An Honest Discussion of White Privilege, by Two White Guys

[RKMBrown]

Is that you very best response to me proving you dont know what you are talking about?

Which is it girlie boy, being a woman is the same as being black or it's different. Make up your mind.

You must really have hurt feelings to resort to these puerile taunts in order to deflect.

You said gender based AA and race based AA are different. They are not unless you have something disputing the link I provided.

Affirmative action - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The concept of affirmative action was introduced in the early 1960s in the United States, as a way to combat racial discrimination in the hiring process and, in 1967, the concept was expanded to include sex.

Which is it girlie boy being black is just like being a female, yes or no? Why are you so confused? Why do you need to hide behind skirts? Why are you complaining about AA actions taken for women? If you want to be a woman just put the damn skirt on.

 

[RKMBrown]

Negro dysfunction is just another word for white fear of being inferior. Why else would someone deny white privilege exists despite the facts being that it does? Its ok because no white person can stop me no matter how many road blocks are in the way. However, lets not pretend everyone starts on a level playing field. Successful Blacks just outwork their white counterparts.

No. That's not what dysfunction means.

White privilege is the excuse blacks need for negro dysfunction.
Negroes must be absolved of all their shortcomings, failures and inadequacies.

Black people can do literally anything, at any time, for any reason or no reason at all and, if it's bad, it's not their fault.
It was caused by "slavery" or "racism" or "white privilege".

No. Thats not what white fear means.

Negro dysfunction is the excuse white men pull out of thier ass to pretend the system is not set up in their favor. It would be pitiful if it were not so funny. The way around this system is to simply outwork the lazy white guys that complain about AA even though it benefits white women more than anyone else.

Everyone already knows Black people can do anything. We just have to outwork white people that have a head start due to white privilege. You see what happened in the NBA once the playing field was leveled.

Yeah cause AA for your lazy black ass is all about blacks having to working harder than whites to get ahead.

 

[holston]

White Privilege is a concept that unintelligent, menial labor poor whites aren't able to intellectually comprehend...

Case in point, see above.

Here's something YOU can comprehend, Konky Dong.

Rich Black Men And Hot White Women, Part 2 - Video | izlesem.org

 

[holston]

The SOUL Train line up:

[/IMG]


I wanz nun a dat honky sh!t.

 

[squeeze berry]

Negro dysfunction is just another word for white fear of being inferior. Why else would someone deny white privilege exists despite the facts being that it does? Its ok because no white person can stop me no matter how many road blocks are in the way. However, lets not pretend everyone starts on a level playing field. Successful Blacks just outwork their white counterparts.

No. That's not what dysfunction means.

White privilege is the excuse blacks need for negro dysfunction.
Negroes must be absolved of all their shortcomings, failures and inadequacies.

Black people can do literally anything, at any time, for any reason or no reason at all and, if it's bad, it's not their fault.
It was caused by "slavery" or "racism" or "white privilege".

No. Thats not what white fear means.

Negro dysfunction is the excuse white men pull out of thier ass to pretend the system is not set up in their favor. It would be pitiful if it were not so funny. The way around this system is to simply outwork the lazy white guys that complain about AA even though it benefits white women more than anyone else.

Everyone already knows Black people can do anything. We just have to outwork white people that have a head start due to white privilege. You see what happened in the NBA once the playing field was leveled.

sorry, but white women have higher IQs and higher SAT scores and benefit from being more intelligent and not from your imaginary AA benefit

 

[Asclepias]

No. That's not what dysfunction means.

White privilege is the excuse blacks need for negro dysfunction.
Negroes must be absolved of all their shortcomings, failures and inadequacies.

Black people can do literally anything, at any time, for any reason or no reason at all and, if it's bad, it's not their fault.
It was caused by "slavery" or "racism" or "white privilege".

No. Thats not what white fear means.

Negro dysfunction is the excuse white men pull out of thier ass to pretend the system is not set up in their favor. It would be pitiful if it were not so funny. The way around this system is to simply outwork the lazy white guys that complain about AA even though it benefits white women more than anyone else.

