An entire generation of college students have been taught to hate free speech....

[H B Lowrie]

Youre a moron. You and the other fool actually argued about it.

Out of intellectual ammo again?...What a shame.

Says the guy that made the retarded claim. How could you be that stupid to say if you get banned from FB that means you hate free speech?

The Powell Memorandum explicitly laid out how the educational, political and economic systems were to be restructured by the Wall Street/donor/"job creator” class in the aftermath of the social and political engagement of the masses during the 1960-70s. They decided the unsubstantial people were being too educated and had too much leisure time and nondiscretionary income; in short, that a less informed, more corporate state indoctrinated, and less affluent middle class under economic duress would make the population easier to control.

Is this "Powell memorandum" a piece of communist propaganda?

You come off as a devotee of that lunatic Noam Chomsky.

You really need an education. Search it, Lewis Powell vomited it up, later became a US Supreme Kangaroo Court Just Us.

If you have a coherent argument make it. Thus far it's nothing but labels and Reich wing Pavlovian slobbering cues.

Can we get a Saul Alinsky name drop in here somewhere if you're tapped out?

 

[bripat9643]

Youre a moron. You and the other fool actually argued about it.

Out of intellectual ammo again?...What a shame.

Says the guy that made the retarded claim. How could you be that stupid to say if you get banned from FB that means you hate free speech?

The Powell Memorandum explicitly laid out how the educational, political and economic systems were to be restructured by the Wall Street/donor/"job creator” class in the aftermath of the social and political engagement of the masses during the 1960-70s. They decided the unsubstantial people were being too educated and had too much leisure time and nondiscretionary income; in short, that a less informed, more corporate state indoctrinated, and less affluent middle class under economic duress would make the population easier to control.

Is this "Powell memorandum" a piece of communist propaganda?

You come off as a devotee of that lunatic Noam Chomsky.

You really need an education. Search it, Lewis Powell vomited it up, later became a US Supreme KAngaroo Court Just Us.

So the "Powell memorandum" didn't do anything you claim. That's just how you chose to characterize it. However, the rest of us aren't encumbered with pink tinted spectacles.

 

[H B Lowrie]

They are evil. For one thing, they are monopolies, and that gives the DOJ a basis for anti-trust prosecution. Furthermore, Google behaves like a publisher that edits its content rather than just a common carrier. As such, it shouldn't be protected from lawsuits regarding its content.

They are not evil, if they were doing what they were doing for the conservative movement you would be on here daily kissing their ass.

Neither are monopolies, it is impossible to monopolize the internet.

Google controls 90% of the search engine traffic, so how is it not a monopoly? The government split up Standard Oil when it only controlled about 70% of the refining industry.

You just admitted that Google takes sides in the political debate. That gives the conservative side grounds for a lawsuit.

It is, so is your corporate state media machine, americans used to know monopolies were detrimental to soceity, now we worship corporate kings.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Why do you say they have been taught to hate free speech?

Because they need safe spaces from it, so their precious feelings don't get offended

You guys say you need a safe space from Mexicans. Are your precious feelings getting offended?

That's already written law, sweetheart. Mexicans are called "foreigners". They're not called "citizens". They should be called notgonnalivehere

So you agree you need a safe place then?

It's so embarrassing that I have to walk you THROUGH YOUR OWN INANE ARGUMENT....

Yes, we all need safe spaces from INTRUDERS. Or do you leave the doors to your home slung wide open?

We should not need safe spaces from WORDS and IDEAS. Because in that case we are talking about FEELINGS.

Clear enough for you? Do you need pictures? Diagrams? What?

Here. Just in case he needs pictures, you can borrow the set I keep around for leftists.

 

[H B Lowrie]

Out of intellectual ammo again?...What a shame.

Says the guy that made the retarded claim. How could you be that stupid to say if you get banned from FB that means you hate free speech?

The Powell Memorandum explicitly laid out how the educational, political and economic systems were to be restructured by the Wall Street/donor/"job creator” class in the aftermath of the social and political engagement of the masses during the 1960-70s. They decided the unsubstantial people were being too educated and had too much leisure time and nondiscretionary income; in short, that a less informed, more corporate state indoctrinated, and less affluent middle class under economic duress would make the population easier to control.

