitution.

You're the one ignoring both the house and senate with opening prayer everyday.
 
A salutation common for the time and the parlance commonly used as a closing salutation is certainly not a legal recognition. The framers of the Constitution explicitly excluded any mention of "the creator", meaning the Christian gods in the body of the Constitution.

Everyone believed in one creator.
Our constitution was written by that ideology.
The Constitution and our laws are based on that whole belief system one creator of the universe.
Even the native Americans believed in one creator.
It does not mean we are a theocracy, we have never nor will be one either.
Not true.....even the OT doesn't refer to just one creator.



Are you nuts????


Even liars like you should have some limits.
Look at the 10 Commandments...."you shall have no other god before me"......how can that be if there is only one god? The Jewish god was just demanding to be #1.



God was simply saying don't pretend that they idols you pray to are actual gods.

You Liberals/Democrats should have considered that before you claimed that Obama was god, Jesus, and the messiah.....you wouldn't have appeared quite so ridiculous.
Nope....he stated to have no other gods BEFORE him......that infers there are other gods. You really need to pay attention. Words have meanings.
 
Uh ----------- that would be you. Read much?

It is indeed not a reference to "Jesus Christ", yet her you sit, denying that it is not.

Self-making pretzels. Yum. Thanks for fessing up that you're a liar.



Let's check:

Here is the true quote.


done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independance of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,
The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription


If you obtained your version from wikipedia, it is proof that Liberals corrupted and lie about the Constitution.

The same is the case for government school.


Clearly, the Constitution references Jesus




Or....

in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven


...give your alternate explanation for whom the reference describes.



Liberals never have the class, honesty, or character to admit when they're proven wrong.
Thank goodness, I never have to.
No direct reference to Jesus there. Sorry, Comrade. Words have meaning.


Answer the question, dope.


in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven

Is any possible explanation for the above that doesn't specify....SPECIFY... Jesus Christ?



...give your alternate explanation for whom the reference describes.


Here comes the chorus of 'is not, isssssssss nooooottttttttttt!!!"
No "Jesus" there, Comrade.

Never mind the court ruling in 2017.
Federal court upholds prayer in Congress
A federal court ruled Wednesday that Congress can continue to open its sessions each day with a prayer, and upheld the House’s ability to pick and choose who’s allowed to lead the prayer.
I don't agree with that ruling UNLESS Congress allows all religions to step up.
 
V bh bhgh vhf
You boomeranged yourself kid because you are worshipping Washington as though he was a god when he was a free Mason pagan idol stone worshipper.

You are so clueless that you will never know


I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.
Princess Diana insulted the queen

How is she doing dunce

Lol

You do know that washington laid devil triangles as streets in dc....

Lol, I bet you are an abused altar girl


I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.

Worship all the god you wish.

Just remember that the FF's intentionally kept your gods out of the Constitution.

Not Gods
God
If that were true both houses would never have had opening prayer.
Which god? And what about the goddesses? Why do you leave them out?
 
You forgot to answer what happened to diana after she insulted the god queen



Are you still claiming that the English worshipped the king as God....or have you admitted your error?


All of your posts should be seen through this prism:

I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.
You are extraordinarily funny when triggered

I certainly don't mind revealing what a fool you are.......


Are you still claiming that the English worshipped the king as God....or have you admitted your error?


All of your posts should be seen through this prism:

I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.
You really are not smart

Divine right of kings - Wikipedia



You need not go to the trouble of proving you're an imbecile....

From that link:

"Outside of Christianity,[clarification needed] kings were often seen as either ruling with the backing of heavenly powers or perhaps even being divine beings themselves."



Ever hear of the Magna Carta, dope?
Divine Right of Kings.....completely ignoring that, are you Comrade? Even your Tzars believed in that.
 
A salutation common for the time and the parlance commonly used as a closing salutation is certainly not a legal recognition. The framers of the Constitution explicitly excluded any mention of "the creator", meaning the Christian gods in the body of the Constitution.

Everyone believed in one creator.
Our constitution was written by that ideology.
The Constitution and our laws are based on that whole belief system one creator of the universe.
Even the native Americans believed in one creator.
It does not mean we are a theocracy, we have never nor will be one either.