Everyone already knows Black people can do anything. We just have to outwork white people that have a head start due to white privilege. You see what happened in the NBA once the playing field was leveled.

Yeah cause AA for your lazy black ass is all about blacks having to working harder than whites to get ahead.

Sorry but AA helps white women more because white men have lost the ability to compete without a jet pack and a head start. Insecure, lazy, white men like you whine all the time there is no white privilege but offer nothing to dispute the tangible evidence all around them.

Peace

 

[Coyote]

Folks...let's get back on the topic. Those who wish to change the topic, feel free to start a new thread in the appropriate areas.

Thanks

 

[Asclepias]

No. That's not what dysfunction means.

White privilege is the excuse blacks need for negro dysfunction.
Negroes must be absolved of all their shortcomings, failures and inadequacies.

Black people can do literally anything, at any time, for any reason or no reason at all and, if it's bad, it's not their fault.
It was caused by "slavery" or "racism" or "white privilege".

No. Thats not what white fear means.

Negro dysfunction is the excuse white men pull out of thier ass to pretend the system is not set up in their favor. It would be pitiful if it were not so funny. The way around this system is to simply outwork the lazy white guys that complain about AA even though it benefits white women more than anyone else.

Everyone already knows Black people can do anything. We just have to outwork white people that have a head start due to white privilege. You see what happened in the NBA once the playing field was leveled.

sorry, but white women have higher IQs and higher SAT scores and benefit from being more intelligent and not from your imaginary AA benefit

Dont be sorry. I agree. AA is indeed a imaginary benefit for Blacks. White women benefit from it more than any other demographic. There are 2 things insecure, low hanging fruit white guys just cannot accept. White women with Black men and white privilege. If you deny either of these exist, go see a doctor. If you guys actually thought about it the evidence of both occurs on a daily basis. Denial is not good for a healthy mental outlook on life.

 

[RKMBrown]

No. Thats not what white fear means.

Negro dysfunction is the excuse white men pull out of thier ass to pretend the system is not set up in their favor. It would be pitiful if it were not so funny. The way around this system is to simply outwork the lazy white guys that complain about AA even though it benefits white women more than anyone else.

Everyone already knows Black people can do anything. We just have to outwork white people that have a head start due to white privilege. You see what happened in the NBA once the playing field was leveled.

Yeah cause AA for your lazy black ass is all about blacks having to working harder than whites to get ahead.

Sorry but AA helps white women more because white men have lost the ability to compete without a jet pack and a head start. Insecure, lazy, white men like you whine all the time there is no white privilege but offer nothing to dispute the tangible evidence all around them.

Peace

ROFL lost the ability to compete. A law forcing corporations to hire women and blacks based on gender and race alone, is not evidence that white men have lost the ability to compete. That you don't understand the difference between ability to compete and permission to compete is just further evidence that without AA government intervention you'd be lucky to hold down a job stocking beer coolers with rdean. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

AA is like walking up to a class room of kids and bumping up the grades on all black kids and women by a full letter grade just because of gender and race. It's ridiculous.

Two wrongs, and in this case, three wrongs, do no make a right.

If hiring and promoting based on race and gender was a vile act when white males benefited such acts back in the 50s, why the hell do you think hiring and promoting based on race and gender isn't a vile act when it's done today for the benefit of females and people of color? Why is it not a vile racist act when it's done for blacks but it is a vile racist act when it's done for whites? Why is it vile to you, a black man, when a white woman benefits from it but it's not vile when a black woman benefits from it?

I can only discern from your statements, that you promote AA against whites because you are racist, or at best using USMB to promote racial strife for the fun of it.

 

[Asclepias]

Yeah cause AA for your lazy black ass is all about blacks having to working harder than whites to get ahead.

Sorry but AA helps white women more because white men have lost the ability to compete without a jet pack and a head start. Insecure, lazy, white men like you whine all the time there is no white privilege but offer nothing to dispute the tangible evidence all around them.