Is this "Powell memorandum" a piece of communist propaganda?

You come off as a devotee of that lunatic Noam Chomsky.

You really need an education. Search it, Lewis Powell vomited it up, later became a US Supreme KAngaroo Court Just Us.

So the "Powell memorandum" didn't do anything you claim. That's just how you chose to characterize it. However, the rest of us aren't encumbered with pink tinted spectacles.

Yeah, you are blinded, agreed.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Give AssLips some slack; Blacks need illegals so they can think they’re superior to some group.

Says the clown still trying to push the idea that "illegals are going to take jobs from Black people" bogey man. Its still not working on me clown.

I always enjoy the contortionism required for racists, white supremacists, and backwater inbred peckerwoods to feign concern for black folk.

I always enjoy the contortionism required for ignorant leftists to turn everything they hear into a validation of their narrow-minded, laughable worldview.

 

[bripat9643]

They are evil. For one thing, they are monopolies, and that gives the DOJ a basis for anti-trust prosecution. Furthermore, Google behaves like a publisher that edits its content rather than just a common carrier. As such, it shouldn't be protected from lawsuits regarding its content.

They are not evil, if they were doing what they were doing for the conservative movement you would be on here daily kissing their ass.

Neither are monopolies, it is impossible to monopolize the internet.

Google controls 90% of the search engine traffic, so how is it not a monopoly? The government split up Standard Oil when it only controlled about 70% of the refining industry.

You just admitted that Google takes sides in the political debate. That gives the conservative side grounds for a lawsuit.

It is, so is your corporate state media machine, americans used to know monopolies were detrimental to soceity, now we worship corporate kings.

The left is the only faction worshiping monopolies. Monopolies are almost always government creations. They can't exist unless the government props them up. That's the case with Google and Facebook.

 

[bripat9643]

Says the guy that made the retarded claim. How could you be that stupid to say if you get banned from FB that means you hate free speech?

The Powell Memorandum explicitly laid out how the educational, political and economic systems were to be restructured by the Wall Street/donor/"job creator” class in the aftermath of the social and political engagement of the masses during the 1960-70s. They decided the unsubstantial people were being too educated and had too much leisure time and nondiscretionary income; in short, that a less informed, more corporate state indoctrinated, and less affluent middle class under economic duress would make the population easier to control.

Is this "Powell memorandum" a piece of communist propaganda?

You come off as a devotee of that lunatic Noam Chomsky.

You really need an education. Search it, Lewis Powell vomited it up, later became a US Supreme KAngaroo Court Just Us.

So the "Powell memorandum" didn't do anything you claim. That's just how you chose to characterize it. However, the rest of us aren't encumbered with pink tinted spectacles.

Yeah, you are blinded, agreed.

Yeah, I haven't succumbed to the revealed truth of communism as you have.

 

[H B Lowrie]

They are evil. For one thing, they are monopolies, and that gives the DOJ a basis for anti-trust prosecution. Furthermore, Google behaves like a publisher that edits its content rather than just a common carrier. As such, it shouldn't be protected from lawsuits regarding its content.

They are not evil, if they were doing what they were doing for the conservative movement you would be on here daily kissing their ass.

Neither are monopolies, it is impossible to monopolize the internet.

Google controls 90% of the search engine traffic, so how is it not a monopoly? The government split up Standard Oil when it only controlled about 70% of the refining industry.

You just admitted that Google takes sides in the political debate. That gives the conservative side grounds for a lawsuit.

It is, so is your corporate state media machine, americans used to know monopolies were detrimental to soceity, now we worship corporate kings.

The left is the only faction worshiping monopolies. Monopolies are almost always government creations. They can't exist unless the government props them up. That's the case with Google and Facebook.

Partisanshitheads do not want the truth. Your "two" parties play you twits off of each other.