Actually the Constitution was written by the ideology of Liberalism. Had nothing to do with creators or universes. And no, not everyone believed in "one creator" at all anyway.

And the idea of Liberalism was and is that power derives from the consent of the governed and NOT from an authoritarian hierarchy of royalty and an established Church -- which had been the "standard" way of things up to then. That's why it was called the Great Experiment -- it was a new approach. And that's what the entire structure of the government as laid out in the COTUS is all about.

You are absolutely correct that neither that structure, nor the archaic phrasing of the date, means we are a theocracy.
A salutation common for the time and the parlance commonly used as a closing salutation is certainly not a legal recognition. The framers of the Constitution explicitly excluded any mention of "the creator", meaning the Christian gods in the body of the Constitution.

Everyone believed in one creator.
Our constitution was written by that ideology.
The Constitution and our laws are based on that whole belief system one creator of the universe.
Even the native Americans believed in one creator.
It does not mean we are a theocracy, we have never nor will be one either.

Actually the Constitution was written by the ideology of Liberalism. Had nothing to do with creators or universes. And no, not everyone believed in "one creator" at all anyway.

And the idea of Liberalism was and is that power derives from the consent of the governed and NOT from an authoritarian hierarchy of royalty and an established Church -- which had been the "standard" way of things up to then. That's why it was called the Great Experiment -- it was a new approach. And that's what the entire structure of the government as laid out in the COTUS is all about.

You are absolutely correct that neither that structure, nor the archaic phrasing of the date, means we are a theocracy.

All of our laws ,amendments and morals are based on the Bible.
Without a moral nation you are seeing the results of lawlessness like we are seeing now.

Our founders created a document based on a political theory of natural rights, public policies based on moral conditions of freedom.
Without self morals you have lawlessness where anything and everything is acceptable.
Totally opposite of what we are.
With lawlessness you need more government control over those who are lawless.
"All of our laws, amendments and morals are based on the bible".....simply not true.

Then you don't know our history , or our world history if you believe that.
I apparently do. The Enlightenment and Masonry had way more to do with our Constitution than any religion.
 
Let's check:

Here is the true quote.


done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independance of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,
The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription


If you obtained your version from wikipedia, it is proof that Liberals corrupted and lie about the Constitution.

The same is the case for government school.


Clearly, the Constitution references Jesus




Or....

in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven


...give your alternate explanation for whom the reference describes.



Liberals never have the class, honesty, or character to admit when they're proven wrong.
Thank goodness, I never have to.
No direct reference to Jesus there. Sorry, Comrade. Words have meaning.


Answer the question, dope.


in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven

Is any possible explanation for the above that doesn't specify....SPECIFY... Jesus Christ?



...give your alternate explanation for whom the reference describes.


Here comes the chorus of 'is not, isssssssss nooooottttttttttt!!!"
No "Jesus" there, Comrade.



Let's check.


Here is the actual quote from the US Constitution.


done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independance of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,
The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription

If you obtained your version from wikipedia, it is proof that Liberals corrupted and lie about the Constitution.

The same is the case for government school.


Clearly, the Constitution references Jesus




Or....

in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven


...give your alternate explanation for whom the reference describes.



Liberals never have the class, honesty, or character to admit when they're proven wrong.
Thank goodness, I never have to.
No reference to Jesus there, Comrade......even if you were to translate it into Russian.
Your tds is showing, as everyone who does not agree with you is a russian
 
I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.
Princess Diana insulted the queen

How is she doing dunce

Lol

You do know that washington laid devil triangles as streets in dc....

Lol, I bet you are an abused altar girl


I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.

Worship all the god you wish.

Just remember that the FF's intentionally kept your gods out of the Constitution.

Not Gods
God
If that were true both houses would never have had opening prayer.
Which god? And what about the goddesses? Why do you leave them out?

One sprit, one creator.
Non belief, both equal freedom.
No politics involved of no creator like the extreme far left believe.
With that belief all of our religions have no representation.
 