Peace

ROFL lost the ability to compete. A law forcing corporations to hire women and blacks based on gender and race alone, is not evidence that white men have lost the ability to compete. That you don't understand the difference between ability to compete and permission to compete is just further evidence that without AA government intervention you'd be lucky to hold down a job stocking beer coolers with rdean. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

AA is like walking up to a class room of kids and bumping up the grades on all black kids and women by a full letter grade just because of gender and race. It's ridiculous.

Two wrongs, and in this case, three wrongs, do no make a right.

If hiring and promoting based on race and gender was a vile act when white males benefited such acts back in the 50s, why the hell do you think hiring and promoting based on race and gender isn't a vile act when it's done today for the benefit of females and people of color? Why is it not a vile racist act when it's done for blacks but it is a vile racist act when it's done for whites? Why is it vile to you, a black man, when a white woman benefits from it but it's not vile when a black woman benefits from it?

I can only discern from your statements, that you promote AA against whites because you are racist, or at best using USMB to promote racial strife for the fun of it.

Who said AA was evidence that white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field? The reaction to AA and the denial of the existence of white privilege is the evidence white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field. If insecure white men truly had confidence they could compete then the mention of white privilege would be easy to admit to. AA would not be seen as discrimination. Your words and reactions tell on you. Do you really think no one sees it?

AA is not a vile racist act simply because it also benefits white men via white women being the group that has benefited primarily from AA. Another reason it would not be a vile racist act is because it is correcting the economic imbalance created by 400 years of white mens AA. If you had of manned up and played fair from the beginning there would be no need for any type of AA. As it is you needed a significant head start for 400 years and still continue to whine and deny white privilege.

I never said it was vile that a white woman benefitted from AA. Now you are just thrashing around looking for something. They were also the victims of white mens insecurity and little dick syndrome. The point is that ultimately those dollars from those jobs benefit the white man primarily as most white women are married to white men. its ok but lets not pretend thats not the case.

Why would pointing out the truth promote racial strife and why would it concern me if it did? i dont care what you find aggravating. You cant do anything about it even if you wanted to. Truth should never promote racial strife. Suggesting it would is a sign of intellectual immaturity.

 

[Montrovant]

Sorry but AA helps white women more because white men have lost the ability to compete without a jet pack and a head start. Insecure, lazy, white men like you whine all the time there is no white privilege but offer nothing to dispute the tangible evidence all around them.

Peace

ROFL lost the ability to compete. A law forcing corporations to hire women and blacks based on gender and race alone, is not evidence that white men have lost the ability to compete. That you don't understand the difference between ability to compete and permission to compete is just further evidence that without AA government intervention you'd be lucky to hold down a job stocking beer coolers with rdean. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

AA is like walking up to a class room of kids and bumping up the grades on all black kids and women by a full letter grade just because of gender and race. It's ridiculous.

Two wrongs, and in this case, three wrongs, do no make a right.

If hiring and promoting based on race and gender was a vile act when white males benefited such acts back in the 50s, why the hell do you think hiring and promoting based on race and gender isn't a vile act when it's done today for the benefit of females and people of color? Why is it not a vile racist act when it's done for blacks but it is a vile racist act when it's done for whites? Why is it vile to you, a black man, when a white woman benefits from it but it's not vile when a black woman benefits from it?

I can only discern from your statements, that you promote AA against whites because you are racist, or at best using USMB to promote racial strife for the fun of it.

Who said AA was evidence that white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field? The reaction to AA and the denial of the existence of white privilege is the evidence white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field. If insecure white men truly had confidence they could compete then the mention of white privilege would be easy to admit to. AA would not be seen as discrimination. Your words and reactions tell on you. Do you really think no one sees it?

