Darkwind
Diamond Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,860
- 19,381
- 1,915
It isn't a problem, and it isn't a problem that anyone with less education than the CEO's have are going to be able to solve.Well, because I'm neck-deep in this stuff as part of my profession, I have to think about this stuff quite a bit. Given the current nature of the global economy, we would be able to increase personal income tax rates only so far, and not as high as they were in the 50's and 60's..
So what, if anything, would be the solution to the problem Warren poses?
Precisely?
And, since no solution is perfect, what would be the potential problems?
.
What worked before? Income inequality has never been at the level it is now.
Our tax policies got us here, why do you think they can't get us out of here?
I would support adding two new margins, one at 44.9% and one at 49.9%. I think we could get away with that without much macro damage.
But that would not be enough to address this, not even close. This is a very complex issue and not solved with one approach.
.
In 40 years the gap between CEO pay and worker pay has gone from 20 times the average worker to over 300 times the average worker. There's something wrong with that. The average worker isn't working any less hard than they were before, they're working harder in fact.
It's a complex issue that isn't going to be solved by the people making 300 times the salary of the working guy. If the government elected to represent that working guy doens't do anything about it, the alternative is seldom pretty.
![]()
I don't care how little anyone else makes. I will not permit low intelligent, minimum wage people determine My worth.