Princess Diana insulted the queen

How is she doing dunce

Lol

You do know that washington laid devil triangles as streets in dc....

Lol, I bet you are an abused altar girl


I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.

Worship all the god you wish.

Just remember that the FF's intentionally kept your gods out of the Constitution.

Not Gods
God
If that were true both houses would never have had opening prayer.
Which god? And what about the goddesses? Why do you leave them out?

One sprit, one creator.
Non belief, both equal freedom.
No politics involved of no creator like the extreme far left believe.
With that belief all of our religions have no representation.
Is that a bob Dylan song
 
Who do you think the native indigenous peoples of the Americas were talking about when they say
the great spirit?
A single deity.
One creator .
Not a sun god or mother earth god.
Nope...the great creator was the one who did the creating....doesn't mean he/she was the only one......

The Great Creator was and still is, all of God's spirit's in one ,whose spirt is in everything living on this planet.
What about goddesses? Why are you leaving them out?
 
Who do you think the native indigenous peoples of the Americas were talking about when they say
the great spirit?
A single deity.
One creator .
Not a sun god or mother earth god.
Nope...the great creator was the one who did the creating....doesn't mean he/she was the only one......

The Great Creator was and still is, all of God's spirit's in one ,whose spirt is in everything living on this planet.
What about goddesses? Why are you leaving them out?
You mean like your goddess of cankles Hillary
 
Princess Diana insulted the queen

How is she doing dunce

Lol

You do know that washington laid devil triangles as streets in dc....

Lol, I bet you are an abused altar girl


I once saw a post from a dunce who claimed that the Church of England worshipped their king as God.


Oh....wait.....that imbecile was you!!!!



"Besides the founding fathers were members of the Church of England of which the King was God."

Does A Religion Need A God?



THE KING OF ENGLAND WAS NOT GOD, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!!!w

And no one worships Washington as God.

We believers worship God.

Worship all the god you wish.

Just remember that the FF's intentionally kept your gods out of the Constitution.

Not Gods
God
If that were true both houses would never have had opening prayer.
Whether worshipping god or gods or statues or golden icons.

Nothing to do with the Constitution.

You're the one ignoring both the house and senate with opening prayer everyday.
Do they have to do it? And do they have to do a specific religion? And show us where the "opening prayer" is required by the Constitution.
 
No direct reference to Jesus there. Sorry, Comrade. Words have meaning.


Answer the question, dope.


in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven

Is any possible explanation for the above that doesn't specify....SPECIFY... Jesus Christ?



...give your alternate explanation for whom the reference describes.


Here comes the chorus of 'is not, isssssssss nooooottttttttttt!!!"
No "Jesus" there, Comrade.



Let's check.


Here is the actual quote from the US Constitution.


done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independance of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,
The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription

If you obtained your version from wikipedia, it is proof that Liberals corrupted and lie about the Constitution.

The same is the case for government school.


Clearly, the Constitution references Jesus




Or....

in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven


...give your alternate explanation for whom the reference describes.



Liberals never have the class, honesty, or character to admit when they're proven wrong.
Thank goodness, I never have to.
No reference to Jesus there, Comrade......even if you were to translate it into Russian.
Your tds is showing, as everyone who does not agree with you is a russian
No...not everyone who disagrees is Russian.
 
Who do you think the native indigenous peoples of the Americas were talking about when they say
the great spirit?
A single deity.
One creator .
Not a sun god or mother earth god.
Nope...the great creator was the one who did the creating....doesn't mean he/she was the only one......

The Great Creator was and still is, all of God's spirit's in one ,whose spirt is in everything living on this planet.
What about goddesses? Why are you leaving them out?
You mean like your goddess of cankles Hillary
She's not a goddess...she's a human being. But you seem to think that politicians can be gods/goddesses......does that explain the orange cult?
 
Answer the question, dope.


in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven

Is any possible explanation for the above that doesn't specify....SPECIFY... Jesus Christ?



...give your alternate explanation for whom the reference describes.


Here comes the chorus of 'is not, isssssssss nooooottttttttttt!!!"
No "Jesus" there, Comrade.



Let's check.