AA is not a vile racist act simply because it also benefits white men via white women being the group that has benefited primarily from AA. Another reason it would not be a vile racist act is because it is correcting the economic imbalance created by 400 years of white mens AA. If you had of manned up and played fair from the beginning there would be no need for any type of AA. As it is you needed a significant head start for 400 years and still continue to whine and deny white privilege.

I never said it was vile that a white woman benefitted from AA. Now you are just thrashing around looking for something. They were also the victims of white mens insecurity and little dick syndrome. The point is that ultimately those dollars from those jobs benefit the white man primarily as most white women are married to white men. its ok but lets not pretend thats not the case.

Why would pointing out the truth promote racial strife and why would it concern me if it did? i dont care what you find aggravating. You cant do anything about it even if you wanted to. Truth should never promote racial strife. Suggesting it would is a sign of intellectual immaturity.

I wonder how, if white men needed a significant head start, how did they get ahead in the first place? If they are so inferior, as you seem to be claiming, how were they able to oppress women and minorities to begin with?

If the reaction of some white men to AA and white privilege shows that white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field, what does it mean that other white men have different reactions to AA and white privilege? Or does that not matter because it doesn't play into your own racism?

While I would agree that it is very likely that most married white women are married to white men, I don't know that simply saying most white women are married to white men is accurate. Between white women married to non-whites, the few but growing number married to women, and those not married at all, I don't know where the numbers stand, and I'm curious about where you get yours.

You are strangely inconsistent in your argument. If white men are so deficient, it makes little sense that they would have been in a position to oppress others for so long. Instead, I think that you have reacted to white bigotry, real or perceived, with racism of your own against whites, white men in particular.

 

[alan1]

These two guys get it...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etg0ghv3Ieg

Particularly the guest, who helped the host, David Pakman, to articulate the situation more effectively.

To those who wish to respond, please watch the video first, it's about 8 minutes and change long.

They forgot to talk about Yellow privilege and advantage. But then, racists do that shit.

 

[Unkotare]

I wonder how, if white men needed a significant head start, how did they get ahead in the first place?

The Bubonic Plague. Gold star to anyone who can explain why.

 

[RKMBrown]

Sorry but AA helps white women more because white men have lost the ability to compete without a jet pack and a head start. Insecure, lazy, white men like you whine all the time there is no white privilege but offer nothing to dispute the tangible evidence all around them.

Peace

ROFL lost the ability to compete. A law forcing corporations to hire women and blacks based on gender and race alone, is not evidence that white men have lost the ability to compete. That you don't understand the difference between ability to compete and permission to compete is just further evidence that without AA government intervention you'd be lucky to hold down a job stocking beer coolers with rdean. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

AA is like walking up to a class room of kids and bumping up the grades on all black kids and women by a full letter grade just because of gender and race. It's ridiculous.

Two wrongs, and in this case, three wrongs, do no make a right.

If hiring and promoting based on race and gender was a vile act when white males benefited such acts back in the 50s, why the hell do you think hiring and promoting based on race and gender isn't a vile act when it's done today for the benefit of females and people of color? Why is it not a vile racist act when it's done for blacks but it is a vile racist act when it's done for whites? Why is it vile to you, a black man, when a white woman benefits from it but it's not vile when a black woman benefits from it?

I can only discern from your statements, that you promote AA against whites because you are racist, or at best using USMB to promote racial strife for the fun of it.

Who said AA was evidence that white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field? The reaction to AA and the denial of the existence of white privilege is the evidence white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field. If insecure white men truly had confidence they could compete then the mention of white privilege would be easy to admit to. AA would not be seen as discrimination. Your words and reactions tell on you. Do you really think no one sees it?

AA is not a vile racist act simply because it also benefits white men via white women being the group that has benefited primarily from AA. Another reason it would not be a vile racist act is because it is correcting the economic imbalance created by 400 years of white mens AA. If you had of manned up and played fair from the beginning there would be no need for any type of AA. As it is you needed a significant head start for 400 years and still continue to whine and deny white privilege.