 

[H B Lowrie]

The Powell Memorandum explicitly laid out how the educational, political and economic systems were to be restructured by the Wall Street/donor/"job creator” class in the aftermath of the social and political engagement of the masses during the 1960-70s. They decided the unsubstantial people were being too educated and had too much leisure time and nondiscretionary income; in short, that a less informed, more corporate state indoctrinated, and less affluent middle class under economic duress would make the population easier to control.

Is this "Powell memorandum" a piece of communist propaganda?

You come off as a devotee of that lunatic Noam Chomsky.

You really need an education. Search it, Lewis Powell vomited it up, later became a US Supreme KAngaroo Court Just Us.

So the "Powell memorandum" didn't do anything you claim. That's just how you chose to characterize it. However, the rest of us aren't encumbered with pink tinted spectacles.

Yeah, you are blinded, agreed.

Yeah, I haven't succumbed to the revealed truth of communism as you have.

There we go, now you're down to "commies". Have a nice day, discussion impossible.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Give AssLips some slack; Blacks need illegals so they can think they’re superior to some group.

Says the clown still trying to push the idea that "illegals are going to take jobs from Black people" bogey man. Its still not working on me clown.

I always enjoy the contortionism required for racists, white supremacists, and backwater inbred peckerwoods to feign concern for black folk.

I always enjoy the contortionism required for ignorant leftists to turn everything they hear into a validation of their narrow-minded, laughable worldview.

Sort of like you just did with this post?

 

[bripat9643]

They are evil. For one thing, they are monopolies, and that gives the DOJ a basis for anti-trust prosecution. Furthermore, Google behaves like a publisher that edits its content rather than just a common carrier. As such, it shouldn't be protected from lawsuits regarding its content.

They are not evil, if they were doing what they were doing for the conservative movement you would be on here daily kissing their ass.

Neither are monopolies, it is impossible to monopolize the internet.

Google controls 90% of the search engine traffic, so how is it not a monopoly? The government split up Standard Oil when it only controlled about 70% of the refining industry.

You just admitted that Google takes sides in the political debate. That gives the conservative side grounds for a lawsuit.

It is, so is your corporate state media machine, americans used to know monopolies were detrimental to soceity, now we worship corporate kings.

The left is the only faction worshiping monopolies. Monopolies are almost always government creations. They can't exist unless the government props them up. That's the case with Google and Facebook.

Partisanshitheads do not want the truth. Your "two" parties play you twits off of each other.

You're claiming you aren't partisan?

 

[Cecilie1200]

...and now these people have been put in charge of censoring search engines and social platforms such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.

When these kids are old enough to be judges, the First Amendment will be murdered.

You fail to comprehend exactly what rights the First Amendment protects. There is no right of "free speech" and there never has been. The right protected by the First Amendment is the right to openly criticize the government without fear of persecution or prosecution by the government. What the First Amendment does NOT DO, is to give YOU the right to say anything you want to anyone at any time. There is no such thing as "free speech" in regards to anything other than your ability to criticize the government.

". . . or abridging the freedom of speech".

No right to free speech, huh? Funny that they used those exact words, then.

 

[whitehall]

According to author and political analyst David Horowitz every high profile conservative speaker including Horowitz himself as well as the likes of Bill Bennett and little Ann Coulter has been a victim of assault on a college campus. College kids have been taught by radical professors that assault is a form of free speech.

 

[Cecilie1200]

...and now these people have been put in charge of censoring search engines and social platforms such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.

When these kids are old enough to be judges, the First Amendment will be murdered.

You can't really call Republicans "students". Because the majority believe college is bad for America. And because of that, many don't go.

And they listen to the rhetoric of racists like Trump and other Republicans and don't have anything to compare it to or anyone discuss it with.

Also,

Shouting "fire" in a crowded theater is NOT "free speech".

Saying that Obama was born in Kenya is not free speech. It's slander. Why protect slander?

Saying that Trump refused to pay workers, some of whom even went bankrupt because he tricked them out of their work is not slander because he actually did that.

Posting the truth is free speech. Lying is lying. If someone is going to lie, they have the right to prove they are telling the truth. And if they aren't telling the truth. then who wants to listen to lies hiding behind the curtain of "free speech"?