Here is the actual quote from the US Constitution.


done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independance of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,
The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription

If you obtained your version from wikipedia, it is proof that Liberals corrupted and lie about the Constitution.

The same is the case for government school.


Clearly, the Constitution references Jesus




Or....

in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven


...give your alternate explanation for whom the reference describes.



Liberals never have the class, honesty, or character to admit when they're proven wrong.
Thank goodness, I never have to.
No reference to Jesus there, Comrade......even if you were to translate it into Russian.
Your tds is showing, as everyone who does not agree with you is a russian
No...not everyone who disagrees is Russian.
Then get checked out because you are seeing russians
 
Who do you think the native indigenous peoples of the Americas were talking about when they say
the great spirit?
A single deity.
One creator .
Not a sun god or mother earth god.
Nope...the great creator was the one who did the creating....doesn't mean he/she was the only one......

The Great Creator was and still is, all of God's spirit's in one ,whose spirt is in everything living on this planet.
What about goddesses? Why are you leaving them out?
You mean like your goddess of cankles Hillary
She's not a goddess...she's a human being. But you seem to think that politicians can be gods/goddesses......does that explain the orange cult?
Wrong, hillary is clearly the goddess of cankles

You will accept this eventually
 
That refers to the Judeo-Christian faith. Compare this fact with the elites of the major political party today, and the schools they oversee, teaching quite the reverse.

The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/mt/archives/2010/02/new_column_libe_4.html Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundamentalist hate group.”



Last week Att’y Gen William Barr gave a speech about the importance of having a religious America. And, of course, he was attacked for it.


1.“United States Attorney General William Barr spoke at Notre Dame Law School [enemies of religion] raced to warn us of our impending doom. Also as per usual, in their screeds were seeds of the very things Barr described.

…RefuseFascism.org, which proclaimed in a headline, “At Notre Dame, William Barr Lays Out a Christian Fascist Nightmare.”

…writer Joan Walsh described Barr as "a paranoid right-wing Catholic ideologue who won't respect the separation of church and state." She mocked the Catholic men's service group Knights of Columbus (of which Barr has been a member) as "a patriarchal cosplay group." Walsh's distaste for Catholicism is matched only by her evident loathing of evangelicals. She writes: "(I)t's worth noting that Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney were all also raised Catholic -- but Pence and Pompeo went one better than Barr and joined the official GOP denomination, White Evangelical Protestantism ... I couldn't wish these guys better company to spend time with in hell.

“From the Founding Era onward, there was strong consensus about the centrality of religious liberty in the United States.

The imperative of protecting religious freedom was not just a nod in the direction of piety. It reflects the Framers’ belief that religion was indispensable to sustaining our free system of government.

In his renowned 1785 pamphlet, “Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments,” James Madison described religious liberty as “a right towards men” but “a duty towards the Creator,” and a “duty….precedent both in order of time and degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society.



How does religion promote the moral discipline and virtue needed to support free government?

First, it gives us the right rules to live by. The Founding generation were Christians. They believed that the Judeo-Christian moral system corresponds to the true nature of man. Those moral precepts start with the two great commandments – to Love God with your whole heart, soul, and mind; and to Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself.”
America’s great experiment with freedom needs religion
A Moral Citizenry Is Not a Theocracy



Faith is inseparable from liberty and freedom.

Rabid anti-religion bigots attacked Barr....hoping that all of America renounce the views of our Founders, that which made our nation the shining city on the hill.

If you agree with Barr about the relationship between religion and liberty, you cannot, of course, vote Democrat.

Usual PC idiocy.
 
With the start of the courts ruling of banning of prayer in 1961 up to all other rulings buy activists judges who believe in separation of church and state has had the effect of all other rulings, is not just to eat away at the sacredness of the name of God, but to eliminate the sacredness and thereby the substance of the oath itself.
With solemn oaths and binding contracts between individuals removed, the state eventually sits where God ought, and only the state’s cause is held valid. There is no longer an absolute and just legal basis for judging “between a man and his brother,” much less a man and his neighbor (Deuteronomy 1:16, 17). All affairs of life become subject to state, rather than individual control.
 

Forum List

Back
Top