I never said it was vile that a white woman benefitted from AA. Now you are just thrashing around looking for something. They were also the victims of white mens insecurity and little dick syndrome. The point is that ultimately those dollars from those jobs benefit the white man primarily as most white women are married to white men. its ok but lets not pretend thats not the case.

Why would pointing out the truth promote racial strife and why would it concern me if it did? i dont care what you find aggravating. You cant do anything about it even if you wanted to. Truth should never promote racial strife. Suggesting it would is a sign of intellectual immaturity.

Racist thinks I'm 400years old. Yeah so that's why my government has to give you a personal boost of AA up your ass, cause I'm supposedly 400years old and guilty of owning slaves and receiving white privilege.

Face it, not only are you a dumb ass that can't live without hand outs, the hand outs have left you impotent.

My wife never had to work and has never benefited from AA, ya dumb ass.

I've been successful by leaving corporations that adhere to AA guidelines. All of them were really just to shitty a place for me to be even remotely interested in staying. American Corporations are in free fall, because of dumb asses like you.

 

[Asclepias]

ROFL lost the ability to compete. A law forcing corporations to hire women and blacks based on gender and race alone, is not evidence that white men have lost the ability to compete. That you don't understand the difference between ability to compete and permission to compete is just further evidence that without AA government intervention you'd be lucky to hold down a job stocking beer coolers with rdean. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

AA is like walking up to a class room of kids and bumping up the grades on all black kids and women by a full letter grade just because of gender and race. It's ridiculous.

Two wrongs, and in this case, three wrongs, do no make a right.

If hiring and promoting based on race and gender was a vile act when white males benefited such acts back in the 50s, why the hell do you think hiring and promoting based on race and gender isn't a vile act when it's done today for the benefit of females and people of color? Why is it not a vile racist act when it's done for blacks but it is a vile racist act when it's done for whites? Why is it vile to you, a black man, when a white woman benefits from it but it's not vile when a black woman benefits from it?

I can only discern from your statements, that you promote AA against whites because you are racist, or at best using USMB to promote racial strife for the fun of it.

Who said AA was evidence that white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field? The reaction to AA and the denial of the existence of white privilege is the evidence white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field. If insecure white men truly had confidence they could compete then the mention of white privilege would be easy to admit to. AA would not be seen as discrimination. Your words and reactions tell on you. Do you really think no one sees it?

AA is not a vile racist act simply because it also benefits white men via white women being the group that has benefited primarily from AA. Another reason it would not be a vile racist act is because it is correcting the economic imbalance created by 400 years of white mens AA. If you had of manned up and played fair from the beginning there would be no need for any type of AA. As it is you needed a significant head start for 400 years and still continue to whine and deny white privilege.

I never said it was vile that a white woman benefitted from AA. Now you are just thrashing around looking for something. They were also the victims of white mens insecurity and little dick syndrome. The point is that ultimately those dollars from those jobs benefit the white man primarily as most white women are married to white men. its ok but lets not pretend thats not the case.

Why would pointing out the truth promote racial strife and why would it concern me if it did? i dont care what you find aggravating. You cant do anything about it even if you wanted to. Truth should never promote racial strife. Suggesting it would is a sign of intellectual immaturity.

I wonder how, if white men needed a significant head start, how did they get ahead in the first place? If they are so inferior, as you seem to be claiming, how were they able to oppress women and minorities to begin with?

If the reaction of some white men to AA and white privilege shows that white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field, what does it mean that other white men have different reactions to AA and white privilege? Or does that not matter because it doesn't play into your own racism?

While I would agree that it is very likely that most married white women are married to white men, I don't know that simply saying most white women are married to white men is accurate. Between white women married to non-whites, the few but growing number married to women, and those not married at all, I don't know where the numbers stand, and I'm curious about where you get yours.

You are strangely inconsistent in your argument. If white men are so deficient, it makes little sense that they would have been in a position to oppress others for so long. Instead, I think that you have reacted to white bigotry, real or perceived, with racism of your own against whites, white men in particular.