My God you are stupid. Lying is protected under free speech. In fact so is slander, you can't go to jail for slander. You can win a CIVIL suit, but that is entirely outside the scope of the first amendment which merely prevents the government from limiting speech.

As for your stupid comments about uneducated Republicans well they are too stupid to even bother with except for ridicule.

That isn't 100% accurate, lying under oath is a crime, and lying for any sort of monetary or economic gain is fraud.

Plus, saying that "lying is protected" because slander is a civil case instead of a criminal is an indication that Dandy doesn't understand the law very well. Whether it's civil or criminal, it's STILL the government punishing you.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

...and now these people have been put in charge of censoring search engines and social platforms such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.

When these kids are old enough to be judges, the First Amendment will be murdered.

You fail to comprehend exactly what rights the First Amendment protects. There is no right of "free speech" and there never has been. The right protected by the First Amendment is the right to openly criticize the government without fear of persecution or prosecution by the government. What the First Amendment does NOT DO, is to give YOU the right to say anything you want to anyone at any time. There is no such thing as "free speech" in regards to anything other than your ability to criticize the government.

". . . or abridging the freedom of speech".

No right to free speech, huh? Funny that they used those exact words, then.

Thank you for highlighting that the government, and the government only, is prohibited from abridging the freedom of speech. It has nothing to do with private companies.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Ok kids, schools in session.
kids obama song - Bing video

The left does it in the schools, the right does it in church...

Attending church is optional, attending school not so much.

Depends on where you live, actually.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You're stating the obvious. All social media sites are pushing limited speech. They're terrified of people speaking their mind and letting truth out.

And that is their prerogative as private companies.

Go to a Christian forum and they limit your speech...trust me.

They all do it, even this site.

If you do not like what FB does, start your own FB. The internet is a big, wide open place.

Of course they do. I've never opened any accounts on any social media site ie twitter, fb, instagram etc so I don't worry about their anti free speech. Im not going to participate in their hatred for the first amendment.

A private company cannot hate what does not apply to them. That is just silly.

If they can't, they wouldn't remove.

Free speech is a function of the government, not private entities.

They cannot remove your free speech, all they can do is limit it on their sites...like this site does.

Except that then they become a publisher, not a platform, and they become subject to slander, libel, and defamation laws, just like any other publisher. The laws haven't caught up to them yet, but give it time and they will.

Right now, there's a very good case to be made that they're either in breach of contract, or engaging in false advertisement.

 

[bripat9643]

And that is their prerogative as private companies.

Go to a Christian forum and they limit your speech...trust me.

They all do it, even this site.

If you do not like what FB does, start your own FB. The internet is a big, wide open place.

Of course they do. I've never opened any accounts on any social media site ie twitter, fb, instagram etc so I don't worry about their anti free speech. Im not going to participate in their hatred for the first amendment.

A private company cannot hate what does not apply to them. That is just silly.

If they can't, they wouldn't remove.

Free speech is a function of the government, not private entities.

They cannot remove your free speech, all they can do is limit it on their sites...like this site does.

Except that then they become a publisher, not a platform, and they become subject to slander, libel, and defamation laws, just like any other publisher. The laws haven't caught up to them yet, but give it time and they will.

Right now, there's a very good case to be made that they're either in breach of contract, or engaging in false advertisement.

I can't believe the Trump admin hasn't filed an anti-trust action against them yet. I suppose that's the doing of that spineless AG sessions.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Ok kids, schools in session.

The left does it in the schools, the right does it in church...

Attending church is optional, attending school not so much.

There are lots of options. Home school, religious schools, private schools..

No, those are options of WHERE to attend, not whether to or not. And let's face it shall we? Many are home "schooled" because that's a way for parents to legally engage in racial segregation. Note to hissyfitters, no one said "all" here.

Let's face it: you THINK that's what's happening, simply because you assume anyone who disagrees with you MUST think that way.

Given that every single post I've seen from you so far is about "my political opponents are racists, because . . . I just KNOW they are!" I think you're telling us far more about you than you are about anyone or anything else.

Note to pussyacher (I'm looking directly at you, HB): if you can't prove it, it deserves zero respect. If you state it as fact multiple times without proving it, YOU deserve zero respect.