Its pretty simple how they got ahead in the first place. With their women they were physically stronger and could subject them to their whims. With other men, it had to be through trickery. Europeans lived in a land poor in resources. This caused the hyper competitiveness and aggression other races simply had no need for. They knew of the civilizations built in Egypt and West Africa overflowing with gold. They understood that the only way to gain a foothold was create the illusion that they were interested in commerce. Once in they had superior weapons borne of this need to be aggressive and warlike. If you notice most white cultures hold war as a sign of progress instead of sad and uncivilized.

Pretty sure most white women are married to white men. I'd like to see your numbers disputing that.

I'm not being inconsistent. I think you have just proved that you think differently. You think oppressing people makes you great or superior. Thats seems to be the MO with white cultures. Civilized people don't think like that. Of course I have reacted to white bigotry. I dont understand the need for it. Why the whole charade by changing history to make it seem like you are more than what you are? If you are a man stand up and do your thing but dont lie and change things to appear as if you are superior. The truth always comes out because you cant cover everything up with a non complicated lie.

 

[Asclepias]

ROFL lost the ability to compete. A law forcing corporations to hire women and blacks based on gender and race alone, is not evidence that white men have lost the ability to compete. That you don't understand the difference between ability to compete and permission to compete is just further evidence that without AA government intervention you'd be lucky to hold down a job stocking beer coolers with rdean. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

AA is like walking up to a class room of kids and bumping up the grades on all black kids and women by a full letter grade just because of gender and race. It's ridiculous.

Two wrongs, and in this case, three wrongs, do no make a right.

If hiring and promoting based on race and gender was a vile act when white males benefited such acts back in the 50s, why the hell do you think hiring and promoting based on race and gender isn't a vile act when it's done today for the benefit of females and people of color? Why is it not a vile racist act when it's done for blacks but it is a vile racist act when it's done for whites? Why is it vile to you, a black man, when a white woman benefits from it but it's not vile when a black woman benefits from it?

I can only discern from your statements, that you promote AA against whites because you are racist, or at best using USMB to promote racial strife for the fun of it.

Who said AA was evidence that white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field? The reaction to AA and the denial of the existence of white privilege is the evidence white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field. If insecure white men truly had confidence they could compete then the mention of white privilege would be easy to admit to. AA would not be seen as discrimination. Your words and reactions tell on you. Do you really think no one sees it?

AA is not a vile racist act simply because it also benefits white men via white women being the group that has benefited primarily from AA. Another reason it would not be a vile racist act is because it is correcting the economic imbalance created by 400 years of white mens AA. If you had of manned up and played fair from the beginning there would be no need for any type of AA. As it is you needed a significant head start for 400 years and still continue to whine and deny white privilege.

I never said it was vile that a white woman benefitted from AA. Now you are just thrashing around looking for something. They were also the victims of white mens insecurity and little dick syndrome. The point is that ultimately those dollars from those jobs benefit the white man primarily as most white women are married to white men. its ok but lets not pretend thats not the case.

Why would pointing out the truth promote racial strife and why would it concern me if it did? i dont care what you find aggravating. You cant do anything about it even if you wanted to. Truth should never promote racial strife. Suggesting it would is a sign of intellectual immaturity.

Racist thinks I'm 400years old. Yeah so that's why my government has to give you a personal boost of AA up your ass, cause I'm supposedly 400years old and guilty of owning slaves and receiving white privilege.

Face it, not only are you a dumb ass that can't live without hand outs, the hand outs have left you impotent.

My wife never had to work and has never benefited from AA, ya dumb ass.

I've been successful by leaving corporations that adhere to AA guidelines. All of them were really just to shitty a place for me to be even remotely interested in staying. American Corporations are in free fall, because of dumb asses like you.

Claiming something I never said is one of the worst tactics you can use. it screams you are desperate to deflect. I wont let you off the hook Brown.

Your wife is one person. The proof I posted earlier in the thread showing white women benefit more from AA than anyone else invalidates your insignificant one offs.

Again telling me personal stories has nothing to do with the conversation. We are talking about the existence of white privilege. Your heroic story of overcoming AA is just that.....a story I am beginning to take with a grain of salt. You sure are bitter about something you supposedly beat. American companies are not in a free fall moron. The landscape is changing and slow people like you cant see the opportunities that are opening up and replacing the old opportunities.

 

[Ibentoken]

Who said AA was evidence that white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field? The reaction to AA and the denial of the existence of white privilege is the evidence white men never had the ability to compete on a level playing field. If insecure white men truly had confidence they could compete then the mention of white privilege would be easy to admit to. AA would not be seen as discrimination. Your words and reactions tell on you. Do you really think no one sees it?

AA is not a vile racist act simply because it also benefits white men via white women being the group that has benefited primarily from AA. Another reason it would not be a vile racist act is because it is correcting the economic imbalance created by 400 years of white mens AA. If you had of manned up and played fair from the beginning there would be no need for any type of AA. As it is you needed a significant head start for 400 years and still continue to whine and deny white privilege.

I never said it was vile that a white woman benefitted from AA. Now you are just thrashing around looking for something. They were also the victims of white mens insecurity and little dick syndrome. The point is that ultimately those dollars from those jobs benefit the white man primarily as most white women are married to white men. its ok but lets not pretend thats not the case.

Why would pointing out the truth promote racial strife and why would it concern me if it did? i dont care what you find aggravating. You cant do anything about it even if you wanted to. Truth should never promote racial strife. Suggesting it would is a sign of intellectual immaturity.

Racist thinks I'm 400years old. Yeah so that's why my government has to give you a personal boost of AA up your ass, cause I'm supposedly 400years old and guilty of owning slaves and receiving white privilege.

Face it, not only are you a dumb ass that can't live without hand outs, the hand outs have left you impotent.

My wife never had to work and has never benefited from AA, ya dumb ass.

I've been successful by leaving corporations that adhere to AA guidelines. All of them were really just to shitty a place for me to be even remotely interested in staying. American Corporations are in free fall, because of dumb asses like you.

Claiming something I never said is one of the worst tactics you can use. it screams you are desperate to deflect. I wont let you off the hook Brown.

Your wife is one person. The proof I posted earlier in the thread showing white women benefit more from AA than anyone else invalidates your insignificant one offs.

Again telling me personal stories has nothing to do with the conversation. We are talking about the existence of white privilege. Your heroic story of overcoming AA is just that.....a story I am beginning to take with a grain of salt. You sure are bitter about something you supposedly beat. American companies are not in a free fall moron. The landscape is changing and slow people like you cant see the opportunities that are opening up and replacing the old opportunities.

You are a racist. Period.

 

[longly]

These two guys get it...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etg0ghv3Ieg

Particularly the guest, who helped the host, David Pakman, to articulate the situation more effectively.

To those who wish to respond, please watch the video first, it's about 8 minutes and change long.

In the place I live I don’t have the capability of viewing videos so if you will tell me in a few words what this white privilege is. What is that whites can do that that blacks can’t?

 

[longly]

I wonder how, if white men needed a significant head start, how did they get ahead in the first place?

The Bubonic Plague. Gold star to anyone who can explain why.

The people that died left their money to their survivors. So many people died and so many people inherited money and property from their dead relatives that a large number people suddenly found themselves wealthy. They invested and spent their money on luxury goods such as spices; this stimulated the economy to the point that a common sailor returning from the spice isles could be set for life with the sell of his personal supply of spices.

 

[RKMBrown]

These two guys get it...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etg0ghv3Ieg

Particularly the guest, who helped the host, David Pakman, to articulate the situation more effectively.

To those who wish to respond, please watch the video first, it's about 8 minutes and change long.

In the place I live I don’t have the capability of viewing videos so if you will tell me in a few words what this white privilege is. What is that whites can do that that blacks can’t?

They can be forced to the back of the line to let blacks go to the front.